Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Next quiz

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Next quiz Page: <<   < prev  84 85 [86] 87 88   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 3:49:03 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
I think Normandie would qualify on the 2 clues, but it was not a warship per se, just a big pre-war French cruise liner that rolled over and sank in New York harbor early in the war. Can't remember the exact cause, but it wasn't the Axis. A picture of it was on TV the other day when they were discussing how to raise the the cruise ship that partially sank off Italy last week, or I would never have thought of it.


Found a couple good quiz questions:

1) Where in the war (39-45, none of the 30s conflicts) did biplane fighter fight biplane fighter?

2) Where in the war did Italian aircraft shoot down German aircraft?



edit: there may be more than one answer to #1. I know one for sure, and one possibility.

< Message edited by brian brian -- 1/21/2012 4:32:52 PM >

(in reply to ItBurns)
Post #: 2551
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 5:01:10 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
The Winter War and maybe the Mediterranean - Malta and the Western Desert?

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2552
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 7:17:44 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

I think Normandie would qualify on the 2 clues, but it was not a warship per se, just a big pre-war French cruise liner that rolled over and sank in New York harbor early in the war. Can't remember the exact cause, but it wasn't the Axis.

Warspite1

[4245 Transport]
.P World in Flames uses two main types of naval transport counter: Transport
(TRS) and Amphibious (AMPH). The way in which these counters are used depends to
an extent on what optional rules are in play. However, as a general rule, TRS
represent the types of ship that were used to transport men and material from one
friendly port to another, while AMPH represent the specialised shipping that
could land men and material on a hostile shore.
.P TRS not only include troopships but also other vessels that kept the troops
fighting overseas supplied. These vessels include tankers, munitions ships and
other cargo carrying vessels.
.P At the outbreak of World War II the United States merchant fleet was the
second largest in the world. The US Government had set up the United States
Maritime Commission (USMC) in 1936 to oversee production of merchant shipping and
to ensure that the US merchant marine replaced its ageing fleet with modern
vessels. In 1939 the US merchant fleet had just over 8.5m of gross tonnage,
spread across just under 1,500 vessels. There were around 55,000 Americans
employed in the fleet in 1939.
.P Upon the US entry into the war in December 1941, the fleet expanded rapidly
as, under USMC guidance, the shipyards of the US churned out the vessels required
to support the Allied war effort across all the oceans of the world. The famous
Liberty ships - built to a standard design to aid mass production, alone numbered
two thousand seven hundred vessels.
.P Separate to the USMC, the Government set up the War Shipping Administration,
and it was the job of this organisation to ensure that the required number, and
the right type, of existing civilian vessels were requisitioned to serve with the
US Navy or army.
.P The men required to crew these ships was to grow approximately four-fold
during the years 1939-45.
.P This projection of US industrial might was needed most in the North Atlantic,
as the German U-boat fleet threatened not only to starve the United Kingdom into
defeat, but furthermore, to seriously undermine Allied military operations
overseas. It was only from 1943 that the number of merchant ships built by the
Allies - mostly in the US - outstripped losses.
.P Like the British merchant marine, their counterparts in the US suffered more
losses proportionally than in any other service. Over 9,000 US merchant sailors
were to lose their lives during the Second World War.
.P This write-up looks at a "what if" ship; a transport that could have been
employed by the United States, had she been converted as planned.
.P
.B Name: USS Lafayette
.B Engine(s) output: 200,000 hp
.B Top Speed: 32 knots
.B Main armament: Unknown
.B Gross Tonnage: 83,423 tons
.B Thickest armour: Not Applicable
.P The SS Normandie began life as a luxury transatlantic liner. She was built in
the early thirties for the French company, Compagnie General Transatlantique and
she sailed for New York for the first time at the end of May 1935.
.P Normandie won the prestigious Blue Riband trophy - for the fastest
transatlantic crossing - on that very first voyage; recording a time of four
days, three hours and two minutes. It was the first time a French ship had won
the Blue Riband, taking the record from the Italian vessel Rex, and she would
dispute this honour with the RMS Queen Mary over the course of the next few
years.
.P Her peacetime career did not last very long. On the 1st September 1939 Germany
invaded Poland and, two days later, the British and French declared war on
Germany; the Second World War had started.
.P During that fateful weekend Normandie was in New York harbour, where she was
interned by the US authorities; she never left New York under her own steam
again.
.P Her French officers and crew were allowed to remain aboard Normandie, but when
the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in December 1941, an act quickly followed by
Adolf Hitler's declaration of war on the United States, the fate of Normandie
came into sharp focus. The US authorities took control of the liner and she was
formally handed over to the US Navy for the purposes of converting her to either
a troopship or an aircraft carrier. Ultimately the decision taken was that
Normandie be used as a troopship.
.P This was an entirely sensible decision given the sheer number of men that
would need to be transported from the US to Europe in the coming months and
years. The Normandie compared in size to the Queen Mary, and the British liner
was to prove able to carry almost 17,000 men (an entire division) in one voyage
alone; a record for any ship.
.P It was decided to re-name Normandie USS Lafayette; a shrewd political move
given that the Marquis de La Fayette was a Frenchmen who had served in the
Continental Army with distinction during the American War of Independence. Her
official classification was AP-53, reflecting her forthcoming role as a
transport.
.P After acceptance by the United States Navy, she was then offered to, and
accepted by the US Army on the understanding that the US Navy be responsible for
her conversion, albeit to the Army's specification. In another turnaround she was
then offered back to the Navy.
.P All this back and forth debate cost a number of wasted weeks. In addition to
this, there was much disussion about the timescale for her completion. A tight
deadline of the 14th February 1942 was given and would not be moved. No doubt
this general level of confusion combined with a ridiculously tight timescale
contributed to what happened on the 9th February. Stray sparks from a blowtorch
started a fire that quickly spread, sending flames throughout the ship.
.P In the early evening, the fire was thought to be under control but the ship
took on an ever increasing list and eventually had to be abandoned. She capsized
in the early hours of the following morning and rested on her port side with half
the ship visible above the shallow water. 1 man had died in the attempt to save
the burning ship but a great many more were injured.
.P There have been claims that her destruction was caused by sabotage, but the
most likely cause of the fire was a simple accident.
.P Although Lafayette was raised in August 1943 and work began on re-building
her, it was quickly realised that the task was too big and that there were too
many other pressing projects to be dealt with; a very sad end to a fine ship.
.P SS Normandie / USS Lafayette was scrapped in 1948.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2553
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/21/2012 10:25:47 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

Just reading through the thread and notice someone said a gurhka was the only soldier to win 2 VC's now if that is just WW2 fair enough but a young man from liverpool Noel Chavasse one two during WW1. One of them on the Somme.
Warspite1

There were two double winners from WWI - both members of the RAMC. In addition to
Noel Chavase, there was also Lt-Col Arthur Martin-Leake.


The only combat soldier ever to be awarded the VC and bar was Charles Upham from New Zealand. He was awarded the first on Crete in 1941 and the Bar at Ruweisat Ridge in 1942.

As he was captured in the action on Ruweisat Ridge the secaond award was post war.

I dont remember the details but he had links to the 2 RAMC doctors who achieved this in WW2.

There were a few others who were nominated for a Bar to their VC but politics got in the way (Derrick)

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2554
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 10:31:11 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

I think Normandie would qualify on the 2 clues, but it was not a warship per se, just a big pre-war French cruise liner that rolled over and sank in New York harbor early in the war. Can't remember the exact cause, but it wasn't the Axis. A picture of it was on TV the other day when they were discussing how to raise the the cruise ship that partially sank off Italy last week, or I would never have thought of it.


Found a couple good quiz questions:

1) Where in the war (39-45, none of the 30s conflicts) did biplane fighter fight biplane fighter?

2) Where in the war did Italian aircraft shoot down German aircraft?



edit: there may be more than one answer to #1. I know one for sure, and one possibility.


1) RAF Gladiators & Gauntlets against Italian CR42 & CR32 in the Western Desert and Greece. Finnish Gladiators against Red Air Force I-15/I-153 in the Winter War (Maybe the continuation war as well) Sth African Gladiators, Gauntlets, Hectors et al against CR42 & CR32 in Abbysinia.
Maybe Chinese Gladiators v IJAAF aircraft.

2) Italy post 1943 by the Italian Co-Belligerant Air Force.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2555
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 10:40:03 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
There are probably a lot more actions from biplanes against biplanes, since the British Swordfish were pretty active in the Med against the Italians. The very small Greek airforce also did use biplanes against the Italians. I wouldn't be surprised if there were a lot more of those encounters than we think there would be...


_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2556
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 10:44:39 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
I forgot the Stringbags but being picky it was fight v fighter), but I know the Greeks had PZL fighters but maybe biplane Bregeuts on Ground attack. (Maybe the RAF handed over some Gladiators when Hurricanes  arrive)

What was the Yugoslav AF flying? Biplane Avias? Maybe the Rumanians and Bulgarians and Italians flew against Soviet Biplanes.


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 2557
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 10:50:50 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
outstanding work on the Normandie. I hope someday we get a counter for it, though really you need 2 Queens to move a corps. Italy could get one too I think?

On the bi-planes, I did say fighter vs fighter. I had thought about the Russian I-15s, but I was considering a possibility in 1941. I kinda doubt they kept any that long?
I did not know Finland had Gladiators. I was mostly thinking about over Malta, and did not know if the Desert Air Force had Glads too, but probably now that I think about it.

For the 1943 "Allied" Italians ... did they fly Italian planes? Not the answer I had in mind but most likely correct.

thanks everyone!


Here is a new one:

3. Where did a German plane bomb a German ship?

(no, not shenanigans with captured equipment or anything)

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 2558
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 11:07:59 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

outstanding work on the Normandie. I hope someday we get a counter for it, though really you need 2 Queens to move a corps. Italy could get one too I think?

On the bi-planes, I did say fighter vs fighter. I had thought about the Russian I-15s, but I was considering a possibility in 1941. I kinda doubt they kept any that long?
I did not know Finland had Gladiators. I was mostly thinking about over Malta, and did not know if the Desert Air Force had Glads too, but probably now that I think about it.

For the 1943 "Allied" Italians ... did they fly Italian planes? Not the answer I had in mind but most likely correct.

thanks everyone!


Here is a new one:

3. Where did a German plane bomb a German ship?

(no, not shenanigans with captured equipment or anything)


Before posting a question it would help to know the answers.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2559
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 11:11:25 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
RAF Gladiators also faought against Iraqi Gladiators & CR42 at Habbinyia.
Hungary also used the CR42 against the Red Air Force.

< Message edited by JeffK -- 1/21/2012 11:16:30 PM >


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2560
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 11:20:18 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
3.  Happened all the time, just as the Allied Air Firces bombed Allied Ships all the time.

Do you want to define it as HIT a German ship?


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2561
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 11:30:46 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
no, not a friendly fire incident. I'm not sure if the German made plane actually hit the German ship though. I think so. Not a German combat ship, but one from Germany with a German captain and crew.


I was thinking of the Hungarian CR.42 on the Eastern Front. 24 kills I read. The CR.42 was a nimble little thing. The image of CR.42 vs Gladiators over Malta got me thinking, but I suspect y'all are right, there are a lot possibilities on that one.

What planes did the post-43 Allied Italians fly?

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2562
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 11:32:18 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
I'm Gooogling now.
Finnish Bristol Bulldogs v Red Air Force Winter war   Claims only against monplanes
Finland also used the Gloster gauntlet in the Winter war
Yugoslavia used the Hawker Fury II against Germany & Italy, no claims against Biplanes.
The Red Air Force used its I-15 & I-153's against biplanes flown by most of its attackers.
http://surfcity.kund.dalnet.se/biplanes.htm


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2563
RE: Next quiz - 1/21/2012 11:43:23 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

What planes did the post-43 Allied Italians fly?

Immediatly on forming it used the Italian aircraft it flew prior to the surrender.
Definately MC202 & MC205, Re2000? and bombers.
It was attached to the Balkan Air Force and only flew over Yugoslavia, Albania & Greece.
Later it was equipped with Spitfire V, P39Q Airacobra & Martin Baltimores
I'm not sure if it flew against Axis-Italian crewed aircraft but may have faced Italian built aircraft.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2564
RE: Next quiz - 1/22/2012 12:08:33 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
cool, I did not know the Italian air force veterans did that.

the answer I was thinking of was Belgium's CR.42s shooting down 3 or 4 Me109s and a couple Dornier bombers in May, 1940. So two answers on that one too.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2565
RE: Next quiz - 1/22/2012 12:12:07 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

cool, I did not know the Italian air force veterans did that.

the answer I was thinking of was Belgium's CR.42s shooting down 3 or 4 Me109s and a couple Dornier bombers in May, 1940. So two answers on that one too.

But you asked about biplane on biplane, from memory, the 109 was a monoplane.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2566
RE: Next quiz - 1/22/2012 12:25:57 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
nah, question # 2 was where did Italian aircraft shoot down German aircraft. you doubled the # of correct answers. I kinda doubt the 43 Free Italians flew any CR.42s if they had any. it could do OK against early model Spitfires and Hurricanes, until the monoplane pilots figured out to always have altitude on the CR.42 guys. by 43 I wouldn't think it's advantage in turning radius would be enough to keep it safe any more.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2567
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/22/2012 7:33:28 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

Just reading through the thread and notice someone said a gurhka was the only soldier to win 2 VC's now if that is just WW2 fair enough but a young man from liverpool Noel Chavasse one two during WW1. One of them on the Somme.
Warspite1

There were two double winners from WWI - both members of the RAMC. In addition to
Noel Chavase, there was also Lt-Col Arthur Martin-Leake.


The only combat soldier ever to be awarded the VC and bar was Charles Upham from New Zealand. He was awarded the first on Crete in 1941 and the Bar at Ruweisat Ridge in 1942.

As he was captured in the action on Ruweisat Ridge the secaond award was post war.

I dont remember the details but he had links to the 2 RAMC doctors who achieved this in WW2.

There were a few others who were nominated for a Bar to their VC but politics got in the way (Derrick)
Warspite1

See Post 102

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2568
RE: Next quiz - 1/22/2012 9:57:25 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

outstanding work on the Normandie.

I hope someday we get a counter for it, though really you need 2 Queens to move a corps. Italy could get one too I think?


Warspite1

Thank-you.

I don't think the Normandie on her own would warrant a counter - as you say, at Corps level you would need two or more ships realistically.

Italy I think is a definite no no. Their two largest passenger ships. Rex (a Blue Riband winner in 1933) and Conte di Savoia were almost half the size of Queen Mary/Queen Elizabeth. I suspect that they would have struggled to transport a division between them.

They were little used (I don't think Rex was used at all) as troopships in the confined waters of the Mediterranean, and unsurprisingly neither lasted the war.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2569
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/22/2012 11:22:10 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

Just reading through the thread and notice someone said a gurhka was the only soldier to win 2 VC's now if that is just WW2 fair enough but a young man from liverpool Noel Chavasse one two during WW1. One of them on the Somme.
Warspite1

There were two double winners from WWI - both members of the RAMC. In addition to
Noel Chavase, there was also Lt-Col Arthur Martin-Leake.


The only combat soldier ever to be awarded the VC and bar was Charles Upham from New Zealand. He was awarded the first on Crete in 1941 and the Bar at Ruweisat Ridge in 1942.

As he was captured in the action on Ruweisat Ridge the secaond award was post war.

I dont remember the details but he had links to the 2 RAMC doctors who achieved this in WW2.

There were a few others who were nominated for a Bar to their VC but politics got in the way (Derrick)
Warspite1

See Post 102

But thats 2455 posts back, I cant read that many!!!

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2570
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/22/2012 2:02:59 PM   
ezzler

 

Posts: 863
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
This was from an English newspaper's letters page.The Daily Telegraph.

SIR – Those with experience of the old Stock Exchange floor will readily recall some of the nicknames (Letters, August 22) bestowed upon its habitués.
Among them were two brothers, both with highly distinguished military careers and both winners of the Military Cross, one with bar and one without.
The latter acquired the sobriquet of “The Coward”.


In case you're not sure, its English humour.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2571
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/22/2012 11:46:08 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
OK, a few clues on the German plane bombing the German ship.

1. I think this plane and it's owner was discussed in this thread.

2. This plane has a WiF counter, though it is a German counter.

3. This plane was purchased from Lufthansa. Your first two guesses of that will most likely be wrong.

(in reply to ezzler)
Post #: 2572
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/23/2012 5:19:17 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
Ok I'm guessing: HE - 111

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2573
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/23/2012 7:13:48 PM   
ezzler

 

Posts: 863
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

purchased from Lufthansa


And i'll do the FW-200 to get the second wrong one out of the way.

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2574
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/23/2012 8:01:55 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
I asumed that Junkers Ju 52 would be among our two first guesses. But since it is not I bring it forward as candidate number three.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to ezzler)
Post #: 2575
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/24/2012 1:33:53 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
Lufthansa used He-111 ? But then I did not know they used the plane in question here. The Ju-52 and the FW-200 would be my first and only two guesses.

In December 1939 the South African Air Force used one of their Ju-86's to bomb a German ship in the South Atlantic. It was their first 'combat' operation of the war, though of course the German ship couldn't shoot back I don't think. The South Africans got their final Ju-86 fresh from Germany complete with new spare parts and technical manuals courtesy of the Vichy French in Djubuti handing it over to the Allies, though they had purchased about a dozen of them before the war, and once war started converted them to bombers. I think I first read about this in this thread at some point, but ran across more on it the other day.

Here is some other South African Air Force trivia you can maybe use somewhere else. They were the only air force in the Commonwealth not to use the word 'Royal' on the front of the name. As a result I think they used a different ... uh, uh, 'roundrel' than the others? Is that the right thing for the round thing on the plane that identifies what country it is from, the lo-tech version of today's IFF transponders?

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 2576
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/24/2012 8:48:30 PM   
ezzler

 

Posts: 863
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
Which aircraft that saw service during WW2 was produced in the most numbers.

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2577
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/24/2012 8:58:53 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
Messerschmitt Bf109 in its various models.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to ezzler)
Post #: 2578
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/24/2012 10:46:52 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ezz

Which aircraft that saw service during WW2 was produced in the most numbers.

Warspite1

Wasn't it a Soviet aircraft? Sturmovik?

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to ezzler)
Post #: 2579
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 1/24/2012 11:15:06 PM   
ezzler

 

Posts: 863
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
Not 109.

Not Sturmovik either.

The wording of the question is important.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2580
Page:   <<   < prev  84 85 [86] 87 88   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Next quiz Page: <<   < prev  84 85 [86] 87 88   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.219