Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: OT: Radios

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: OT: Radios Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 4:32:08 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: armin

First people need to realize that Star Trek and Star Wars will never happen. We already now so far that every planet that we encountered outside of solar system is barren or gas like not suitable for any carbon based life form. Every mission that will be launched in near future will be focused to strip resources from our solar system. And if some poor sods will be launched for colonizing some asteroid they will be just miners. Not mentioning human body would never survive such acceleration and any theory about dampeners is bullcrap since it doesnt work in universe that way.

So to answer to your question yes you would be faster then radio signal. The further you would get the older messages you would hear but when you would be close to light speed you would stop hearing them becouse you would stop existing.

If you want to know how our future will look like imagine warhammer 40k hive cities just without the fantasy beings and warp travel.


so your saying that Red Dwarf got it right.

Bummer man. Especially if you've read the book.


_____________________________


(in reply to armin)
Post #: 31
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 4:58:23 PM   
packerpete

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 2/27/2010
Status: offline
Do your headlights on your space Civic emit light? Or do they suck darkness??

(in reply to CRations)
Post #: 32
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 5:41:14 PM   
jcjordan

 

Posts: 1900
Joined: 6/27/2001
Status: offline
As to space travel, didn't Einstein say that to propel an ant to the speed of light, it'd take engines as massive as the earth to get it that fast but it won't be to the speed of light or faster than it but just short of it?

(in reply to packerpete)
Post #: 33
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 6:07:10 PM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 586
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline
If there were radio transmissions originating on your ship or the Space Civic beside you doing the same speed you would receive them. At light speed any transmission from behind you
couldn't catch you. The signals from sources laterally separated would be wierdly distorted. I do not know about the signals from sources ahead of you closing speed would in fact be 300000 km/sec + 300000 km/sec exceeding "c".
Regardless there will always be punks driving around in the middle of the night in space with their stereos set to 11 blasting out hiphopcrap. And if you stopped suddenly all the signals from behind you would arrive at once and
your Tivo would blow up killing all aboard....the Tori Spelling radiation from 90210 alone would do it.

(in reply to jcjordan)
Post #: 34
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 6:25:07 PM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
If I missed someone saying so, if you are traveling near the speed of light and the radio transmitter were moving at the same speed and same direction either in front of you or behind you, there would be no doppler shift so you would hear your Slim Whitman or whatever it is you listen to just fine.

On the OT, I believe we are in the early stages of an extiction event on the scale of the end of the Permian period. I pretty much agree with wdolson's estimate but I usually just say 1 billion. Besides a new ice age (which actually began about a thousand years back{don't quote me on that, I'm forgetting when exactly the current ice age cycle began, I might be way off as in much longer ago}) extreme drought over much of what is now arable land caused by the climate disturbance would also lower the limit. I'm afraid about 90% of all life from all the Kingdoms of life will disappear, and our own species will go extinct earlier rather than later. Al Gore is an optimist, I think the damage is already done and the outcome irreversible now. Our only chance would be if someone can figure out how to remove vast quantities of carbon dioxide and methane from the upper reaches of our atmosphere. If it could be done I'd guess the cost would be something like a million times what the Apollo Moon program cost, and the Congress will never pay for that. Sorry to be such a downer.

(in reply to jcjordan)
Post #: 35
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 6:55:29 PM   
Treetop64


Posts: 926
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gräfin Zeppelin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

If a man talks in a forest and there's no woman around to hear him.....is he still wrong?

(my fav.)

Absolutely.


The GF constantly accuses me of wrongdoing. Curiously, the things she accuses me of are exactly the same sort of things she does. I try to argue back about this.

I lose ever time.

I just don't get it...

_____________________________



(in reply to Grfin Zeppelin)
Post #: 36
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 6:58:15 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
You know the old saying....."Don't do as I do......DO AS I SAY!!!"

ah....the GF/Sig. Other "Double Standard" Never ever point it out. A couch will be in your immediate future.


_____________________________


(in reply to Treetop64)
Post #: 37
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 6:59:10 PM   
mdiehl

 

Posts: 5998
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
You will hear one song, repeated endlessly: "Drop Kick Me Jesus Through The Goal Posts of Life."

_____________________________

Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?

(in reply to Phanatikk)
Post #: 38
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 7:02:47 PM   
Treetop64


Posts: 926
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

You know the old saying....."Don't do as I do......DO AS I SAY!!!"

ah....the GF/Sig. Other "Double Standard" Never ever point it out. A couch will be in your immediate future.




It was last night.

_____________________________



(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 39
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 7:05:24 PM   
LoBaron


Posts: 4776
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline
Good comparision to Perm, I agree with your asessment although I rate one significant difference to that
event more important than you obviousely.

The Perm extinction event lacked a lifeform able to think ahead, to develop tools from complex plans, and
to know fear of things not physically present. The chance I see in our time is, considering we are quite a bunch
of people continuousely communicating ofe bilogically huge distances, information is passed on fast enough
to built up a resistance against global destruction.

It is improbably that in Perm something comparable existed, at least not on a globally dominant scale as humanity
is. There are dangerous times ahead and I am sure we as a race need above capability to the utmost to prevent a similar
desaster.





_____________________________


(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 40
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 7:06:59 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
quote:


It was last night.


see? I have a future in relationship counceling



_____________________________


(in reply to Treetop64)
Post #: 41
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 7:11:07 PM   
Kwik E Mart


Posts: 2447
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline
...i retract my last comment on hearing disco...after much more thought, i believe there would be three potential songs one would hear in this situation...

1) Elton John's "Rocket Man"
2) The Buggles "Video Killed the Radio Star"
3) Radiohead "How to Disappear Completely"

...of course, which song one would hear is all relative...

_____________________________

Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.


(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 42
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 7:18:40 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
"Microsize Boy"

_____________________________


(in reply to Kwik E Mart)
Post #: 43
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 8:19:42 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Treetop64


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

You know the old saying....."Don't do as I do......DO AS I SAY!!!"

ah....the GF/Sig. Other "Double Standard" Never ever point it out. A couch will be in your immediate future.




It was last night.


Interesting you all seem to think this is a loss for you and not her. Maybe work on your technique(s)?

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Treetop64)
Post #: 44
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 8:22:50 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
Ha!



_____________________________


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 45
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 8:38:04 PM   
Treetop64


Posts: 926
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)
Status: offline
The phallus is infallible. Truth. But that can't always be exclusively counted on to temper the unpredictably extreme gyrations of the other party's emotional state.

_____________________________



(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 46
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 8:53:21 PM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 586
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline
Keep your heads down and don't bunch up!
One shot might get us all!
If you think you know what you're doing, Treetop, tell the world
before the fem-posse finds you and kills you.
Any man who learned how to win in such a situation has not
live to tell the tale.

(in reply to Treetop64)
Post #: 47
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 9:29:46 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Treetop64

The phallus is infallible. Truth. But that can't always be exclusively counted on to temper the unpredictably extreme gyrations of the other party's emotional state.


So why do you end up on the couch and not the unhinged party?

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Treetop64)
Post #: 48
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 9:36:57 PM   
Treetop64


Posts: 926
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: Treetop64

The phallus is infallible. Truth. But that can't always be exclusively counted on to temper the unpredictably extreme gyrations of the other party's emotional state.


So why do you end up on the couch and not the unhinged party?


Well, "that" didn't happen.

_____________________________



(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 49
RE: OT: Radios - 5/16/2012 11:59:11 PM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: danlongman

If there were radio transmissions originating on your ship or the Space Civic beside you doing the same speed you would receive them. At light speed any transmission from behind you
couldn't catch you. The signals from sources laterally separated would be wierdly distorted. I do not know about the signals from sources ahead of you closing speed would in fact be 300000 km/sec + 300000 km/sec exceeding "c".
Regardless there will always be punks driving around in the middle of the night in space with their stereos set to 11 blasting out hiphopcrap. And if you stopped suddenly all the signals from behind you would arrive at once and
your Tivo would blow up killing all aboard....the Tori Spelling radiation from 90210 alone would do it.


The signals would never exceed the speed of light, even relative to anything else. To someone traveling .99c, someone traveling in the opposite direction at .99c would have a closing velocity around .9992c. The key equation that influences everything is the square root of 1-v^2/c^2.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 50
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 12:27:08 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

If I missed someone saying so, if you are traveling near the speed of light and the radio transmitter were moving at the same speed and same direction either in front of you or behind you, there would be no doppler shift so you would hear your Slim Whitman or whatever it is you listen to just fine.

On the OT, I believe we are in the early stages of an extiction event on the scale of the end of the Permian period. I pretty much agree with wdolson's estimate but I usually just say 1 billion. Besides a new ice age (which actually began about a thousand years back{don't quote me on that, I'm forgetting when exactly the current ice age cycle began, I might be way off as in much longer ago}) extreme drought over much of what is now arable land caused by the climate disturbance would also lower the limit. I'm afraid about 90% of all life from all the Kingdoms of life will disappear, and our own species will go extinct earlier rather than later. Al Gore is an optimist, I think the damage is already done and the outcome irreversible now. Our only chance would be if someone can figure out how to remove vast quantities of carbon dioxide and methane from the upper reaches of our atmosphere. If it could be done I'd guess the cost would be something like a million times what the Apollo Moon program cost, and the Congress will never pay for that. Sorry to be such a downer.


Technically we are in a warm period of an ice age that started about 1 million years ago. This warm period started about 14,000 years ago. Before that the Earth was locked in ice in the northern and southern regions for about 20,000 years. Many parts of the Earth remained ice free and there was a lot more land in the equatorial region because the oceans were much lower than today. The Mediterranean existed, but it was probably about the size of a couple of the great lakes. The places at sea level now were way up in the mountains.

The ice was not uniform across the globe. On the west coast it only came down as far as Seattle (same latitude as Montreal), but was down to about NY City in the east. Most of modern Europe was unusable. The Pacific Rim was very different from the Atlantic. As the oceans fell, the Aleutians turned into a mountain range separating the Arctic from the Pacific. About half of Alaska was ice free as a result, though it was probably pretty cold. The western US deserts were pretty nice with high rainfall and lush vegetation. The San Joaquin Valley in California that now grows 50% of the US's produce was mostly a giant inland sea.

About 1000 years ago we had the Medieval Warming where world temperatures were much warmer than today. During this time the vikings explored westward and set up self sustaining colonies in Iceland and Greenland. Greenland was called Greenland because the southern end of it was grassland. England was known for it's fine wines.

About 1600 this reversed and we went into what's called the Little Ice Age which lasted until about 1850. The Little Ice Age didn't have ice sheets or anything, but the winters were much colder than they are now. Ice skating on the Thames in winter was pretty common. The New World was settled by Europe during this period.

From 1850 to now, the world has been warming a bit. So far it hasn't been as dramatic as the Medieval Warming, but it could go that way. We only have monastery records to indicate how the Warming started and they are very subjective. On the other hand, world weather spiked hotter in the 1930s (one of the hottest decades in modern world history), then settled into a cooling trend from 1940 to 1975 before warming again. The winter of 1944-45 was one of the coldest in Western Europe in 100 years. Along the US west coast the coldest winter on record was 1949-50. It snowed in Los Angeles and the Pacific Northwest set snow fall records.

The ice records from Lake Vostok, which is one of the best long range histories of world icing going back over 100,000 years shows that major ice periods are often preceded with a spike up in world temperatures. The resolution of the data can't tell if the spike lasts for a couple of years or 50, but it's usually very short in geologic time. It is possible that we're starting an icing period. It's about time for it to start. The relatively ice free periods usually last 10,000-15,000 years, so we're on the long side for the window now.

Most geologists look at the climate and say "who knows what happens next". The geologic record shows that the last 100 years is not terribly clear of anything significant. It could mean nothing, small shifts one direction or another, or a major shift not seen in recorded human history. We don't have enough data to know.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 51
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 12:38:50 AM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 586
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline
The signals would never exceed the speed of light, even relative to anything else. To someone traveling .99c, someone traveling in the opposite direction at .99c would have a closing velocity around .9992c. The key equation that influences everything is the square root of 1-v^2/c^2.

Bill

I do not purport to understand relativity, but I am still afraid of Tori Spelling radiation. If I am standing at point "B" with radiating sources to my right at "A" and left "C". How fast are these Tori Spellings on either side approaching each other relativity speaking?

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 52
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 1:11:11 AM   
Knavey

 

Posts: 3052
Joined: 9/12/2002
From: Valrico, Florida
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: armin

First people need to realize that Star Trek and Star Wars will never happen.


WRONG...FAIL...BORKED ANSWER!

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...cue music!

Star Wars HAPPENED!

_____________________________

x-Nuc twidget
CVN-71
USN 87-93
"Going slow in the fast direction"

(in reply to armin)
Post #: 53
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 3:08:29 AM   
zzodr


Posts: 178
Joined: 6/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

You assume an initial boost and then coasting. A constant acceleration craft could go interstellar distances in much less itme, relativistic effects notwithstanding. There are several technologies in theoretical range of that, solar sails being one.

A great, now-old, juvenile novel about this is Heinlein's "Time for the Stars" about stellar exploration using constant-boost "torch ships" coupled with telepathic twins who are able to communicate outside relativistic norms. Outside the hard-science fun it's an interesting social commentary on what might happen between twins when one ages and the other essentially does not. The last chapter always made me think really hard when I was a kid reading these great books. Picture Magellan lost at sea for 500 years, and after sacrifice and great hardship is re-found and brought home on a 747 in an afternoon.


Yeah thats nice and all but I was referring to manned craft.
And a solar sail isn't going to work too well in interstellar space once you go past the heliopause of a nearby star.



_____________________________


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 54
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 3:26:50 AM   
mdiehl

 

Posts: 5998
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline
quote:

nd a solar sail isn't going to work too well in interstellar space once you go past the heliopause of a nearby star.


Well, but does it have to? If a solar sail generated some small amount of thrust constantly out to the heliopause, wouldn't the spaceship-beastie be moving pretty fast?

< Message edited by mdiehl -- 5/17/2012 3:29:42 AM >


_____________________________

Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?

(in reply to zzodr)
Post #: 55
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 6:07:11 AM   
zzodr


Posts: 178
Joined: 6/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mdiehl


Well, but does it have to? If a solar sail generated some small amount of thrust constantly out to the heliopause, wouldn't the spaceship-beastie be moving pretty fast?


Fast in race car terms, yes, very. Fast as in travelling to another star system? No.
Voyager 1 is now entering this area where the solar energy from our Sun is negligible.

In 100 days a sail could reach 16,000 kilometers per hour (10,000 miles per hour); in one year it could reach 58,000 kilometers per hour (36,000 miles per hour). In just three years, a solar sail could reach a speed of over 160,000 kilometers per hour (100,000 miles per hour). At that speed you could reach Pluto in less than five years. In comparison, the New Horizons misson to Pluto, using chemical propulsion and a gravity-assist from Jupiter, is planned to take nine years to reach its target.

Still, 160,000 kilometers per hour (100,000 miles per hour) is still only 0.00015 the speed of light. It would take about 1,000 years for a solar sail to reach one-tenth the speed of light, even with light shining on it continuously. This emphasizes just how hard interstellar flight is.

http://www.discoversolarenergy.com/solar/sails.htm

_____________________________


(in reply to mdiehl)
Post #: 56
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 6:21:12 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
The human race may travel to the stars someday, but it will take first a major scientific breakthrough followed by some pretty serious technological breakthroughs. If it ever happens, it will be a very long time.

Right now we are about where ancient Romans people were dreaming about 747s. The concept of flight existed, but nobody had a clue how to make it happen for anything other than birds. For FTL we don't even have any examples we can look at (unless you want to believe stories of downed UFOs which are within the realm of remote possibility, but are, at minimum, unproven to the general public).

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to zzodr)
Post #: 57
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 8:49:32 AM   
LoBaron


Posts: 4776
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline
We are definitely one or several major scientific breakthroughs away from reaching the stars, or even the outer planets in timespans that justify
the effort.

What currently seems to be the big problem, is that the attributes of our universe which are most promising for those breakthroughs are at the smallest
possible scale, right down to Planck. A few hundred years ago your average scientific experiment exploring the macroscopic or microscopic realm
may have cost a small fortune for a human, now doing the same costs a small fortune for several countries.

Christian Huygens and his colleagues would not have imagined that, in a few hundred years, pushing back the boundary of macro- and microcosm would not require
a couple of well placed optical lenses and mirrors, but a high precision device with 30 years built time, 26km circumference, and the energy consumption of a small country.

What I really hope is that in the future the global developement remains stable enough that there are the funds available to fuel such projects.

_____________________________


(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 58
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 12:23:21 PM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson

England was known for it's fine wines.


No no no no NO! That's impossible!

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 59
RE: OT: Radios - 5/17/2012 1:52:36 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zzodr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

You assume an initial boost and then coasting. A constant acceleration craft could go interstellar distances in much less itme, relativistic effects notwithstanding. There are several technologies in theoretical range of that, solar sails being one.

A great, now-old, juvenile novel about this is Heinlein's "Time for the Stars" about stellar exploration using constant-boost "torch ships" coupled with telepathic twins who are able to communicate outside relativistic norms. Outside the hard-science fun it's an interesting social commentary on what might happen between twins when one ages and the other essentially does not. The last chapter always made me think really hard when I was a kid reading these great books. Picture Magellan lost at sea for 500 years, and after sacrifice and great hardship is re-found and brought home on a 747 in an afternoon.


Yeah thats nice and all but I was referring to manned craft.
And a solar sail isn't going to work too well in interstellar space once you go past the heliopause of a nearby star.



"Time For the Stars" does involve manned craft.

Solar sails work to boost the craft for a LONG time while near the home star. Larry Niven also posited a system where large spaceborne lasers beamed light energy to the sailing craft once they were outside the heliopause. Onboard fuel would be needed to decelerate at the destination.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to zzodr)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: OT: Radios Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.031