Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Panthers in the Fog >> RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/22/2012 8:00:10 AM   
WoT

 

Posts: 83
Joined: 11/21/2012
Status: offline 		see, each is different



< Message edited by WoT -- 11/22/2012 8:01:28 AM >

(in reply to WoT)
Post #: 31
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/22/2012 8:21:56 AM   
MikeGER

 

Posts: 379
Joined: 2/1/2011
Status: offline 		sure !
but its still a Close Combat sim, not a Close Gardening sim.

its not a problem to generate trees that are different with special software routines build in , even on the fly every new game,
but would you have liked to pay 400$ instead of 40$ to get that level of detail ?
...
as a work-around the map (overlay) is just a 'picture' and can be modded
(but the overlay should still fit to the underlaying grid of 'object types' of course)

< Message edited by MikeGER -- 11/22/2012 8:23:29 AM >

(in reply to WoT)
Post #: 32
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/22/2012 8:30:01 AM   
WoT

 

Posts: 83
Joined: 11/21/2012
Status: offline 		It's called immersion... cookie cutters take away the immersion.




Same with tanks not travelling where they should, but a bigger problem than cookie cutter trees.

< Message edited by WoT -- 11/22/2012 8:33:36 AM >

(in reply to MikeGER)
Post #: 33
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/22/2012 8:43:20 AM   
MikeGER

 

Posts: 379
Joined: 2/1/2011
Status: offline 		sure thing!

i hope Matrix had put most of the 'unseen' effort in AI routines, then in graphics, ...well, we are here to find that out
(i prefer a non-immersion-killing behavoir of pixel troops, over a few graphic slack-offs)

(in reply to WoT)
Post #: 34
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/22/2012 12:04:06 PM   
Stwa


Posts: 484
Joined: 8/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Steve McClaire


quote:

ORIGINAL: PKH

The problem I have with reverse, is that after it is done and the tank has come to a stop, it will usually turn around 180 degrees unless given a defend/ambush order.


Can you give me an example of the sort of order you're giving that's causing the vehicles to turn around at the end?



I see it in CCMT some times. When a vehicle (tanks included), finish their move (any move). Sometimes they feel the need to face in a direction that I assume the vehicle commander feels is important. (could be up to 180 degrees)

Most of the time, it is not the facing I would prefer for the vehicle, so it requires that I re-position it with a defend or ambush order as PKH mentioned.

I use this alot so a tank doesn't get shot in its rear or side.

And yes, players should use Move Fast and Move Covert (CCMT commands), for short distance moves forward and backward that usually ALWAYS follow the blue line to the waypoint.

(in reply to SteveMcClaire)
Post #: 35
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/22/2012 12:08:46 PM   
Stwa


Posts: 484
Joined: 8/12/2005
Status: offline 		Is it possible for any player or maybe even Matrix to start a screenshot thread for this game?

I would like to see more pics than what is persented on the product page.

(in reply to Stwa)
Post #: 36
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/22/2012 7:18:01 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Yep... that's basically what I'd figured.

Back to AP and DCCB :)

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to MikeAP)
Post #: 37
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/23/2012 8:43:36 AM   
MikeGER

 

Posts: 379
Joined: 2/1/2011
Status: offline 		in the mean time i had found time to run some more 'Sherman driving tests' on that La Roche map area (my screenshot)

Sorry, its NOT a reaction to threats!

immersion speak on*

...it looks like there is some disturbance in the soil on that dirt road (not visible from so far above) that the Tankers think it could be a hastily buried AT mine. They play it save, and so they decide to circumvent that piece of road

immersion speak off*

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 38
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/23/2012 10:31:12 PM   
Rosseau

 

Posts: 2757
Joined: 9/13/2009
Status: offline 		My brain and eye functions have deteriorated significantly since the intro of CoI

So I barely notice these pathing issues. I do notice PitF has come a loooong way from CoI. Good job.

(in reply to MikeGER)
Post #: 39
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/24/2012 12:57:59 AM   
xe5

 

Posts: 783
Joined: 5/3/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Emir Agic
For example, when on defense, is AI prone to put squads in the middle of open terrain when there are buildings nearby? When on attack, does he just rush his units towards objectives via shortest (and possibly deadleist) route or it is paying more attention to cover, flanks etc.?

The AI makes better use of cover and concealment (bldgs & hedges) prior to and during battle. If caught in the open it will seek to go into Ambush mode where its soldier sprites are replaced by a unit icon which then gradually fades from view, much like CC1's 'ghost soldiers'. Firing at enemy icons is treated as area fire rather than targeted fire and is consideraby less effective.

It doesnt recognize and avoid kill zones but also doesnt always attack via the most direct approach. It is actually most effective when it rushes an attack. AI troops sometimes seem to have a Fast+ speed similar to fleeing crews. Much preferable to the old crawl-of-death.

The AI is noticeably fatser at spotting and suppressing enemy units using targeted (red dot) fire. US players will quickly come to loathe the sound of MG42s as it means some team is getting chewed up.

(in reply to Emx77)
Post #: 40
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/24/2012 2:41:11 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xe5

quote:

ORIGINAL: Emir Agic
For example, when on defense, is AI prone to put squads in the middle of open terrain when there are buildings nearby? When on attack, does he just rush his units towards objectives via shortest (and possibly deadleist) route or it is paying more attention to cover, flanks etc.?

The AI makes better use of cover and concealment (bldgs & hedges) prior to and during battle. If caught in the open it will seek to go into Ambush mode where its soldier sprites are replaced by a unit icon which then gradually fades from view, much like CC1's 'ghost soldiers'. Firing at enemy icons is treated as area fire rather than targeted fire and is consideraby less effective.

It doesnt recognize and avoid kill zones but also doesnt always attack via the most direct approach. It is actually most effective when it rushes an attack. AI troops sometimes seem to have a Fast+ speed similar to fleeing crews. Much preferable to the old crawl-of-death.

The AI is noticeably fatser at spotting and suppressing enemy units using targeted (red dot) fire. US players will quickly come to loathe the sound of MG42s as it means some team is getting chewed up.


OK... with the mix of good and bad comments I guess I need to come off the fence and play the game myself. Purchasing it now.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to xe5)
Post #: 41
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/24/2012 4:55:01 PM   
Tejszd

 

Posts: 3437
Joined: 11/17/2007
Status: offline 		redmarkus4 probably is best. Reality is usually between the more extreme examples and or views expressed. It will be CC you are buying so some of the same old quirks, some small tweaks and a couple big changes (in PiTF I would say these are the big changes; the new explosions/maps at 32bit, max. 21 teams/vehicles per side in battle, carrying men and towing guns, and the mortar changes.)

< Message edited by Tejszd -- 11/30/2012 4:31:34 PM >

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 42
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/30/2012 3:12:08 PM   
Beag

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 5/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4

OK... with the mix of good and bad comments I guess I need to come off the fence and play the game myself. Purchasing it now.


By all means please post your feedback on the AI, information from veterans is certainly greatly appreciated by privates considering to buy such games.

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 43
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/30/2012 7:13:51 PM   
blazej

 

Posts: 76
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		Hi,

In my opinion, the offensive AI is as bad as ever. As soon as I started playing, I remembered why I found a human opponent the last time around - the AI is incapable of mounting an efficient attack, even with far superior firepower :)

In the scenario I was playing, Allies had several tanks (Germans had none to speak of) and infantry squads, and yet failed to make any significant gains even though many of my units were deployed towards the rear. The tanks were driving aimlessly, and infantry didn't try to secure important locations (such as buildings). I regretted having deployed so many units in the rear because I believe I had a shot at pushing the Allies off the map entirely. Without armor, mind you :)

Now I will have to pick an operation where I will be attacking. It should make for a more entertaining play :) (because the defensive AI is actually very good in CC).

On the strategic level, the AI also does weird things. I selected one of the operations (again, I was playing as Germany), and the first thing the Allied AI did was to move away from the Hill 314 map... This seemed so bizarre to me that I immediately went back and selected a different operation :)

Best,
Michal

< Message edited by blazej -- 11/30/2012 7:14:32 PM >

(in reply to Beag)
Post #: 44
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/30/2012 9:57:28 PM   
Southernland


Posts: 2283
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		I've just fought a battle in the GC with a depleted german recce unit vz a US armoured unit. The US took half the map in a 15 minute battle loosing a wolverine and an HMC and a few infantry units while I lost two A/Cs, three squads and a Pak40, the AI brought down artillary strike on one of my positions so it is able to do some things right.

(in reply to blazej)
Post #: 45
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 11/30/2012 10:28:02 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Beag


quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4

OK... with the mix of good and bad comments I guess I need to come off the fence and play the game myself. Purchasing it now.


By all means please post your feedback on the AI, information from veterans is certainly greatly appreciated by privates considering to buy such games.


:) Well, 'Veteran' just means I post here a lot, not that I'm any good with the games themselves!

Anyway, it's been a while since I played CC and this title has been fun so far. Sure, the AI isn't perfect and you can probably take advantage of it big time, if you want to, but the game is solid, graphically appealing and has many good features.

If you like CC, or any game of this type, I am sure you won't regret buying this new release. I also expect it to become the foundation for future mods, which would be a good thing.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Beag)
Post #: 46
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/3/2012 6:53:27 AM   
BigKev

 

Posts: 20
Joined: 11/21/2012
Status: offline 		I have played ~ 30 battles (German and American), and I have seen several instances where tanks will not follows the straight line movement commanded by way point(s). They seem to veer off at least slightly, about 30% of the time, usually for no apparent reason (not under attack). This Does not ofent lead to unit loss due to enamy fire - but it often leads to America, armor becoming "tracked" (immobile). I would say on any given battle, 30% to 50% of my American armor wanders off into the hedges and becomes immobile. Very frustrating.

Is there any way for the devs to fix this?

P.S. If you really baby sit a unit, sometimes this wondering can be avoided... But this becomes tedious - and there are 20 other units to watch over...


(in reply to WoT)
Post #: 47
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/3/2012 7:05:22 AM   
SteveMcClaire

 

Posts: 4472
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		The path finding is something I am looking at for a pending update, yes.  There are some issues with how the underlying terrain is represented in the game which make narrow 'corridors', like roads lined with hedgerows or trees, a problem for the path finder.

(in reply to BigKev)
Post #: 48
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/3/2012 3:01:24 PM   
blazej

 

Posts: 76
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		OK, I'll give it another shot, then :)

Best,
Michal

(in reply to Southernland)
Post #: 49
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/3/2012 9:37:17 PM   
JiminyJickers


Posts: 290
Joined: 10/4/2011
From: New Zealand
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Steve McClaire

The path finding is something I am looking at for a pending update, yes.  There are some issues with how the underlying terrain is represented in the game which make narrow 'corridors', like roads lined with hedgerows or trees, a problem for the path finder.



That is good to hear. I'm waiting for this to be sorted before I'm willing to take the plunge.

(in reply to SteveMcClaire)
Post #: 50
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/3/2012 10:59:35 PM   
Beag

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 5/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blazej

Hi,

In my opinion, the offensive AI is as bad as ever. As soon as I started playing, I remembered why I found a human opponent the last time around - the AI is incapable of mounting an efficient attack, even with far superior firepower :)



If you think CC games have bad AI, I have three words for you:

Empire Total War

< Message edited by Beag -- 12/3/2012 11:00:31 PM >

(in reply to blazej)
Post #: 51
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/4/2012 4:17:14 AM   
Southernland


Posts: 2283
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JiminyJickers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Steve McClaire

The path finding is something I am looking at for a pending update, yes.  There are some issues with how the underlying terrain is represented in the game which make narrow 'corridors', like roads lined with hedgerows or trees, a problem for the path finder.



That is good to hear. I'm waiting for this to be sorted before I'm willing to take the plunge.



Do it before the kiwi dollar drops

(in reply to JiminyJickers)
Post #: 52
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/4/2012 8:55:32 PM   
JiminyJickers


Posts: 290
Joined: 10/4/2011
From: New Zealand
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Southern_land
Do it before the kiwi dollar drops


Haha, you may be right.

(in reply to Southernland)
Post #: 53
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/4/2012 9:59:06 PM   
oldbaldwargamer

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 12/4/2012
Status: offline 		Hello,

I bought this as I played CC years and years ago.

I played the scenario GER. Played first as the Alies and had no problem taking victory points and scoring a minor victory. Played then as the Germans and figured the Allies would come at me at least a little bit like I had but they did not...I took mostly the same victory hexes without much opposition and won that with a major victory. It was a very boring scenario as the enemy didnt do much, especially as the allies, when I expected a lot more.

Is there a recomendation for a scenario(s) which will be a lot harder against the AI? I'm assuming where the AI will be on the defensive. I really need some decent opposition and that scenario was not really too exciting.

Thanks!

< Message edited by oldbaldwargamer -- 12/4/2012 10:00:42 PM >

(in reply to JiminyJickers)
Post #: 54
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/4/2012 11:27:42 PM   
Reboot


Posts: 759
Joined: 12/18/2007
Status: offline 		Some ways I create challenge against the ai:

Mission settings - ai as recruit player as elite, full realism, and battle ends when morale gets too low
Deployment - play my units as they are deployed by the computer, no taking cover and better positions before I hit Begin
Reduce my number of units

(in reply to oldbaldwargamer)
Post #: 55
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/5/2012 6:46:58 AM   
oldbaldwargamer

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 12/4/2012
Status: offline 		Well, I played Hill 314 as the axis. Took out victory hexes with no problems. Made the Allies Elite and mine average. It was just a slow plodding boring game. Minor axis victory.

I remember playing CC and there were tense hard fought battles with lots of armor and men and really working on placements and having a fun time but sometimes a tough time of it. This seems totally different from what I remember....maybe I'd be better off buying one of the remakes of the older ones.....just not very fun yet.

(in reply to Reboot)
Post #: 56
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/5/2012 7:25:07 AM   
Pvt_Grunt

 

Posts: 327
Joined: 2/13/2007
From: Frankston Victoria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: oldbaldwargamer

Well, I played Hill 314 as the axis. Took out victory hexes with no problems. Made the Allies Elite and mine average. It was just a slow plodding boring game. Minor axis victory.

If you are Germans you need to make Allies RECRUIT to give them more / better units. If you make them ELITE they get less units.
Also as Reboot says make yourself ELITE to have less units / higher difficulty.

_____________________________


(in reply to oldbaldwargamer)
Post #: 57
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/5/2012 4:47:43 PM   
oldbaldwargamer

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 12/4/2012
Status: offline 		Oh OK...figured Elite would be easier against a recruit A.I....very odd.

I'll try again tonight! Thanks.

(in reply to Pvt_Grunt)
Post #: 58
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/5/2012 10:34:27 PM   
Reboot


Posts: 759
Joined: 12/18/2007
Status: offline 		try the other stuff too and you'll get a fight

(bye the bye, how old is old? 61 here, organized wargaming since early 60's, and digital since CC2 came out)

(in reply to oldbaldwargamer)
Post #: 59
RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? - 12/6/2012 5:05:06 PM   
oldbaldwargamer

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 12/4/2012
Status: offline 		Well...that worked...a lot more action.

One thing I dont like is when I have the victory conditions based on morale...I win the morale fight but it says the other side is a major or minor victor because they have more victory hexes....I won the darn morale condition, I should be the victor!

I'm not old..yet...but my body from gout and thyroid problems feels a lot older than I am...turning 50 in 3 months...body, turning 75 tomorrow!

Played board wargames in my teens and computer wargames since college...will never stop!

(in reply to Reboot)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Panthers in the Fog >> RE: Strategic and Tactical AI - How good is it? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.719