Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 18 May 44

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 18 May 44 Page: <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 18 May 44 - 1/27/2013 6:47:51 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		second day




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 1/27/2013 6:48:19 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1051
RE: 20May 44 - 1/28/2013 1:34:53 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		First the Aso was reported sunk. now seems the Kaga has been hit.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 1/28/2013 1:35:06 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1052
RE: 20May 44 - 1/30/2013 10:20:37 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		Another blistering attack on the road to Pegu. Looks like 5 more divisions will be destroyed on the Pegu/Toungoo road. Intel reports 5 fresh IJA divisions UNDER THE 14TH ARMY at Pegu moving to Moulein. REMEMBER THAT THE 25TH ARMY IS IN ISOLATION AT THE AKYAB POCKET.


So looks like ten IJA divisions will be destroyed in Burma. If I can catch the 8th Area army before it crosses the river to Moulmein then I may bag 15 IJA divisions in Burma. Does anyone know how many divisions the japs get? I am starting to wonder about the strategic implications...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 1/31/2013 9:37:34 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1053
RE: 20May 44 - 2/2/2013 7:04:55 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		44-5-18:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/2/2013 7:05:20 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1054
RE: 20May 44 - 2/2/2013 7:06:43 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		44-5-19:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1055
RE: 20May 44 - 2/6/2013 5:09:44 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		A big Turn... All eyes are on south Burma. Does FatR pull out another trick from his bag, or has Bigred finally put the nails into the FatR coffin at Burma Theatre?

Not mentioned below is the allied infantry division moving down the east bank of the Pegu river. It has moved 44 of 46 miles, is in combat mode and will be sitting on the hex between Pegu and Moulmien this turn. If FatR crosses the river then he will have to make a shock attack. If FatR put his rested divisions in move mode they may get out of Pegu but then have to make a cross river shock attack.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/6/2013 5:17:57 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1056
RE: 20May 44 - 2/6/2013 10:56:48 AM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline 		The 2000AV you have 1 day out- why are they in pursuit mode? Pursuit mode is a sub set of combat mode and as far as I know you can only select it when in a hex with an enemy force. After pursuing a defeated enemy if they don't make it all the way to the hex the enemy has retreated to I'd switch them to move mode if you want them to catch up quickly.

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1057
RE: 20May 44 - 2/6/2013 1:15:07 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		oh well,




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to Itdepends)
Post #: 1058
RE: 20May 44 - 2/6/2013 1:18:32 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

as far as I know you can only select it when in a hex with an enemy force

My experience on the Pegu road was If in pursuit mode and w/in one day march of the battle the pursuit troops will participate if a pursuit is allowed. Seems if the adjacent troops arrive in hex before the battle then they will participate in pursuit if placed into pursuit mode the day before.

I note the road and terrain made it easy to execute. If I had been in jungle w/ trail this might not occur.


This is why FatR went from 100000troops to 40000troops on the road to Toungou.

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/6/2013 1:30:42 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1059
RE: 20May 44 - 2/6/2013 2:18:19 PM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline 		Interesting- I'll have to keep that in mind.

Thanks,

Daniel

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1060
RE: 20May 44 - 2/6/2013 10:23:14 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

quote:

as far as I know you can only select it when in a hex with an enemy force

My experience on the Pegu road was If in pursuit mode and w/in one day march of the battle the pursuit troops will participate if a pursuit is allowed. Seems if the adjacent troops arrive in hex before the battle then they will participate in pursuit if placed into pursuit mode the day before.

I note the road and terrain made it easy to execute. If I had been in jungle w/ trail this might not occur.


This is why FatR went from 100000troops to 40000troops on the road to Toungou.

This was discovered by accident. After the initial attack at Tongou about 2/3rd of the divisions arrived 2 days later to make another attack in the immediate SW hex. 1/3rd of the allied divisions were straglers unable to keep up the road movement pace but within 1 day march of the attack. This caused me to set these straggling units to pursuit! Oddly the combat reports showed they participated in the pursuit as I had no units in the original same hex w/ enemy set to pursuit..

really a good blitz style attack. Causes me to wonder why some players complain about the land model.

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/6/2013 10:27:43 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1061
RE: 20May 44 - 2/6/2013 10:25:29 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		FatR needs to rename his playing handle FATCAT, he seems to have nine lives...


quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

oh well,






< Message edited by bigred -- 2/6/2013 10:26:02 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1062
RE: 20May 44 - 2/8/2013 2:53:58 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		should the allies continue the steamroller effect and make a cross river attack next to Pegu?
IIRC to avoid a shock attack the attacker must have 1/3rd the combat value of the defender present in the hex from a previous turn.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/8/2013 3:03:27 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1063
RE: 20May 44 - 2/12/2013 3:50:13 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		My armor was ordered to move east. It moved southeast into the enemy hex uncoordinated. Now the armor is headed NE. I guess the computer calculated the fastest move route and changed my orders.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/12/2013 3:51:34 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1064
RE: 26May 44 - 2/12/2013 3:59:32 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		FatR has a CV TF south of Palembang. Interesting..




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/12/2013 4:00:14 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1065
RE: 25th June 1942 - 2/19/2013 6:37:25 AM   
uncivil_servant


Posts: 200
Joined: 2/19/2013
Status: offline

<Deleted>

< Message edited by uncivil_servant -- 2/19/2013 7:08:37 AM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1066
RE: 25th June 1942 - 2/19/2013 1:31:20 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		Hello...VPs as of May 30th...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to uncivil_servant)
Post #: 1067
RE: 30th May 1942 - 2/19/2013 7:54:42 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		After landing at Manus allies did encounter the IJN fleet and lost some ships...Combat replay indicates FatR is flying in reinforcements to Manus. CA Wichita was in a Bombardment TF that was caught by a RA70 mod Battlecruiser and escorts...she would have made it home if I had provided the TF w/ CAP...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/19/2013 8:00:21 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1068
RE: 30th May 1942 - 2/19/2013 8:01:47 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		also...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1069
RE: 30th May 1942 - 2/19/2013 8:02:52 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		and




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1070
RE: 30th May 1942 - 2/28/2013 3:02:05 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		Well, we have reached 1 june 44. I press forward w/ reinforced Marcus island attack and a flanking paradrop at Murgui to the south of Moulmein. With the capture of Rangoon I have begun shelling Moulmein w/ 2x CA TFs every turn plus I switched to night bombing the Moulmein AFields until because I now have 70%+ moonlight. Last turn Moulmein had over 200 fighters on site. This turn Moulmein reports about a 70 ftr count.

The Mergui para assault was made by the 77th chindits who had 100prep for the attack and still struggled against construction engineers and a recon battalion...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/28/2013 3:09:04 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1071
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/2/2013 12:36:02 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Станислав

2:00 AM (4 hours ago)

to me:
Not my best day...






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 3/3/2013 2:12:08 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1072
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/3/2013 2:13:26 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		Then the shelling started at moulmein w/ 4 Bombard TFs.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1073
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/3/2013 2:14:55 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		and other events:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 3/3/2013 2:15:11 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1074
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/3/2013 2:16:42 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		Then the second day we land at Sinabang, kill more Jap transports, and really gather experience on IJA at Lae!!!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 3/3/2013 2:17:01 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1075
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/8/2013 5:14:15 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		We crossed the river at Moulmein. I ordered the army to follow a base support unit and I lost alot of AV...FatR may push me back across the river.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 3/8/2013 5:16:10 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1076
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/12/2013 5:03:55 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		FatR just wacked me good off Port Blair. I should have been more careful...FatR indicates this to be a chance meeting engagement. I was moving my CVTFs to support amphib ops around Moulein and cut the route to close to enemy held islands. Not game ending but a definite hit on my Burma campaign.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 3/12/2013 5:11:06 PM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1077
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/12/2013 10:53:49 PM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline 		Ouch! I assume as a meeting engagement neither of you had DL on your carrier forces before the battle. Any reason your counter punch was relatively ineffective? Grossly outnumbered?

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1078
RE: 3 jun44 - 3/13/2013 1:41:17 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Itdepends

Ouch! I assume as a meeting engagement neither of you had DL on your carrier forces before the battle. Any reason your counter punch was relatively ineffective? Grossly outnumbered?

Well all those 2 TFs really did was cover amphibs...w maybe about 8 TBFs on each light CV for offensive punch....also they were not moving together so did not get a combined cap advantage. One TF of CVLs and the other all CVEs..

I was not planning to have a CV battle...I wanted to take a shortcut thru the andamans to kill more LBA that might be on nav attack.

The good news is most of my pilots landed at car nicobar and will be recycled...I did CV inventory...of active CVs

8 fleetCVs
34 CVL/CVE...all still available. I figure I can reassemble a CVE Tf w/ 10 ships in the indian ocean in about 2 weeks. Seems if you put 10 CVEs together they really shoot down LBA.

Also I get about 12 more fleet CVs and about 35 more CVEs...reinforcements...

Seems FatR came up the west side of Sumatra (where I have no search ability) just like the first time against Yubari.

I did score 3 hits, but this was really one sided...I did not have my 10% nav search turned on ...
CVE Shinyo, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CV Junyo, Torpedo hits 1
CVL Zuiho, Torpedo hits 1









Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 3/14/2013 4:11:21 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to Itdepends)
Post #: 1079
RE:11jun44 - 3/14/2013 4:23:02 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline 		4 big mistakes on my part..
1. I knew the KB was in the area because I had spotted the TFs at the Crakatoa straits 2 turns ago.(should have made a safe move)
2. I was in a hurry to reinforce the Mergui landing but I need CVE CAP to reinforce by sea. Land based IJAAF fighters is attriting my Air trans..(should have took my time and developed the situation)
3. I took a short cut close to the Andamans to support my sea lift.
4. W/ 97% moonlight FatR had one or 2 KI49 sqn on night low naval operating around Lil Andaman and they located my CVL TF at night and drove up my DL before daylight. (Should never have moved close to enemy bases w/ KB in area)
5. Lady luck was with FatR when he caught my 2 TFs separated which divided my CAP. (FatR was lucky w/ the placement of his KB , but extraordinary in his intuition of placing his units at the right place at the right time. Maybe I am becoming too predictable).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 3/14/2013 4:27:21 AM >

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1080
Page:   <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 18 May 44 Page: <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656