Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/16/2012 10:46:43 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Here you go




Attachment (1)

(in reply to HITMAN202)
Post #: 91
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/16/2012 10:47:29 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Losses




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 92
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/16/2012 10:49:07 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		I don't have the number of divs destroyed, but it's a lot, obviously. There have been quite a few pockets - that's why my OOB is so low and Blubel still has so much ground to cover. I'll get them back, though, which is good for AP expenditure.

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 93
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/16/2012 11:11:02 PM   
HITMAN202


Posts: 714
Joined: 11/10/2011
Status: offline 		Yea the 2.2 mil is impressive. You did fight forward. Pelton and I separately played a dude Cyclops, who fought forward and lost quickly. (pelton has an AAR) He played well in holding me back in my eastward push, but loss ++ 4 mil lost by the 12=13 th turn !!!!. This was prior to the Soviets learning to use RESERVE MODE in D. I'm sure he is a dangerous Soviet opponenet now. But the game in '41 is so different than 6 months ago.

You are playing with fire !!!

My assessment still is your ad. But 2.2 mill ??? At least 4-500,000 more than it shoud be looking at other (and my) active server games.

But his ++ 314,000 losses are also a lot.



_____________________________

WITE is a good addiction with no cure.

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 94
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/17/2012 12:09:53 AM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Yes, it's in the balance. I'm hoping that if I can hold on to a good number of manpower I can recruit men fairly quickly.

(in reply to HITMAN202)
Post #: 95
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/18/2012 8:11:02 PM   
hugh04

 

Posts: 165
Joined: 9/14/2011
Status: offline 		I checked my progress on turn 10 in an AAR I previously posted (Sledgehammer). I had inflicted 1.9 mill casualties on the soviet. You have sufferred 2.2 million but are in a geograpically superior position. However, you are weak enough that if your opponent can grind you down bad things can happen. Be careful my friend.

If you are opening turns and seeing 30+ routed soviets, I would consider retreating faster.

Vandev

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 96
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/18/2012 9:25:09 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		I agree, but I think the thing about fighting forward is that it is risky, and you will certainly suffer more casualties, but it does make for a better game, which is not a minor consideration given the length of time it takes to play. But the real point is that those 300,000 digital soldiers you sacrifice in the fighting are, or may prove to be, an investment that will be repaid later from the cities you didn't lose. At least, that is the principle I'm working to.

(in reply to hugh04)
Post #: 97
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 1:05:12 PM   
Manstein63


Posts: 688
Joined: 6/30/2010
Status: offline 		I have a game running against Blubel as well (just coming into the Mud turns) so I would be interested to know what turn you are on to compare. I also was fighting forward but I overstayed & ended up losing 90 units in one turn which is making the defense of Moscow a tad uncomfortable
Manstein63

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 98
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 1:10:23 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Ninety Can you survive that? This is only at turn 10, but I do have some more to post when I get round to it.

< Message edited by hooooper -- 12/19/2012 1:12:23 PM >

(in reply to Manstein63)
Post #: 99
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 2:16:55 PM   
Manstein63


Posts: 688
Joined: 6/30/2010
Status: offline 		You get them all back though they have to be filled out & I think some may have been SU's & HQ's but it meant that I only have a  thin screen in the south while everything else has been sent to the Moscow & Lenningrad Area's. As I said we are just starting the Mud Turns Lenningrad has all but fallen although I am supplying by air and he is sitting next to Moscow it will be an interesting few turns.

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 100
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 4:37:56 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Turn 11

The Germans needed a good turn to keep their momentum, and they have got one in the Leningrad sector. The Open Door defence, which relies on an orderly withdrawal of the forces defending the Luga line to the the Volkhov line, is vulnerable to a sudden strike along the valley of the Volkhov, and for the first time ever, an opponent has succeeded in pulling this off: a cleaving blow that separates 27th Army and 33rd Army from their defensive positions on the east bank of the Volkhov. Leningrad is seriously threatened now.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by hooooper -- 12/19/2012 4:39:25 PM >

(in reply to Manstein63)
Post #: 101
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 4:41:33 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		South of the Valdai, the German secondary push (stripped of its armour) continues, meeting with some success




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by hooooper -- 12/19/2012 4:43:38 PM >

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 102
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 4:49:22 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Moscow. The Germans break through south of Rhzev.The attack comes with the ambitious exploitation that is a characteristic of Blubel's Guderian-like style.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 103
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 4:55:46 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Tula. Another small encirclement.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 104
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 4:57:45 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Kiev. The defences hold, more or less, for another turn, but the Germans are getting control of the battle.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by hooooper -- 12/19/2012 4:58:44 PM >

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 105
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:02:30 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Soviet responses. Leningrad: there's no choice but to launch a counter attack with all available forces and to funnel reinforcements to man the east bank of the Volkhov.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 106
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:13:08 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Valdai. The Red Army reinforces its positions on the hills. These will be held to the last bullet.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by hooooper -- 12/19/2012 5:20:15 PM >

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 107
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:16:32 PM   
hugh04

 

Posts: 165
Joined: 9/14/2011
Status: offline 		Man, looking at all those 1 cv soviet units right next to the axis attackers...My axis juices see mass slaughter. Why not just give it up and retreat to the volkov and into leningrad. You are going to have to any way. The carnage you are going to suffer here does not seem to be worth the time gained. You may then find yourself too week to hold the volkov line. Those 0 cv units will route if an axis gets near them.

Good Luck

Vandev

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 108
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:21:48 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		I cant' get to the Volkhov! That move was pretty much forced. Anyway, I want to see if he goes north or east next go ....

(in reply to hugh04)
Post #: 109
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:25:07 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Moscow. Another big step back. I'm still not hugely concerned about this situation because there's usually a compressed spring effect as the Germans approach the Kremlin.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 110
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:28:07 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Tula. Another defensive line is positioned in deep reserve, filled with depleted units.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 111
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:36:59 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Kharkov. We going to risk postponing our withdrawal for another turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 112
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:41:22 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Big picture: centre




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by hooooper -- 12/19/2012 5:48:24 PM >

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 113
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 5:50:40 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Big picture south




Attachment (1)

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 114
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/19/2012 6:11:04 PM   
gingerbread


Posts: 2994
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Lots of partisan cadres - are you getting any supply flights?

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 115
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/20/2012 3:52:03 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		I've forgotten about partisans. I don't think I have, but then I haven't put the night bombers on the right airbases yet. I set up partisan supply missions in my game with Bomazz, but didn't have any drops until about turn 20. After that I was able to make a few manually, but not before.

(in reply to gingerbread)
Post #: 116
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/20/2012 8:05:38 PM   
Scook_99

 

Posts: 301
Joined: 6/20/2007
Status: offline 		It seems the game has built in delay for partisan supply now. I think that's ok, as it would take some time to get partisan cadres built up, and then work out an air supply drop schedule. The Germans did have it comparitively "easy" the 1st three months or so, as they were viewed as liberators. Didn't take them long to learn the true Nazi way.

hooooper, you have my respect. I think an Eastern Front game should be played like two crazy men are in charge, and there is no running away. Anyone willing to stay and fight up front I would play against. Heck, I would even use house rules to avoid the ahistorical Lvov pocket turn 1 if the Russian would stay and fight.

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 117
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/20/2012 9:09:20 PM   
hooooper_slith

 

Posts: 540
Joined: 10/26/2012
Status: offline 		Thanks for the info about partisans, that explains a lot. I'm not sure if partisans ever have a serious effect on the Germans - I haven't played the Axis side enough to know.

I wonder what constitutes "fighting forward" - surely the Russians have to run away part of the time. I read Tarhunnas' bizarre AAR with Michael T, in which he agreed to fight armed only with croquet mallets and stale sandwiches, and (surprise surprise) was cut to ribbons in about 12 turns. That's just silly.

< Message edited by hooooper -- 12/20/2012 9:10:09 PM >

(in reply to Scook_99)
Post #: 118
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/20/2012 10:32:28 PM   
Scook_99

 

Posts: 301
Joined: 6/20/2007
Status: offline 		the biggest effect partisans have is in 1941-42 in this game. When you are building your initial rail lines, a partisan hit can put an entire army group out of supply. I think that is why the modification to supply of partisans. You still have to do security to avoid the early hits, but it is entirely avoidable now. Once the rail lines are all laid out and converted, partisans really have little effect in slowing the Axis down in any way shape or form.

The thought of this part of the game looked good on paper, but worked out backwards to what should happen. That is why the entire re-design of rail line supply and how partisans affect movement of rolling stock. In War in the West, (from my understanding) rail line will have a supply and traffic capacity, and rail bombing and partisans will knock down that capacity level. It will be even more abstract, but that sounds quite a bit better to what should happen on the rails.

War in the East II will use that structure, and whatever modifications found to made from War in the West. I really can't wait for version 2 of this, as this is the best war game I have played. Love the level of logistics and operational control you get here. Not many games make the HOW to get there as important as WHAT is getting there.

Not fighting forward: Germans moving forward and not having significant combat for at least three turns in a row because the Soviets keep moving back faster than the Germans can keep up. Yes, there is time when moving back is important, but giving up massive amounts of real estate without bloodshed just wouldn't happen.

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 119
RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel - 12/20/2012 11:45:47 PM   
sillyflower


Posts: 3509
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Back in Blighty
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hooooper

I don't have the number of divs destroyed, but it's a lot, obviously.


Yes you do - it's in destroyed units below a/c losses

_____________________________

web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?

(in reply to hooooper_slith)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Towards the edge of destruction: hooooper v Blubel Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.891