Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Gettysburg 150th

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Gettysburg 150th Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Gettysburg 150th - 6/29/2013 6:26:25 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Gettysburg's sesquicentennial begins tomorrow - the real meat of the battle beginning on June 30, 1863, and end on July 4, 1863. (Since the Confederates also surrendered at Vicksburg on July 4 of that year, some of us southerners jokingly contend that we don't celebrate the 4th of July.)

There's a blurb on the CNN website that I think is wrong. See what you think. Here's the story:

(CNN) -- "For every Southern boy fourteen years old, not once but whenever he wants it, there is the instant when it's still not yet two o'clock on that July afternoon in 1863."

So starts a powerful passage by William Faulkner in "Intruder in the Dust." The Mississippi novelist and poet poignantly painted the scene of dry-mouthed young men anticipating battle.

But the Confederate attack, known in the annals of history as Pickett's Charge, ended about a mile away in failure, gray-clad troops blunted by determined Union troops at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

Those young boys recalled by Faulkner were stopped at the Angle, a stone wall considered the high-water mark of the Confederacy -- perhaps the last chance for victory in the U.S. Civil War. Instead, the Union prevailed at Gettysburg, a turning point in the four-year war that claimed at least 620,000 lives.


Faulkner isn't painting a scene of dry-mouthed youn men anticipating battle. He's painting a post-war scene, describing how for every southern boy since that fateful charge there comes a point in his mind where it's again 2 p.m. on July 3, 1863, just as Pickett's Charge is about to begin.

I think the CNN correspondent misses the point. Or did I miss the correspondent's point?

P.S. I wish I could be at Gettysburg for the festivities....but I can assure you I will be at Chickamauga this September for that battle's sesquicentennial observance.
Post #: 1
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/29/2013 6:41:44 PM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Gettysburg's sesquicentennial begins tomorrow - the real meat of the battle beginning on June 30, 1863, and end on July 4, 1863. (Since the Confederates also surrendered at Vicksburg on July 4 of that year, some of us southerners jokingly contend that we don't celebrate the 4th of July.)


Thats ok CR. You can start to celebrate my birthday instead .. some unsubstantiated rumors say i turn 40 on thursday. Time pass fast... its been 8 years since i last spend a 4th of July in the US.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 6/29/2013 6:44:02 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/29/2013 7:31:29 PM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
Well, I interpret Faulkner to be saying that modern boys may imagine themselves there. They may also imagine themselves dry-mouthed (but I don't know where CNN got that). So far so good, CNN. But when they say "those young boys recalled by Faulkner" they've totally lost touch. Though there may well have been many 14 year olds at the battle, Faulkner couldn't be clearer that he was referring to modern youths.

(in reply to Walloc)
Post #: 3
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/29/2013 10:05:00 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Gettysburg's sesquicentennial begins tomorrow - the real meat of the battle beginning on June 30, 1863, and end on July 4, 1863. (Since the Confederates also surrendered at Vicksburg on July 4 of that year, some of us southerners jokingly contend that we don't celebrate the 4th of July.)

There's a blurb on the CNN website that I think is wrong. See what you think. Here's the story:
<snip>
I think the CNN correspondent misses the point. Or did I miss the correspondent's point?

P.S. I wish I could be at Gettysburg for the festivities....but I can assure you I will be at Chickamauga this September for that battle's sesquicentennial observance.

First off Dan, I’m doing the Staff Ride at Chickamauga on Wednesday the 18th. Beaudy the wonder dog is in the doggie hotel till Monday the 23rd, so we could hook up maybe. I’ll have some time, and will have just gone over the ground with the Army pukes, for whatever that’s worth. Gimme a shout.

I do think CNN misses the point. Perhaps a better point is from the Gettysburg movie when they pan along Armistead’s line; this private is the grandson of a president, that private is the son of a governor, and on and on. Every young man (and middle aged and even old generals) on that field, South and North had dry mouths. That is what makes a soldier.

Gettysburg is not so much a celebration of a Northern victory as it is a recognition of the courage and sacrifice of American soldiers, whether North or South. Those fields, rocks, and slopes are Holy ground, for all of us. Modern interpretations just cheapen it.

ps, I'll have my flag out and I got two racks of baby backs and a poop load of silver queen corn, and me and my Alabama neighbors are gonna celebrate the 4th, as Americans.

Ciao, John

< Message edited by Symon -- 6/29/2013 10:07:52 PM >


_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 4
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/29/2013 10:34:02 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
I agree, Faulkner is clearly referring to post war Southern 14 year olds imagining what it must have been like and perhaps imagining that their participation might have resulted in a different outcome.


Of course, they might also be imagining that General Picket had just instructed them to "run along now and tell General Lee this is a really, really bad idea...oh...and be persuasive."

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/29/2013 11:29:01 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
Or is he trying to suggest that pre-Picketts Charge the CSA had not yet lost the battle, and the war, and that every Southern boy thinks that given a chance that history could have changed and the CSA emerge victorious.

If that's correct, every Southern man wishes he were there.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 6
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/30/2013 4:33:16 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
That magnificent moment is SOOOOOOOOOO well created in the film Gettysburg. Pickett and Armistead and 15,000 men KNOWING what they were about to walk into yet THINKING they might succeed. Really recommend James McPherson's For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War. Use it in my Civil War history classes. GREAT work.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 7
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/30/2013 4:42:44 AM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
I think the point is, is that in the time Faulkner was writing, and perhaps still today, 14 year old boys from the South identified with the Confederacy and believed somehow that their cause was just, and that somehow that battle could yet be won. We were still dealing with this dichotomy during WWII, during the desegregation of the armed forces, and still today.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 8
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/30/2013 7:09:35 PM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline
As long as there are people who think so little of themselves that the only way to feel as they have any worth is to put someone else down, tread upon them, and subjugate them, we will have that problem.

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 9
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/30/2013 7:43:58 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
The Minneapolis Star-Tribune today published a long 3-page article with maps and photos on a Minnesota soldier at the battle. He was detailed to the field hospital and only witnessed the slaughter of the 1st Minnesota in the action that held the Union line on the second day and probably swung the battle's outcome. This action resulted in the highest casualty percentage of any Union unit in the entire war.

He wrote two diaries through the war; one survives and the article prints extensive portions of the Gettysburg sections. He stayed there for weeks afterward, helping the wounded and burying hundreds of dead. This is a portion of the battle not often dealt with by historians more interested in the movements of the two armies in the days and weeks after the fighting. Worth a read.

http://www.startribune.com/local/212817551.html?page=1&c=y
An excerpt:

"About 4 p.m. on July 2, Southern forces mounted a ferocious attack on Union soldiers under the command of Gen. Daniel Sickles, who shifted his men to higher ground near some peach trees west of Little Round Top, a move that left his flanks vulnerable.

Soldiers, their guns too hot to hold, resorted to hand-to-hand combat. Some even threw cobblestones at their enemy as control of a nearby wheat field changed hands a half-dozen times during two hours of relentless fighting.

Confederates swarming in from three sides finally broke Sickles’ line and his soldiers retreated in panic past the First Minnesota, standing by on the crest of a ridge.

Gen. Winfield Hancock, overseeing a corps that included the First Minnesota, moved his men a quarter-mile to fill the gap on Cemetery Ridge. The Minnesotans looked down the gently sloping pastureland to a marshy swale known as Plum Run.

About 262 Minnesotans on the ridge were all that stood between more than a thousand Confederate soldiers and the disaster they would cause if they managed to pour over the ridge and split the Union line.

With dead bodies punctuating the field, Hancock needed reinforcements. But first, he had to plug the collapsing line for five minutes to delay the Confederate advance until help could arrive.

“What regiment is this?” Hancock asked. Col. William Colvill, a lawyer and publisher from Red Wing, responded: “First Minnesota.”

“Charge those lines!” Hancock ordered. “Take them!”

William Lochren, an Irish-born soldier who would become a federal judge in Minnesota, heard Hancock’s order.

“Every man realized in an instant what that order meant — death or wounds to us all, the sacrifice of the regiment to gain a few minutes time and save the position, and probably the battlefield — and every man saw and accepted the necessity for the sacrifice.”

Marching at double-quick time with bayonets fixed, the First Minnesota charged down the incline into the whistling bullets, screeching shells and dense smoke unleashed by some 1,600 Alabamians.

“Bullets were coming like hailstones,” Sgt. John Wesley Plummer wrote to his brother back home, “whittling our boys like grain before the sickle.”

Stunned by the Minnesotans rushing toward them, the Confederate soldiers grew disorganized in the Plum Run bog. The five-minute charge had indeed thwarted the Southerners’ advance and saved the Union line on Cemetery Ridge."


< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 6/30/2013 7:45:51 PM >


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to RevRick)
Post #: 10
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/30/2013 8:41:48 PM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline
The 150th anniversery of Gettysburg supprisingly made it into a danish "news"paper. There is a 16 picture pictorial of the re-inactors at Gettysburg from yesterday, in todays paper.

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 6/30/2013 8:46:16 PM >

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 11
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 6/30/2013 9:23:24 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Those young boys recalled by Faulkner were stopped at the Angle, a stone wall considered the high-water mark of the Confederacy -- perhaps the last chance for victory in the U.S. Civil War. Instead, the Union prevailed at Gettysburg, a turning point in the four-year war that claimed at least 620,000 lives.

Faulkner isn't painting a scene of dry-mouthed youn men anticipating battle. He's painting a post-war scene, describing how for every southern boy since that fateful charge there comes a point in his mind where it's again 2 p.m. on July 3, 1863, just as Pickett's Charge is about to begin.


I think you're entirely right. For one thing, the average age in Pickett's Charge (or more formally, the Pickett-Pettigrew Assault) was not fourteen: the Confederacy didn't start "robbing the cradle and the grave" by expanding the age of conscription until later.

A secondary point is that I believe the Confederacy still had two later chances for victory: if they could have destroyed the armies of both Rosecrans and Burnside in Tennessee, and if they could have held Atlanta long enough to ensure Lincoln's defeat in the November 1864 election.

But this thread should probably not be in the AE section.

< Message edited by Capt. Harlock -- 6/30/2013 9:26:19 PM >


_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 12
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/1/2013 6:04:22 PM   
Mundy


Posts: 2869
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline
Just spend the day last Thu at Gettysburg.  I'll tell you, going in late June is different than going in April. 

Managed to hit Antietam two days before that.

Ed

_____________________________


(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 13
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/2/2013 1:24:55 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Mil History channel has a Gettysburg show tonight at 6pm

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 14
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/2/2013 2:40:26 AM   
whippleofd

 

Posts: 617
Joined: 12/23/2005
Status: offline
I live just south of Erie, PA so I've been there once a year since moving here 11 years ago. This year I'm arriving on 21 July and leaving on 26 July. It's going to be a might different this year as my son is now married and a 2nd Lt. stationed at Ft. Hood, Texas. We always went together, and he credits going to a different part of the battlefield each year as one of the three reasons he decided to join the Army. He said he could imagine the men standing there, shoulder to shoulder looking across those fields at each other and imagine one of them saying, 'If not me, who? If not now, when?" Col. Jac Jacob's book of the same name was the second.

Going to be all be all by myself, so if anyones going to be in the area during the week, drop me a line. I do have private matters to attend to each day till about 1500-1600, but I'm free afterwards. Based on the temp, it's not going to be much fun to go any earlier anyways.

Whipple


_____________________________

MMCS(SW/AW) 1981-2001
1981 RTC, SD
81-82 NPS, Orlando
82-85 NPTU, Idaho Falls
85-90 USS Truxtun (CGN-35)
90-93 USS George Washington (CVN-73)
93-96 NFAS Orlando
96-01 Navsea-08/Naval Reactors

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 15
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 1:33:18 AM   
topeverest


Posts: 3376
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Houston, TX - USA
Status: offline
Ahhh, to be at that time of year again in the USA. Probably will take the kiddies down to the reenactment.

Being an avid student of the battle & war as well as a veteran of dozens of walking trips to the battlefield, my 2 cents is that there was a genuine opportunity to deliver a desperate blow to the Union at Gettysburg on each of the three days during the battle. I subscribe to the theory that RE LEE was over confident. He did not exert effective leadership during the campaign nor did he listen to his trusted subordinates views. It is easy to blame many others, but the responsibility lies with REL. He was at his worst during the campaign, and specifically on July 3. He truly believed in the invincibility of his troops - and that the Union troops would not fight or be lead well. We all know how it turned out.

It is a poison pill many a leader has taken.

_____________________________

Andy M

(in reply to whippleofd)
Post #: 16
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 8:54:39 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Would LOVE to be there right now!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to topeverest)
Post #: 17
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 10:27:47 AM   
morejeffs

 

Posts: 249
Joined: 4/24/2013
Status: offline
I have to agree with you Topeverest. As brilliant as Lee was, he made the big (and wrong) decisions at Gettysburg.
He deserves (and gets) the respect due to him...But I think there is perhaps a bit too much veneration of him in southern legend
and this leads to a desire to protect his legacy....

Pickett`s charge was completely his order and it is hard to blame the subordinates for the failure of it.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 18
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 3:19:06 PM   
Skyros


Posts: 1570
Joined: 9/29/2000
From: Columbia SC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mundy

Just spend the day last Thu at Gettysburg.  I'll tell you, going in late June is different than going in April. 

Managed to hit Antietam two days before that.

Ed

What did you find different, the heat or the foliage. Here is a pic I took in April 2011 and it was cold.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 19
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 4:03:29 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
For me Gettysburg is less a historical monument and more a graveyard.  Some 51,000 Americans died fighting in those 3 days.  Many of them buried on site.  Such monumental self-inflicted carnage that it hurts me to contemplate.  It hurts me to contemplate why some 650,000 of our best youth died over the course of the war against ourselves.  To remember the American Civil War is to think about how very close we came to chaos, the abyss and national self-immolation.  A warning from the pages of history, bought so dearly.

I appreciate the military angle-who was where, when, how the battle raged, etc.  But the predominant feeling I have for Civil War battlefields is sorrow, loss, and maybe a little bit of anger.

_____________________________


(in reply to Skyros)
Post #: 20
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 4:18:39 PM   
Mundy


Posts: 2869
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Skyros

What did you find different, the heat or the foliage. Here is a pic I took in April 2011 and it was cold.





I would say the foliage. I think it was in 2009. It was actually around 70 at the time, so it was a beautiful day.

Ed-

_____________________________


(in reply to Skyros)
Post #: 21
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 5:04:27 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I love Civil War battlefields - at least that's the way I feel about the three I know best - Chickamauga, Sharpsburg and Gettysburg. Beautiful, tranquil, interesting, haunting places.

For those of you close enough to visit Chickamauga, the park has a newly produced introductory film that is fabulous. It's more like watching Gettysburg and Glory! than the typical park documentaries of the past.

I make a standing offer to give a tour for any AE players able to visit Chickamauga. Except during the sesquicentennial observation. I understand this will be the largest reenacement for any battle - even larger than Gettysburg - but that it will take place in a rural location a few miles south of the park (on terrain involved in a major skirmish a few days before the battle). But I won't be at the reenactment. I'll be walking and bicycling through the park, stopping to read the historic markers and pausing to reflect on what happened there 150 years ago. I think that's best done alone.

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 22
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/3/2013 5:33:20 PM   
janh

 

Posts: 1216
Joined: 6/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I love Civil War battlefields - at least that's the way I feel about the three I know best - Chickamauga, Sharpsburg and Gettysburg. Beautiful, tranquil, interesting, haunting places.

For those of you close enough to visit Chickamauga, the park has a newly produced introductory film that is fabulous. It's more like watching Gettysburg and Glory! than the typical park documentaries of the past.

I make a standing offer to give a tour for any AE players able to visit Chickamauga. Except during the sesquicentennial observation. I understand this will be the largest reenacement for any battle - even larger than Gettysburg - but that it will take place in a rural location a few miles south of the park (on terrain involved in a major skirmish a few days before the battle). But I won't be at the reenactment. I'll be walking and bicycling through the park, stopping to read the historic markers and pausing to reflect on what happened there 150 years ago. I think that's best done alone.


Damn, if it were not that far... As a child I and I friend used to play "Rebel Charge at Chickamauga" by Landrey and Kroegel on C64 every afternoon and every free day I could scrape together. The loading times, and the "computer plotting" phases sometimes took 3 hours between every turn, but I'd fill that gap by keeping notes and sketching battle plans or reports. Those were the days... Since then I always wanted to see Chickamauga and Chattanooga.


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 23
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/4/2013 4:58:22 AM   
topeverest


Posts: 3376
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Houston, TX - USA
Status: offline
Canoerebel,

I never really read what I thought was a definitive 'Coddington' style analysis of Chickamauga. What would be your favorite study?

And I agree that Chickamauga was a spectacular struggle. It is hard to stand on Snodgrass and not stand in amazement at the struggle that occurred there. I wish I could say that I know the battle as well as many others I have studied, and I recommend any that haven't to visit.

_____________________________

Andy M

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 24
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/4/2013 6:01:31 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Dan got me hooked on Cozzen's writings. EXCELLENT work!

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 25
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/4/2013 6:52:20 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
This Terrible Sound, by Peter Cozzens, is the finest treatment of Chickamauga. Huge book told from the perspective of the soldiers (through letters, diaries, reminiscences, etc.). I pay it the highest possible compiment when I say it's the second best piece of historical writing I've ever read (We Were Soldiers Once being the finest).

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 26
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/5/2013 4:30:10 PM   
topeverest


Posts: 3376
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Houston, TX - USA
Status: offline
Thanks gents...I'm headed out now to find this puppy. Got a long flight to Fairbanks,, need a prose fix, and I don't do electronic readers.

_____________________________

Andy M

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 27
RE: Gettysburg 150th - 7/5/2013 6:46:42 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
This Terrible Sound, by Peter Cozzens, is the finest treatment of Chickamauga. Huge book told from the perspective of the soldiers (through letters, diaries, reminiscences, etc.). I pay it the highest possible compiment when I say it's the second best piece of historical writing I've ever read (We Were Soldiers Once being the finest).

Yep. +1. Think Colonel Moore would agree. The writing of battles is the writing of the men who participated in them.

Ciao. JWE

_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 28
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Gettysburg 150th Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.984