Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005 From: Honolulu, Hawaii Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 76mm quote:
ORIGINAL: Chux So in reality you simply did not read through all the manuals but just thought you found something that wasn't in the manuals you could gripe about. In other words, RTFM? Not really. I actually have read the manuals, and did not see any specific reference to "See Appendix X for explanation of the dots". Perhaps I missed the specific reference, but if there isn't one I'm not sure I should be expected to guess that these would be explained somewhere in the appendices. Also strange that these dots--which are pretty important--are not addressed in the voluminous tutorials. Whether a unit is organized or disorganized is a rather huge difference in the game, but I didn't see any explanation in the rather voluminous text of how to tell if a unit is disorganized or not. If it is there, someone please correct me. Rather than call them dots, the Players Manual refers to them as status indicators. Picture & Text Tutorial #9 on supply mentions these one pages 1, 4, and 5. Perhaps elsewhere too, I didn't do a detailed analysis. Tutorial Video #5 covers the same material that's in Picture & Text Tutorial #9 so the status indicators are mentioned there as well. They are probably also mentioned whenever they become relevant. For instance, when placing units aboard naval transports or carriers, when choosing units to make land attacks, and so on. The first time they are mentioned in the Players Manual is on page 3 of volume 1, when describing the Essential changes from the board game.
_____________________________
Steve Perfection is an elusive goal.
|