Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Trouble With Sweeps

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Trouble With Sweeps Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 1:12:40 AM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
I've been trying to get multiple fighter units to sweep a base together, but I have no luck at all. I have two units of the same model stationed at the same base sweeping at the same altitude, but they never go in at the same time. There is an air HQ at the base, excess aviation support and supply present, yet they go in one at a time every time.

As a result, the first unit goes in, initially tears into the CAP, but then gets eaten up due to the fact that it is outnumbered. End result - first unit breaks even or achieves a slight victory. The second unit then goes in and hammers the remaining CAP without taking many (or even any) losses. (After they dive on the remaining CAP, there is no CAP left.)

I can't help but think that if they went in simultaneously, then together they would absolutely destroy the CAP with the initial dive bonus and not have to worry about the CAP biting back (as it would basically be non-existent after the first round of dives).

Am I missing something? What else can I do to get these two units to sweep together as one entity?
Post #: 1
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 4:04:12 AM   
topeverest


Posts: 3376
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Houston, TX - USA
Status: offline
IME, air units in the same command work better together, and of course, the better the commanders the more chance of coordination. Check the air HQ commander too. To the degree you dont have the same patrol altitude, I dont experience good coordination. lastly, I believe that fighters whose speed is very far apart are unlikely to coordinate.

I'd bring more fighters of the same or similar type up and try. You should get several to coordinate.

_____________________________

Andy M

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 2
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 4:11:49 AM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
IMO coordination of sweeps is not desirable in most circumstances. When sweeping, if you have multiple sqds. assigned to do it in the same hex, it's actually better (perhaps you could say coordinated) if they arrive at different times to clear the hex of enemy fighters throughout the day so that your bombers can do their work unmolested. When you order a sqd. to sweep you already have a built in advantage in that the entire sqd. arrives simultaneously. If I'm designing an algorithm for that I would have multiple sqds. avoid overlaps, unless their commanders are nincompoops. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish but perhaps you should rethink your tactic.

_____________________________



(in reply to topeverest)
Post #: 3
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 7:22:33 AM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

I've been trying to get multiple fighter units to sweep a base together, but I have no luck at all. I have two units of the same model stationed at the same base sweeping at the same altitude, but they never go in at the same time. There is an air HQ at the base, excess aviation support and supply present, yet they go in one at a time every time.

As a result, the first unit goes in, initially tears into the CAP, but then gets eaten up due to the fact that it is outnumbered. End result - first unit breaks even or achieves a slight victory. The second unit then goes in and hammers the remaining CAP without taking many (or even any) losses. (After they dive on the remaining CAP, there is no CAP left.)

I can't help but think that if they went in simultaneously, then together they would absolutely destroy the CAP with the initial dive bonus and not have to worry about the CAP biting back (as it would basically be non-existent after the first round of dives).

Am I missing something? What else can I do to get these two units to sweep together as one entity?



that's how it is. The few times you will see more squadrons going in together on a sweep is probably a flaw then.

_____________________________


(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 4
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 7:28:23 AM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
Sweeps do not coordinate. Read this thread.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2804256&mpage=1&key=sweep%2Ccoordination

There will be subtle changes between the two fighter units in question which will reduce the chances of both arriving simultaneously. More info provided by screenshots (several) would need to be provided to identify what the relevant differences are.

Alfred

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 5
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 9:22:14 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
Sweeps can coordinate using the official patch. Not so much with the betas.

Both I and my opponent have had up to 150+ fighters in a coordinated sweep. That is fairly devastating to the defenders. It has only happened with same model of plane being in all groups.

This has happened for us from level 9 bases with plenty of support. Close to destination. Not sure on the other particulars. It is rare and you can't really plan for it, but when it happens it's pretty to watch, unless you're on the receiving end.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 6
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 9:41:18 AM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline
Few times in my game i saw sweep coordination.
Every time all groups fly this same plane model (climb speed and cruise speed where equal) and they fly from the same AF or different AF but distance to target was the same.

For 520+ turns i play it happens only 4 or 5 times to me

_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 7
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 11:32:10 AM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
Why do I even bother to do the research and post the primary material when people can't be bothered to do the work themselves or read CLOSELY, not read into what I write their own interpretation. I spent over 6 hours on Saturday researching the various answers before I posted to several threads. Today, just on this single thread I spent 2 hours researching the topic before selecting the most comprehensive single thread on the subject.[sm=00000018.gif

Coordination is only available to synchronise multi bomber and their escorts from one/several airfields to strike the enemy at the same spot. Any other aircraft groups on different mission profiles may co-operate sufficiently that they appear over a target close to each other. This may look as coordination but it is not.

When a dev says sweeps do not coordinate, what part of the message from the dev is unclear. When I retrieve the answers there are too many more interested in the opportunity to find offense in my posts or contradict me, rather than thinking through what I provide on my own time.

And no, before some smart alec wants to accuse me of just playing with semantics, there is a difference between "coordination" and "cooperation". In the former the code, as stated by theElf in 2009, once it realises the player wants to create a coordinated strike package it attempts to do so. But the player must utilise that key otherwise there is no possibility of coordination only at best some cooperation. Everything else which players are told is necessary to get "coordination" (for which the link I gave is invaluable) is required in order to facilitate, in a 0,1 virtual world the "physical" arrival of the aircraft. With "cooperation" there is no similar trigger key. Which is why it is rarer to witness cooperation.

Sure it is possible for players to anecdotally witness 150 fighters arriving over the target. They did well with the factors necessary to facilitate their "physical" arrival but that is not coordination which is favoured by the code provided the trigger is set and it is "physically" possible in the virtual world.

So the next person who wants to find fault with me is really complaining about the devs. I doubt too many will undertake the requisite research or think through the issues. Far easier to attack me publicly on the forum, or privately via PM/email which allows them to say things which would get them banned from the forum.

Alfred

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 8
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 12:34:34 PM   
RogerJNeilson


Posts: 1277
Joined: 4/12/2012
From: Bedlington, Northumberland, UK
Status: offline
Alfred, your posts are always a mine of great information to me, maybe more people should register their appreciation rather than 'have a go' at you.

Roger

_____________________________

An unplanned dynasty: Roger Neilson, Roger Neilson 11, Roger Neilson 3 previous posts 898+1515 + 1126 = 3539.....Finally completed my game which started the day WITP:AE was released

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 9
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 12:44:03 PM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
One of the highlights for me was when I managed *once* to correct Alfred.

He is the living encyclopedia of AE.

< Message edited by Sardaukar -- 4/20/2013 1:38:19 AM >


_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to RogerJNeilson)
Post #: 10
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 2:20:13 PM   
towers58

 

Posts: 20
Joined: 1/25/2013
Status: offline
Alfred,

I appreciate your efforts and always devour the info you provide.

Thank you,

Mike

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 11
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 3:05:48 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

The solution is simple. If the target us in range place two or three squadrons on Long Range Cap over the target. Then sweep with one or two other units. In most all cases the units on Long Range Cap will join in the fight over the target and support the sweep. They also tend to support each sweep even if they are not coordinated. This is not guaranteed but will happen most all of the time. It makes for a very powerful sweep. In doing this it actually becomes more desirable for the sweeps to go in one at at time as you will have multiple opportunities to engage the defenders in large air battles. If you are trying to suppress an airbase or cause attrition to the enemy then this is my preferred tactic.

I would not advise layering your units. Place them all at the highest altitude allowed by your HRs.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to towers58)
Post #: 12
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:06:57 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: topeverest

IME, air units in the same command work better together, and of course, the better the commanders the more chance of coordination. Check the air HQ commander too. To the degree you dont have the same patrol altitude, I dont experience good coordination. lastly, I believe that fighters whose speed is very far apart are unlikely to coordinate.

I'd bring more fighters of the same or similar type up and try. You should get several to coordinate.


I'll check the air HQ commander. I already have taken all of your other points into account - belong to the same command, good leaders, same altitude and same exact model aircraft (so same speed). I suspect the air HQ is not going to have much of an effect, but I'll give it a shot. At this point, I'll try just about anything.

(in reply to topeverest)
Post #: 13
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:08:19 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

IMO coordination of sweeps is not desirable in most circumstances. When sweeping, if you have multiple sqds. assigned to do it in the same hex, it's actually better (perhaps you could say coordinated) if they arrive at different times to clear the hex of enemy fighters throughout the day so that your bombers can do their work unmolested. When you order a sqd. to sweep you already have a built in advantage in that the entire sqd. arrives simultaneously. If I'm designing an algorithm for that I would have multiple sqds. avoid overlaps, unless their commanders are nincompoops. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish but perhaps you should rethink your tactic.


I'm basically just sweeping to kill enemy fighters at this stage. Bombing runs will commence only when the enemy has no more fighters left at the base.

(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 14
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:16:05 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Sweeps can coordinate using the official patch. Not so much with the betas.

Both I and my opponent have had up to 150+ fighters in a coordinated sweep. That is fairly devastating to the defenders. It has only happened with same model of plane being in all groups.

This has happened for us from level 9 bases with plenty of support. Close to destination. Not sure on the other particulars. It is rare and you can't really plan for it, but when it happens it's pretty to watch, unless you're on the receiving end.


Obvert - you may be onto something. I'm sweeping from two different bases and they are size 3 and size 7. The 3 is close to the target, but the 7 is a good way off. Perhaps that's the problem.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 15
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:25:47 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


The solution is simple. If the target us in range place two or three squadrons on Long Range Cap over the target. Then sweep with one or two other units. In most all cases the units on Long Range Cap will join in the fight over the target and support the sweep. They also tend to support each sweep even if they are not coordinated. This is not guaranteed but will happen most all of the time. It makes for a very powerful sweep. In doing this it actually becomes more desirable for the sweeps to go in one at at time as you will have multiple opportunities to engage the defenders in large air battles. If you are trying to suppress an airbase or cause attrition to the enemy then this is my preferred tactic.

I would not advise layering your units. Place them all at the highest altitude allowed by your HRs.


I think I just struck gold here. I didn't realize you could LRCAP an enemy base (at least without a friendly unit or TF located there). I'll give it a shot.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 16
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:29:44 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Yes, I have been doing is with great success for over 1,000 turns. I also never escort bombing raids but put LRCAP over the target. Mind you this works for one day turns but does not work so well if you are playing two day turns.

You can forget about trying to coordinate. Let us know if this works for you.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 17
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:46:18 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Yes, I have been doing is with great success for over 1,000 turns. I also never escort bombing raids but put LRCAP over the target. Mind you this works for one day turns but does not work so well if you are playing two day turns.

You can forget about trying to coordinate. Let us know if this works for you.


Will do.

Just a quick question though. Does this LRCAP technique incur huge amounts of plane and/or pilot fatigue? With sweep and escort, it's just a single round trip to the target and back. But with LRCAP, it would involve constant shuttling of planes out/back and out/back and out/back . . . all day long. Have you noticed crazy levels of fatigue compared to simple sweep and escort missions?

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 18
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:53:17 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Sweeps do not coordinate. Read this thread.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2804256&mpage=1&key=sweep%2Ccoordination

There will be subtle changes between the two fighter units in question which will reduce the chances of both arriving simultaneously. More info provided by screenshots (several) would need to be provided to identify what the relevant differences are.

Alfred


Very helpful thread.

How do you manage to use the search function so efficiently? I try searching before I post most of my questions on this forum and get either: no results at all, or a couple hits with pretty much no relevance to my question.

I'm the same way with Google. I can search all night for some info on particular home/lawn/garden projects I'm in the middle of and won't find anything. I'll tell my wife of my frustrations and she'll find something in 2 minutes! Maddening to say the least!

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 19
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 6:54:39 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: towers58

Alfred,

I appreciate your efforts and always devour the info you provide.

Thank you,

Mike


+1

(in reply to towers58)
Post #: 20
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 7:50:53 PM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
Alfred the Great.

_____________________________



(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 21
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 7:53:58 PM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


The solution is simple. If the target us in range place two or three squadrons on Long Range Cap over the target. Then sweep with one or two other units. In most all cases the units on Long Range Cap will join in the fight over the target and support the sweep. They also tend to support each sweep even if they are not coordinated. This is not guaranteed but will happen most all of the time. It makes for a very powerful sweep. In doing this it actually becomes more desirable for the sweeps to go in one at at time as you will have multiple opportunities to engage the defenders in large air battles. If you are trying to suppress an airbase or cause attrition to the enemy then this is my preferred tactic.

I would not advise layering your units. Place them all at the highest altitude allowed by your HRs.


Agreed. Also if you're sending in bombers, multiple sweeps will wear out the defenders and their reserves and your bombers get in free gratis. The sweeping fighters being faster get there first.

Ugh, that's an improper usage of free, gratis but you get my meaning.

< Message edited by geofflambert -- 4/19/2013 7:56:41 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 22
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 8:17:30 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Sweeps do not coordinate. Read this thread.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2804256&mpage=1&key=sweep%2Ccoordination

There will be subtle changes between the two fighter units in question which will reduce the chances of both arriving simultaneously. More info provided by screenshots (several) would need to be provided to identify what the relevant differences are.

Alfred


Very helpful thread.

How do you manage to use the search function so efficiently? I try searching before I post most of my questions on this forum and get either: no results at all, or a couple hits with pretty much no relevance to my question.

I'm the same way with Google. I can search all night for some info on particular home/lawn/garden projects I'm in the middle of and won't find anything. I'll tell my wife of my frustrations and she'll find something in 2 minutes! Maddening to say the least!



Google-fu is something of an art form. It's intuitive to some, and others get frustrated.

Using Google to search these forums actually isn't a bad idea, either. Just add the "site:matrixgames.com" and then go through those results. It's probably faster than searching on the forum engine itself.

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 23
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/19/2013 9:53:58 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Yes, I have been doing is with great success for over 1,000 turns. I also never escort bombing raids but put LRCAP over the target. Mind you this works for one day turns but does not work so well if you are playing two day turns.

You can forget about trying to coordinate. Let us know if this works for you.


Will do.

Just a quick question though. Does this LRCAP technique incur huge amounts of plane and/or pilot fatigue? With sweep and escort, it's just a single round trip to the target and back. But with LRCAP, it would involve constant shuttling of planes out/back and out/back and out/back . . . all day long. Have you noticed crazy levels of fatigue compared to simple sweep and escort missions?


Yes, fatigue will be high. That is the down side. I think that more than compensates for the much fewer casualties that you take. Best to rest LRCAP after one mission.


< Message edited by crsutton -- 4/19/2013 9:55:13 PM >


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 24
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/20/2013 12:25:38 AM   
topeverest


Posts: 3376
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Houston, TX - USA
Status: offline
Alfred,

Many thanks, what I am seeing must be cooperation and not coordination.

_____________________________

Andy M

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 25
RE: Trouble With Sweeps - 4/21/2013 6:45:02 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Why do I even bother to do the research and post the primary material when people can't be bothered to do the work themselves or read CLOSELY, not read into what I write their own interpretation. I spent over 6 hours on Saturday researching the various answers before I posted to several threads. Today, just on this single thread I spent 2 hours researching the topic before selecting the most comprehensive single thread on the subject.[sm=00000018.gif

Coordination is only available to synchronise multi bomber and their escorts from one/several airfields to strike the enemy at the same spot. Any other aircraft groups on different mission profiles may co-operate sufficiently that they appear over a target close to each other. This may look as coordination but it is not.

When a dev says sweeps do not coordinate, what part of the message from the dev is unclear. When I retrieve the answers there are too many more interested in the opportunity to find offense in my posts or contradict me, rather than thinking through what I provide on my own time.

And no, before some smart alec wants to accuse me of just playing with semantics, there is a difference between "coordination" and "cooperation". In the former the code, as stated by theElf in 2009, once it realises the player wants to create a coordinated strike package it attempts to do so. But the player must utilise that key otherwise there is no possibility of coordination only at best some cooperation. Everything else which players are told is necessary to get "coordination" (for which the link I gave is invaluable) is required in order to facilitate, in a 0,1 virtual world the "physical" arrival of the aircraft. With "cooperation" there is no similar trigger key. Which is why it is rarer to witness cooperation.

Sure it is possible for players to anecdotally witness 150 fighters arriving over the target. They did well with the factors necessary to facilitate their "physical" arrival but that is not coordination which is favoured by the code provided the trigger is set and it is "physically" possible in the virtual world.

So the next person who wants to find fault with me is really complaining about the devs. I doubt too many will undertake the requisite research or think through the issues. Far easier to attack me publicly on the forum, or privately via PM/email which allows them to say things which would get them banned from the forum.

Alfred


Again, many thanks for your efforts. I did not realize the difference between the two different operations as in your actual first post you didn't mention two terms, and I was traveling so didn't have the time to read through the thread that was linked.

Providing contradictory information is not a personal attack, however, especially if based on solid evidence and presented in an objective manner. While I didn't provide combat reports or other evidence, it is all in the AAR if someone cares to look, and is probably in my opponent's AAR as well. The interest is that this provides a pretty clear advantage when it happens, as the fighters do overwhelm the defenders with those numbers, however rarely it may occur.

The OP was concerned mostly with sweeps getting over the base with many groups arriving at once, so I was trying to encourage him that it could happen, while tempering that with the information I've learned based on game play that it is fairly rare. I guess that could be anecdote, but much of the information is necessarily anecdotal on this forum. We have to share experiences if we want to learn. The manual and the developers can tell us a lot, but to me it's much more interesting to learn about these particulars with the addition of actual game play examples.

While it may be much more rare to see 'co-operation' with sweeping groups it can happen, which is really the point. Hopefully by stating that it can happen this thread continued to generate interesting ideas and other players were able to pitch in to provide examples whether I used the wrong descriptor or not. Sometimes after your authoritative posts some may feel 'the case is closed' and not offer other information. There is usually still more to learn, and as it turned out in this case, more to be interpreted. If several of us hadn't chipped in to give our little anecdotes maybe you wouldn't have been able to explain the difference between the 'coordination' and 'cooperation' which I at least found quite interesting.


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 26
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Trouble With Sweeps Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.234