Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:20:40 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I got lucky on this carrier raid on Brisbane. I'm looking for a CVE that was reported in port but no luck so far. Maybe Jim has already evacuated it to the east. Or south.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 811
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:24:35 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I got lucky again and hit one of Jim's AK's coming out of SFO. Long periods of waiting and then a few minutes of war.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 812
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:31:23 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Lots of Allied ships congregating in Java. I'm going to have to rally all my subs and see if I can't herd them into a group or something.
I've got a carrier headed this way and I'm repairing some surface ships to head that way in a day or two.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 813
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:38:22 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
The fight for Kuantan isn't over yet. There's still a lot of fight left in the Allied troops left there. I'm thinking of skipping the capture of the
abandoned airfields on the west coast for a follow up mission and just march all the way to Singers to try to cut off the Allied troops not in the Singers area yet.




EDIT: I have no idea what happened to the picture. It was there a minute ago.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/4/2012 5:57:32 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 814
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:40:29 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
The fight for Kuantan isn't over yet. There is still a lot of fight left in the Allied troops still in Kuantan. On the west coast there's some
abandoned airfields that need to be captured and I'm thinking I can leave that for some follow up mission and take the troops near the
west coast all the way to Singers to try to cut off the Allied troops not in the immediate Singers area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 815
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:43:42 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's what happened at Clark Field on the ground. I'm thinking of trying a DA just to see what the result might be.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 816
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:46:38 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I'm taking it easy at Manila because I'm still horribly outnumbered. I've got some troops headed to Manila even as we speak.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 817
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:50:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's what happened at Bandy: I'm going to do a DA tomorrow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 818
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:53:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
This is what happened at Koepang. I think a DA is in order for tomorrow morning.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 819
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/2/2012 7:57:46 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's what happened on the ground at Paley. I think I should let the ground troops rest a bit and maybe do some ship-to-shore
bombardment several times to soften up the resistance.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 820
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/3/2012 4:47:27 PM   
Methuen

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 8/28/2009
From: Durban, South Africa
Status: offline
Problem with bombardment of Palembang is that you'll end up damaging the oil facilities there , you need that 900 oil and 1000 refinery in tact! You're stretched very thinly in the DEI and you're trying to take Malaya and PI at the same time. See if you can round up a few troops at some of the secured bases and ship them to Paley. Historically you are quite a bit ahead as far as invasions are concerned. Also try not to use any engineers when taking a base that has facilities in it - they tend to blow sh!t up unnecessarily If you have good odds against your opponent use just a deliberate attack, using a shock attach also runs the risk of doing damage to facilities (oil, refinery, resources, etc). I can see a number of enemy TF's at Bataan!! Nooo! you've got to make sure he cant get supply to his troops in Manila or Bataan, He'll end up being able to hold out for months if he can get supplies through, worse - he'll be able to build fortifications. Blockage Bataan and keep bombing the port and/or airfields in Manila and Bataan - this has the effect of preventing him from building forts. The game engine works such that if port or airfields are damaged then engineers will repair them first before switching to building forts.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 821
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/3/2012 6:15:55 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brotherbaldrick
Problem with bombardment of Palembang is that you'll end up damaging the oil facilities there , you need that 900 oil and 1000 refinery in tact! You're stretched very thinly in the DEI and you're trying to take Malaya and PI at the same time. See if you can round up a few troops at some of the secured bases and ship them to Paley.

Oh yeah, I totally was forgetting about that. Good catch. No more ship bombardments, gotcha. I've got some troops enroute to Pally even as we speak. They should be there within about a week or so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: brotherbaldrick
Historically you are quite a bit ahead as far as invasions are concerned.

I didn't know that. I'm guessing that's a good thing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: brotherbaldrick
Also try not to use any engineers when taking a base that has facilities in it - they tend to blow sh!t up unnecessarily If you have good odds against your opponent use just a deliberate attack, using a shock attach also runs the risk of doing damage to facilities (oil, refinery, resources, etc).

Thanks for the heads up.......I didn't know that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: brotherbaldrick
I can see a number of enemy TF's at Bataan!! Nooo! you've got to make sure he cant get supply to his troops in Manila or Bataan, He'll end up being able to hold out for months if he can get supplies through, worse - he'll be able to build fortifications.

I've got the harbour blockaded and his ships aren't moving anywhere but from Bataan to Manila and back. Every once in a while he'll try running my blockade and we'll end up having some ships get hit. I've got mines in the blockade hexes so that helps.

quote:

ORIGINAL: brotherbaldrick
Blockage Bataan and keep bombing the port and/or airfields in Manila and Bataan - this has the effect of preventing him from building forts. The game engine works such that if port or airfields are damaged then engineers will repair them first before switching to building forts.

Bomb the ports and airfields to keep the engineers working on them instead of the forts.......good idea. I like that. Thanks. All this advice is greatly appreciated and I'm hoping there is something we can tell Jim about his situation also. Fair is as fair does I guess.

(in reply to Methuen)
Post #: 822
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/3/2012 6:37:02 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's the troops I have headed for Manila. It's the 53rd/C Div and it's about 4,000 men strong. I'm hoping it'll make a difference
when it finally arrives at Manila because I'm sort of in a hurry to grab the city. I figure that if I can grab Manila Jim's PI troops will
be out of supply and will steadily weaken from my bombing and so on. The 53rd/A and 53rd/B are still on the home island and I'm
saving up the PP's to convert them to the 14th Army to be able to load them on transports so as to eventually bring the entire
division to the PI. I figure it'll be needed there to do the final reduction of Bataan.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 823
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/4/2012 12:09:34 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 16, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nice job clearing Paley... Dropped over 600 mines at the start of the war there...

TF 740 encounters mine field at Palembang (48,91)
Japanese Ships
DMS W-13
DMS W-12
DMS W-4
DMS W-3
DMS W-2

71 mines cleared

Luvin my Dutch subs, Minelayers as well as shooters!

TF 42 encounters mine field at Bandjermasin (60,99)
Japanese Ships
PB Bisan Maru #3
PB Busho Maru, Mine hits 1, heavy damage

1 mine cleared

Previously damaged sub got forced to surface... not pretty

Submarine attack near Singkawang at 55,87
Japanese Ships
DD Satsuki
DD Yuzuki

Allied Ships
SS O16, hits 19, and is sunk


Another example of "High and from the sun" attacks...Note: Larry is splitting his fighters altitudes too.


Morning Air attack on Rahaeng , at 58,56
Weather in hex: Heavy rain
Raid spotted at 26 NM, estimated altitude 28,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-27b Nate x 8

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-27b Nate: 3 destroyed

No Allied losses

Aircraft Attacking:
10 x H81-A3 sweeping at 25000 feet

CAP engaged:
1st Sentai with Ki-27b Nate (0 airborne, 2 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters to 10000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 31 minutes
77th Sentai with Ki-27b Nate (1 airborne, 4 on standby, 0 scrambling)
5 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters to 20000.
Raid is overhead


Gaining experience for the bombers, it's taking forever to move Chinese fighters into range to escort em!

Morning Air attack on Hankow , at 85,50
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid spotted at 10 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 3 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-27b Nate x 15

Allied aircraft
I-15-III x 3

No Japanese losses

No Allied losses

CAP engaged:
54th Sentai with Ki-27b Nate (0 airborne, 6 on standby, 0 scrambling)
6 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters to 10000.
Raid is overhead
66th I.F.Chutai with Ki-27b Nate (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 2 being recalled, 4 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 39 minutes

Morning Air attack on 21st Ind.Mixed Brigade, at 68,56 (Hanoi)
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 11 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 3 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-27b Nate x 1

Allied aircraft
SB-III x 3

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
SB-III: 2 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x SB-III bombing from 15000 feet *
Ground Attack: 3 x 100 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
77th Sentai Det B with Ki-27b Nate (1 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000
Raid is overhead


Again Larry is simply overwhelming my ASW forces on the West Coast...

Submarine attack near San Francisco at 216,72
Japanese Ships
SS I-4

Allied Ships
xAK Alabaman, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Hopefully Phillipine Is. will be a slow attrition war- I REFUSE to be sucked into an attack because Larry keeps referring himself as being outmanned and outgunned in Manila!
I keep thinking back to what Michael said about RA defenses and stacking there , I now know what he means about the penalties, Too Late to do anything about it now!
I am ALWAYS willing to take advice in this game, Larry seems to be getting the bulk of it so far... must be his avatar pix, LOL!





_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 824
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/4/2012 5:58:37 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
What does it mean when the HQ unit is listed in RED? Anybody know?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 825
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:10:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I had to finish working on Rob's moves before I could get to Jim's moves but I'm on it now and here's the combat results from 17Jan42:

Here's the resource history for Japan so far:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 826
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:15:46 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's me bumping up the oil refinery at Tokyo by 100 to get more fuel output.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 827
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:22:33 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's aircraft production. According to Tracker I'm losing more Zero's than I'm building so I need to bump up the production of Zero's.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 828
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:28:40 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's the losses for 17Jan42:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 829
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:34:55 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's the strategic map so far:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 830
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:47:44 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
It appears that Jim may be moving some people to the Fiji area. RO-60 fired 2 torpedoes and missed with both. D'oh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 831
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:53:32 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Jim has at least three subs operating near the Japanese Home Islands. They are making pests of themselves.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 832
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 1:57:26 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
There's a fourth sub near Hokkaido. It's a PITA.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 833
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 2:01:04 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Allied sub KIX is inside the harbour at Makassar. What an insult. I need some more mines there asap.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 834
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 3:44:11 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I am aware of the excellent advice above about bombardment of Palembang and I would have turned off this bombardment attack on Palembang except that I had already sent my moves to Jim.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 835
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 3:49:21 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's another good ship-to-shore floating arty strike on Koepang. It's just a matter of time before Koepang falls.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 836
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 3:52:43 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
All my capital ships are busy elsewhere or I would have included some in this delivery of troops to Cebu. Jim's CD guns are making it
all the more expensive.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 837
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 3:56:57 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
It appears that I may have gotten some hits on the SS KIX at Makassar. Maybe he'll go away now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 838
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:02:11 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Earlier the RO-60 skipper missed with two torpedoes and I was thinking of replacing him next time he docked but now he's connecting
with two torps so I'm thinking I'll keep him after all.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 839
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:07:26 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Jim has some P-40's near Davao that still have some bite left. I really need to get some airfield troops into Davao to help get more
Zero's airborne on these raids.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 840
Page:   <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.063