Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:17:43 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There was an Allied bombardment attack at Ambon but they didn't hit anything.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 511
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 5:38:13 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I moved a Bab's unit to Temuloh in order to be in range of Palembang. I specified Paley as the target of the recon so maybe we'll have some information about what's in there in the way of troops, etc.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 512
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 5:47:23 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've moved a Lilly unit to Kendari to do Naval Searches. You can see in the picture that I have them concentrated on the SE Java Sea.
Hopefully I'll be able to use these guys to find the ships and the Betty's and Nell's can destroy them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 513
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 5:54:16 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've ordered a Sally unit to do ground attacks on the Allied ground unit at Ambon. I may have to bomb him for a couple of days to see any change in the Allied unit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 514
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 6:02:32 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've moved a Betty unit to Rabaul and they have a radius of action of 21 hexes and can do Naval Attacks in the waters near the NE Australia coast. Maybe in some future turn I can move them further to the west and south to more fully cut off any ship traffic in and around North Australia.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 515
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 1:03:16 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Wow!
Larry's sure been busy, doesn't leave much to add for Jan 1 or Jan 2. Jan 3rd is a disapointment for the PT's at Sorby... 12 PT boats and a CV TF sailing right by them...I missed a golden opportunity!

A coupleof his subs took damage - they wont be out of commission long, but it's good for morale.

I'm doing exactly as Larry pointed out, rolling with the punches, setting up as many surprises as I can with meager ships and supplies. It's' not going to change much until late 42 or early 43. Then it will be more of a boxing match.

I'll think twice before sending anyone to Wake... I am not about to waste 2CV's for a potshot at a CA, or even the BB... but my can't shoot straight gang (USN subs) however is an entirely different story!

< Message edited by moore4807 -- 7/10/2012 1:09:25 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 516
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:15:52 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 03, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morale builders! Remember I said I left some surprises laying around!!!

TF 28 encounters mine field at Brisbane (96,160)
Japanese Ships
SS I-10, Mine hits 1


TF 82 encounters mine field at Soerabaja (56,104)
Japanese Ships
SS RO-33, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage


TF 22 encounters mine field at Brisbane (96,160)
Japanese Ships
SS I-2, Mine hits 1

This is the one that just seems sooooo wrong!!! Check out the moonlight and rain... the nighttime equivalent to a sun shower?

Night Time Surface Combat, near Soerabaja at 56,103, Range 6,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
CV Akagi
CV Kaga
CVL Ryujo
CVL Shoho
CVL Zuiho
BB Haruna
CA Myoko
CA Aoba
CL Abukuma
CL Kiso
DD Hatsukaze
DD Natsushio
DD Hayashio
DD Amatsukaze
DD Hamakaze
DD Tanikaze
DD Ariake
DD Asakaze
DD Matsukaze
DD Hasu
DD Karii

Allied Ships
PT TM-9
PT TM-10
PT TM-11
PT TM-12

Poor visibility due to Rain with 100% moonlight
Maximum visibility in Rain and 100% moonlight: 6,000 yards
Range closes to 9,000 yards...
Range closes to 8,000 yards...
Range closes to 7,000 yards...
Range closes to 6,000 yards...
CONTACT: Japanese lookouts spot Allied task force at 6,000 yards
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 6,000 yards
Prins D. gains tactical advantage
CV Kaga , CV Akagi , CVL Zuiho ,
CVL Shoho screened from combat
- escorted by DD Matsukaze , DD Hamakaze , DD Hatsukaze
BB Haruna engages PT TM-12 at 6,000 yards
DD Asakaze engages PT TM-12 at 6,000 yards
Range increases to 7,000 yards
CV Kaga , CV Akagi , CVL Zuiho ,
CVL Shoho , CVL Ryujo screened from combat
- escorted by DD Asakaze , DD Tanikaze , DD Amatsukaze ,
DD Hatsukaze
DD Karii engages PT TM-12 at 7,000 yards
DD Natsushio engages PT TM-12 at 7,000 yards
Range closes to 6,000 yards
Range closes to 5,000 yards
CV Kaga screened from combat
- escorted by DD Natsushio
DD Amatsukaze engages PT TM-12 at 5,000 yards
DD Hayashio engages PT TM-12 at 5,000 yards
Range increases to 9,000 yards
DD Asakaze engages PT TM-12 at 9,000 yards
DD Ariake engages PT TM-12 at 9,000 yards
Range increases to 11,000 yards
CV Kaga , CV Akagi , CVL Zuiho ,
CVL Shoho , CVL Ryujo screened from combat
- escorted by DD Karii , DD Hasu , DD Amatsukaze ,
DD Hayashio
CA Aoba engages PT TM-12 at 11,000 yards
DD Ariake engages PT TM-12 at 11,000 yards
Task forces break off...

and again...sigh


Night Time Surface Combat, near Pamekasan at 58,103, Range 2,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
DD Suzukaze

Allied Ships
PT TM-4
PT TM-5
PT TM-6
PT TM-7

Reduced visibility due to Rain with 96% moonlight
Maximum visibility in Rain and 96% moonlight: 2,000 yards
Range closes to 8,000 yards...
Range closes to 6,000 yards...
Range closes to 4,000 yards...
Range closes to 2,000 yards...
CONTACT: Japanese lookouts spot Allied task force at 2,000 yards
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 2,000 yards
Boetcher C. gains tactical advantage
PT TM-5 engages DD Suzukaze at 2,000 yards
DD Suzukaze engages PT TM-7 at 2,000 yards
Range increases to 4,000 yards
PT TM-7 engages DD Suzukaze at 4,000 yards
Range increases to 5,000 yards
PT TM-4 engages DD Suzukaze at 5,000 yards
Task forces break off...


I gotta get my P--40's altitude higher for the bounce against the Zeroes... or does that matter in this game?


Morning Air attack on Cebu , at 80,86

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid detected at 39 NM, estimated altitude 25,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 14



Allied aircraft
P-40B Warhawk x 3
P-40E Warhawk x 11


Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Warhawk: 2 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 2 destroyed



Aircraft Attacking:
9 x A6M2 Zero sweeping at 20000 feet

CAP engaged:
24th PG/20th PS with P-40B Warhawk (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(3 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 42 minutes
35th PG/21st PS with P-40E Warhawk (1 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(1 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Raid is overhead
24th PG/3rd PS with P-40E Warhawk (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(4 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 4 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 5 minutes
35th PG/34th PS with P-40E Warhawk (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(6 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 4 being recalled, 2 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 42 minutes

I really want to do some damage, but do not want to give the game away so early... too Kimmel-ish? Larry has already moved the KB south and east further than IRL...Makes me wonder if he's going to try to strangle Australia? Force me to move everything through Africa? Hmmm... any suggestions? I'm holding the India units and Naval forces around Karachi until he starts to play his hand out... Need to move Warspite through the East Coast to Africa (mombasa?) to avoid his picket line of subs...


_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 517
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:20:27 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm fortunate in that the oil fields and refineries at Ballikpapan seem to be largely undamaged. Some miinor dents here and there but most of them are running. I should be able to get some oil and supplies out of that port pretty soon.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 518
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:31:11 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Just a side story...
I was just reading Mandrakes AAR and he was commenting on his fridge not working after the repairman visited to fix something else wrong with it... I had my big screen Samsung go on the fritz about six months ago. Found out it was a $.80 resistor that was 12.5 wattts or volts and it was supposed to be a 25 watt or volt resistor... VERY nice repairman fixed the part - showed me what was wrong and that I shouldn't have any more problems... In an extreme stroke of luck he was still here when the the LCD component blew up protecting the new $.80 resistor!!! Because of that fact Samsung covered the part even though it wasn't technically under warranty... I haven't had a problem since then... I even sent the repairman a christmas card and a bottle as a thank you!



_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 519
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 8:52:36 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Larry - I was just rereading the last couple pages of posts and saw where you wanted to scuttle the ARD??? Its a mobile repair dock that can fix damage to flotation with supply... Not as fast as regular drydocks, but very important around Truk, Kwajalein, Beetlebob, or even Wake if you take over Midway. Very valuable in my experience and highly sought after to destroy by the Allies as not having it will force you to go to a regular drydock further behind the lines...

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 520
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 5:44:54 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Things are looking up...yeah not really but something is better than nothing...<smile>
11 of the twelve cargo ships I sent to Pago Pago are now fish houses...
It also says I bagged the CA Suzuya, nothing from Larry about that soo I'll assume it's FOW.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moore4807 -- 7/11/2012 5:48:03 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 521
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 6:58:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807
Larry - I was just rereading the last couple pages of posts and saw where you wanted to scuttle the ARD??? Its a mobile repair dock that can fix damage to flotation with supply... Not as fast as regular drydocks, but very important around Truk, Kwajalein, Beetlebob, or even Wake if you take over Midway. Very valuable in my experience and highly sought after to destroy by the Allies as not having it will force you to go to a regular drydock further behind the lines...

It's a mobile drydock.......how cool is that. Well, I found a second one of them so I guess I won't scuttle them after all.

That sunken CA isn't showing on my sunk ships screen so I'm guessing your game engine is FOW-ing you Jim.







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 7/11/2012 7:16:17 AM >

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 522
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 7:23:52 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		Larry,

In the game manual there is an appendix with descriptions of all the ship types and designations... hope it helps you

I started using it so much I actually printed out the appendix on paper and had them laminated... I still have them today on top of my computer...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 523
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 7:27:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Yeah, I was aware of the appendix section for ship types I was just too lazy to look up the ARD type. But thanks though.

EDIT: Ambon is NOT an uncontested landing site.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 7/11/2012 8:16:57 AM >

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 524
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:22:09 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim still has P-40's sweeping Davao and I've still got some Zero's based there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 525
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:24:52 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Another good carrier strike at Batavia got some hits on some ships there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 526
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:27:00 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And yet another successful carrier strike




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 527
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:29:42 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And yet still another good carrier strike near Canton Island




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 528
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:33:43 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This may be the last of the good carrier strikes for this turn




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 529
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:39:36 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is how it went on the ground at Iloilo this turn





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 530
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:42:30 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Clark Field ground pounding is proceeding slowly. Exceedingly slowly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 531
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 8:44:52 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Ground pounding at this pace could last for literally years. Something else needs to be done.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 532
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/11/2012 6:12:11 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is a picture of the list of subs that have major damage. I've been hard on my subs. They deserve better treatment.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 533
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/12/2012 2:33:25 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

This is a picture of the list of subs that have major damage. I've been hard on my subs. They deserve better treatment.





Hmm, and I was all ready to pat my ASW guys on the back for a good job

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 534
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/12/2012 6:12:10 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 04, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the best news of the day...

Pre-Invasion action off Ambon (76,109)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force
70 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAK Huzikawa Maru, Shell hits 10, heavy fires
PB Kanko Maru
xAK Otori Maru

Japanese ground losses:
57 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

120mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAK Huzikawa Maru at 10,000 yards
75mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAK Huzikawa Maru at 10,000 yards
PB Kanko Maru fired at enemy troops
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 5,000 yards
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 2,000 yards



Invasion Support action off Ambon (76,109)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force
37 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAK Huzikawa Maru, Shell hits 3, heavy fires
xAK Hino Maru #3, Shell hits 13, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Okuyo Maru, Shell hits 4, on fire
PB Kanko Maru
xAK Otori Maru

75mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAK Huzikawa Maru at 7,000 yards
120mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAK Hino Maru #3 at 7,000 yards
75mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAK Okuyo Maru at 7,000 yards
75mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAK Hino Maru #3 at 7,000 yards
PB Kanko Maru fired at enemy troops



Pre-Invasion action off Ambon (76,109)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force
62 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAKL Kumakawa Maru, Shell hits 11, heavy fires, heavy damage
PB Nanpo Maru
TB Tomozuru
xAK Sydney Maru #2

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

120mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAKL Kumakawa Maru at 6,000 yards
TB Tomozuru firing to suppress enemy battery at 6,000 yards
75mm CD Gun Battery engaging xAKL Kumakawa Maru at 6,000 yards
TB Tomozuru firing to suppress enemy battery at 6,000 yards
PB Nanpo Maru fired at enemy guns
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 5,000 yards
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 2,000 yards



KB is swinging westward...but not in enough of a hurry to spare a TF

Morning Air attack on TF, near Canton Island at 153,143
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 30
B5N2 Kate x 44
D3A1 Val x 30

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
DD Downes
DD Cassin, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
TK Gulfland, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Reid, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Porter
xAK Laida
xAK Florence D., Bomb hits 2, heavy fires

wait - more affordable fish housing units courtesy of the KB???

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Canton Island at 153,143
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 30
B5N2 Kate x 18
D3A1 Val x 38

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
DD Porter
DD Reid, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Laida, Bomb hits 3, and is sunk
DD Downes
DD Cassin, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage


Banshee's finally see action...with predictable rookie results

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Milne Bay at 99,133
Weather in hex: Light rain
Raid spotted at 5 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 1 minutes

Allied aircraft
A-24 Banshee x 3

Allied aircraft losses
A-24 Banshee: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
DD Teruzuki

And to close out tonight's performance... The beatdown goes on!
Japanese forces CAPTURE Boela !!!
Japanese forces CAPTURE Pare Pare !!!


< Message edited by moore4807 -- 7/12/2012 6:14:25 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 535
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/12/2012 10:55:48 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		It's Thursday 12July2012 14:32 and I'm in possession of Jim's moves for 06Jan42 and here's some Tracker alerts:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 536
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/12/2012 11:09:12 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm guessing that only the Dud-ness of Jim's torpedoes saved my AK. I had dispatched this AK to Ocean Island to refuel the port so it's loaded with all kinds of fuel and would burn brightly if torped.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 537
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/12/2012 11:12:52 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Yorktown is showing up on the sunk ships list but with only one torp hit I'm not 100% sure I should believe it's sunk. More likely it's just limping back to SFO and will spend some time in the shipyard. Only Jim knows for sure and he hasn't said anything about it yet.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 538
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/12/2012 11:15:46 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		SS plumber's helper is still being a pest. I've got aviation assets and ASW ships operating in that area so maybe he'll go away after a while.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 539
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/12/2012 11:18:37 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This was a largely inconsequential raid on Clark Field. Maybe I should ship some more troops in there and try to take it by ground assault?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 540
Page:   <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672