RE: Blizzard Battles

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Blizzard Battles

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Blizzard Battles

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/9/2012 8:02:24 PM

Wuffer

Posts: 402
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline

That must be quite a double shocking for him.
First the winterexperience of course, but than Stavka's awakening too: You are so much better in the attack! Like a hungry ice bear. :-)

Looks like he has lost coherance, after giving up the initiative. At least it appears so. At first, I was thinking about some hidden masterplan, try to evelope total fronts of you sometime during the end of winter, maybe even attacking in blizzard?, but I'm not sure any longer. Did he really has a written plan? The surprise attack into the north before blizzard together with his desolate start in AGC was much under B's niveau - he could have act much butter.

Trying :-) To make a point at least: I think you could probably turn the whole affaire into a longlasting strategic gain, rather than some tactical, soon forgotten victories.

I wouldn't say anything about his forces or positions of course, but it is obvious that panzers in the open are a big win for you.
It's quite easy and comfortable to defend Moscow for him now, because his spearheads are safe enough. It's not really all about numbers and oob's, it's about the so called morale of his sharpened and polished floret-spearheads - make them blunt. Imagine Pelton without his 18th army?!

The few digested Infantry Div's will only hurt him insofare, as they will happily consume all reenforcements for a while - his elite units became weaker. A perfect first step to say so.
B is at a point now where all reactions hurt. No matter what he is doing now, there are no good alternatives left, it's the search for the last bad move and that make players vulnerable for false assumptions... and feints.

Bring the stress on him. And give him a 'solution' he would happily accept...

He has only a very limited reserve.

Well done so far, now keep on.

< Message edited by Wuffer -- 1/9/2012 8:09:47 PM >

(in reply to Klydon)

Post #: 61

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/9/2012 9:28:04 PM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

quote:

I am not sure what you are doing with the rifle brigades, but believe me, they are UTTERLY useless as diggers They will NOT build any fort level (a zero) come spring.

Latest version definitely nerfed them in this regard, but they still maintain fortification levels, yes?
Would assigning them to HQs with a heavy construction SU contingent noticeably improve this?
I have somewhere on the order of 100 inf brigades on the map at this point (first week of Dec.) and intended to use them to keep up the fortification levels I'd already built as the inf. div., cav corps, and tank brigades carry the winter offensive.

(in reply to Wuffer)

Post #: 62

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/9/2012 9:43:10 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

quote:

I am not sure what you are doing with the rifle brigades, but believe me, they are UTTERLY useless as diggers They will NOT build any fort level (a zero) come spring.

Latest version definitely nerfed them in this regard, but they still maintain fortification levels, yes?
Would assigning them to HQs with a heavy construction SU contingent noticeably improve this?
I have somewhere on the order of 100 inf brigades on the map at this point (first week of Dec.) and intended to use them to keep up the fortification levels I'd already built as the inf. div., cav corps, and tank brigades carry the winter offensive.

Any unit with a visible CV of 1 or more will maintain forts. So, YES.

The Rifle Brigades are a potential problem for the Soviets. Some are set to REFIT when they enter as reinforcements, so they will fill-out and you can't change that. But you don't want the rest to fill-out with men; you really want them to stay DEPLETED for awhile. 100 Rifle Brigades that have 2,000 men each is just wasted Manpower.

The reason is you need to funnell replacements to front-line units, so they don't become UNREADY. You don't have enough replacements to fill out every unit, so you have to pick and choose. It's better to fill out Divisions, which have more Mobility, than Brigades, which are mobility challenged.

IMO, REFIT management is an often overlooked area for Soviet players in Blizzard. You must manage it well to keep your offensive from running out of gas.

_____________________________

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 63

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/9/2012 10:59:21 PM

TulliusDetritus

Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone�
Status: offline

Anyway, no matter what you should end up with unready rifle divisions at the start of your turn. This is inevitable. During my blizzard offensive these divisions were not advancing & attacking that turn. They were refitting. On the next turn they were ready to go. I had always 1 or 2 rifle divisions (unready that is) per frontline/Stavka army refitting. And anyway, unready divisions can still make a hasty attack (along some ready chums) = easy wins = potential harvested guards.

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 64

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/11/2012 5:27:30 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

T28 and T29: 1/1/42:

Forgot to post last turn, so combining into 2.

This Blizzard is going OK. Baelfiin's strategy is all-in on Moscow, and basically abadonding everything else. As a result, I have hit a brick wall around the Moscow area, but I am gobbling up territory and some units elsewhere.

I have destroyed the equivalent of 5 Germans Infantry Divisions, and 2 Italian Ones (including the Cav that turns into a semi-useful Motorized Division in 1942; that one is bye-bye). I don't anticipate more captures than that.

Otherwise, I am moving West as fast as Cav and AFVs can clear the way, but for the most part Baelfiin is pulling back faster than I can keep up with even those guys.

Attack Counter:

TOTAL SO FAR: 148-56

The ratio isn't great, because I am launching alot of hasty attacks at the end of long marches to catch-up to retreating formations (also, my numbers are not including Surrenders). I also tend to err on the side of "too much", as I really want to get as many Guards as possible.

Moscow:

We have hit a brick wall; north of town, there is at least 2 Panzer Corps, with another Corps south of it, plus Mountain Troops.

If Baelfiin wants to commit his Panzers in the open, he will keep me away from Moscow, at least the "wedge" he has about 6 hexes to either side.

It looks like he is contesting this wedge, but allowing me on the flanks. As a result, I think we will end Blizzard with a Moscow "Bulge", with a cluster of Panzers inside. His March counterattack will likely consist of an attack out of this bulge. That could be to the south, where the terrain is easier to clear one side of the bulge, or to the north, to get a head-start on cutting off Leningrad.

Leningrad:

Speaking of which, this question will be paramount going forward: Will he go for Leningrad in 1942, or not?

I am advancing past Pskov and into Estonia, but these positions are ridiculously overextended, and I will be pulling back in Snow. But after that, what next?

I need to form 2-3 Reserve Armies in the spaces around V-V and Cherepovets, to prevent a big push from Moscow to the Svir. This is objective #1.

Not sure what he'll do; he will also need to attack in the SOUTH in order to clear space in the Ukraine, and push me back east of the Dnepr.

South:

South of Moscow, we are just marching while Fritz Runs westward as fast as possible.

We did some serious damage around Kharkov, and this area has been a disaster for Baelfiin

Not sure what our stop-line is in the South, but we are moving forward, probably into space we will end-up giving back

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)

Post #: 65

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/11/2012 5:53:30 PM

Klydon

Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline

It will be tough, but it looks like if you could launch a strong drive south from the west side of Moscow (just west of Kalinin) that he seems thinner there and it would start to make him sweat a bit in Moscow, especially if you could get some movement from the south of Moscow for a big pincers movement.

As long as he is in that area in strength, it is hard to set up a good line going through the Valdi Hills and up to Leningrad, although such a line would be on very favorable defensive terrain, it could also wind up being a huge pocket.

One other thing that may hurt him in the long run. His attrition from so much movement in blizzard has to be taking its toll. He will take even more attrition from moving in the mud in the spring most likely and he will have a ton of territory reoccupy, which will again add to his attrition from movement.

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 66

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/11/2012 6:13:17 PM

Flaviusx

Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

It's a pity you haven't got any cavalry just south of the Valdai hills.

Drive for Smolensk imo. Just ignore Moscow, go deep behind him. On both flanks. This is a game where I can see you continuing the offensive into February.

BTW what kind of shape is your airborne and transports. I would seriously consider making some drops in his deep rear to cut all the rail links leading into Moscow.

< Message edited by Flaviusx -- 1/11/2012 6:19:05 PM >

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Klydon)

Post #: 67

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/11/2012 11:22:59 PM

Peltonx

Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline

The all Moscow thing is not going to work.

Leningrad and the south 1941, then Moscow 1942, nothing wrong with taking it if you can, but to hold it is to expensive.

He left allot of easy manpower pts in the south.

Not sure what he has under cover, but it would have to be atleast 12 and 12 inf and panzer.

Nice job, Q-ball.

Pelton

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 68

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/12/2012 8:23:21 AM

Wuffer

Posts: 402
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

It's a pity you haven't got any cavalry [... ]
Smolensk [...]

[...] airborne and transports?????

Flavius, sorry to quote you in such a suspect way, but these were exactly my spontaneous thoughs.

You showed us his railsystem, Q-Ball, now slot his aorta. At least you force all his panzers in the open.

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 69

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/12/2012 10:38:29 AM

BletchleyGeek

Posts: 4713
Joined: 11/26/2009
From: Living in the fair city of Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

The situation on your map and what you describe looks to me as Stalingrad in slow-motion or end up as a massive Demyansk-like thing, with a lot of German forces getting to Spring in a very tight position.

However, I'd be very wary of those forces he's obviously keeping in Germany come March.

Good job as always, Q-Ball :) You'll might get one of the very few massive Axis encirclements to see in AARs here.

_____________________________

(in reply to Wuffer)

Post #: 70

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 3:16:56 AM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

T-30: 1/15/42

Blizzard Offensive continues; still limited attacks, as the Germans keep falling back.

Paras: I saw a couple suggestions on dropping paras on the rail lines. I do have Paras available, but I personally think taking out the rail lines via paras is a little on the gamey side. Others may disagree, and it's not all black and white, but I just think it's a little extreme.

A para drop far enough behind would take several turns to clean-up; a unit has to "flip" the hex, and the FBDs probably can't get there because they are stranded forward. So, I can see it being very crippling, but I don't personally like it.

Production and APs

With the flip to 1942, I am getting 100,000 Manpower a turn. I think this is pretty solid for the most part; keeping Leningrad and the Donbas helps. I am also beginning to run an armaments surplus, so I am turning Artillery TOEs back on.

Not sure how others feel, but I have to work to spend 50 APs a turn, to keep it at 450 or under. I have changed out all the leaders I want to, and I am not that worried overall about C in C. It's almost impossible to keep up, so I don't bother that much, since Soviet has alot of turnover. I am spending some APs on replacing VVS Biplanes.

I am spending the AP surplus on Rifle Brigades. At this point I don't need them, but I am planning ahead, and the way I am managing REFIT, they are just shells. I can always disband them later if I need to; I don't want to get behind if I lose alot of units in 1942.

Not sure what others do, or if you have a surplus. I'll hit April with 500 APs and be able to form lots of Tank Corps, so that will keep me busy with APs for awhile.

Attack Counter:

174-68

Again, lots of failures are hasty attacks on running units. Also, a couple bloody repulses around Moscow.

Not alot of Guards so far....

Moscow:

You can see the maps below, pretty good description

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to BletchleyGeek)

Post #: 71

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 4:13:32 AM

Klydon

Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline

At some point you will also want to beef up on support units again, so spending some of those points soon on that may not be a bad idea as it will take time for them to train up and be worth a lick.

Getting some brigades in the pipeline now is a good idea simply because you would like to wait about 4-6 weeks before doing anything with them and allow them to train up. That puts them around the first of March. Could go with the occasional cav division as well depending on your situation.

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 72

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 6:20:42 AM

Flaviusx

Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

It's easy to save up APs during the blizzard for lack of really good spending opportunities. Armament points are too short to really go nuts on SUs, corps aren't available for building, other units are much too expensive to build, and manpower is tight anyways. (You probably won't even be able to fill out all those rifle brigade shells, let alone new units.) You can modernize the Red Air Force. But mostly, this is a time to bank APs.

So you should setting them aside and building up as big of a pool as possible, because APs will become very scarce after spring of 42 in relation to the many demands on them. You'll be AP starved for at least the next two years after this.

Considerable para drops did in fact occur in the first winter. In most games it doesn't make sense to drop them, but this one is somewhat exceptional. I don't see it being gamey at all to drop them to help pocket and cut supplies, as that is how they were in fact used in real life. Remember that the Sovs came very close to crippling AGC.

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Klydon)

Post #: 73

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 10:49:52 AM

janh

Posts: 1216
Joined: 6/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx
Considerable para drops did in fact occur in the first winter. In most games it doesn't make sense to drop them, but this one is somewhat exceptional. I don't see it being gamey at all to drop them to help pocket and cut supplies, as that is how they were in fact used in real life. Remember that the Sovs came very close to crippling AGC.

Didn't the Soviets Para units -- I mean to recall they used several divisions and brigade sized formations in spring and early summer 42 -- get so badly trashed and almost entirely captured behind the German lines that they didn't play any role anymore for the rest of the conflict? I believe they were poorly conducted assaults, that failed to coordinate and the jumpers were also not well trained, whereas the Germans were quick to react and crush the assaults before that had time to coordinate.

Would be an interesting question how much use a player could make of a large para formation in the later war instead of risking to sacrifice them early?

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 74

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 5:21:58 PM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

quote:

I do have Paras available, but I personally think taking out the rail lines via paras is a little on the gamey side. Others may disagree, and it's not all black and white, but I just think it's a little extreme.

I always thought Monty was a gamey bastard!

Trying to circumvent the river barrier rules by dropping Amis, Brits and <gasp> Poles, willy-nilly!

Here's something I just found on Soviet use of the paras in the winter offensive:

quote:

During the Soviet counter-offensive for the Defence of Moscow at Vyazma, 27th January 1942, the Soviet 4th Airborne Corps began a series of night drops of paratroopers in the German rear. Forty civilian and twenty-two military aircraft, escorted by limited numbers of fighters and ground attack aviation, supported the landings. From the beginning, the operation did not go well. After, six nights, only 2,100 men from the 10,000-man airborne corps had been dropped in. Because of bad weather and the pilots' inexperience with night navigation, most of these troops landed twenty kilometers south of the intended drop zone. Plans for five to six sorties each night did not take into account adverse weather conditions, aircraft failures, or combat losses. Also, the failure to conceal the buildup of troops at the airborne fields led to the closing of one of them by German bombers. The remaining two fields provided only two to three sorties per night. The paratroops that landed, however, did succeed in interdicting lines of communication in the German rear area for almost three weeks, in part because of their linkup with the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps on 6 February. A second series of night landings occurred near Yukhnov between 17 and 23 February. The paratroops were again spread out over a large area because of inaccurate drops, and many supplies were lost. Some of the paratroops eventually joined partisan groups in the area, while the main body restricted itself to night operations because of its lack of artillery and air support. A planned two- to three-day operation extended to almost five months, but despite incredible problems, the remnant of the 4th Airborne Corps managed to break through two encirclements (with the help of a battalion of reinforcements dropped into the area on 15-16 April) and to reach friendly lines by late May. Although it had created considerable havoc in the German rear, the corps was decimated. It had not accomplished its mission of preventing a German withdrawal to the west, because German counterblows had halted the main Russian advance.

(in reply to janh)

Post #: 75

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 9:32:31 PM

Tarhunnas

Posts: 3152
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline

Nice AAR. It is comforting to see someone else getting a dose of the Q-Ball winter offensive.

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 76

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 10:40:21 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas

Nice AAR. It is comforting to see someone else getting a dose of the Q-Ball winter offensive.

Thanks! I definitely like my Blizzards.

In fact, I personally think Blizzard was my best phase in my game vs. Bletchley Geek. My summer 1941 was OK, but nothing special (I didn't take Moscow), and so far my 1942 is also nothing great either. But I put a plan together and executed it in Blizzard in that game, and I came out of it about as well as could be expected, IMO. It's possible I'm now squandering that advantage, but I think I "won" Blizzard in that game, as much as it is possible for the Germans to "win" it.

I just broke my arm patting myself on the back...

T-32: 1/15/42

WOW! Moscow is liberated. The Fascists left town! I can't beleive it. I thought he could have held a little longer, though I also think Baelfiin is really gearing-up for a big March. And that's got me worried.

Blizzard Offensive:

We are seriously running out of gas.

First, we have advanced 20 hexes in some places, grossly outrunning our pitiful rail repair. I halted around Velikye Luki, not from German resistance, but because our units crossed into "YELLOW". Not good. I guess not having Cav there didn't hurt me after all, because supplies are not happening there.

My units are mostly still "READY", but a little depleted, and at any rate, strung-out from running westward every turn.

Finally, we are starting to run into serous German formations

Wehrmacht:

All Blizzard, I haven't seen more than about 50-ish divisions along the front. And I know the Wehrmacht has over 100 Infantry Divisions at this stage. I think he must have a big reserve somewhere, that definitely includes at least half his Panzers.

There are two Wehrmachts; the guys who have spent 1941 outside, getting kicked around; they are really in bad shape. And, there is a 1941 Wehrmacht still out there, ready to pounce.

Baelfiin clearly withdrew forces, and is surviving by trading space for time. I have taken huge amounts of ground, but he let me out-run my supplies, and now with January ending, I am at the end of the line. Not a terrible strategy, actually.

I captured some units this Blizzard, but other than that, my main accomplishment is taking space. Space that I will mostly give right back in March. The only good news is that I can easily afford to surrender 30-ish hexes in most places without a problem, at least in the Center.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to Tarhunnas)

Post #: 77

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 10:58:00 PM

Peltonx

Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline

Wow his OOB is at 3.3 million mid January. Most times I am at about 3 million mid January, but your OOB is strong also.

Nice Blizzard O.

Should be a very interesting 1942.

All things seem to be equal so far.

Pelton

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 78

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 11:03:22 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Wow his OOB is at 3.3 million mid January. Most times I am at about 3 million mid January, but your OOB is strong also.

Nice Blizzard O.

Should be a very interesting 1942.

All things seem to be equal so far.

Pelton

That's what I'm saying.....he is weak on the map, but I suspect he has been conserving strength elsewhere.

It's not a bad strategy, in the sense that his army will be in good shape. The tradeoff is that he surrendered ALOT of ground, so it's predicated on his ability to win it back in 1942. Which he probably can.

I still think the most critical spot in 1942 is going to be Leningrad, and whether I can hold it.

I expect to lose Moscow again, but hope to make him expend alot of effort in re-taking it

_____________________________

(in reply to Peltonx)

Post #: 79

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/13/2012 11:50:00 PM

Klydon

Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline

Honestly, I think he will go for the knock out shot with a drive to the north to the EAST of the Valdi Hills through VV and points north. Should your dispositions remain as they are, he will bag an enormous amount of the Red army. This is the area of the map that you appear to be most vulnerable in to that sort of manuver. Even if he settles for lopping off a big chunk, it will hurt bad. He is also positioned to launch some sort of offensive in the south by heading east and then south to the Sea of Azov, but I don't think he will bag as much down there and he knows it.

It appears you can still make hay south of Moscow by driving NW. Perhaps you can get him to back up some more.

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 80

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/14/2012 3:04:40 AM

Texasgrunt

Posts: 19
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline

1) amph in an army or two to Rumania. Teach him to take Odessaor lose the south flank.

2) Drive to NW Vyazma, to threaten the rail line to Moscow.

Thenhe has to pull out.

_____________________________

Destroy the enemy's army, then you can do what you will with his land, cattle and women.

(in reply to Klydon)

Post #: 81

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/14/2012 3:26:08 AM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Klydon

Honestly, I think he will go for the knock out shot with a drive to the north to the EAST of the Valdi Hills through VV and points north. Should your dispositions remain as they are, he will bag an enormous amount of the Red army. This is the area of the map that you appear to be most vulnerable in to that sort of manuver. Even if he settles for lopping off a big chunk, it will hurt bad. He is also positioned to launch some sort of offensive in the south by heading east and then south to the Sea of Azov, but I don't think he will bag as much down there and he knows it.

It appears you can still make hay south of Moscow by driving NW. Perhaps you can get him to back up some more.

North is exactly what I think he is going to try. Why?

First, as you mention, my front-line forces there are really weak.

Second, he is really committing to hold a line right at Rhzev. The only reason to do that is if you anticipate a drive north. Oh yeah, and he went half-way there last Snow season.

NW Front is weak, but I have alot of reserves behind there, up by V-V and points north. I have at least 20 divisions in that space digging a checkerboard of trenches; plus, of course, the terrain is favorable to the defense.

I am not done yet, but I am very aware of this as a potential axis, and plan to move more troops there. Probably the most I have.

You are also right on the Sea of Azov, though I am not flooding that area with units. That's too dangerous.

_____________________________

(in reply to Klydon)

Post #: 82

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/14/2012 1:37:17 PM

Encircled

Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline

You should have enough Recon units to identify where his troops are building up.

If he goes for the North, the terrain is massively in your favour, and you will hold him off with ease

You should be able to give yourself (with recon) about two to three turns warning of where he is coming, and that should be enough

_____________________________

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 83

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/14/2012 2:03:26 PM

Peltonx

Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline

Even if he takes leningrad as long as you make it painfull and don't have a major opps your ahead of the game.

The main push by the Red Horde is in the south.

I think the smart thing would be to retake Moscow and push/ pocket units to the south of it for a month or 2 then try for Leningrad in late August after he weakens you.

If he trys for Leningrad first he will probably not have the strength to clear the south.

He can set the table to take Leningrad during July with infantry attacks.

Pelton

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Encircled)

Post #: 84

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/14/2012 11:47:35 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

1/31/42:

I haven't posted for a couple turns, but with my guys slowing down, not a ton to really report, since Moscow was abandoned.

Our attacks have tapered-off, primarily due to long supply lines, changing CVs, and stiffening resistance.

Moscow Front:

We have advanced another 3 hexes past Moscow, but there is a very strong, 3-deep wall of Germans in a great semi-circle covering Rzhev and Vyazma.

I am able to punch here and there, but for the most part, this wedge is impregnible. I am going around the edges, but even there, there is significant risk in doing so.

Northern Front:

I basically halted 5 hexes past Pskov, which is ridiculously far in front. I make attacks to run-up Victory totals, but that's my only reason. Further north, I am approaching Talinin (!), which is crazy-far in front of my lines.

I plan a big pullback in March, at least to the Luga River. There is no reason to try to hold all this empty space.

South of Moscow:

We have cleared Kaluga, Sumy, and Poltava, among other towns, and we are at the gates of Bryansk. This is very deep into the Ukraine, and it's making me nervous being so far forward of my rail lines.

But I keep going, to rack-up some wins and keep the pressure on. I have 3 Guards Cav Corps now, and 5 Guards Infantry, and I am trying to run the count up further. Once a unit hits GUARDS, I am moving it to the rear; no reason to get chewed-up forward come Snow.

_____________________________

(in reply to Peltonx)

Post #: 85

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/15/2012 6:11:20 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

Feb 5, 1942

Still Blizzard all around the front.

QUESTION: On Random weather, if a non-Blizzard result is rolled, are all First-Winter effects also cancelled for that turn? (including Morale, Supply, etc.?)

I am winding down the Blizzard offensive, and starting to dig. Because I have taken so much ground, I am in a vulnerable position, particularly in the Center.

We had 10 successful attacks this turn, but all of them were really just attempts to get some cheap wins before Snow.

Where I am in contact with the Germans, I would either have to advance into space to keep winning, or he is stacked-up deep with strong units I can't push (all around Moscow, and also Krivoi Rog).

So, my Blizzard is about over. I will keep contact with the Germans to attrite them and cause morale hits, but I just don't have many attack opportunities anymore.

Center:

Between Kaluga and Dnepropetrovsk, we advanced on average 20 to 25 hexes. The problem is we also completely outran our Rail Lines, so in many places, my front units are 15 hexes or so off the Railhead. That is not good.

It's not just for REFIT or supplies, but the big problem is that a counteroffensive in this area will get away from me quickly, because I can't move reserves into an area without Railways. He could gobble-up hopeless immobile units. The only saving grace is 20 hexes in Snow is a supply problem for the Germans too.

I am worried about this area.

Odessa:

I am also winding down Odessa. This was an interesting interlude, but taking space around the port has the unfortunate consequence that if I do have to retreat, I will retreat out of the town and into Fields where my units will die. (Rather than rout to safety)

I am down to 2 Brigades there now, and I am debating whether to just pull them, as a strong attack will kill them.

I hate to give it up without a fight, but it may be time.

I would recommend to everyone: If you are playing Soviets, make the Germans kick you out of there in Summer 1941 (just leave a unit there). And if you are playing Germans, make sure you send a couple German divisions down there to do that. Can't leave it alone to just Romanians.

Snow Preparations:

In general, I am starting to shift my units. I am pulling units I don't want to lose off the line, including Guards, Cav Corps, and Mountain Units. These are moving into deeper reserve. I have been pulling all Guards anyway as soon as they flip, in order to let other units have a chance to rack-up wins, and keep them out of harm's way.

I am moving "cheap" units forward, so if he does make a major move, I lose more units I don't care about; Rifle and Tank Brigades. Tank Brigades in particular, if he doesn't kill some I will have to disband them anyway, because I don't have the Trucks to support 96 Tank Brigades, or 32 Tank Corps.

Rifle Units with more than 8 wins, I am moving backwards as well.

I can give up tons of ground without a problem, so this is one area where I am in good shape at the moment

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Q-Ball -- 1/15/2012 6:18:05 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 86

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/15/2012 8:45:28 PM

Klydon

Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline

I would leave a couple of units in Odessa. Make him work at taking you out, even if you lose the two brigades.

I would also have the Crimean bottlenecks guarded if you have them fortified, but you probably already have this done.

I am impressed at his manpower at this point. The Luftwaffe also appears to be in good shape plane count wise as well. Tanks are a bit low, but he will have more coming on line soon.

I don't know if he has decided not to garrision, but that seems like a ton of partisan units on the map.

Certainly some interesting tactics by the Axis in this game and you get the feeling he is going to be looking to kick some major butt soon.

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 87

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/15/2012 8:54:44 PM

Flaviusx

Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Klydon

I am impressed at his manpower at this point.

Don't be. It's fairly trivial in 1.05 for the Axis to preserve their manpower. Only a major disaster will drop them below 3 million. Most of the time under the present ruleset the Axis will be well above that by the end of February. The recovery of disableds has been massively accelerated, too.

The blizzard isn't what it used to be.

Just look around at all the other AARs post 1.05. Or play the game solo. Manpower just isn't a constraining factor now in this blizzard period.

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Klydon)

Post #: 88

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/15/2012 10:34:02 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

Feb 12, 1942:

I think there is no doubt the Wehrmacht is in decent shape, considering. His tank losses are fairly low at this stage, and his troop count is decent, boosted no doubt by almost 180K in Hiwis from all the POWs he took.

He is behind in territory, but in good position to get a whole lot back pretty quickly. And I am not in good position to resist that, at least not in the Ukriane, where he should be able to roll me at least as far as Kharkov, the Crimean exits, and the Donbas without a problem.

We are rotating some units getting ready for this, by taking units I want to keep off the front lines (Guards, Cav, Mtn).

Attacks: We launched only 7 attacks this turn, in all cases trying to get some wins. I have a couple Tank Brigades close to Guards possibility; I want to push them over, so I can get at least 1 Guards Tank Corps.

Red Army:

At least our numbers should also be pretty strong.

I now have 13 Guards Divisions and climbing (plus 5 Guards Cav Corps), and I'm moving them back into Reserve for now. I am trying to get all formations to mid-40s morale before sending them forward. I have alot of units behind the lines, gaining morale.

I formed another 5 Rifle Brigades with Excess APs; I would like an inventroy in case I lose alot of units in 1942, which I probably will.

_____________________________

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 89

RE: Blizzard Battles - 1/15/2012 10:35:57 PM

Peltonx

Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Klydon

I am impressed at his manpower at this point.

Don't be. It's fairly trivial in 1.05 for the Axis to preserve their manpower. Only a major disaster will drop them below 3 million. Most of the time under the present ruleset the Axis will be well above that by the end of February. The recovery of disableds has been massively accelerated, too.

The blizzard isn't what it used to be.

Just look around at all the other AARs post 1.05. Or play the game solo. Manpower just isn't a constraining factor now in this blizzard period.

3.4 million at this point is clearly better then average. In my other 3 game's 1.05 ( - TDV 2.8) all had 3.1 million on turn 38. Vs M60 I had 3.17 million and I had a good spring and summer. M60 had 6.2 million.

So Axis is a little better then average and Russian is about average. This numbers are following trends in most of the AAR's

Germans are coming out of Blizzard with about 3.1 to 3.3 million.
Russians are coming out of Blizzard with about 6 million.

So if you +/- these numbers you have a good idea of how your doing.

My game vs TVD we are both below averge GHC 2.7 and SHC 5.2 million.

I would say over-all if you take all the AAR's as a hole 1941 really settles nothing, which is great.

1942 is the key yr and even then if the Russian player is not using his AP's right the German player can easly get a draw.

Its looking more an more like a fixed table might have been better for the game, giving the Russian player the freedom to build what they like can do more harm then good in most cases.

Pelton

< Message edited by Pelton -- 1/15/2012 10:37:16 PM >

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 90