Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Page: <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:13:41 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm hoping that Jim will eventually run out of fighters and this air was will be over with.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 571
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:18:57 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I can't decide if this raid was ineffectual or not. They DID get one ship. But only one ship. I expected more from this raid.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 572
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:21:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Two ships. Not bad for just 16 planes. Where was the Allied CAP? Maybe there is none.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 573
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:24:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is a good strike by the Allies. I'm beginning to think I need some CAP at Kendari.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 574
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:31:41 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I don't know how to judge this one. I'm guessing the Catalina's missed the ship and hit the dock where there were personnel milling around. Or something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 575
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:37:05 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Another fairly desent air strike. Half of the ships got hits on them. Okay......I can live with that.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 576
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:40:38 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's how things went on the ground at Iloilo. Operation "Beat-Down 2" is proceeding slowly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 577
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:43:14 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		No damage for either side at Clark Field. I'm going to have to move some more troops in there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 578
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:45:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Manila could definately use the infusion of more troops. The damage is almost equal and that won't do.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 579
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/15/2012 2:48:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I need to turn off the attacking at Ambon before some of my people get hurt. More troops is in order here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 580
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/16/2012 5:56:09 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I moved a Babs unit down south to scope out the Panay to Mandano area more. Some of those places don't have a very high Detection Level so I'm hoping this Babs unit will raise the DL somewhat and perhaps save me some troops losses when I assault. And I'm planning on assaulting pretty soon after Manila falls, or if I can find the troops to do it, I'll try to clean out those Allied bases before Manila falls. And I plan on Manila falling within 6 months, around there. I'm guessing. I don't remember when Manila fell, sometime in April maybe or May of '42. It's still January now game time so there's no telling if I'm on schedule or not. With Real Life I mean.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 581
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/16/2012 8:33:24 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is me upping the output of the Home Island oil refineries to get more fuel and supplies. I'm running out of supplies in the cities of the home islands and I'm hoping I can remedy that with more supplies being produced. The more fuel is a byproduct of the process. I can always use more fuel to haul out to the field.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 582
8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 4:30:10 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Um.......I sent my moves to Moo about 00:40 last night as I recall and I've already got Moo's moves back from him already and did the combat replay and have the combat report in my hot little hand and I've started up Tracker and here's some current alerts:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 583
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 4:48:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I got a good hit on an AP near Cooktown.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 584
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 4:52:49 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's me turning up the output of the Merchant ShipYards so as to burn up some of those 2K+ points that is in the MerY pool.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 585
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 4:55:20 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the latest Tracker economic chart:

EDIT: You can see where I've turned up the Oil Refineries quite a bit. I'm hoping to create a lot of supplies for the home islands, they're running low in almost every city except Tokyo. I had to send about 2 dozen AKE's to Tokyo to get their supplies because the port they were in had only 2K+ supplies each. I need to build that up substantially, hence the upping of the OilR numbers.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 7/17/2012 4:58:36 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 586
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:02:10 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the resource history for "Japan". Things may be looking up, as the last entry row for the resource history shows a gain in oil and resources. That's a good sign. I hope it continues. Supplies are still going down though. D'oh.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 587
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:15:44 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the Alllied Air losses so far:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 588
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:17:01 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And here's the Jap air losses so far:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 589
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:20:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		We had a night-time surface encounter with the Allies loosing I think.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 590
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:29:38 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've looked up all the Ambon references in the Combat Report and I thought I'd present them one at a time so you can see what's going on at Ambon yesterday.

The Ambon defenders aren't making this any easier for me. This could get expensive pretty quickly now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 591
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:33:11 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		More losses when they finally started unloading all the AK's onto the beach. It's not looking pretty right now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 592
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:36:17 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		More Drama happens next. And then some more.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 7/17/2012 5:40:17 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 593
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:42:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		AND THEN the Allies start to bring out the really BIG guns.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 594
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:45:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Then finally, in mid-morning, my bombers show up. Not much help though. No damage was discernable.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 595
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:48:15 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Then, some escorted Sonia's show up to add their 2 cents.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 596
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:50:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then some of my CAP shoots down a PBY-5 over Ambon.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 597
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:53:10 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then my boys did a recon by fire to ascertain the opposition. I'm thinking the next attack should be a DA.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 598
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:55:08 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then the Allies did their bombardment attack. The rest is anti-climactic.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 599
RE: 8Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/17/2012 5:58:24 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		A similar kind of thing is going on at Lautem.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 600
Page:   <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Page: <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.688