Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 January 2012 (2nd part)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 January 2012 (2nd part) Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/26/2012 8:14:06 PM   
Theages

 

Posts: 167
Joined: 2/16/2007
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris H

Michaelm

Has the TF Auto refuel system been changed in anyway recently? I'm continually getting TF arriving in port and not refueliing ,even though set to full refuel, where originally they did.


The behaviour seems to have changed (sometimes?). 2 saves are attached. Japanese side. The task force has arrived at Hong Kong at the first turn. It did not dock and not auto refuel. On the next turn (no order given to the TF) it has docked and is already partially unloaded. It still has not refuelled. Shouldn't it have already refuelled? Wasn't the refuel previously done at arrival?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 1561
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/26/2012 8:19:53 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
Michael I think there could be something wrong with the TF window.
Look at TF 57 in the TF list it's listed as CS and tooltip also shows CS but looking at the TF itself it shows Human Control, now what really is weird is that clicking on return to Abadan the settings jumps to CS:Bombay.


@hades1001
As this topic came from this thread:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2989021
we should continue discussion there.

Michael is reading & answering there two.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to hades1001)
Post #: 1562
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/26/2012 8:21:25 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
Here a screenshot of the TF list.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1563
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/26/2012 8:26:12 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
And here a screenshot of the TF window.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1564
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/26/2012 11:46:10 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
<deleted>

< Message edited by michaelm -- 1/26/2012 11:51:23 PM >


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to hades1001)
Post #: 1565
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/26/2012 11:50:40 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BigDuke66

Michael I think there could be something wrong with the TF window.
Look at TF 57 in the TF list it's listed as CS and tooltip also shows CS but looking at the TF itself it shows Human Control, now what really is weird is that clicking on return to Abadan the settings jumps to CS:Bombay.



I had noticed that behavior if you changed the CS to Human control. The CS flag wasn't being cleared.
It should be right in beta R9 though.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1566
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/27/2012 1:01:10 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Theages


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris H

Michaelm

Has the TF Auto refuel system been changed in anyway recently? I'm continually getting TF arriving in port and not refueliing ,even though set to full refuel, where originally they did.


The behaviour seems to have changed (sometimes?). 2 saves are attached. Japanese side. The task force has arrived at Hong Kong at the first turn. It did not dock and not auto refuel. On the next turn (no order given to the TF) it has docked and is already partially unloaded. It still has not refuelled. Shouldn't it have already refuelled? Wasn't the refuel previously done at arrival?

The placement of the 'refuel at port' function hasn't been changed. But just arriving at a base does not immediately cause a refuel. There are some other things that can happen before it does.
In this case, the auto refuel is happening after the TF unloads. In a way this would make sense. If the base had no fuel, and the TF was carrying the port's additional fuel, it wouldn't want to refuel as soon as it hit the base hex as there would have been no fuel there. Whereas waiting till the TF unloaded, the TF could get its fuel.
Refueling will almost always be done before a TF leaves on its mission.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Theages)
Post #: 1567
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/27/2012 2:24:41 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm
I had noticed that behavior if you changed the CS to Human control. The CS flag wasn't being cleared.
It should be right in beta R9 though.


Sorry I should have mentioned it, I already use r9.

_____________________________


(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1568
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/27/2012 3:05:09 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BigDuke66


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm
I had noticed that behavior if you changed the CS to Human control. The CS flag wasn't being cleared.
It should be right in beta R9 though.


Sorry I should have mentioned it, I already use r9.

Then post a save where it is happening, thanks.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1569
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/27/2012 3:14:46 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
Check post 1562, there is an attached save.

_____________________________


(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1570
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/27/2012 3:20:03 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BigDuke66

Check post 1562, there is an attached save.

Thanks, didn't see if for the other posts.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1571
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/27/2012 3:30:34 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
It is the problem of the CS flag not being cleared. Just change the control from Human to Comp back to Human.

The TF was most likely taken out of CS in an earlier version so the flag was still set. R9 will only stop the problem going forward if the TF is removed from CS.


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1572
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/27/2012 8:17:52 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
Ah OK, thanks.

_____________________________


(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1573
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/28/2012 8:00:18 AM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
Since upgrading to r9 I'm experiencing terrible replay slowdown whenever ground bombing happens, making the game practically unplayable. An example of an affected replay is attached. What can be the cause of this.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1574
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/28/2012 8:35:26 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
This seems to be a save from 1106i not r9.Save is dated July 2011


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 1575
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/28/2012 9:15:24 AM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
Sorry, picked up wrong replay slot. Here's the one from today.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1576
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/28/2012 9:47:24 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
It ran okay to completion.
Message delay was 1 second.
I could hit escape to speed it up animations or space bar to speed up the delay.


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 1577
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/28/2012 10:24:25 AM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
Reinstalling fixed the problem, sorry for bothering you...

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1578
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/28/2012 11:19:27 AM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Not that I am aware of.


I think there is. For instance TF 487 at Manus should have refueled on arrival at the port but it didn't. I left it for a turn but it still didn't. Port size 7 with plenty of fuel and naval support at 138. There are no large TF docked but two undocked cargo TF unloading.

Save attached


Attachment (1)

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1579
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/28/2012 12:14:24 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
TF487 arrived at LA and refueled okay.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 1580
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/29/2012 12:51:32 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
I looked at Manus and there was a support TF 497 which didn't refuel when I told it to leave port.

[edit]
So there may be something to the randomness that refuel isn't always working.

The general rule from what I can see is that TFs are checked for refuel before they leave the base.
There are other conditions that also govern refuel, but I would have expected the general rule to be the backstop.

There was a bug that was fixed in the early beta that could have some bearing on this.
quote:

From 1107 list:
Viewing TF list automatically tries to refuel ships; don't do this as it affects ship ops and port refueling without player's knowledge [MEM]

Whenever the TF screen was opened, the code would go thru the list before displaying and attempt to refuel any possible TFs from port or RepTfs. IIRC, it didn't even necessarily allocate Ops to the ships.
This was fixed and the extra button added 'Refuel all on list' so that the player had some control over which TFs could be refueled.

It could be that this bug was hiding that not all TFs were being auto-refueled correctly.

[edit]
Non-transport type TFs with cargo space used (as in Support ships with supplies) are not being refueled. I think this may have always been the case but was obscured by the above bug. The check was to stop Transport TFs from refueling while loading and using up Ops points.


< Message edited by michaelm -- 1/29/2012 5:38:05 AM >


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1581
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/29/2012 5:18:28 AM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
A request regarding the TF list, could TFs that are idle(docked but neither loading nor unloading) be somehow highlighted?
Maybe similar to the red that is used for returning subs a color could be used to make such TFs easy to find.


_____________________________


(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1582
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/29/2012 7:59:14 AM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline

Would help if I had given you the correct information. It was 497.


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Refueling will almost always be done before a TF leaves on its mission.


Makes sense but in this instance the TF is set to 'do not unload'. I have had other instances were an empty TF has arrived in port and not refuelled, this is not much of a problem under manual control but under CS it is.


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

I looked at Manus and there was a support TF 497 which didn't refuel when I told it to leave port.

[edit]
So there may be something to the randomness that refuel isn't always working.

The general rule from what I can see is that TFs are checked for refuel before they leave the base.
There are other conditions that also govern refuel, but I would have expected the general rule to be the backstop.

There was a bug that was fixed in the early beta that could have some bearing on this.
quote:

From 1107 list:
Viewing TF list automatically tries to refuel ships; don't do this as it affects ship ops and port refueling without player's knowledge [MEM]

Whenever the TF screen was opened, the code would go thru the list before displaying and attempt to refuel any possible TFs from port or RepTfs. IIRC, it didn't even necessarily allocate Ops to the ships.
This was fixed and the extra button added 'Refuel all on list' so that the player had some control over which TFs could be refueled.

It could be that this bug was hiding that not all TFs were being auto-refueled correctly.

[edit]
Non-transport type TFs with cargo space used (as in Support ships with supplies) are not being refueled. I think this may have always been the case but was obscured by the above bug. The check was to stop Transport TFs from refueling while loading and using up Ops points.



Checking for refuelling when you list TF is weird

< Message edited by Chris H -- 1/29/2012 8:08:13 AM >

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1583
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/29/2012 11:15:38 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Non-transport type TFs with cargo space used (as in Support ships with supplies) are not being refueled. I think this may have always been the case but was obscured by the above bug. The check was to stop Transport TFs from refueling while loading and using up Ops points.


Wow. Thanks for digging into this Michael, and again for all the great support!




_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1584
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 1/29/2012 12:20:35 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:


Makes sense but in this instance the TF is set to 'do not unload'. I have had other instances were an empty TF has arrived in port and not refueled, this is not much of a problem under manual control but under CS it is.

CS have their own conditions for refueling separate from normal TFs.

quote:


Checking for refueling when you list TF is weird

Not sure why this was done but .
If I recall, I was investigating why fuel was disappearing from one on my front-line bases which had several TFs at it, but they weren't configured to refuel.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 1585
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 2/3/2012 6:28:53 AM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
I guess it isn't a normal behavior when the Auto Convoy system forms TFs and simply adds escorts(KV, DD) to it even when they are NOT in the Auto Convoy pool?

Pre-Turn save attached, best example is looking at the 3 DD is Colombo and looking at them in the after turn save, you find 2 of them now in Auto Convoy TFs.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BigDuke66 -- 2/3/2012 6:35:27 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 1586
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 2/3/2012 6:30:12 AM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline
After Turn save.


Any chance we could get an option like:"Send Convoy only with X escort", where X is the number of escorts fpr the AC system?
I really hate it when he thinks 1 PC is not enough for 2 AKLs but then sends a TK without any escort.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BigDuke66 -- 2/3/2012 6:36:14 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1587
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 2/3/2012 8:04:42 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
This is something I've noticed for a while over numerous betas: I'm playing auto-sub mode and subs seem to gather in port but won't go out and play again on their own. As I recall, they used to form their own SS TFs and go out on patrol.

Is this a bug or a feature? Thanks in advance for your response, michaelm.

Cheers,
CC


_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 1588
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 2/3/2012 9:29:39 AM   
Banzan

 

Posts: 288
Joined: 3/13/2010
From: Bremen, Germany
Status: offline
Did you use auto-sub from start or did you activate it later? I noticed once, that if its not active from start it will not work till they "arrive" at a harbour.

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 1589
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 Ja... - 2/3/2012 11:59:38 AM   
DD696

 

Posts: 964
Joined: 7/9/2004
From: near Savannah, Ga
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

This is something I've noticed for a while over numerous betas: I'm playing auto-sub mode and subs seem to gather in port but won't go out and play again on their own. As I recall, they used to form their own SS TFs and go out on patrol.

Is this a bug or a feature? Thanks in advance for your response, michaelm.

Cheers,
CC



This has been happening in my game vs the Jap AI also. A few would be sent out, but the vast majority were lounging away the war in port. I would have to form a sub TF at the base and then set it to computer control. I use the betas, but have no saves as I have now restarted and am back doing the first turn. The Jap AI was doing the same thing and I was encountering very few subs.

_____________________________

USMC: 1970-1977. A United States Marine.
We don't take kindly to idjits.

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 1590
Page:   <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108r9 updated 21 January 2012 (2nd part) Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.891