Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwinter Darkness)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwinter Darkness)

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwinter Darkness)

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwinter D... - 2/26/2014 9:16:40 AM

blh42

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

This is a remake of my old scenario Midwinter Darkness that includes only the latter part of the book Midvinterm�rker.

It boils down to an attempt by the Sweden to strike back and reduce the landing force that are currently deploying at Gotland.

Please give thoughts!

blh

Attachment (1)

Post #: 1

RE: Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwint... - 2/27/2014 9:13:17 PM

Flankerk

Posts: 417
Joined: 6/21/2006
Status: offline

Lots working very well, the land combat was ideal, the alerts messages and so forth worked very well.
I haven't fully completed it but got to 188 points and it was effectively won.
I think the only things I encountered was that the points didn't trigger a win, a triumph or disaster etc. (That may be as I have one SAM site to knock out though) The southern SAG also gets stuck pathing around Gotland.

I did have slight reservations on one of the attacks to the north where the Swedish airbase gets hit, but is a single unit airfield. I'm not so sure that actually matters though as I think the intention is to mostly make the player nervous.
I didn't get chance to be nervous as at that stage a manic land war was being fought over the island.

I can't emphasize how mad that part of the battle was, trying to get special forces into the SAM sites etc. Really nicely done.

Must admit my mortars didn't survive long, I'm not actually sure they can? So much heavy armour bearing down on them.

A scenario I'll definitely be playing again.

(in reply to blh42)

Post #: 2

RE: Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwint... - 2/28/2014 9:05:33 AM

Lnestig

Posts: 49
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline

Nice scenario, works fine
A few things, call signs are spelled Romeo not Romio
Maybe you could add a pair of JAS armed with Brimstone missiles as in the book.

(in reply to Flankerk)

Post #: 3

RE: Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwint... - 2/28/2014 4:59:13 PM

blh42

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flankerk

Lots working very well, the land combat was ideal, the alerts messages and so forth worked very well.
I haven't fully completed it but got to 188 points and it was effectively won.

I think the only things I encountered was that the points didn't trigger a win, a triumph or disaster etc. (That may be as I have one SAM site to knock out though) The southern SAG also gets stuck pathing around Gotland.

Yea, I haven't figured out when to end the scenario yet.

quote:

I did have slight reservations on one of the attacks to the north where the Swedish airbase gets hit, but is a single unit airfield. I'm not so sure that actually matters though as I think the intention is to mostly make the player nervous.
I didn't get chance to be nervous as at that stage a manic land war was being fought over the island.

Cool, I didn't mean that attack in the North to happen. Still some stuff I've seen that shouldn't be. Even seen a fight break out between russia and nato all on its own. Not sure why :D

quote:

I can't emphasize how mad that part of the battle was, trying to get special forces into the SAM sites etc. Really nicely done.

Must admit my mortars didn't survive long, I'm not actually sure they can? So much heavy armour bearing down on them.

A scenario I'll definitely be playing again.

Happy you liked it. I'm sure I will make some changes for the final version.

blh

(in reply to Flankerk)

Post #: 4

RE: Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwint... - 2/28/2014 5:00:03 PM

blh42

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lonestig

Nice scenario, works fine
A few things, call signs are spelled Romeo not Romio
Maybe you could add a pair of JAS armed with Brimstone missiles as in the book.

Thanks!

I cant recall where those where staged with Brimstone missiles?

blh

(in reply to Lnestig)

Post #: 5

RE: Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwint... - 3/1/2014 12:32:18 PM

Lnestig

Posts: 49
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline

My misstake, I mixed it up with the second book brimstone missiles are deployed.

(in reply to blh42)

Post #: 6

RE: Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwint... - 3/1/2014 1:39:00 PM

Bazza042

Posts: 100
Joined: 1/11/2012
Status: offline

A thoroughly enjoyable scenario with considerable replay value.

Many thanks.

However I did enjoy the slightly wider scope of your first scenario although I can see why you simplified it a bit.

But when I played it under 394, I didn't get any of the 'special' messages that were an excellent part of your earlier versions, although I have the display 'flag' for these set. I noted that Flankerk commented favourably on the 'alert messages' so I am not sure whether I have missed these, there is a flaw in RC 1.03 or whether Flankerk was just referring to the normal sighting notifications.

I did miss having to save the Vice Prime Minister this time around however........ (unless that was one of the messages I missed!)

Thanks again.

(in reply to blh42)

Post #: 7

RE: Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwint... - 3/1/2014 3:16:16 PM

blh42

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bazza042

A thoroughly enjoyable scenario with considerable replay value.

Many thanks.

However I did enjoy the slightly wider scope of your first scenario although I can see why you simplified it a bit.

But when I played it under 394, I didn't get any of the 'special' messages that were an excellent part of your earlier versions, although I have the display 'flag' for these set. I noted that Flankerk commented favourably on the 'alert messages' so I am not sure whether I have missed these, there is a flaw in RC 1.03 or whether Flankerk was just referring to the normal sighting notifications.

I did miss having to save the Vice Prime Minister this time around however........ (unless that was one of the messages I missed!)

Thanks again.

I've reduced the amount of messages etc.. but I'm considering giving it another go to make the large scenario at some point. I just wanted to make something complete first. Maybe i'll do the scenario in two parts? Not sure

Glad you enjoyed it!

blh

(in reply to Bazza042)

Post #: 8

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> Scenario for testing: Operation Gudrun (was Midwinter Darkness)

Page: [1]