Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Fulkerson vs. Moo

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs. Moo Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fulkerson vs. Moo - 9/30/2012 2:02:59 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Here's the next post I make......... it's got a date/time almost 5 weeks later. This is that many hits in about 5 weeks. Thanks all you guys.


Larry,
Your math is a little off, unless I'm reading this wrong...
May is month 5 September is month 9. I'm roughly figuring 4 weeks per month and we are probably over 16 weeks not 5! But I'm still pretty awed by the numbers anyway!


_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1411
RE: Fulkerson vs. Moo - 9/30/2012 2:34:50 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807


quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Here's the next post I make......... it's got a date/time almost 5 weeks later. This is that many hits in about 5 weeks. Thanks all you guys.


Larry,
Your math is a little off, unless I'm reading this wrong...
May is month 5 September is month 9. I'm roughly figuring 4 weeks per month and we are probably over 16 weeks not 5! But I'm still pretty awed by the numbers anyway!


Of course you're right.....I don't know what I was thinking. That'll make it about 90 hits per day.........still a respectable figure.

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/1/2012 12:52:21 AM >


_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 1412
RE: Fulkerson vs. Moo - 9/30/2012 3:17:43 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Feb 05, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Larry told me in the e-mail CL Sumatra's being a pest... The Dutchmen couldn't be happier...

Night Time Surface Combat, near Soerabaja at 56,102, Range 6,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
CVE Hosho
CVE Taiyo
DD Asashio
DD Oshio

Allied Ships
CL Sumatra, Shell hits 1

What I've haven't figured out - is the 1 hit each time or is it a report of what happened to it so far?

Day Time Surface Combat, near Soerabaja at 56,103, Range 9,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
PB Senyo Maru, Shell hits 24, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CL Sumatra, Shell hits 1


Day Time Surface Combat, near Soerabaja at 56,102, Range 14,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
PB Kantori Maru, Shell hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage
AV Sanyo Maru, Shell hits 10, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied Ships
CL Sumatra, Shell hits 1


"We get by with a little help from our friends..."

Submarine attack near Soerabaja at 56,101
Japanese Ships
AV Sanyo Maru, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS KXV

A couple of rainouts keep this one from getting interesting - too bad Sumatra didnt Kamikaze them!

Day Time Surface Combat, near Soerabaja at 56,102, Range 21,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
CVE Hosho
CVE Taiyo
DD Asashio
DD Oshio

Allied Ships
CL Sumatra


Day Time Surface Combat, near Soerabaja at 56,102, Range 21,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
CVE Hosho
CVE Taiyo
DD Asashio
DD Oshio

Allied Ships
CL Sumatra


Meanwhile Larry is STILL hammering Cebu, methinks I might have annoyed him here...

Night Naval bombardment of Cebu at 80,86 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Haruna
CA Aoba
CA Myoko
CA Chokai
CL Abukuma
CL Yura
CL Jintsu
DD Karii
DD Arashio
DD Hamakaze


Allied ground losses:
243 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 8 destroyed, 22 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 14 (4 destroyed, 10 disabled)


Manpower hits 5
Fires 600
Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 5
Port hits 6

This isn't going to improve his mood... EDIT: I found a pix of Japan's 24cm howitzer...




Amphibious Assault at Cebu (80,86)
TF 408 troops unloading over beach at Cebu, 80,86

24cm T45 Howitzer lost from landing craft during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer lost in surf during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer dropped into water during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer lost overboard during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer lost in surf during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer lost overboard during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer dropped into water during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer dropped into water during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer lost in surf during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer lost in surf during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer lost from landing craft during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2
24cm T45 Howitzer accidentally lost during unload of 1st Hvy.Artillery Rgt /2



Back on Port Moresby - A warm welcome is given to ships arriving to the party...

Pre-Invasion action off Port Moresby (98,130) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force
52 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
xAK Kosei Maru, Shell hits 2, on fire
xAK Liverpool Maru

Amphibious Assault at Port Moresby (98,130)
TF 529 troops unloading over beach at Port Moresby, 98,130

Invasion Support action off Port Moresby (98,130)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force
33 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
xAK Liverpool Maru
xAK Kosei Maru, Shell hits 12, heavy fires, heavy damage


Invasion Support action off Port Moresby (98,130)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force
37 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
xAK Liverpool Maru, Shell hits 12, on fire, heavy damage

Larry of course brings some fireworks to the party too...

Morning Air attack on Port Moresby Coastal Gun Battalion, at 98,130 (Port Moresby)
Weather in hex: Light rain
Raid detected at 81 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 28 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 7
G4M1 Betty x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 15000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking 49th Australian Battalion ...
Also attacking Port Moresby Coastal Gun Battalion ...


Finally Port Moresby's ground combat still brings good news...


Ground combat at Port Moresby (98,130)
Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 726 troops, 74 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 131
Defending force 7838 troops, 68 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 173

Assaulting units:
144th Infantry Regiment
1st Sasebo Assault/A Division
5th Mortar Battalion
3rd Mortar Battalion
41st Field AA Battalion

Defending units:
53rd Australian Battalion
39th Australian Battalion
49th Australian Battalion
Port Moresby Coastal Gun Battalion
D Coy/NG Rifles
Torres Strait Battalion
Port Moresby Brigade
14th RAAF Base Force
15th RAAF Base Force


Ground combat at Port Moresby (98,130)
Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 4103 troops, 38 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 173
Defending force 5969 troops, 167 guns, 4 vehicles, Assault Value = 131

Japanese ground losses:
242 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 18 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 9 (1 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
16 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
D Coy/NG Rifles
Port Moresby Coastal Gun Battalion
39th Australian Battalion
Torres Strait Battalion
49th Australian Battalion
53rd Australian Battalion
Port Moresby Brigade
14th RAAF Base Force
15th RAAF Base Force

Defending units:
144th Infantry Regiment
1st Sasebo Assault/A Division
3rd Mortar Battalion
5th Mortar Battalion
41st Field AA Battalion



And in this corner of the world, I figure Kuantan is a good a place to slaughter my trapped troops...

Morning Air attack on 22nd Indian Brigade, at 51,80 , near Kuantan
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid spotted at 38 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 17
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 17

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
28 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
17 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

Well I didnt expect this result considering the details BUT -"I like it like that!"

Ground combat at 51,80 (near Kuantan)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 3050 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 65
Defending force 3290 troops, 16 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 78

Japanese adjusted assault: 3

Allied adjusted defense: 79

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 26

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
496 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 57 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
23 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled


Assaulting units:
66th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
8th Indian Brigade
1st Hyderabad Battalion
22nd Indian Brigade
1st ISF Base Force


And to close out our show, Orphan Annie has nothing to sing about... Thats all for tonight, folks!



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moore4807 -- 9/30/2012 3:26:03 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1413
RE: Computer hacked! - 9/30/2012 3:34:04 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807

witpqs,

Yes you just hit a nerve - aren't the boot sectors in the CMD line and date changed is the last thing in the line?

Thats what I liked about Symantec - it records any changes to both the programs and the CMD/.exe files. I was able to track down the suspicious files pretty quickly. Once the backup files from the 23rd were restored, the two files stuck out.

The biggest challenge was getting into the Windows Vista. Safe mode didn't work because the hacker somehow got the setup files and the load wasn't completing before the screen showed up.

I'm pretty beat and I am having trouble being clear here -even to myself... LOL If I dont make sense I apologize, I'll try again tomorrow.
Jim


I have no idea. I certainly am not saying that the hack you got hit with did those things, just making sure you know they are possibilities in case that helps you, either in this instance or a future one. Heck, it's even been shown they can hide viruses in the flash memory on components like the video card - crikey! I've not heard of that being done in the wild yet.

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 1414
RE: Computer hacked! - 9/30/2012 4:01:05 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
Thanks again witpqs,

I understand your point and appreciate it. I went to bed around 1:30a after getting both turns done, then rechecking everything.

I got up at 8:30a and reread everything (and did Symantec customer survey questionaire...) It all seems OK... so far. what bothers me is that we never found the delivery vehicle. I was in my e-mail when the site hit me, but didn't have any open e-mails and e-mail scanning is on for both antiviruses. Maybe it was a time -bomb hack?

We did find 2 files in the exe.startup which we copied to Symantec and then deleted. Thats what makes your observation so unsettling and probably accurate too!

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1415
RE: Computer hacked! - 9/30/2012 4:18:57 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807

Thanks again witpqs,

I understand your point and appreciate it. I went to bed around 1:30a after getting both turns done, then rechecking everything.

I got up at 8:30a and reread everything (and did Symantec customer survey questionaire...) It all seems OK... so far. what bothers me is that we never found the delivery vehicle. I was in my e-mail when the site hit me, but didn't have any open e-mails and e-mail scanning is on for both antiviruses. Maybe it was a time -bomb hack?

We did find 2 files in the exe.startup which we copied to Symantec and then deleted. Thats what makes your observation so unsettling and probably accurate too!

It's hard to say. For sure check that all the software on your PC that either can be accessed directly from the Internet or that you use with the Internet in any way is fully patched (up to date). There is a category of exploits called 'drive-by exploits' wherein you merely visit a web site - just load a page - and they can hack you. Like many hacks those depend on some flaw/weakness in the software involved (browser, etc.). Like others these can be undiscovered by the good guys ('zero-day'). But the place to start is to make certain that all your stuff is up to date. BTW the web sites involved in drive-bys are often innocent in that they were hacked and the owners/operators are unaware of the infection.

There are enormous numbers of PCs that get infected because various software (including the OS) was never updated. Literally viruses from a decade ago still infect machines out there. It's amazing but true. For someone like you who is careful, the issue is to stay as current as possible so that you benefit from all the fixes that have been made.

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 1416
RE: Computer hacked! - 9/30/2012 4:35:14 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
Witpqs

Very true statements, Yes I do, Yes I did, Yes I did again last night!

I've done everything I can think of, it will have to play itself out - if it happens again I will wipe the drive and restore from backup.

Thanks for everything!

Edit: I am posting a copy of PC Pitstops Exterminate scan - it doesnt find any major malware problems either.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moore4807 -- 9/30/2012 5:05:07 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1417
RE: Computer hacked! - 9/30/2012 5:14:24 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
Ingtar,

I'm sorry for not responding to you last night, I didnt understand what you were speaking of...

I'm much more awake now and will look into this company, thanks for posting!

Jim

_____________________________


(in reply to Ingtar)
Post #: 1418
RE: Computer hacked! - 9/30/2012 5:39:59 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807

Ingtar,

I'm sorry for not responding to you last night, I didnt understand what you were speaking of...

I'm much more awake now and will look into this company, thanks for posting!

Jim

NOD-32 is also the product I use.

eset.com

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 1419
RE: Computer hacked! - 9/30/2012 11:57:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I'm still going through my moves for Rob's game but I've run into a situation where it might be of interest to Jim and / or my readers:
I've run a TF up to adjacent to the target hex and I've turned on "full speed" setting so as to get as much troops and supplies on the
beach and get the ships out of gun range as soon as possible so that they don't get shot at at all, if possible and I intend to turn it
back to missiion speed after the ships are headed out of immediate danger, sometime next turn perhaps or a soon subsequent turn.
I'll have to keep these guys in mind to switch the speed setting ( and I can't forget to switch the speed for very long because these guys are out where the Allied subs roam ) so I'll have to reconnect him w/ his escort at the same time as soon as possible after the unload.

EDIT: Sound Track for this next paragraph...click this line

This is the first time I've tried this technique and I don't remember any human AAR opponent trying this, full-speeding the ships this way
during the emergency unload across the beach during the deep of night working under searchlight(s) and the crash of the surf is the
loudest noise allowed with the itchy feeling you get when the cross-hairs reach the base of your throat on the back-side of your head
Again And again, fighting down urges to run and hide to survive.Because deep down inside you sometimes feel like you're not as
good as the next man and your number might come up real soon now.....living each day as if it were your last and maybe after your
dead you might know the truth at last. All the big bigger and biggest questions get answered. Maybe. Maybe not.........maybe I'll just
be dead.

That kind of situation.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/1/2012 12:54:15 AM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1420
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 12:20:13 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
This is the arrangement as it is now: I've split off the escort because he's 11 knots max and the transports are something like 17 knots
so it made sense to take him off for now and park him along the return path of the TF so as to start to follow and then re-join the
transports after the emergency drop-off. First escort, the PB, then the escortee's.

The sound track for this next paragraph...click this line

One act into a three-act play at it were. Part of the eternal dance of war. Participants in a process that's been going on for as long as
there was a different tribe. As if disease, poverty, catastrophic desolation as a daily possibility, as if these aren't enough to distroy
human society there was war to cap it off. Take care of the rest as it were. No one gets a free ride....it's tough for everybody. A part of
reality we'd rather not know about all day long everyday. That's why alcohol was invented We discovered that it gave you a different
ride. Took some of the pain away for awhile. And we've been looking for escapes as long as there have been people. Just to exist has it's own kind of pain when you actually stop to figure it all out. Something having to do with Compassion and Empthy and being
good. There are some parts about truth that are better not known. Until you're ready to handle the responsibility that comes with just
knowing something that's true. If there's something about the situation that might engender pain in another, it's often up to you to
Act upon that knowledge to prevent that pain. To actually do something. Not knowing what to do is frustrating. It's trying to do some-
thing unpopular that is really hard. Your efforts are resisted and ridiculed and not even considered. At least you tried.

That kind of situation.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/1/2012 12:46:41 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1421
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 1:25:37 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Sound track for this particular post ...click this line

I'm going through my moves for Rob's game still but it just occured to me that I've lived long enough now to see how it might be possible
for me to be a resurrected reincarnate person and could have been the captain of the ship depicted in this image. Or maybe I've
lived different lives many times and now I'm pretending to be some old guy in a trailer park on the outskirts of Tucson playing WITP-AE
and thinking about ship boat captains.

That kind of situation




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1422
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 4:59:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Okie dokie.......it's 08:50 Monday 10-01-2012 and I'm finally done with my moves for Rob and I'm laying into my moves for Jim:
Here's the latest combat results:

This is the first of several encounters that CL Sumatra has with Jap ships. This picture is the morning after the night-time encounter
but you get the point.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/1/2012 5:19:02 PM >


_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1423
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 5:05:15 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Allied sub SS K1X is having a bad day.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1424
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 5:08:37 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Jim likes to get his subs into my major shipping lanes and troll there for ships. I finally got a hit on one of his subs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1425
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 5:13:40 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I did a little night-time bombardment of Cebu and most of the casualties that resulted were non-combat related. D'oh. I'll have to keep
trying I guess.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1426
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 5:20:02 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's some action that happened at the Port Moresby beach-head.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1427
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 5:23:25 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Most of my heavier guns are up in the Cebu area and unavailable. I'm hoping I can neutralize the Samatra w/ the carriers. I've got my
fingers crossed.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1428
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 5:26:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
And the Sumatra is sweeping the sea. I really need a heavy gun in the Java Sea right about now. I got overconfident again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1429
RE: Computer hacked! - 10/1/2012 5:32:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
It appears that operation SKIDDING CAR Two is over because the Allied planes appear to be gone from Wenchow. So the Jap planes
can concentrate on some other target.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1430
5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 5:46:33 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's another raid from operation BEAT DOWN and it's going slowly but surely.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1431
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 5:55:19 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's another raid by the Japs and there was only one damaged plane but there was no Allied damage listed which leads me to
believe that there was none and maybe these raids are a waste. But on the other hand they buck up the morale of the men down
there so since I'm not losing very many planes I'll keep going with the raids to help the men on the ground. Plus it's good training for
the pilots.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1432
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 6:10:28 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's another one of those raids on the 22nd Indian Brigade that nets a few ground soldiers and damages a plane or two and they
are dropping those 500 lb hard-bombs instead of the daisy cutters that might do some good. But the ground commander is thankful
for the help he IS getting after all, and he says to the commander of the flight "....Wow You don't know all the good you're doing".
To which the pilot had to agree......he really DIDN'T know all the good he was doing.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/1/2012 6:11:22 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1433
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 6:22:48 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's where a flight of 9 Lilly's tried to raid the home base ( it appears ) of the AVG. They got chewed up pretty good. I think I'll
stand them down for a day or two to let them recover from this drama. A day off as it were.

EDIT: I found one unit of Lilly's that were already on stand-down...so I assigned them a ground mission instead because their
morale was high and the fatigue hadn't even hit the lowest peg on the gauge yet.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/1/2012 6:28:06 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1434
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 6:41:46 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
And then there was a ground attack by some Sonia's at Manila. They had to contend with some P-40's and got chewed up but not
so badly. And then they bombed from 5,000 feet. No Allied damage was listed so I guess there was none. D'oh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1435
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 6:47:49 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
And then some 10 Allied bombers attacked me and I shot down 2 of them. About 6 were damaged I'm guessing.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/1/2012 6:48:01 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1436
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 6:58:57 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Location code named Mole Man got hit again. I've finally decided that Mole Man needs some Nate's for CAP and I've assigned about
40 of them for that duty. I've got some AF dudes on the road and they should be there within a week I'm hoping some of those Nates
will still be flyable at the end of that week. If not those AF dudes will have some workload on their hands. I may have to send a 2nd
AF dudes unit just in case.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1437
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 7:04:13 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
And then one of my ground units headed south to Singapore got attacked by some Allied planes and my CAP shot down some of them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1438
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 7:08:19 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
And then I tried another raid on the AVG base in China and the losses weren't so bad. Still not enough damage done to have paid so
much for the mission.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1439
RE: 5Feb42 combat results: - 10/1/2012 7:11:00 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
An that afternoon KIX is still having a bad day.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1440
Page:   <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs. Moo Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

5.844