Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Parry and Spar, or is it... Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Fulkerson(J) vs Moore (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry and Spar, or is it... Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Fulkerson(J) vs Moore (A) Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Parry and Spar, or is it... Reluctant Admiral 4.2 ... - 6/9/2012 8:47:34 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Jap-wise report on the game so far:

Um......I'm starting phase 2 where I ship some planes to the places where I've landed just troops in the past. I'm actually loading some planes and shipping them to the perimeter of the boundry so as to project force better. To ward off some of the air attacks and protect what I've gained already. Most of the easy parts are already grabbed now I gotta concentrate on the not so easy ones. The contested ones. Rabaul is getting hit almost every turn now with Allied B-17's and I need some CAP there to discourage that. And some AA units can't hurt there at Rabaul. And some planes couldn't hurt the Miri area and around Jolo. There seems to be an operational Allied field with some fighters at or near Cebu and I'm going to have to put a stop to that sooner or later. Because Davao is getting pounded via the air. Davao and Bubbledrop seem to be important hubs and I need them free of Allied interference for loading and unloading so I'm thinking I need some CAP at Bubbledrop too. I'm marching down to the SW on the PI and northward from Davao and soon the Allied aircraft won't have quite so many airfields to operate from as I grab them and convert them, fix them etc. I'm trying to expand ports and airflelds as I capture them so the supply of fuel and supply is important also, not just troops. They are all going in at the same time if possible. Grabbing them, expanding them, moving on to the next one and doing the same. The captured area is getting bigger and bigger with each passing turn. For the last two weeks now. Jim is fighting back here and there punching and jabbing looking for weaknesses and finding one every once in a while. His subs are really busy. I'm trying to keep my subs moving too. I'm keeping an eye on the economy and it's doing as well as I thought it might be doing about this time in the game. Nothiing is crashing down yet. Lots of resources to move still. Port Arthur is close and accessable so far. Hokkaido is a good source of resources too. Thanks, whoever told me about that.


That is about the best compliment I can hope for - it is true to what happened in real life... So far everything falling because I cannot protect it, YES I am reduced to spending an hour per turn, figuring out if I can hold my positions and if not, how far back do I fall? USN subs are not effective fighters because of the torps, but are great at intel gathering. Larry's plan is solid and what he is posting is ambitious, but doable...I can only hope Larry overexpands and loses the economy balance because I found playing the A.I. the economy is REALLY hard to get it back on track once it slides into the negative.

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 151
22Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:07:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Okie dokie.......Jim has sent me his moves.....I ran the combat replay etc. and here's some Tracker alerts:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 152
RE: 22Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:08:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the combat report in it's entirety for those of you who want to see it.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 153
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:17:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I think maybe it might be time to start posting stuff again. I've got about 5 or 6 turns of stuff saved up now and our OPSEC is probably safe.

This is from the 17th of Dec 41:

Just from the first glance at the Intelligence display I'd say I have a lot of Manchukuo stuff that I can buy out with my PP's to use elsewhere, and I've got about 1250 PP's now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 154
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:18:14 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm pretty sure Jim is going to run out of Warhawks on Clark Field eventually and if he doesn't buy out the B-17's and move them they might get trapped and destroyed also. I'm trying to capture all the possible airfields that Jim might use to fly out his aircraft and that's a hard thing to do with the B-17's range. He's still got fields he can fly stuff to in Borneo and the DEI and places like that but pretty soon those are going to be gone.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 155
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:19:16 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim is driving his subs hard and it shows. I've lost a bunch of ships to his subs the last couple of turns. I'm going to have to figure out how to configure my convoys to have escorts in them before I lose this war.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 156
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:20:00 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim and I are having our own private Sub / DD war going on near Pearl.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 157
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:20:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There was another altercation between my subs and an Allied TF near San Francisco.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 158
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:21:33 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		One of the Hong Kong MTB's sortied and was sunk in a series of sea battles. This is the result of the third sea battle.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 159
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:22:15 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The DMS-only TF that left Cam Rahn Bay a couple of days ago finally arrived at Miri and has started their sweeping.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 160
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:22:55 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim is double-teaming me with his subs off the coast of Cam Rahn Bay. I'm going to lose more than these two ships I think.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 161
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:23:29 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The air war over the PI is going on strong still. This is just one of the many raids that happened.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 162
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:24:03 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here is another example of the ferrosity of the air war over the PI.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 163
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:24:43 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here is an example of the air war near Sinagpore.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 164
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:25:17 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here is Jim hitting my boys on Rabaul. I'm going to have to ship some AA units to that AO.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 165
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:25:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The battle for Alor Star is now over.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 166
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:26:28 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the second battle for Hong Kong.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 167
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:27:01 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		My boys did good at Kavieng.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 168
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 4:45:21 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Larry is concerned with MY subs? I seem to have a bad case of Sub-itis myself!
He has flooded Pearl Harbor with subs, I'm estimating between 6-10 subs...Then theres the West Coast - I've put every ASW capable aircraft and ship I have there on patrol. I'll post a pix shortly.

More to come, the OPSEC issue slowed things down but now we are picking up steam again and reports should be a lot faster.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 169
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 4:55:06 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Why am I throwing the kitchen sink? This is the reason for the bagging a CA comment earlier... I had 4 subs all in the general area and sent them all... NOT O N E sighting by them...the TF just disappeared! Hyperspace? Warp speed Scotty-san? Where's The Fun???

LOL just shake my head and keep plugging along... I'll gladly sink the TK's and AO's but a warship would do wonders for the morale!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 170
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 12:55:25 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Hey Jim dude.....I see you are running Combat Reporter ( I've got a keen eye for the obvious ) and I'm wondering what CR does for you exactly.

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 171
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/10/2012 1:15:38 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Hey Jim dude.....I see you are running Combat Reporter ( I've got a keen eye for the obvious ) and I'm wondering what CR does for you exactly.


Larry,
When I'm running my turn, Combat Reporter is essentially the replay in snapshots with writing... For idiots like me, it allows me to Alt + Tab between windows and I can look at what I need to address next. (like the enemy TF reported location would be in the Sea battle directory, reported sightings, Intel reports, etc.)

Its available under mods and one of the designers (Bret) checks frequently on the thread for questions and problem reports.

It allows me to not have so many D'Oh moments and saves a TON on the writing pads I was filling up! All hail Combat Reporter!

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 172
RE: 17Dec41 - 6/11/2012 11:46:14 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		12/16/41 We have some ASW progress - not much else...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moore4807 -- 6/11/2012 11:54:20 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 173
Parry & Spar - 6/11/2012 11:59:47 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Finally B17's draw some blood at Rabaul! its still SOME good news!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 174
RE: Parry & Spar - 6/11/2012 8:37:55 PM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline 		Moo, don't forget your subs can also move supplies.  They can get to places the AKLs can't, but they need to dock in order to unload.  Keep the US ones loaded with torpedoes, you still have a coin flip if they hit the target.  After they deliver supplies change them to Sub Patrol mode and give them a hex for reaction on their way home.  I'd move the long range subs based at Pearl to Australia after Wake falls.  They'll do more good there.

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 175
RE: Parry & Spar - 6/11/2012 9:09:00 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

Moo, don't forget your subs can also move supplies.  They can get to places the AKLs can't, but they need to dock in order to unload.  Keep the US ones loaded with torpedoes, you still have a coin flip if they hit the target.  After they deliver supplies change them to Sub Patrol mode and give them a hex for reaction on their way home.  I'd move the long range subs based at Pearl to Australia after Wake falls.  They'll do more good there.


Ok - another thing I wasn't aware of... I thought it had to be subs like the Narwhal to carry supplies (of any consequence). Ive been using the Dutch subs for the hunting in South China Sea, and down the P.I. The S boats have been doing picket duty for me and I got most of them out of Manila... The newer class boats are milling around, I'm trying to guess where Larry is going next and put them there... None to sucessful - so far!

It's good advice - its going to take me around a month to put the subs in place to follow your good advice... I refer the USN subs as the "can't-shoot-straight gang" They have missed so many golden opportunities in A.I. games - I dont trust them now...probably to my detriment.

_____________________________


(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 176
RE: Parry & Spar - 6/11/2012 10:43:33 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's some combat results from 18Dec41:

Jim has at least one sub operating in my landing zone(s). I'll have to do something about that.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 177
RE: Parry & Spar - 6/11/2012 10:44:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim has a conglomeration of surface ships that can threaten my landings on the east side of Borneo that I need to deal with.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 178
RE: Parry & Spar - 6/11/2012 10:45:22 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Wake Island got hit pretty hard by two separate night-time bombardments.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 179
RE: Parry & Spar - 6/11/2012 10:46:10 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The air war over the Singapore area is as hot as ever.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry and Spar, or is it... Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Fulkerson(J) vs Moore (A) Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.892