JeffroK
Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote:
ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur correct Warspite1 See post 3030 Yeah, Dan had it mostly correct though the 1st AIF didnt rename its units. I'll have a check but I believe the units were renamed to distinguish them from the AMF units which remained in place. from TO BENGAZHI http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/records/awmohww2/army/vol1/awmohww2-army-vol1-ch2.pdf Page51 This was done by following closely the organisation of th e 1st Division of the First A .I .F. Thus the 16th Brigade, like the 1st Brigade of 1914, was to consist of four battalions raised in N .S.W., the 2/1st, the 2/2nd, 2/3rd and 2/4th, the prefix 2/ distinguishing them from the 1st , 2nd, 3rd and 4th Battalions, which were among the N .S.W. battalion s of the militia and to which belonged the Battle Honours of the corresponding units of the old A .I .F . 4 The 17th Brigade (2/5th, 2/6th, 2/7th and 2/8th Battalions) was to be recruited in Victoria. In the 18th Brigade, the 2/9th Battalion and two companies of the 2/12th were to b e recruited in Queensland, the 2/10th in South Australia, the 2/11th i n Western Australia and the remainder of the 2/12th in Tasmania . 5 The recruiting of the reconnaissance regiment, the artillery and other arm s were allotted similarly among the States, an unwieldy procedure but one which local sentiment demanded .
< Message edited by JeffK -- 6/16/2012 5:56:51 AM >
_____________________________
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
|