Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 8:58:43 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Thanks, have registered all of these on me

As pointed out, Po Hang class is already there:

PCC 756 Po Hang [Flight II] -- South Korea (Navy), 1985, Exocet
PCC 756 Po Hang [Flight II] -- South Korea (Navy), 1990, Exocet

Recently added the Buyan and Buyan Mod as well:

MRK Buyan [Pr.21630 Buyan] -- Russia [1992-] (Navy), 2007
MRK Buyan Mod [Pr.21631] -- Russia [1992-] (Navy), 2014



quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

A few more suggestions, possibly repeating some from another thread, but I figured it was best to make sure they were posted here, too.

Car Nicobar Class Fast Attack Craft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_Nicobar_Class
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/car-nicobar-class-fast-attack-craft/

Buyan-class corvette
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyan-class_corvette
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/buyan-class-corvettes-project-21630-russia/

Cape-class patrol boat (Australia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape-class_patrol_boat
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/cape-class-patrol-boats/

Gumdoksuri-class patrol vessel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gumdoksuri-class_patrol_vessel
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/pxk-gumdoksuri/

Baynunah Class Corvettes
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/baynunah/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baynunah-class_corvette

Type 26 Global Combat Ship
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Combat_Ship
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/global-combat-ship-gcs-programme/

Amazonas-class corvette

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazonas-class_corvette
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/amazonas-offshore-patrol-vessels/

Khareef-class corvette
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khareef-class_corvette
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/khareef-class/

Knud Rasmussen-class patrol vessel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knud_Rasmussen-class_patrol_vessel
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/knud-rasmussen-class/

French patrol vessel L'Adroit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_patrol_vessel_L%27Adroit
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/ladroit-offshore-patrol-vessel/

M80 Stiletto
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/m80-stiletto/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M80_Stiletto

Pohang-class corvette
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pohang-class_corvette
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/pohangclasscombatcor/

POVZEE Offshore Patrol Vessel
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/povzee/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guaiquer%C3%AD-class_patrol_boat

Holland Class Offshore Patrol Vessels
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/hollandclasspatrol/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holland-class_offshore_patrol_vessels

Saettia MK4, Diciotti Class Patrol Vessel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diciotti-class_offshore_patrol_vessel
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/saetti-diciotti/

Go Jun Bong Class LST
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/go-jun-bong-class-lst/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_Jun_Bong-class_LST

Makassar Class Landing Platform Dock
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/makassar-class-landing-platform-docks/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makassar-class_landing_platform_dock

Thanks for considering these!








_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 151
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 9:00:27 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mercho

Hello everyone,

it would be nice if the german frigate f125 could be included to the database.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/F125 (sorry only in german, but on the english wiki sensors and radars are not listed)

thank you !!!


Assigned to me, will be added when time allows. If needed for a scenario please let me know and I'll add it asap.

Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to mercho)
Post #: 152
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 9:13:58 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Thanks. Have made some adjustments as per your info. Have a couple of questions/comments:

Is the Sonac/PTA TASS even fitted? Some sources say the ship has provision only, and that it is not carried operationally.

I'll let scenario designers add mines to the Hamina class themselves, if needed. Fair?

Several sources mention EOMS from SAGEM. Where on the ship is this system located, and what it is used for? I'm assuming Ceros-200 is the primary fire control sensor, so why EOMS?

quote:

ORIGINAL: El Savior

Finland Hamina-class is without SONAR and ASW-weapons:

The sonar suite includes a Simrad Subsea Toadfish active high-frequency search and attack sonar, and a Sonac/PTA towed array sonar. Not sure which model it is, but it can be added same Toadfish sonar in Rauma-class SS2400 Toadfish.
1 ×  rail for depth charges or mines (depth charges are normal load)
1 x Sonac/PTA towed array sonar

Also speed for Hamina is 30+ knots. I know that they can go much faster with their state of the art water propulsion jet. Adding few knots wont do bad. True high speed is classified, but 35 knots can be easily achieved. Older Rauma class can go at least 35 knots too, which Hamina replaced.

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/haminaclass/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamina-class_missile_boat

Hämeenmaa minelayer is without mines. From 2009+ new mine can be added: Sea Mine 2000 - bottom, Acoustic & target Discrimination. Older version use bottom mines.
4 × rails for 100-150 mines

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A4meenmaa-class_minelayer

Thanks!



< Message edited by emsoy -- 11/30/2013 10:16:57 PM >


_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to El Savior)
Post #: 153
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 9:23:48 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

Minor issues I spotted...

#1475 Civilian Motor Yacht [38 m] is listed as only 3 tons and 1 DP? That seems very low when the 13-meter yacht is listed as 10 tons.

#1379 Civilian Sailboat [38 m]...ummm...I'm not sure but the wrong picture may be linked to that record...I'm pretty sure that's not what a 38-m sailboat looks like. :)




Fixed, thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 154
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 9:26:24 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

"AK-100 100mm/59" -> "AK-100 100mm/70"

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNRussian_39-70_ak100.htm


Updated, thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 155
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 9:28:49 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MR_BURNS2

Unimportant minor typo, RQ-4B Global Hawk Block 10-30 listed under US Army instead of USAF.


Fixed, thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 156
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 9:36:02 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baloogan



Minor minor typo for loadouts for the F-111C Aardvark AUP Raptor vs Popeye


Fixed, thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
Post #: 157
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 11/30/2013 10:05:47 PM   
Jakob Wedman

 

Posts: 202
Joined: 3/20/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: El Savior

There seems to be a minor error in Finland radar database:

#1518 Radar VRRVY - was HF radar for main radar VRRVI not 3D radar as it's now in database. This was Finnish made radar from 1956.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MoRsE/Radars


VRRVY could be used both as a 2D and as a HF radar:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Antenna_radar_3d_VRRVY_Finland.jpg

Each radar station had either a VRRVI (Pohjanpalo 1) 2D radar or a VRRVY (Pohjanpalo 2). Pohjanpalo 2 could be used for GCI. Therefore I think it's best if this radar is implemented as 3D.

_____________________________


(in reply to El Savior)
Post #: 158
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 6:45:22 AM   
El Savior

 

Posts: 337
Joined: 7/31/2003
From: Finland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Is the Sonac/PTA TASS even fitted? Some sources say the ship has provision only, and that it is not carried operationally.

Several sources mention EOMS from SAGEM. Where on the ship is this system located, and what it is used for? I'm assuming Ceros-200 is the primary fire control sensor, so why EOMS?



Sonac/PTA - 50 meters long towed array. Surely not all had this, it was added provision only like you said. Can scenario maker add "general towed array" to simulate it? This of course is much shorter version than ocean versions. Sources say very little about it. Only that is was used in (one?) Helsinki-class 2002, I have a picture of it but no name for the ship is included. I haven't seen any picture where is it actually used by Hamina.

EOMS - EOMS is a multifunction optronic system, unique of its kind. Designed for surface vessels, it combines infrared search and track (IRST) with electro-optical gun fire control in a single unit. It is a highly effective solution for self-protection against symmetrical and asymmetrical, surface or air threats. - See more at: http://www.sagem-ds.com/spip.php?rubrique270#sthash.LsH2LPNL.dpuf

I believe it's here in the picture (Hamina-class) pointing stern. It seems Ceros-200 is pointing forward and EOMS pointing backward.


FNS Pori (83) Hamina-class

Same EOMS-sensor is fitted in Hämeenlinna-class


Hämeenlinna-class minelayer fitted with EOMS


Croatian Vukovar, Helsinki-class. Not sure is this EOMS, but if it is it also pointing stern.

Hope this helps.

< Message edited by El Savior -- 12/1/2013 7:54:27 AM >


_____________________________

El Savior

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 159
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 7:01:40 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jakob Wedman


quote:

ORIGINAL: El Savior

There seems to be a minor error in Finland radar database:

#1518 Radar VRRVY - was HF radar for main radar VRRVI not 3D radar as it's now in database. This was Finnish made radar from 1956.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MoRsE/Radars


VRRVY could be used both as a 2D and as a HF radar:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Antenna_radar_3d_VRRVY_Finland.jpg

Each radar station had either a VRRVI (Pohjanpalo 1) 2D radar or a VRRVY (Pohjanpalo 2). Pohjanpalo 2 could be used for GCI. Therefore I think it's best if this radar is implemented as 3D.


Restored, thanks Jakob!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Jakob Wedman)
Post #: 160
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 11:29:27 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Thanks for the information on the EOMS. Have added the system to the ship.

Would it be possible to dig up more information on the Sonac/PTA? The info we have so far makes it impossible to do a good implementation

Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 161
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:20:39 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: apd1004

I have an issue with the ZSU-23-4 in the database, and the GUN DISH radar as well. As far as I know, it is the same entry in DB3K as CWDB (maybe different entry #?).

In DB3K the GUN DISH radar is listed as an onboard sensor on the ZSU-23-4 (#908) under the mounts/stores/weapons listing, but GUN DISH also has a separate listing as a "mobile vehicle" (#1248). After much research I have found no references of the GUN DISH being used or mounted anywhere other than on a ZSU-23-4. As far as I can tell, the GUN DISH radar was the fire control radar for the ZSU-23-4 exclusively and it was also capable of search and acquisition and had a 20km range.


Thanks, whacked the standalone radar.

quote:


I have done some testing and discovered that the vanilla ZSU-23-4 when firing at a target has only a 5% base probability of hit. Compare this to the M163 VADS which has a 70% base probability to hit. The M163 VADS had a range-only radar not tied to the fire control system like the GUN DISH is on the ZSU-23-4. True, the M163 is a rotary cannon with 3000rpm, but the ZSU-23-4 had four 23mm liquid cooled cannons capable of 800-1000rpm on each gun, so as far as sustained rate of fire the ZSU-23-4 can actually put more lead downrange than the Vulcan, so RPM should not be a differentiating factor between the two systems. The ZSU-23-4 used the GUN DISH to provide a firing solution to the ballistic computer which would then lay the powered & stabilized turret and guns to provide automatic lead for the gunner. In short, I think the ZSU-23-4 base probability of hit is way too low and the M163 is way too high. They should probably both be somewhere in the 30-50% range, with the ZSU being in the upper zone and the Vulcan being in the lower zone of that percentage spread.


Good point. Have given the Vulcan a 30% PoK and ZSU-23 a 50% PoK. Have updated other, similar systems accordingly.

quote:


During the same tests I also discovered that the vanilla ZSU-23-4 was not detecting aircraft with anything other than Mk1 Eyeball and gave off no radar signature, even with the GUN DISH active. The M163 does give off a radar signature and does not detect aircraft, which is appropriate for a range-only radar.


Fixed, thanks!

quote:


When placing a stand-alone GUN DISH, it behaves the way I would expect the one mounted on the ZSU-23-4 to behave, and that is it has a 10nm (should be 12nm) air radar circle and it does detect aircraft and gives off a radar signature. When I removed the internal GUN DISH sensor from the ZSU-23-4 and added the standalone version, I got the ZSU-23-4 that I wanted to see except that the PH was still 5%.

I also believe that the gun range on the ZSU-23-4 is a bit short as is the M163 Vulcan. My references show ZSU-23-4 having a tactical AA range of 2500m (1.35nm) and the Vulcan at 2000m (1.07nm). I would be ok with 1.2nm for the ZSU and 1.0nm for the Vulcan. It should also be able to be used against ground targets.


1.35nm effective range for the ZSU-23-4? Hm... I'm not too sure, the effective range for AAA is pretty short.

quote:


I'm also wondering about manually aimed AA guns having a base PH of 1%, but that will require more testing and can be in another thread. I just don't agree that a ZU-23 towed AA gun only has a 1% chance to hit a UH-1 Huey flying straight and level.


Yes the model probably needs to be refined a bit. What do you think the PoK for different target types should be?

quote:


Summary of proposed changes:

-Remove #1248 (GUN DISH radar) from DB3K as a standalone unit
-Install the sensor data from #1248 onto the ZSU-23-4 (#908) i.e. - put the GUN DISH on the ZSU so that it actually works right
-Increase range on all Soviet 23mm AA guns (ZU-23 and ZSU-23-4) to 1.2nm
-Increase range of GUN DISH radar to 12nm.
-Increase 23mm ZSU-23-4 burst base PH to 50% (#1844)
-Decrease 20mm/85 Vulcan burst base PH from 70% to 30% (#1836)
-Increase range of 20mm/85 Vulcan to 1nm
-Allow both weapons to engage ground targets


All done except gun range increase. Also gave the Gun Dish its full 50km search range, 27nm.

quote:


Cheers

SOURCES:

Anti-aircraft ZSU-23-4 Shilka (Translated from Russian). Accessed November 11, 2013. armyinrussian.narod.ru/suhoputnie/shilka.htm

FM 100-2-3. Washington D.C.: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1991


< Message edited by emsoy -- 12/1/2013 2:22:26 PM >


_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to apd1004)
Post #: 162
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:24:49 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MR_BURNS2

I just noticed that ZSU-23-2 also has the same FCR as the -4, i think they used their common optics only.


Hm? What DB ID#?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to MR_BURNS2)
Post #: 163
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:28:25 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hannable

I'm not sure if this has been requested or not, but I'd like to see the Brazilian corvette, "Barosso" class added to DB3000. I'd give you more info, but it seems I can't post links.

Also the Brazilian navy operated a few Alan M. Sumner destroyers into the 1990's.

Two "Brooklyn" class light cruisers were in service until the late 1970's which I know doesn't *quite" get into DB3000, but would be nice if they could be slipped in.




Have added requests for these. Since you've made more than 5 posts to the forum I think you're now able to post links. Would be great to have more info on these. Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Hannable)
Post #: 164
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:29:40 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

J-6 and F-6 should be Fighter instead of Attack.


Fixed, thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 165
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:35:05 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob322

I saw both CV 41 Midway and CV 43 Coral Sea had space for AIM-54A and C in their magazines. But those carriers couldn't carry the F-14 and none of the jets they could carry could handle the AIM-54.


Thanks for reporting this one. Might be too much detail to have separate carrier magazines for all carriers.

I assume that scenario designers customize their carrier magazines anyway, and will add/remove stuff as they see fit. So the magazines in the database are more a guideline than a truth.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Rob322)
Post #: 166
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:39:48 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JAK63

If this hasn't been asked for already can you add the CF-101B Voodoo to DB3000. It was in squadron service in Canada till 1984. Thanks!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_CF-101_Voodoo


Request added, thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to f4migcap)
Post #: 167
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:41:40 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Der Zeitgeist

There's an inaccuracy with the SS-N-3a Shaddock missile. It currently can be launched by submarines that are submerged, but should only be able to be launched when on the surface. That was one of the main problems with the Soviet Juliett and Echo class subs. I updated my spreadsheet accordingly:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhTk9byWTG-hdGJtTkY4QXNWRG4wLTlScjhjRXM0Qmc&usp=sharing#gid=0


Have been checking off a couple more intems in the list.

The SS-N-3a launch depth needs to wait as we need to get the AI to work with this as well.

Thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Der Zeitgeist)
Post #: 168
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:43:09 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis


quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: harpoon731

I don't see the KC-46A? Am I just not seeing it in the DB3000?

Thanks!


I'm afraid we need more (detailed!) info in order to make a good implementation. If you know any good sources that have enough info please post up.

Thanks!



Hope this helps...

http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/military/kc46a/pdf/kc46a_tanker_backgrounder.pdf
http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/kc46a/index.page
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=865
http://www.bga-aeroweb.com/Defense/KC-46-Tanker.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_KC-46
http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/652430.pdf



Thanks, pretty good details there. Have updated existing KC-46 request.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 169
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 1:44:09 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bsq

For Syria please can you add...

SA-26 GOA 1:05 on video and in the text
SA-13 GOPHER 1:56 on video (if you accept the video is genuine then this is an SA-13 in Syria)

http://www.armyrecognition.com/july_2012_new_army_military_defence_industry_uk/syria_is_equipped_with_new_russian_air_defense_missile_system_pechora-2m_1007123.html

Barlock A
Side Net
Odd Pair
Back Trap
Back Net
Tin Shield
Type 120
Squat Eye
Sheet Bend

All from GE Imagery


Star 2000

http://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/karte214.en.html


Added request, thanks!

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to bsq)
Post #: 170
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 3:10:55 PM   
bsq


Posts: 517
Joined: 1/5/2007
Status: offline
Could I also ask, because I have not seen it listed yet as a fix, that the arcs of fire of the S-300P (and variants), the S-300V (and variants) and the S-400 are modified from the current 360 degrees (which they most definately are not) to a more realistic 90 degrees in line with the physics of the array.

Like Patriot, once the engagements commence, left and right arc of fire are constrained and I have modelled and posted elsewhere that this is not the case when using these systems as they were able to simulataneously attack waves 180 degrees split from each other with a single FCR.

I know that the FCR can be readily rotated, so this may be an issue, but surely it would be better to have a more realistic engagement with these, already powerful and dangerous systems, because the ability to engage as they currently do is making them 'too good'.

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 171
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 3:16:45 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy
quote:

ORIGINAL: apd1004
I'm also wondering about manually aimed AA guns having a base PH of 1%, but that will require more testing and can be in another thread. I just don't agree that a ZU-23 towed AA gun only has a 1% chance to hit a UH-1 Huey flying straight and level.


Yes the model probably needs to be refined a bit. What do you think the PoK for different target types should be?


I think PoK should affected by target size and speed too.
1. Hit rate for small cruise missile should be smaller than helicopter with agility penalty.
2. Manual AAA may get more penalty against high speed target, when AAA with FCR get less.

Example:
PoK = [Bast PoK] - [Speed * (agility factor + FCR factor)] - [Size penalty] - [Attack angle penalty (gun and torpedo only)]

And every time an aircraft performs evasive maneuver, it will lose some speed.


< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 12/1/2013 4:43:56 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 172
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 5:10:48 PM   
El Savior

 

Posts: 337
Joined: 7/31/2003
From: Finland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Would it be possible to dig up more information on the Sonac/PTA? The info we have so far makes it impossible to do a good implementation

Thanks!


This is the best source so far.

Norman Friedman, The Naval Institute Guide to World Naval Weapons Systems, 1997-1998.

Finnyards Sonac/PTA towed array sonar



According to The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World two system is in use for Rauma (Helsinki II) class.

http://harpgamer.com/harpforum/index.php?/topic/2719-data-for-use-in-hce/
"... best guess for the Finnyard Sonac PTA ...

PTA, Type: T (VDS), Function: Search, Active Range: -, Passive Range: 4.3, Freq Band: VLF, Platform: Surface.

< Message edited by El Savior -- 12/1/2013 6:17:55 PM >


_____________________________

El Savior

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 173
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/1/2013 5:17:03 PM   
CV60


Posts: 992
Joined: 10/1/2012
Status: offline
Probably ya'll have thought about this, but the launch altitude info is already in the database. Is it possible to simply hard code the SS-N-3 to require it being at 0 feet AGL to launch, or is this a matter of the AI needing to understand the submarine needs to surface in order to fire? An additional issue to consider regarding the SS-N-3 is that a firing submarine had to remain surfaced for 8-30 minutes until the SHADDOCK's seeker found the target. See:

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-Cruise-Missiles.html#mozTocId742062; http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/ss-n-3.htm; http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/theater/ss-n-3.htm; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-5_Pyatyorka

On a slightly related point, some of the earlier Soviet ASMs also had fairly stringent launch altitude issues also, so similar AI issues may be present with them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Der Zeitgeist

There's an inaccuracy with the SS-N-3a Shaddock missile. It currently can be launched by submarines that are submerged, but should only be able to be launched when on the surface. That was one of the main problems with the Soviet Juliett and Echo class subs. I updated my spreadsheet accordingly:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhTk9byWTG-hdGJtTkY4QXNWRG4wLTlScjhjRXM0Qmc&usp=sharing#gid=0


Have been checking off a couple more intems in the list.

The SS-N-3a launch depth needs to wait as we need to get the AI to work with this as well.

Thanks!



< Message edited by CV60 -- 12/1/2013 9:45:39 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 174
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/2/2013 8:53:17 PM   
Dide


Posts: 156
Joined: 5/10/2009
From: Italy
Status: offline
Hi to all! There's an inaccuracy with the FREMM air facility,(have a two hangar; 1x medium Aircraft
and 1x large aircraft),and with the Cavour. Principally it's a carrier not an amphibious,
(Marina Militare Italiana site), and carry ad least 16 aircraft,
8 in his hangar and 8 in the open parking, (plus 6 spot on left side
for the heli). And maybe you can add the patrol vessel class "Comandanti"on database?
Thanks for the great game and sorry for my bad English!

(in reply to CV60)
Post #: 175
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/3/2013 5:55:19 AM   
gdir

 

Posts: 44
Joined: 11/11/2013
Status: offline
Hi,

I had some issues with satellites in the DB3000 database. All satellites seem to be classified as some kind of submarine (SSGN, ...). I also had the problem that a russian satellite with optical sensor didn't spot a carrier group although it was daylight and clear sky. Details here:

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3485459

(in reply to Dide)
Post #: 176
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/4/2013 12:34:58 AM   
Anathema


Posts: 93
Joined: 10/4/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline
Could I please request the following updates.

Royal Australian Navy's HMAS Sirius Replenishment Oiler
Displacement: 46755 tonnes fully loaded.
Length: 191.3m
Beam: 32m
Draught: 11m
Propulsion: 1 x Hyundai B&W6S50MC (11,640 bhp x 127rpm), 1 direct drive shaft.
Speed: 16 knots
Capacity: 34,806 cubic metres of fuel & 12 containers.
Complement: 60
Aviation Facilities: Helicopter deck, no hangar.
Armament: Small arms only.
Sensors: Unknown.
Links:wikipedia link, navy.gov.au link, defence.gov.au "Getting Sirius" pdf link

Royal New Zealand Navy's L421 Canterbury
Displacement: 9,000 tonnes fully loaded
Length: 131m
Beam: 23.4m
Draught: 5.4m
Propulsion: CODADE (Combined Diesel and Diesel Electric) consisting of 2 Wärtsilä Engines @ 4.5 MW, 3 x Auxiliary diesels, 2 x Bow Thrusters
Speed: 19.6kt max, 16kt cruise.
Range: 8000nm at 16kts.
Capacity: 1,451 square metres of cargo space.
Complement: 109 + up to 250 troops.
Aviation Facilities: Helicopter deck and hangar for 1 Seasprite SH-2G & up to 4 NH-90 TTH.
Sensors: Vistar Electro-Optical fire control, CEA Warrlock HFDF ESM, S & X band radar.
Armament: 1 x Remote Controlled MSI DS25 Stabilized Naval Gun with 25mm M242 Bushmaster cannon, 2 x .50 calibre machine guns
Boats: 2 x LCM, 2-4 RHIB
Links: wikipedia link army.mil.nz pdf link

AUSTRALIAN AIRCRAFT:
- A minor correction, the RAN NH90 should be TTH version and not the NFH naval version. (navy.gov.au news story)
- RAN is to replace S-70B Seahawk with 24 x MH-60R. (sikorsky.com press release on delivery of first aircraft)
- RAAF EA-18G Growlers to get AGM-88E HARM capability. (airforce-technology.com news story)

(in reply to gdir)
Post #: 177
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/4/2013 8:12:05 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bsq

Could I also ask, because I have not seen it listed yet as a fix, that the arcs of fire of the S-300P (and variants), the S-300V (and variants) and the S-400 are modified from the current 360 degrees (which they most definately are not) to a more realistic 90 degrees in line with the physics of the array.

Like Patriot, once the engagements commence, left and right arc of fire are constrained and I have modelled and posted elsewhere that this is not the case when using these systems as they were able to simulataneously attack waves 180 degrees split from each other with a single FCR.

I know that the FCR can be readily rotated, so this may be an issue, but surely it would be better to have a more realistic engagement with these, already powerful and dangerous systems, because the ability to engage as they currently do is making them 'too good'.


Fully understood, but this is a limit with the current sensor model. Have added your suggestions to the feature request list.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to bsq)
Post #: 178
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/4/2013 8:14:30 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy
quote:

ORIGINAL: apd1004
I'm also wondering about manually aimed AA guns having a base PH of 1%, but that will require more testing and can be in another thread. I just don't agree that a ZU-23 towed AA gun only has a 1% chance to hit a UH-1 Huey flying straight and level.


Yes the model probably needs to be refined a bit. What do you think the PoK for different target types should be?


I think PoK should affected by target size and speed too.
1. Hit rate for small cruise missile should be smaller than helicopter with agility penalty.
2. Manual AAA may get more penalty against high speed target, when AAA with FCR get less.

Example:
PoK = [Bast PoK] - [Speed * (agility factor + FCR factor)] - [Size penalty] - [Attack angle penalty (gun and torpedo only)]

And every time an aircraft performs evasive maneuver, it will lose some speed.



Thanks, have added your comments to the 'PoK improvements' bug report.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 179
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 12/4/2013 8:16:34 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: El Savior

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Would it be possible to dig up more information on the Sonac/PTA? The info we have so far makes it impossible to do a good implementation

Thanks!


This is the best source so far.

Norman Friedman, The Naval Institute Guide to World Naval Weapons Systems, 1997-1998.

Finnyards Sonac/PTA towed array sonar



According to The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World two system is in use for Rauma (Helsinki II) class.

http://harpgamer.com/harpforum/index.php?/topic/2719-data-for-use-in-hce/
"... best guess for the Finnyard Sonac PTA ...

PTA, Type: T (VDS), Function: Search, Active Range: -, Passive Range: 4.3, Freq Band: VLF, Platform: Surface.


Thanks, have used this info plus a whole lot of wilda$$ guessimates to create the system

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to El Savior)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.110