DanielAnsell
Posts: 128
Joined: 5/5/2006 From: United States Status: offline
|
Some while ago, I made a comment or two in the Reluctant Admiral development threads about letting the US have reliable torpedoes as a counterbalance to the various benefits given to the Japanese side by the Reluctant Admiral mod. I say this without intending to smear the work done by the RA team. They've done a lot of research, and I think done some really keen work on that mod, and in its later development, improved it still further. I withdrew from that discussion, after realizing that the idea of using reliable US torpedoes held no interest for the team. As time has gone on, and I read over AARs from both sides,not just of RA matches, but using any of the Japan enhanced scenarios or mods in PBEM play. My sense is that Japan has a number of capabilities in the game that would astonish the actual Japanese command from WWII. Netties making massed and incredibly effective torpedo strikes at more then six hundred miles from base, and the ability to throughout the war build vast numbers of only the most efficient air-frames and man them with well-trained pilots with only a bit of planning ahead being two that stand out. The Allies have some unusual capabilities too, of course. But they can't really increase any facet of their production, or change the order or amount of reinforcement they get, without modding. Looking into the history,and the sheer and unlikely number of errors and oversights that had to occur to allow the situation with US torpedoes to come about, it seems as least as likely that at some point it would have been spotted and corrected, as it is that the various Japanese enhancements given by scenarios and mods would have happened. (Whew! Long sentence!) The point I am making, and asking for comment on, is this: Using reliable US torpedoes is a valid and historically viable counterbalance to the enhanced Japanese capabilities even the 'historical' scenarios provide, and even more so in a 'Japan enhanced' scenario.
|