Mgellis
Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tevans6220 quote:
ORIGINAL: thewood1 It is not the review itself, but the fairly well known information that the reviewer has a running feud with the developers, including accusations of IP theft. Not only that, the reviewer has engaged with government projects using Harpoon as the platform. Either of those should have disqualified him from doing the review for an independent site. He obviously had not put a ;ot of time into even remotely understanding the game and its interface and that makes the review, combined with his history with the developers, have an odd tome to it. If someone else had done the review I could easily look at it and agree with a lot of individual points. There have already been a couple reviews out similar to it. But the fact that none of the background was considered or disclaimed borders on either incompetence or malfeasance from and editorial standpoint. Who cares? Did the review stop you from buying? Herman may have been a little biased in his review but no more so than those of you who automatically discredit it because of who wrote it. There's bias all around and it all stems from some stupid feud going back to Harpoon days. He may have got some things wrong in his review but it seems to me his review was pretty detailed which tells me he had to spend a fair amount of time with the game. Nitpicking about things he got wrong is just plain stupid. Name one review that gets 100% right, 100% of the time. There is none. And reviews are just opinions. This game is going to live or die based on it's merits and the support it gets. So far the support has been excellent and the game is too. Why worry about one review? Unfortunately, the Harpoon database wars were so toxic that it is hard not to have some kind of bias about Herman. Personally, I think the real issue is that Command just took away a lot of Herman's relevance and he knows it. The people complaining about his review are annoyed, I suspect, because they know it, too, and they feel he is not being honest, but is instead motivated more by ego and a desire to protect his turf than by any interest in the truth.
|