Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1 - 6/18/2012 6:09:58 PM   
moonraker65


Posts: 556
Joined: 7/14/2004
From: Swindon,Wilts. UK
Status: offline 		All working now . Excellent mod, thanks to John and all for creating

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 151
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1 - 6/19/2012 10:16:26 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline 		I've noticed that crew for G8N is set to 0 (when copying its data for Perfect War files, BTW). Not sure if this even matters, because all planes seem to use one pilot regardless, but should be 2.

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to moonraker65)
Post #: 152
Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 6/22/2012 1:06:47 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Houston, we have a problem!!!

Just found out that there are 3 different Sentai that CANNOT move to any other base!!

4th Sentai - Nates - (ID 1004, 1005, 1006) located at Fukuoka and Formosa is Restricted and for some reason can ONLY transfer with bases under Southern Command.

144th Sentai (ID 1105) at Tokyo with Nates cannot transfer to any bases, PERIOD!!

At Okayama, there are three parts of a Sentai that are Restricted, but you can use PP to buy it out and transfer off Honshu (ID 1063, 1372, 1373).

What happened John??

_____________________________


(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 153
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 6/22/2012 2:02:04 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		OK, while drinking my second cup of coffee, I found the problem. 1st Air Division (ID 3038) has two errors. First is the "static attached" is checked. Second, the Air HQ is attached to "Southern Command" while the other scenarios have it attached to "General Defense Command." I was able to fix it in the Editor, but it didn't seem to make changes with ongoing games, only new games.

Thus, in ongoing games a few of the permanently restricted air units (two Sentai worth of Army fighters) CANNOT leave their current base unless they fly to a Southern Command base. However, they can make it to Luzon by island hopping through Okinawa if you place a BF there.

_____________________________


(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 154
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 6/22/2012 5:45:06 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		CRAP. Will work that. Thanks. Will fix ASAP.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 155
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 6/22/2012 5:54:22 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Problem is now FIXED. Am sending new file (4.6) to FatR. FatR please Post here when this is done.

Sorry Kyberbill for the new update!

Good catch. As people play--ALWAYS Post issues.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 156
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 6/22/2012 6:00:41 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Files sent.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 157
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 6/23/2012 4:25:18 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline 		Posted them on the site. Also, set the crew stat for G8N right for this version, before posting.

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 158
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 6/23/2012 6:23:00 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Thanks FatR and a good, simple fix to G8N issue.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 159
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/17/2012 12:15:00 AM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		Greetings,

As I tried to rebase them, I found out that [1169 -3rd Tpt. Chutai] based in Kompong Chhnang, is attached to [2nd Air(R)]. Although it is easy to fix, I wonder if it should not start Attached to [Southern Army]?

Just a thought :)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 160
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/17/2012 5:38:44 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

Greetings,

As I tried to rebase them, I found out that [1169 -3rd Tpt. Chutai] based in Kompong Chhnang, is attached to [2nd Air(R)]. Although it is easy to fix, I wonder if it should not start Attached to [Southern Army]?

Just a thought :)


Thanks for the note. I shall keep a list of needs for an eventual new update. Don't plan to do anything soon and am looking comments from players who notice issues like this or play deep enough in to find new problems.

Thanks Kitakami!

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 161
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/21/2012 6:04:20 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		This is a question, not necessarily a bug:

31 Ku-T1, an IJN Val Hikotai, will arrive around January 22... in Manila? That is a somewhat tight timetable to receive the reinforcement there, no?

Just my 2 cents

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 162
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/21/2012 6:43:05 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline 		I have found the following error

The LCU(5800) Mobiele Eenheid has in wpn2 slot the wrong weapon
It must not be 180mm CD Gun (984) but it must be VCL Tanks

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 163
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/21/2012 6:50:27 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		Also, there are some plane engines that are available LATER than some airframes that use them:

1. Mitsubishi Ha-42 available in Oct '45, while the Ki-67-Ia is available in Apr '44, and the Ki-67-Ia(T) is available in Jun '44
2. Nakajima Ha-44 available in May '43, while the B6N1 is available in Feb '43.
3. Nakajima Ha-45 available in Sep '43, while the N1K1-J is available in May '43.

Is that as designed, so that to use the planes at those dates one must research the engines?

Thanks!


_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 164
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1 - 7/21/2012 8:46:26 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Thanks for the dedicated work fellas. Have a list going by the computer. The engine observation is a major concern and might need immediate attention.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to moonraker65)
Post #: 165
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/21/2012 9:12:00 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

Also, there are some plane engines that are available LATER than some airframes that use them:

1. Mitsubishi Ha-42 available in Oct '45, while the Ki-67-Ia is available in Apr '44, and the Ki-67-Ia(T) is available in Jun '44
2. Nakajima Ha-44 available in May '43, while the B6N1 is available in Feb '43.
3. Nakajima Ha-45 available in Sep '43, while the N1K1-J is available in May '43.

Is that as designed, so that to use the planes at those dates one must research the engines?

Thanks!


These are my oversights. With the latter two it is probably insignificant, they likely will be online in time anyway if you just leave their initial factories as they are, but #1 this might be important, without building a big factory you won't get it in time. It is the historical engine for Ki-67, though. John, I think we should fix that.

A "quickfix" for ongoing games - expand your Ha-42 factory to, say, 100 at the beginning of the game (you'll want at least 50 Ki-67 per month anyway, right?), which should give you this engine around November of 1943. Unfortunately, some potential engine production is going to be lost while your factory is busy researching, unless changes to availability dates can be applied to ongoing games.

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 166
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/23/2012 3:12:28 AM   
Dan Nichols


Posts: 863
Joined: 8/30/2011
Status: offline 		I have a question. I was looking at the DB and noticed that for the Omahas you made two new classes and two for the conversions to CLAA. I was wondering why you did not use the original class slots and modify them?

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 167
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/23/2012 7:37:59 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I tried to place all the new ship classes in the same area of the Editor so they would be easier to find if we needed to check out our work on them.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Dan Nichols)
Post #: 168
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/23/2012 1:21:05 PM   
Dan Nichols


Posts: 863
Joined: 8/30/2011
Status: offline 		OK, thanks John. After reading Garys threat and playing you mod, I thought I might be interested in making a mod that had no basis in history or reality, but was simply a good game mod.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 169
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/24/2012 9:00:07 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dan Nichols
OK, thanks John. After reading Garys threat and playing you mod, I thought I might be interested in making a mod that had no basis in history or reality, but was simply a good game mod.


Two big problems:

(1)The farther we are from reality, the harder it is to keep things balanced and maintain verissimilitude.

(2)Art issues. Currently we must rely on people kindly providing us help whenever we introduce new ships or planes.

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Dan Nichols)
Post #: 170
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/24/2012 9:10:22 PM   
SuluSea


Posts: 2358
Joined: 11/17/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatR


(2)Art issues. Currently we must rely on people kindly providing us help whenever we introduce new ships or planes.


Pardon guys, I haven't checked your thread in awhile. Are you all in a pinch for a ship or plane??

_____________________________

"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 171
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/24/2012 9:33:39 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SuluSea
Pardon guys, I haven't checked your thread in awhile. Are you all in a pinch for a ship or plane??

G8N has its planside art, but still uses what seesm to be basically Emily planetop...

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to SuluSea)
Post #: 172
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/24/2012 10:22:59 PM   
Dan Nichols


Posts: 863
Joined: 8/30/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatR

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dan Nichols
OK, thanks John. After reading Garys threat and playing you mod, I thought I might be interested in making a mod that had no basis in history or reality, but was simply a good game mod.


Two big problems:

(1)The farther we are from reality, the harder it is to keep things balanced and maintain verissimilitude.

(2)Art issues. Currently we must rely on people kindly providing us help whenever we introduce new ships or planes.


2 is not a problem, I don't expect to use any new artwork. 1 is always a problem and I hope to get things right.

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 173
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/25/2012 3:35:56 AM   
SuluSea


Posts: 2358
Joined: 11/17/2006
Status: offline 		Hi guys, I have a top probably in some need of a little fine tuning on the alpha side. Fill me in how you people want me to do this should I insert the G8N1 into your art myself or would you like me to test the top and send it when it's finished?



Thanks guys!!

< Message edited by SuluSea -- 7/25/2012 3:38:00 AM >

_____________________________

"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer

(in reply to Dan Nichols)
Post #: 174
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/25/2012 2:39:35 PM   
SuluSea


Posts: 2358
Joined: 11/17/2006
Status: offline 		Are you guys asleep at the wheel.

The top is complete. if you all want me to insert it let me know.

The art is attached to the post .

Here's what it looks like in testing disregard the Nell letters



Have fun guys!!

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SuluSea -- 7/25/2012 3:33:00 PM >

_____________________________

"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer

(in reply to SuluSea)
Post #: 175
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/25/2012 9:54:02 PM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline 		Looks nice Sulu.  Love the cloud cover.

(in reply to SuluSea)
Post #: 176
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/26/2012 7:03:50 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Does look quite nice.

Guess we better do this as small update. Does anyone else have issues or have noticed something?

Lets hold off for a day or two and see.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 177
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/26/2012 11:10:21 PM   
Falken


Posts: 242
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: ON, Canada
Status: offline 		Hi John,

Listen, there might be a bug in RA4.6. Playing w/Kitakami, and we are in early December '41 in a PBEM, and I seem to be losing a lot of ships, planes, bases, etc. to him. Must be a bug somewhere..... ;)

Kidding aside though, just wanted to let you know that Kitakami and I are having a real good time w/RA, and I wanted to thank all of you that have been involved in this mod., and helping making it the Mod that a lot of us enjoy playing....

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 178
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/27/2012 12:27:01 AM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Falken

Hi John,

Listen, there might be a bug in RA4.6. Playing w/Kitakami, and we are in early December '41 in a PBEM, and I seem to be losing a lot of ships, planes, bases, etc. to him. Must be a bug somewhere..... ;)

Kidding aside though, just wanted to let you know that Kitakami and I are having a real good time w/RA, and I wanted to thank all of you that have been involved in this mod., and helping making it the Mod that a lot of us enjoy playing....


What he said, with one notable exception... the bug is that I have sunk to FEW ships, not too many ;P

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Falken)
Post #: 179
RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.5 - 7/27/2012 1:22:08 AM   
Dan Nichols


Posts: 863
Joined: 8/30/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Falken

Hi John,

Listen, there might be a bug in RA4.6. Playing w/Kitakami, and we are in early December '41 in a PBEM, and I seem to be losing a lot of ships, planes, bases, etc. to him. Must be a bug somewhere..... ;)

Kidding aside though, just wanted to let you know that Kitakami and I are having a real good time w/RA, and I wanted to thank all of you that have been involved in this mod., and helping making it the Mod that a lot of us enjoy playing....


I totally agree, there is something wrong, my ships sink, my aircraft crash and my ground troops surrender. I hope we can get this fixed.

(in reply to Falken)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Reluctant Admiral 4.1 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.469