Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Airpower

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Flashpoint Campaigns Series >> Airpower Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Airpower - 11/12/2013 7:57:52 AM   
andyph

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 11/12/2013
Status: offline
Enjoying the sim!!]

Just a few points (and I havn't played that many scenarios so apologies if I am ahead of myself)

Aircraft I have seen used F-15E, German F4, Soviet Fencers and Mig 23 ML

F-15E was supposedly from the 81TFW, who were actually flying A-10s until about 92, the 48thTFW reequipped with F-15E's from about 91 I think. anyway, F-15E providing CAS/BAI is very unlikely - they would have been target much further back.

Same comment about the Fencer - Deep striker.

Mig 23 ML is a fighter - not much bomb carriage here - some versions of the 23 were dual role but mainly you would be looking at Su-7, SU-25, MiG 27 and some MiG 21s for the Soviets in the CAS/BAI arena.

On the NATO side CAS/ BAI would be mainly done by Belgian Mirage 5s, RAF Jaguar, Harrier, USAF A-10, ANG A-7's and Alpha Jets of the Luftwaffe - interestingly one of the roles of the German Alpha jet wings was anti helicopter (Hind/Hip) with the gun. I remember on some TAC Air exercises they would attack in large (say 16 strong formations) to try and overload the enemy AD - small, smokeless and fast - they appeared and the disappeared as if from nowhere, great fun for all!!. F-16s also were used for BAI but for CAS it was usally seen as a waste and they would be used in emergency only .
Luftwaffe Tornados carrying the MW-1 pod ( is this in the sim?) but typically they would be targeted deeper - I think by the late 80s German F4s were all used for AD except for the Recon examples. Certainly were not doing CAS in the late 80s


The thought of medium level bombing, over the central front? - hmmmm ??? Can't imagine many machines getting over 100ft!!


On other issues.

I know our (well UK) Lynx and Gazelles saw their main threat as airburst artillery - I can't seem to simulate this (almost seems helis are invulnerable to artillery? ). Direct weapons less so as they would drop down out of LOS/LOF .

Soviets used different tactics with their Hinds - less concealment close to the ground and more high speed flight higher up in massed formations. But mainly for mass launching of the unguided rockets

Still I completely agree with the comments about hinds popping over the horizon and seeing every non moving 'concealed' vehicle - I don't think so! If the vehicle didn't move it would be pretty safe!!

Also I think dug in infantry seems too vulnerable, especially in urban areas - it does not seem to take much to wipe them out
Post #: 1
RE: Airpower - 11/12/2013 11:37:29 AM   
CapnDarwin


Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline
Andy, I will answer your questions this evening when I am home. Welcome to the group.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to andyph)
Post #: 2
RE: Airpower - 11/12/2013 2:09:38 PM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:


Just a few points (and I havn't played that many scenarios so apologies if I am ahead of myself)

Aircraft I have seen used F-15E, German F4, Soviet Fencers and Mig 23 ML

F-15E was supposedly from the 81TFW, who were actually flying A-10s until about 92, the 48thTFW reequipped with F-15E's from about 91 I think.


I am working off a TO&E/ORBAT that shows the equipment for each unit in the Orders of Battle for both NATO and the Warsaw Pact for 1989. Those have proven to be mostly correct. All that I would need to do is find an F-15 unit and get it corrected. There will be no A-10 in a scenario where the F-15 is giving CAS.




quote:


anyway, F-15E providing CAS/BAI is very unlikely - they would have been target much further back.

Same comment about the Fencer - Deep striker.


IMO, you can forget anything you were ever told about how CAS would be applied to the battlefield. Airforces would be the #1 target of both sides. As such, the air situation would chaotic. If all you had were long range aircraft flying out of England or even the Soviet Union. You would take them.

[quote}
Mig 23 ML is a fighter - not much bomb carriage here - some versions of the 23 were dual role but mainly you would be looking at Su-7, SU-25, MiG 27 and some MiG 21s for the Soviets in the CAS/BAI arena.


I took aircraft from the list available in the game. I didn't really cherry pick what versions I took. I do know fighters make ground attacks too.

quote:


On the NATO side CAS/ BAI would be mainly done by Belgian Mirage 5s, RAF Jaguar, Harrier, USAF A-10, ANG A-7's and Alpha Jets of the Luftwaffe - interestingly one of the roles of the German Alpha jet wings was anti helicopter (Hind/Hip) with the gun. I remember on some TAC Air exercises they would attack in large (say 16 strong formations) to try and overload the enemy AD - small, smokeless and fast - they appeared and the disappeared as if from nowhere, great fun for all!!. F-16s also were used for BAI but for CAS it was usally seen as a waste and they would be used in emergency only .
Luftwaffe Tornados carrying the MW-1 pod ( is this in the sim?) but typically they would be targeted deeper - I think by the late 80s German F4s were all used for AD except for the Recon examples. Certainly were not doing CAS in the late 80s


Again, CAS would have been turned upside down. You get what you get. This is not an air sim where I match aircraft loadouts and main aircraft types with a mission. This is, "grab what you have and get downtown!"


quote:


On other issues.

I know our (well UK) Lynx and Gazelles saw their main threat as airburst artillery - I can't seem to simulate this (almost seems helis are invulnerable to artillery? ). Direct weapons less so as they would drop down out of LOS/LOF .


Think abstract for some of the artillery and most of the combat engineer functions. We are working on making them a bit more realistic but at the moment they are about a bubble off center.

Fixing several things artillery is on the list.

Good Hunting.

MR

< Message edited by Mad Russian -- 11/13/2013 2:07:46 AM >


_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to CapnDarwin)
Post #: 3
RE: Airpower - 11/13/2013 12:46:06 AM   
CapnDarwin


Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline
Thanks MR. Long day on my end!

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 4
RE: Airpower - 11/24/2013 5:39:38 AM   
andyph

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 11/12/2013
Status: offline
OK,

I thought I'd see if the update would attend to any of this.

I was on most of the RAF ground attack exercises in the late 80s early 90s - Mallet Blows, OSEX, Highland Cardinal etc so have a practical knowledge of the subject- I'll just make a few points though.

Aircraft such as F-15E, F-111 (and I would guess SU -24 on the otherside) Although theoretically capable would not be used for CAS partly because they were not trained for it - in the time period a CAS attack from a '9 liner' was a very difficult task - crews who trained for it all the time didn't have the greatest hit rate of getting their eyes onto a target, even when the targets were lased! - F-15E doing CAS only started in Iraq / Afghanistan.


Again aircraft that are fighters , while they maybe capable of carrying ground to air weapons the crews mostly would not practice with them (or even have them on a fighter base!) certainly in Western Europe NATO at the time the only 'swing role' machines were some of the F-16 Squadrons and the Canadian Hornets that came over in the late 80s. As for the other side, as they got bugger all flying hours and were very regimented in the way they did things I would safely say all units were role specific and that the Mig 23 ML would be only used as interceptors .

You are right. The Army would get what it was given for battlefield support and it would not be deep strikers or fighters!

Perhaps it is a bit of a ask but I think air attack should be split up into CAS and BAI. CAS is obvious and similar in effect to artillery 'direct support' and not very effective, almost laways done by a 2 ship and in an emergency!. BAI is perhaps more tricky - mainly we would be aiming at the support vehicles - we always thought the army can kill tanks on the battlefield as they are very hard to kill from the air. So a typical BAI tasking might be to drop a bridge, then return later and hit any bridging repairs and hopefully and traffic jams of soft skinned on nearby roads. The first attack might be from a pair. while the 2nd might be an 8 ship with cluster bombs.
as an aside, PGMs, had not really made it in battlefield support at the time - apart from Mavericks for the A-10s it would mainly have been iron and cluster weapons - LGBs would mainly be used by the deep striker.

helicopters were not my field but we did work with them from time to time, mainly as a FAC platform.

It seems to me the game treats them as super tanks - in reality they are very vulnerable soft skinned vehicles.
Certainly the British Lynx crews plan was to hide in cover, fire a TOW and run , fast! to the next cover. their main fear was airburst artillery.
i find it quite ludicrous that the Hinds can seem to see all the ground vehicles within a few miles , even if they are in cover, as soon as they crest a rise.
As for closing armored formations and giving battle, I would love to know what you reference is for that as a tactic and why you imagine they would survive!!

I would point you at the how the US Army Apaches got a bloody nose at Najaf ( and Apaches have armour!) I'd also refer you to the tank V helicopter chapter in 'armed action' by James Newton, might be even more relevant.

I think your Hinds would be running for their lives avoiding direct fire (even if it is not AAA) and artillery fire aimed at them if them attacked dug in front line formations!

I do enjoy how you have modeled the ground battle though even if I think that infantry would survive longer!



















(in reply to CapnDarwin)
Post #: 5
RE: Airpower - 11/24/2013 7:17:27 AM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
I tried not to pick aircraft that had mission types like Air Supremacy, Deep Strike or SEAD.

If they are rated as CAS I simply took the one that I thought might be the most likely to show up.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to andyph)
Post #: 6
RE: Airpower - 11/24/2013 8:54:38 AM   
wodin


Posts: 10762
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: England
Status: offline
I think Andy has some interesting points and as he has experience I'd be inclined to take his advice.

I also think Helo's need abit more work on the fidelity side..I agree about them being able to spot to well and some more fidelity in the spotting mechanics is needed further down the line.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 7
RE: Airpower - 11/24/2013 12:34:00 PM   
Panta_slith


Posts: 318
Joined: 4/4/2002
From: Montevideo, Uruguay
Status: offline
I have no personal shooting from/at helos experience, but in other wargames/simulations I've extensively played (TacOps, Steel Beasts Pro PE) all choppers, even the sh**-scaring Hinds are far more fragile to hostile fire, therefore the modelling used in FPC caught me by surprise.

(in reply to wodin)
Post #: 8
RE: Airpower - 11/24/2013 2:06:58 PM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
I think this thread needs to be split. CAS is one issue and helicopters is another.

I'll start a helicopter thread and we can keep this one as the CAS thread.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to Panta_slith)
Post #: 9
RE: Airpower - 11/24/2013 3:46:29 PM   
CapnDarwin


Posts: 8467
Joined: 2/12/2005
From: Newark, OH
Status: offline
All sorts of types are in the data base to use for different scenarios and missions. One area that needs to be expanded on is the air war component including getting an air superiority model in the mix that can provide interdiction missions similar to the air strikes we have now. Like everything else on the improvements list it takes time and needs to be scheduled in the grand road map.

_____________________________

OTS is looking forward to Southern Storm getting released!

Cap'n Darwin aka Jim Snyder
On Target Simulations LLC

(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 10
RE: Airpower - 11/24/2013 9:58:43 PM   
LuckyJim1010

 

Posts: 260
Joined: 7/6/2010
Status: offline
F15E's on CAS - never going to happen. BAI at a push maybe.
48TFW and it's brethren at 20 TFW were dedicated to Counter Air and deep strike. That means well beyond the FEBA.
Same for the RAF GR1's (9, 617,27 Sqn)
Even Jags over the FLOT were a hit and miss thing.
CAS is a demanding and trained for job. Plus any AAD unit in the front line WILL shoot first and ask questions later.
NATO's planning was always to cause maximum attrition to WP Forces before they hit the FEBA
A10's and Harriers were the exception not the rule.
I too spent a few years on Mallet Blow's, OSEX etc and at Otterburn the main tasking was practice bomb runs in an FRA situation, not CAS.

(in reply to CapnDarwin)
Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Flashpoint Campaigns Series >> Airpower Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.469