MaB1708
Posts: 336
Joined: 8/13/2006 From: Freiburg(Germany) Status: offline
|
Dimitris, take the time you need. I can only speak for myself but I have full trust in what you had announced as being "in this for the long run". Sim is out for 3 days now, I cannot say if the amount of technical hickups had been expected by your side or not, but I see ongoing responsiveness from the dev side and I do believe that this will remain. Issues will be fixed, databased will be filled, but let me make clear that COMMAND has so far met my high expectations and not give the newbies or people lurking before buying the idea that this simulation is half-finished or such. It is not. It is outstanding in its scope, in its modelling capacity, in the database it uses etc. Dev team is committed to help on all majors that have surfaced since release and I believe that when this is tackled, they will continue to enhance the experience for us (strike planning, weapon database etc.). Patience for all this to happen - yeah, why not? I have a gem at my mouse-wheel already, so why should I impatiently push for more glitter? It will come. These guys have invested man-years already for no money at all, think about the DB2000, think about the myriads of Harpoon scenarios. Now they run this project as a business project, what else then optimum results for us, the userbase, can we expect? Maybe even now devs would like to open up a separate thread for "Things I would like to see" that are not current technical issues, but I believe the users already have something that - sooner or later - they would like to see implemented or at least considered. I have some and would like to unload them somewhere. Bests, Martin
< Message edited by MartinB -- 9/27/2013 3:38:03 PM >
|