Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 7:47:15 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There appears to be a minefield at Palembang that I'll have to clear out before I can do any heavy operations there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 361
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 7:50:08 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I got a hit on a tanker at Pearl:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 362
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 7:52:55 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		More Jap sub action:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 363
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 7:55:21 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Some PT boats tried to sneak out of Manila harbour and I found them:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 364
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 7:58:20 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		An Allied sub is loose near Cam Ranh Bay. I'm going to have to reroute a bunch of stuff around him. If I can find him again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 365
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:01:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Cuttlefish is being bothersome. I'll have to watch him too.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 6/28/2012 8:02:00 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 366
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:05:22 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Perhaps I should concentrate on Clark Field instead of Manila. And the ground pounding can start big time now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 367
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:14:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Time to take the Nells off airfield missions and put them on ground pounding instead.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 368
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:23:09 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The results of this raid on Singapore ground units tells me that it's too early to start ground pounding Singers. I need to concentrate on the airfield instead. At least for a while. Whittle down the Allied fighters a bit and THEN start ground pounding.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 369
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:31:14 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim is keeping his B-17's at Port Moresby busy. I've moved some Zero's into the area for CAP. Let's see if it makes any difference at all.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 370
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:34:25 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Good results from another carrier strike. I'm running low on sorties though.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 371
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:36:49 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		That Allied sub near the home islands is back. Pesky dude.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 372
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:40:09 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I did a bombardment attack on Clark Field and lost more stuff than Jim did. I'm guessing I'll have to do a bunch of bombardment from the air instead for a while to avoid unneccessary losses.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 373
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:44:37 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm still outnumbered at Iloilo. Gotta ship in some more foot dudes. Either that or just keep bombarding for about 6 months.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 374
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:47:32 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There was good news from Kushing. Now that Kushing is out of the way, I guess Singkawang is next.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 375
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/28/2012 8:52:00 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Balikpapan is not a pushover and Jim has reinforcements headed that way. I'm probably going to have to ship some more dudes into that AO. I don't have any arty nearby but could use some. Maybe some engineers would help out too.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 376
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/29/2012 2:31:25 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		It is now 29June2012 ( 06:12 Tucson time ) and Jim is on his way to his brother-in-law's domicile and thus out-of-pocket. I thought I'd take a minute to explain something to all you guys in Jim's AAR. Um......this is Jim's AAR and I respect that and you guys have probably noticed that I've been posting a lot of stuff in it and thus there's the appearance that I've "taken over" Jim's AAR. I'm not unaware of this and have on numerous occasions, via email, said so to Jimbo but he insists that my posting stuff in his AAR is a good thing and that I should keep it up. The explanation given is that he's playing as the Japs against TommyG and can use all the help he can get from me toward that game and that anything I can think of to signifiy in his AAR is documentation of the sort that would tend to be helpful in that reguard. In other words, I'm trying to help Jim with his TommyG game while documenting our game, both by posting hopefully useful stuff in his AAR.

Jim will be back in town on Sunday so there's going to be a short pause in this verbage stream but stay tuned and we'll be posting more stuff as we find things to post.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 377
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/29/2012 2:42:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's me shipping an Arty unit to Iloilo which is a port level 2 base. Which brings up another good point. I'm wondering what difference it makes what level the port is if I don't own it at this approximate point in time. Presumably I'm offloading equipment "over the bow" and onto the beach and I looked into it and that Arty unit has some heavy duty arty pieces ( 15 cm T96 ) and that there's probably the requirement of a crane at some point in the offloading. So that while I can move the tubes to the hex I'm not sure I can offload them there. Anybody have any idea what's going to happen when the ship arrives in the hex?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 378
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 6/29/2012 2:55:07 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here we have a Jap minesweeping TF presumably sweeping the Allied minefield at Singkawang. This TF has been on patrol on this hex for the last 3 or 4 days and there's never been the announcement in the operations report of any of the ships encountering a minefield. So I'm wondering if I need to alter the patrol to a simple "remain on station" setting instead. Anybody have an idea how to sweep minefields?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 379
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff - 7/3/2012 5:22:46 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		It's 21:37 on Monday 2July2012 and I'm in possession of Jim's moves for 31Dec41 and here they are:

This is the Tracker report on the economy:





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 380
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 31Dec41 stuff - 7/3/2012 5:28:28 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is the Tracker report on Oil. It says I have about 320 days worth of oil in the home islands left.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 381
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 31Dec41 stuff - 7/3/2012 5:37:37 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This Tracker report on fuel says the home islands have about 128 more days of fuel left.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 382
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 31Dec41 stuff - 7/3/2012 5:39:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's me boosting the Oil Refiniery output at Tokyo by 10.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 383
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 31Dec41 stuff - 7/3/2012 5:56:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There's no Allied minefield dot on the map any longer so I'm guessing I finally cleared the Allied minefield at Singkawang.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 384
RE: Jim Moore game v larry 31Dec41 stuff - 7/3/2012 6:17:04 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		My boys detected a minefield at Makassar. Good thing I didn't run ramshackle into it with a non-minesweeper type.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 385
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/3/2012 6:35:15 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		I'm back! Yeah I know...
Larry,
great job posting and keeping the readers up to date... played a month and were just shy of 3K hits read??? Awesome!

I'll post the AAr stuff Tuesday & get caught up... Nothing shocking or good... just the steady grinding of the Empire juggernaught...for now!

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 386
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/3/2012 7:10:01 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807
great job posting and keeping the readers up to date... played a month and were just shy of 3K hits read??? Awesome!

Thanks to all the readers who contributed to the 3K hits we've had so far. My dad would thank you too but he's dead.

quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807
I'll post the AAr stuff Tuesday & get caught up.

Oh, shoot, it's almost 23:00 on Monday.......I only have just less then an hour to get the rest of my stuff posted. No problem....I'll just stay up a little later than I usually do on Monday night. Watch the sun come up maybe. That's always inspiring when you're down. Watch the sun come up and the sky turn all those wonderful colors......all in slow motion.

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 387
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/3/2012 7:11:49 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Okay dokie now that he's attacked somebody I guess the prudent thing would be to move him off Malacca and somewhere maybe more useful.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 388
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/3/2012 7:17:20 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		He went into the harbour and found no minefield and survived. Good for him. He decided not to launch a torp at a target. Replace the captain of this boat? What do you guys think of his behaviour you guys?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 389
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/3/2012 7:23:11 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The SERIOUS ground pounding has begun at Clark Field. I've got multiple squadrons tasked to Clark Field and I intend to keep this up until the Jap ground forces can start to make some headway. I'm guessing Jim will back everybody he can off onto Bataan and hold up until the end. I've tried to split his forces into several parts so I can digest them one at a time with the same Jap folks. Now I see there's some 58K Allied dudes at Manila. Whoa. This may take some time to come.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Jim Moore game v larry 30Dec41 stuff Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.031