Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 8:25:50 PM   
NAVMAN

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 12/31/2002
Status: offline 		Hi All:
Currently playing scen 7(Quiet China w/ 12/8 start) as Allies. I am having no success at all
in maintaining fuel in Australia. Brisbane, Sidney, etc all have zero(0) fuel even though
I keep running in tankers and setting fuel stockpile to "on". No prob with supplies.
I am in 7/42.
Can anyone suggest a course of action? This has effectively immobilized my naval
units.

Thx.
Post #: 1
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 9:05:41 PM   
EUBanana


Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Little England
Status: offline 		It's a bleedin' nightmare. The Australian industry is sucking up all your fuel is whats happening. AFAIK you can't turn it off unless there's been a patch made. So the bottom line is, if you want to have fuel in a base connected to the Australian infrastructure network you need to keep shipping masses of the stuff over or it all gets gobbled up and turned into supply.

The easy, though inconvenient solution is to not ship fuel to Australia in the first place. Use Noumea, or Tazmania, or New Zealand, or Fiji, or something like that.

if you desperately want fuel in Sydney disband some AOs there or something, then the Aussie industrialists won't steal it all.

_____________________________


(in reply to NAVMAN)
Post #: 2
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 9:10:22 PM   
Schanilec

 

Posts: 4040
Joined: 6/12/2010
From: Grand Forks, ND
Status: offline 		A true nightmare. I thought I had it licked. I'm now in the middle of May 1943. Guess what!

_____________________________

This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 3
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 9:32:14 PM   
AcePylut


Posts: 1494
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline 		If I'm not mistaken, you can turn off industry in Oz like the Japanese do.  But I could be wrong.  I swear I've turned it off before.

_____________________________


(in reply to Schanilec)
Post #: 4
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 10:06:46 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AcePylut

If I'm not mistaken, you can turn off industry in Oz like the Japanese do.  But I could be wrong.  I swear I've turned it off before.


You can turn it off. But it's likely that there isn't enough being shipped in either.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to AcePylut)
Post #: 5
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 11:14:12 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

quote:

ORIGINAL: AcePylut

If I'm not mistaken, you can turn off industry in Oz like the Japanese do.  But I could be wrong.  I swear I've turned it off before.


You can turn it off. But it's likely that there isn't enough being shipped in either.


Right-O! I've read estimates of around 70,000 fuel per month required on the Australian mainland. By turning off industry you are stepping on the civilian population. Ship more instead!

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 6
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 11:36:57 PM   
Treetop64


Posts: 926
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)
Status: offline 		Plan your shipping to make sure OZ is supplied with oil, as well as fuel. Get your longest-legged tankers to LA and Abadan to ship fuel to Melbourne and Sydney. Also, if your're early in the campaign you can get some Dutch tankers to ship a lot of oil out of Palambang and the oil cities in southern and eastern Borneo. Get plenty of Oil to Melbourne and Sydney and the refineries there will refine it into fuel.

Also, in Dutch New Guinea the ports at Boelo and Babo will yield some oil and resources, but the ports are small and the services are minimal, so for those locations you'll want to use small tankers.

Port Kembla and Newcastle will need shipments of fuel also (not oil though, no refineries there).

The fuel and oil situation in OZ is something you have to plan for from the very first day of the campaign. Once you get behind there it's very difficult to catch up.

< Message edited by Treetop64 -- 3/7/2012 11:40:58 PM >

_____________________________



(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 7
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/7/2012 11:53:21 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

quote:

ORIGINAL: AcePylut

If I'm not mistaken, you can turn off industry in Oz like the Japanese do.  But I could be wrong.  I swear I've turned it off before.


You can turn it off. But it's likely that there isn't enough being shipped in either.


Right-O! I've read estimates of around 70,000 fuel per month required on the Australian mainland. By turning off industry you are stepping on the civilian population. Ship more instead!


You should monitor your supply situation in Oz and turn off HI/supply production as you see fit. At the beginning of the war fuel will also flow to many port hexes until they are at their base level. This is affected by the size of the port and how many ships are based there. Once things steady out and you determine how many HI installations you want to keep running, if any, estimate what naval ops will need fuel in the next year or so. Then get it moving.

There are many, many old threads in the main forum about supplying Oz with "stuff." There are many ways to go, personal preferences, pros and cons. My oft-stated preference is to route most of everything to Perth from Cape Town, with the East Coast feeding CT. My reasons are in those old threads. But it's up to the individual player, as well as whether it's an AI or PBEM game.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 8
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 1:19:34 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		My recommendation is for the Allies to saddle themselves with leaving everything in OZ "On" and the struggle to supply enough fuel.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 9
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 4:08:06 AM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

My recommendation is for the Allies to saddle themselves with leaving everything in OZ "On" and the struggle to supply enough fuel.


That's one way to go. Although when I had over two million supply at Sydney and no fuel for my ships I thought I'd like a way to turn off the HI machine. Now there is one.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 10
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 4:56:39 AM   
NAVMAN

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 12/31/2002
Status: offline 		Hi All,
Thx for all your suggestions/comments. I d/n realize Oz fuel supply was going to be this
much of an issue. I have turned off all industry but aircraft production. I may try a
tanker "blitz" to the ports someone suggested. Had not thought about the need for shipping
in oil as well to feed the refineries.
Bullwinkle: you mentioned shipping in "CT" from the east coast. What is "CT"?
I'll write down some of the specific suggestions and give them a try.
Thx to all.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 11
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 7:36:50 AM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline 		CT = Cape Town (offmap). which also needs fuel to refuel ships carrying supplies to Oz. it receives fairly regular 'convoy' LCUs, but be careful you don't drain it dry of fuel - set TFs returning to CT to 'do not refuel', & refuel them only as needed for new TFs outbound to Perth.

(in reply to NAVMAN)
Post #: 12
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 9:01:46 AM   
cantona2


Posts: 3749
Joined: 5/21/2007
From: Gibraltar
Status: offline 		Massive tanker convoys from WC to Sydney keep enough fuel in Oz to keep the war machinge rumbling. Use the long legged 14,000 capacity ones and you should be fine.

_____________________________

1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born


(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 13
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 1:10:23 PM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline 		Australia's Heavy Industry requires about 67k fuel/month. If you want to turn off any industry to save fuel, HI is all you need to hit. This is a new capability with the new official patch. That's 5-6 large TK's/month before your ships use a single drop. You will be amazed at how fast a large number of ships operating in the area can drain fuel stores. Get your TK's busy hauling fuel from Abadan, US East Coast, and LA on Day 1 and keep them hauling fuel the entire war. The route you take to get to Oz is up to personal preference of course, and depends on enemy activity.

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to cantona2)
Post #: 14
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 1:14:02 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cantona2

Massive tanker convoys from WC to Sydney keep enough fuel in Oz to keep the war machinge rumbling. Use the long legged 14,000 capacity ones and you should be fine.


This is one way to go. However, the newbie player should carefully consider that "massive convoys" drink massive amounts of the fuel they just hauled across the wide wastes of the Pacific to get themselves back to the West Coast. And that in every hex of the journey--both ways--they are open to attack.

The off-map mechanisms in the game are the single biggest design advantage given to the Allied player. Ships in the wormholes use no fuel and are immune from attack. Why not use them?


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to cantona2)
Post #: 15
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 1:18:44 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NAVMAN

Hi All,
Thx for all your suggestions/comments. I d/n realize Oz fuel supply was going to be this
much of an issue. I have turned off all industry but aircraft production. I may try a
tanker "blitz" to the ports someone suggested. Had not thought about the need for shipping
in oil as well to feed the refineries.
Bullwinkle: you mentioned shipping in "CT" from the east coast. What is "CT"?
I'll write down some of the specific suggestions and give them a try.
Thx to all.


Aircraft production in OZ needs HI, so you'll have to monitor those levels. It's not a lot, but some. It's really about the only economy management the Allied player needs to do. (There is some minor decision-making about repairs in China and other tiny dog & cat issues, but nothing serious.)

There is no need to bring oil to Oz. For the Allied player there is never a need to move oil, anywhere, anytime. Some players like to do it for historical reasons, but there's no need and it ties up precious tankers in an interim step that's unnecessary. You are awash in fuel; it's just in the wrong places. Spend your hull-time moving it, not the dips and drabs of oil available to the Allies which is not already committed to the refineries nearby.

In 1942, remember that fuel can move in xAKs. Not as efficienlty as in a tanker, but in great quantities if needed.

< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 3/8/2012 1:20:23 PM >

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to NAVMAN)
Post #: 16
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 1:46:17 PM   
cantona2


Posts: 3749
Joined: 5/21/2007
From: Gibraltar
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: cantona2

Massive tanker convoys from WC to Sydney keep enough fuel in Oz to keep the war machinge rumbling. Use the long legged 14,000 capacity ones and you should be fine.


This is one way to go. However, the newbie player should carefully consider that "massive convoys" drink massive amounts of the fuel they just hauled across the wide wastes of the Pacific to get themselves back to the West Coast. And that in every hex of the journey--both ways--they are open to attack.

The off-map mechanisms in the game are the single biggest design advantage given to the Allied player. Ships in the wormholes use no fuel and are immune from attack. Why not use them?



Takes longer via the wormhole route. Obviously ones shipping lanes need to be secure and a string of airbases to keep asw/search planes in the air is a prerequisite. It is doable and so far I have had enough fuel in OZ. Slower, similar size convoys do take the other wormhole route via abadan/CT


_____________________________

1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 17
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 2:02:25 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cantona2

Takes longer via the wormhole route. Obviously ones shipping lanes need to be secure and a string of airbases to keep asw/search planes in the air is a prerequisite. It is doable and so far I have had enough fuel in OZ. Slower, similar size convoys do take the other wormhole route via abadan/CT



Once you pay the time penalty once and have a steady-state supply chain the route time is not a significant variable. And the usable throughput in the two cases is significantly differnet when to & fro fuel consumption by the haulers is factored in. The non-loss of tankers is just icing on the cake. No one has yet been able to convince me that a WC-to-Oz route is preferable to using off-map.

Mid-east to Oz is an interim proposition. It is shorter, but also uses fuel both ways and is open to attack. I have had the AI CV-raid into the IO in each game I've played and tankers are dead meat in that case. I've never lost one in the South Atlantic.

< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 3/8/2012 2:03:01 PM >

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to cantona2)
Post #: 18
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 2:13:09 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		Moose, are you sure they don't use fuel???

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 19
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 2:34:58 PM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Moose, are you sure they don't use fuel???


The off map portion of the trip does not use any "on map" fuel. The ships are assumed to be refueling from stops in the Atlantic, etc. East Coast - Capetown never uses a drop of fuel. Of course, once they pop onto the map, they burn fuel.

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 20
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 3:08:30 PM   
denisonh


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/21/2001
From: Upstate SC
Status: offline 		Where are all those U Boats when a JFB needs one........

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

quote:

ORIGINAL: cantona2

Takes longer via the wormhole route. Obviously ones shipping lanes need to be secure and a string of airbases to keep asw/search planes in the air is a prerequisite. It is doable and so far I have had enough fuel in OZ. Slower, similar size convoys do take the other wormhole route via abadan/CT



Once you pay the time penalty once and have a steady-state supply chain the route time is not a significant variable. And the usable throughput in the two cases is significantly differnet when to & fro fuel consumption by the haulers is factored in. The non-loss of tankers is just icing on the cake. No one has yet been able to convince me that a WC-to-Oz route is preferable to using off-map.

Mid-east to Oz is an interim proposition. It is shorter, but also uses fuel both ways and is open to attack. I have had the AI CV-raid into the IO in each game I've played and tankers are dead meat in that case. I've never lost one in the South Atlantic.



_____________________________


"Life is tough, it's even tougher when you're stupid" -SGT John M. Stryker, USMC

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 21
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 5:20:52 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Moose, are you sure they don't use fuel???


You have to carefully study the tables in the manual. Some of the off-map bases have fuel costs to get to the "transit box" while others are 100% off-map and fuel-free. The fuel to the transit boxes is pretty trivial though. In a CT to Oz route the EC to CT is cheap, and CT to Perth and back is mostly free. The route from the wormhole exit to Perth is not 100% safe from attack, but it's a long way for IJN subs to transit from, say, Batavia, and CVs will have little dwell time. OTOH, in many cases having Japanese carriers off on the deep left corner of the map is good for the Allies. If I saw them there I'd just stop the "seagoing train" and let them burn up fuel and fatigue unitl they left.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 22
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 6:38:07 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline 		A properly structured convoy from America or the Middle East to Australia's east and west coast ports respectively will burn only its own fuel stores and not touch a single drop of fuel in an Australian port. It strikes me that players who experience difficulties in building up their fuel stocks in Australia allow their convoys to refuel from an australian port. that is totally unnecessary and considerably reduces the amount of net fuel which is delivered to Australia.

Alfred

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 23
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 6:52:55 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

A properly structured convoy from America or the Middle East to Australia's east and west coast ports respectively will burn only its own fuel stores and not touch a single drop of fuel in an Australian port. It strikes me that players who experience difficulties in building up their fuel stocks in Australia allow their convoys to refuel from an australian port. that is totally unnecessary and considerably reduces the amount of net fuel which is delivered to Australia.

Alfred


Within strict boundaries of ship selection and employment you are correct. There are some few early ships with the round-trip range to do what you suggest. But:

1) They are very valuable and every day they spend west of PH increases chance of loss.
2) They have other, valuable uses such as rapidly building stockpiles at PH and other early-war transfer points.
3) Use of my tactics allows many relatively uselss early-war ships, such as evacuated DEI xAKLs, to be used in the low-fuel shuttle service between the EC and CT.
4) Use of CT-Perth minimizes the need to tie up rare and valuable early-war escorts with any useful ASW capacity. Or to slow speed of advance to constantly re-fuel short-legged escorts such as SCs or AMs.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 24
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/8/2012 10:48:02 PM   
NAVMAN

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 12/31/2002
Status: offline 		Hi All:
Thx for the continued discussion on this. I'm going to print this thread and study the various suggestions/comments. This is the furthest I've gotten in a campaign.
As of now, end of 7/42, PM, Java, etc. are gone. Rangoon, Mandalay, etc are
still holding. I have 4 cvs and I'm toying with the idea of going into Tarawa and
then the Solomons.

Thx.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 25
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/9/2012 1:03:29 AM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Well the obvious question that I did not see asked here was how many ships are you operating in that theater? This is important. If you have all your old BBs in Noumea or OZ along with your carriers then you can expect severe fuel shortages in early to mid 42. There is nothing unusual or unreasonable about this. In my campaigns as the Allies I made that initial mistake. The old BBs especially sucked all the fuel out of the area. Send them back to Pearl until you build up the bases, fuel depots, and get enough tankers to support them.

Leave your old BBs stateside, use your carriers sparingly and you will do OK. I had a general shortage in OZ for the first six months of the war that gradually improved with time. After that, it has never been a problem.



_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to NAVMAN)
Post #: 26
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/9/2012 1:22:37 AM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline 		hi navman,

you're a bit further in your game, i'm in late 5/42. 's good you're holding the Burma Road.

but be careful w/ your CVs, you're still in restricted air-group co-ordination time. 2 AirTFs of 2 CV each, you're not likely to get the best strike-power. 's ok for a raid, but not optimal for an offensive.

a quick raid against island bases close to Pearl might give you some results, but you're likely to have no early recon on the opposition strength, you don't want to have 1 or more of your CVs get tagged.

better, maybe, to conserve your CVs for use in a sustained offensive strike, vs. the Solomons. where, if you've been building/reinforcing Noumea/Luganville, you've got land-based NavS/NavB/CAP from underneath which Air/Surf/Amph/Trans TFs can operate.

which is to say, mebbe you don't want to be sending your CVs out into the ughknown belly/nettle areas, on a low-return operation. best to keep all your CVs fully fueled & operational for a Solomons assault.



(in reply to NAVMAN)
Post #: 27
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/9/2012 1:28:16 AM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline 		crsutton has a good point - oldBBs have no useful purpose, & should stay at USA WC & do their upgrades, until '44. 

(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 28
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/9/2012 1:32:10 AM   
Mundy


Posts: 2869
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline 		If I recall, while reading Neptune's Inferno, this was mentioned.  It came down to sending either the BBs or the carriers to Noumea, but not both.

I feel the pain, trying to keep Oz fueled myself.  It starting to threaten my supply convoys to PM.

Ed-

_____________________________


(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 29
RE: Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia - 3/9/2012 10:21:43 AM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline 		IMO using the "whormhole" in order to be save from attacks smells a bit gamey. Ships using off-map movement should be subject to u-boat attacks .

I'm running supplies and fuel convoys from WC to Australia via a waypoint in the Tahiti area. The convoys have orders not to refuel at the destination in Australia, but to minimal refuel at the waypoint. In the beginning, I keep groups of AOs based at the waypoint while a port is being built. At a certain port size, shortlegged tankers from LA keep this fueling base filled and the AOs leave for other duty.

_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Maintaining Fuel Supplies In Australia Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.092