Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

bombing HQ's

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> bombing HQ's Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
bombing HQ's - 2/3/2013 10:49:41 PM   
Maximeba

 

Posts: 174
Joined: 8/9/2009
From: Buffalo, NY, USA
Status: offline
I asked this question once before but no one responded. So, I will try it again.
In reading of old posts, I thought I read that bombing of HQ's should be avoided due to the unusually high death rate of commanders. In our current game that I'm playing we do not bomb HQ's. We don't want to distort the game by killing off an unusual high amount of commanders (although I wouldn't mind seeing a few dead German leaders).
We are playing version 1.16 so my question is this. Can or can't we bomb HQ's? If we are not going to bomb HQ's why put AA units in them. I will just keep for the front line troops. Also, how does one get to support units such as artillery if you do not bomb HQ's? Isn't this an unfair advantage for the Germans as they are limited in manpower?

_____________________________

Wes
Allies Forever
Post #: 1
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/4/2013 1:06:20 AM   
turtlefang

 

Posts: 334
Joined: 7/18/2012
Status: offline
I don't know if they have changed anything in the last update.

Prior to that, bombing HQs would result in a high chance of leader losses. In 41, this favored the Germans. By mid-42, the Soviet have the advantage as the new bomber's come on line. They can literally destroy the German leadership structure by the end of 42 and never look back.

The recommendation is: 1) don't put HQs alone in a hex, 2) most players adopt a houserule limiting HQ bombing (the most common seems either 0 or 3 per turn), 3) even if you have a house rule, unless you manually use your entire airforce, they will sometimes bomb enemy HQ so you need flak.

How much flak you put with your HQs is really up to you. As the Soviet, I try to put one PVO regiment per HQ. Overtime, this protects my leaders but increases the German air losses way beyond what my early Soviet AF can do. Now, this depends on APs, Admin Pts and manpower - but its what I try to do.

For the Germans, in 41, I ALWAYS stack my HQ with somebody if possible. And I rarely assign them flak except at the Corps HQ level so that they commit to combat. But that's my perference given the ineffectivnesses of the Soviet AF until the first blizzard.

This doesn't directly answer your question as I haven't seen anything on this issue since the last upgrades. But its the best I can offer.

Hope this helps!

(in reply to Maximeba)
Post #: 2
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/4/2013 8:34:34 AM   
cpt flam


Posts: 2352
Joined: 1/16/2011
From: caen - France
Status: offline
even not bombing HQ
you will not have enough flak to give one to everybody
those with an HQ can be affected to a combat
you will affect support unit when they go to an assault
that's the early losses for russia

_____________________________


(in reply to turtlefang)
Post #: 3
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/4/2013 8:10:09 PM   
Peltonx


Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline
Its a broken part of the game that the players have fixed using house rules. No bombing HQ's. Allot will still get killed by recon

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to cpt flam)
Post #: 4
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 12:33:00 AM   
Maximeba

 

Posts: 174
Joined: 8/9/2009
From: Buffalo, NY, USA
Status: offline
Thanks, for the anwers. We decided to bomb HQ's, but limited ourselves to three attacks per HQ in any given turn.



_____________________________

Wes
Allies Forever

(in reply to Peltonx)
Post #: 5
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 7:07:47 AM   
delatbabel


Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/30/2006
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline
With 3 HQ bombing attacks per turn, every turn, for every HQ, I can kill every leader in the German army by late 1944.

You need to be more restrictive than that.


_____________________________

--
Del

(in reply to Maximeba)
Post #: 6
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 8:33:17 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline
The bug where gobs of leaders could be killed by one mass air attack was interesting.

(in reply to delatbabel)
Post #: 7
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 9:25:53 AM   
Von Weber


Posts: 182
Joined: 11/30/2012
Status: offline
quote:

Allot will still get killed by recon

What do you mean Pelton? Can recon cause leader's death too?

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 8
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 10:49:37 AM   
morvael


Posts: 11762
Joined: 9/8/2006
From: Poland
Status: offline
In my game it killed many leaders: Vatutin, Rokossovsky, Reiter, Meretskov, Chuikov, Khozin, Bobkin.

edit: generally speaking, recon is "enemy activity" and as such it can cause leader death nearby. Don't know why it can't be patched out.

< Message edited by morvael -- 2/6/2013 10:50:20 AM >

(in reply to Von Weber)
Post #: 9
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 11:06:20 AM   
gradenko2k

 

Posts: 935
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: delatbabel
With 3 HQ bombing attacks per turn, every turn, for every HQ, I can kill every leader in the German army by late 1944.

You need to be more restrictive than that.

What happens when there are no more leaders in the reserve, and then the current leader gets killed? Crash to desktop?

(in reply to delatbabel)
Post #: 10
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 2:19:54 PM   
Von Weber


Posts: 182
Joined: 11/30/2012
Status: offline
quote:

In my game it killed many leaders: Vatutin, Rokossovsky, Reiter, Meretskov, Chuikov, Khozin, Bobkin.

edit: generally speaking, recon is "enemy activity" and as such it can cause leader death nearby. Don't know why it can't be patched out.

It is unbelievable.Does it also happen if HQ is in stack and having flak SU or just standing alone with nothing AA? Should be recon restricted then by some how?

(in reply to gradenko2k)
Post #: 11
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 2:26:48 PM   
morvael


Posts: 11762
Joined: 9/8/2006
From: Poland
Status: offline
Don't know. Two recon planes 10 miles from the HQ (next hex) that itself was 30 miles from the front and no other enemy activity in at least 100 miles and it still killed my leader.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3214593

< Message edited by morvael -- 2/6/2013 2:27:49 PM >

(in reply to Von Weber)
Post #: 12
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 6:42:04 PM   
Cerion

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 9/16/2009
From: Europe
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: morvael

In my game it killed many leaders: Vatutin, Rokossovsky, Reiter, Meretskov, Chuikov, Khozin, Bobkin.

edit: generally speaking, recon is "enemy activity" and as such it can cause leader death nearby. Don't know why it can't be patched out.


quote:

ORIGINAL: morvael

Two recon planes 10 miles from the HQ (next hex) that itself was 30 miles from the front and no other enemy activity in at least 100 miles and it still killed my leader.


Disheartening

(in reply to morvael)
Post #: 13
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 7:23:56 PM   
Helpless


Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline
There was no prove that recon kills any leaders. if you able to reproduce it please post a save in tech section. Thanks.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to Cerion)
Post #: 14
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/6/2013 7:44:14 PM   
morvael


Posts: 11762
Joined: 9/8/2006
From: Poland
Status: offline
It might have been connected with relative closeness of HQs to the front (3 hexes). When more away (5 hexes) they started to be safe. Problem is in bad weather (mud) the HQs have to be moved closer again, so the unit remain in command range. Plus side is less trucks needed to move supplies and (I think) better replacements flow. Maybe the leader deaths from proximity to front could be reduced yet again (it was toned down in some patch)? This is especially important for the Soviets, as their Army HQ has short command range. Also, I thought for a "fix" so that leaders before their "end date" would have less chance to die (therefore leaders that died or retired would be KIA more often than those who lived to the end of the war).

(in reply to Helpless)
Post #: 15
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/7/2013 12:20:58 PM   
DesertedFox


Posts: 314
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
As per an earlier post/request of mine, this (leader deaths through combat) should be an option at the start of a game.

I am sure most players would turn it to "off".

(in reply to morvael)
Post #: 16
RE: bombing HQ's - 2/7/2013 12:39:44 PM   
morvael


Posts: 11762
Joined: 9/8/2006
From: Poland
Status: offline
Best solution.

(in reply to DesertedFox)
Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> bombing HQ's Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703