Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/31/2014 12:35:59 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Ah the speed boat of the week.

Logged.

Mike


Absolutely. :) What I'm hoping we'll eventually see in the database is about four or five generic police/patrol boats to cover the hundreds of different but frequently almost interchangeable classes produced and used all around the world, even by countries with no other naval forces. We already have a few such classes, with the 7-m and 11-m RHIBs, but there are others that could be added. Maybe something like these four:

10-meter/10-ton <-- 1 x 7.62 machine gun
15-meter/20-ton <-- 2 x 7.62 machine gun
20-meter/35-ton <-- 2 x .50-cal guns, limited AAA capability
25-meter/60-ton <-- 2 x 20-mm. guns, limited AAA capability

These could also be used by criminals, revolutionaries, etc. I'd also like to see more variations on common civilian and commercial vessels that have been armed by criminals (or by companies trying to deal with pirates, etc.)

And, of course, I'd be happy to see as many of the specific models as can be added, if the data for them is available.

I'd also like to see a few more options for mobile ground units that might fit with rebels, mercenaries, criminals, etc. A few generic infantry sections or platoons with weapons like generic RPGs, 81-mm. mortars (only needs a crew of five, has a three-mile range, and can do put serious hurt on buildings, or ships--there is actually one infantry section like this in CWDB), and so on.

As you can see, I'm thinking in terms of how to better model various low intensity conflicts, where a few dozen heroes on small vessels face off against a few dozen bad guys, either right on the shore or in their own small vessels.


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 631
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/31/2014 1:32:31 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Hi Mark

Do you know that you can add and remove weapons, mounts and sensors in the editor? To a large extent these kinds of units are exactly why we added the functions.

Will add these to our to-do list but we do have a good deal in front of it.

Thanks!

Mike





_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 632
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/31/2014 11:55:22 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Hi Mark

Do you know that you can add and remove weapons, mounts and sensors in the editor? To a large extent these kinds of units are exactly why we added the functions.

Will add these to our to-do list but we do have a good deal in front of it.

Thanks!

Mike



First, thanks. I appreciate it.

Second, about editing weapons, etc., yes, absolutely. One reason I'm eager to see these smaller patrol boats added someday is that we have a lot of platforms in the databases for patrol vessels in the range of 100 to 500 tons, but far fewer in the range of, say, 20 or 30 or 50 tons. Many of these boats have better ranges (sometimes at the cost of lower top speeds) than the RHIBs; they are truly patrol vessels, meant to go out for a day or two at a time, rather than "interceptors." That's a difference that can be important in a scenario. Once we've got some of those platforms in the database, however, they can be used as a framework and tweaked by changing sensors and weapons. So I'd love to see, say, 15-, 20-, and 25-meter patrol boats, as generic platforms, in the same way that we already have the 7- and 11-meter RHIBs. Then they can be used to stand in, with a bit of tweaking, for dozens of actual classes of small patrol vessels around the world.




(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 633
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/31/2014 7:09:10 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

And, of course, I'd be happy to see as many of the specific models as can be added, if the data for them is available.



Speaking of that, here are a couple. All three could also be added as "generic" patrol boat models (e.g., "20-meter patrol boat (generic)," etc.). Again, these are all "just to get them in the queue," although I am definitely hoping to see them someday...

Archer-class patrol vessel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer-class_patrol_vessel
http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/The-Fleet/Ships/Patrol-and-Minehunters/P2000-Class

Scimitar-class patrol vessel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scimitar_class_patrol_vessel
http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/The-Fleet/Ships/Patrol-and-Minehunters/Scimitar-class

USCG Response Boat – Medium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Response_Boat_%E2%80%93_Medium
http://www.uscg.mil/acquisition/rbm/pdf/rb-m.pdf <-- fact sheet
http://www.uscg.mil/directives/cim/16000-16999/CIM_16114_41.pdf <-- operator's handbook

Thanks for considering these.



(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 634
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 3/31/2014 8:51:55 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline
By the way, I know I say it all the time, but it's worth saying again, and I think I speak for a lot of people when I say it.

Thank you.

This game and these databases are amazing, and you guys put an incredible amount of work into making them amazing. I really appreciate how much you guys do.






(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 635
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/1/2014 2:44:41 AM   
gsmith63

 

Posts: 27
Joined: 11/17/2013
From: California
Status: offline
I posted this on the main forum in a thread about the geolocation capabilities of modern ESM systems, but I thought I would post it here too and request a db update. Based on the below links, would it be possible to modify or create these ESM systems to include range information: ALQ-218, ALR-94, ALQ-240(V)1, and "Rivet Joint ESM." The Rivet Joint would probably also require a new a/c version, as the only one currently in the db is good from the 1970s on - when single-aircraft geolocation would have been considered a total pipe dream!

quote:


Rivet Joint: http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets/Display/tabid/224/Article/104608/rc-135vw-rivet-joint.aspx - “The Rivet Joint's modifications are primarily related to its on-board sensor suite, which allows the mission crew to detect, identify and geolocate signals throughout the electromagnetic spectrum.”

EA-6B (ICAP III, ALQ-218 system): http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2008/09/29/385385/151114/en/U-S-Navy-Awards-Northrop-Grumman-125-Million-Contract-to-Produce-Fourth-Lot-of-Airborne-Electronic-Attack-Systems.html - “The new ALQ-218 receiver is the heart of the ICAP III Prowler, as are the sophisticated algorithms that allow selective-reactive jamming and precision threat geolocation capabilities.”

EA-18G (which also carries the ALQ-218): http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/print/volume-17/issue-4/news/news/ea-18g-designers-blend-new-and-existing-technology-for-new-electronic-warfare-jet.html - “The Growler will also feature the Super Hornet’s new APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, which enables simultaneous tracking and targeting of multiple air and ground targets. Combined with the ICAP III AN/ALQ-218 EW Receiver Suite, which provides precision passive radar threat detection, identification, precision geolocation and jammer control, the Growler will have unprecedented situational awareness.”

F-22A (Software Increment 3.1 fielded in 2012): http://www.defensenews.com/article/20111213/DEFSECT01/112130310/Final-F-22-Raptor-Rolls-Off-Production-Line - "This increment is designed to defeat air or surface threats in any threat environment; operational test and evaluation is nearly complete," Knuteson wrote. "So far, precision geolocation accuracy exceeds the requirement by 15%, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) map accuracy exceeds specifications by 55%...”

P-8A: http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2012/10/04/495140/10007233/en/Northrop-Grumman-s-Electronic-Support-Measures-System-for-the-P-8A-Poseidon-Receives-Official-Nomenclature.html - The AN/ALQ-240(V)1 electronic support measures system will provide a significant increase in capability for operations in the complex maritime battlespace. The adaptive tuning, precise direction finding and geolocation capabilities of the ALQ-240(V)1 will allow P-8A aircrews to detect and identify radar and other electronic threats to the aircraft and Navy vessels.”


Gregg

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 636
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/3/2014 3:33:18 AM   
Davekhps

 

Posts: 203
Joined: 12/10/2010
Status: offline
Did I miss it, or is the KC-46 not yet in the database?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_KC-46

(in reply to gsmith63)
Post #: 637
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/3/2014 3:34:52 AM   
Davekhps

 

Posts: 203
Joined: 12/10/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gsmith63

I posted this on the main forum in a thread about the geolocation capabilities of modern ESM systems, but I thought I would post it here too and request a db update. Based on the below links, would it be possible to modify or create these ESM systems to include range information: ALQ-218, ALR-94, ALQ-240(V)1, and "Rivet Joint ESM." The Rivet Joint would probably also require a new a/c version, as the only one currently in the db is good from the 1970s on - when single-aircraft geolocation would have been considered a total pipe dream!

Gregg



Second this. Most U.S. UAVs and manned ISR aircraft have geolocation capabilities today.

(in reply to gsmith63)
Post #: 638
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/3/2014 4:09:52 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F-23 could only carry four aim-120 instead of six.

http://voodoo-world.cz/yf23/info.html
http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/f23_1.html

(in reply to Davekhps)
Post #: 639
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/3/2014 6:40:14 PM   
deepdive

 

Posts: 125
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
Got some non important requests, USAF RF-4C and German RF-4E needs bombs and Nukes, for both DB`s.

Bjørn

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 640
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/4/2014 1:40:56 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
DB queries and requests logged from my last post. Thanks guys!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to deepdive)
Post #: 641
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/5/2014 9:44:07 AM   
ipe

 

Posts: 20
Joined: 10/19/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: El Savior

Finland Hamina-class is without SONAR and ASW-weapons:

The sonar suite includes a Simrad Subsea Toadfish active high-frequency search and attack sonar, and a Sonac/PTA towed array sonar. Not sure which model it is, but it can be added same Toadfish sonar in Rauma-class SS2400 Toadfish.
1 ×  rail for depth charges or mines (depth charges are normal load)
1 x Sonac/PTA towed array sonar

Also speed for Hamina is 30+ knots. I know that they can go much faster with their state of the art water propulsion jet. Adding few knots wont do bad. True high speed is classified, but 35 knots can be easily achieved. Older Rauma class can go at least 35 knots too, which Hamina replaced.

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/haminaclass/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamina-class_missile_boat

Hämeenmaa minelayer is without mines. From 2009+ new mine can be added: Sea Mine 2000 - bottom, Acoustic & target Discrimination. Older version use bottom mines.
4 × rails for 100-150 mines

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A4meenmaa-class_minelayer

Thanks!


No, no and no. Hamina doesnt have any ASW sensors. That faulty information been circling all over internet since 90s. Hamina only has ability to take depth charges and their use is controlled by other ships (like Rauma).

Katanpää-class MHC could be added thats newest class of ships in finnish navy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katanp%C3%A4%C3%A4-class_mine_countermeasure_vessel this wikipedia page is accurate.

(in reply to El Savior)
Post #: 642
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/5/2014 2:42:11 PM   
VFA41_Lion


Posts: 228
Joined: 1/30/2014
Status: offline
Is it possible to have the FlightGuard countermeasures system added to Israeli commercial jets? :p

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/05/24/air.defense/
http://aviationknowledge.wikidot.com/aviation:el-al-the-world-s-most-secure-airline (Section 7)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_Guard
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/aircraft/systems/flight_guard/Flight_Guard.htm

_____________________________


(in reply to ipe)
Post #: 643
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/5/2014 8:04:33 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 1203
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
One interesting what-if is the 747 CMCA variant, a bomber/missile carrier proposal for the 747.

< Message edited by Coiler12 -- 4/5/2014 9:05:00 PM >

(in reply to VFA41_Lion)
Post #: 644
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/6/2014 9:15:00 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
LORA SSM missile for Israel:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LORA_(missile)
http://www.defense-update.com/products/l/lora.htm
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htart/articles/20120213.aspx
http://missilethreat.com/missiles/lora/
http://www.deagel.com/Ballistic-Missiles/LORA_a001920001.aspx




< Message edited by Sardaukar -- 4/6/2014 10:23:36 AM >


_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 645
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/7/2014 3:59:16 AM   
slicendice

 

Posts: 18
Joined: 3/4/2014
Status: offline
EO DAS sensor apppears to be nonfunctional as of build 411. I could see that some fixes were applied to build 410 version to allow it to better represent it's real world functionalities(although I'd say that its detection range and update rate is still inadequate). So what was the change between the two builds?

I think I have mentioned this before, but Sea Giraffe 150 HC still lacks a surface search ability. Now LCS 2 is left without a surface search radar which is totally laughable.

< Message edited by slicendice -- 4/7/2014 6:00:11 AM >

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 646
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/7/2014 8:42:04 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
I see the RBS70 missile variants are listed as RB 70, it was almost impossible to find it (also it's not present the RBS90 twin pedestal mount, because the performances very probably employing the RBS70 Mk2 missile, employed by Sweden 1993-2004).
http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/RBS_90

EDIT: Don't mean on it, sorry, I see RBS is the System and is listed as "Facility", RB (Robot) is only the missile. Thanks and go forward!

< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 4/7/2014 10:17:27 PM >

(in reply to slicendice)
Post #: 647
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/10/2014 2:28:10 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Coiler12

One interesting what-if is the 747 CMCA variant, a bomber/missile carrier proposal for the 747.


Have added the request but if you could post some links it would really help us out.

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 648
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/10/2014 6:17:07 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Coiler12

One interesting what-if is the 747 CMCA variant, a bomber/missile carrier proposal for the 747.


Have added the request but if you could post some links it would really help us out.

Thanks!

Mike


This is what I could dig up...

http://www.g2mil.com/bm747.htm
http://wethearmed.com/military-and-law-enforcement/let%27s-turn-the-747-into-a-bomber/
http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/1999/MR1028.pdf
http://www.fas.org/man/eprint/benson.htm
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1974/1974%20-%200348.html

I hope this helps.

Mark



(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 649
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/10/2014 8:00:47 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 1203
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
Don't worry, for my next batch of never-were requests I do have links. Sorry about not getting any for the 747 bomber/missile carrier, I couldn't find many exact proposals.

A-6F Intruder:
Upgraded A-6. Cancelled in favor of the A-12 and then not revived due to post-USSR budgets. (Ironically, the most exact specifications I found were in Russian)

A-6F Intruder (in Russian)

F-117B (Land based) and A/F-117X (Carrier based):
Upgraded F-117.

F-117 Variants

And from Russia, the Il-102, a ground attack plane with an anachronistic tail-gun system passed up in favor of the Su-25.

Il-102

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 650
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/10/2014 11:08:36 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Requests logged. Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 651
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/11/2014 12:06:04 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

F-23 could only carry four aim-120 instead of six.

http://voodoo-world.cz/yf23/info.html
http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/f23_1.html

quote:

F-23


Understood, but so could the F-22 until they introduced the clipped-fin AIM-120. So makes sense to keep the load at 6x?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 652
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/14/2014 11:36:18 AM   
slicendice

 

Posts: 18
Joined: 3/4/2014
Status: offline
http://news.usni.org/2014/04/09/navy-axes-griffin-missile-favor-longbow-hellfire-lcs
LCS Will have Longbow Hellfire instead of Griffin IIB as interim ASuW weapon, for now at least. However I'm really worried about it's ingame lethality against surface target due to the HEAT warhead type.

And I'm not sure about the status of the X-47B entry ingame. If it is meant to be a placeholder for UCLASS, I'd suggest removal for the time being. There's no firm info on it, we won't even know the preferred airframe for at least another year. That means some possible substantial change later on. X-47B itself was never meant to be operational.

< Message edited by slicendice -- 4/14/2014 12:48:11 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 653
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/14/2014 5:42:17 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slicendice

And I'm not sure about the status of the X-47B entry ingame. If it is meant to be a placeholder for UCLASS, I'd suggest removal for the time being. There's no firm info on it, we won't even know the preferred airframe for at least another year. That means some possible substantial change later on. X-47B itself was never meant to be operational.


No! Don't take our killer robots away! :)

Seriously, I'd argue it's better to have a guesstimate version of a future platform than nothing at all; one can always update the information as new data comes in. This way, it and other things like the Global Combat Ship can at least be used in scenario designs.

One issue in scenario design is that some political events are more plausible if you set them ten or fifteen years in the future (i.e., give the world enough time for things to really go to hell in a hand basket) but, of course, we have limited information on what might be in service five or six years down the line and which could be included in the scenario. Like the deployed X-47B (I think I suggested the database editors could use "MQ-47C Medusa" instead to distinguish it from the experimental version.) So, guesstimates on bleeding edge platforms are fine with me. It's better than not having them.



(in reply to slicendice)
Post #: 654
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/14/2014 6:04:32 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slicendice

http://news.usni.org/2014/04/09/navy-axes-griffin-missile-favor-longbow-hellfire-lcs
LCS Will have Longbow Hellfire instead of Griffin IIB as interim ASuW weapon, for now at least. However I'm really worried about it's ingame lethality against surface target due to the HEAT warhead type.





Just curious...anyone know how many missile will be in the VLS Longbow modules? As I recall, the Griffin module had 15 missiles; will it be about the same number?


(in reply to slicendice)
Post #: 655
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/16/2014 1:34:17 PM   
Rudd

 

Posts: 1501
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
This may be of interest

P-8 with the AN/APS-149 or new Advanced Airborne Sensor?

from http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/exclusive-p-8-poseidon-flies-with-shadowy-radar-system-1562912667


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 656
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/18/2014 12:57:55 AM   
NickD

 

Posts: 163
Joined: 2/14/2014
Status: offline
I'd like to register a couple of low-priority requests for New Zealand:

SH-2G(I) Seasprite

NZ has recently purchased ten of the SH-2G(A)s which were originally purchased by Australia but handed back to Kaman when the project was cancelled in 2008. Kaman has actually managed to make them work (with a less ambitious avionics fit, but still capable of operating Penguin missiles) and NZ will operate eight of them from its warships and use the other two as sources of spare parts. They're scheduled to enter service with the RNZAF between 2014 and 2016 and will replace the service's five SH-2Gs:
* http://www.navy.mil.nz/mtf/na/rec-act/april-2013---eight-new-seasprites-to-give-major-increase-in-naval-aviation-capability.htm
* http://www.navy.mil.nz/mtf/na/rec-act/questions-and-answers-purchase-of-sh-2gi-seasprites.htm
* http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/australia-to-continue-with-illstarred-sh2g-seasprite-project-03338/

Protector class OPV

The first tier of the RNZN's patrol force, these two ships can each carry a helicopter and were designed to operate between the South Pacific and the Antarctic:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protector-class_offshore_patrol_vessel
* http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/protectorclassoffsho/

(in reply to Rudd)
Post #: 657
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/18/2014 3:40:00 AM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline
Can you add sensors to mq-8c similar to mq-8b?

I assume they will have equivalent or better.


(in reply to NickD)
Post #: 658
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/18/2014 11:01:58 PM   
Beagle

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 12/14/2013
Status: offline
I would like to add a low priority request for runways to allow two fighters to take off at once. This is quite common place and makes a big difference on intercept missions in getting the extra fighters off the ground quicker.

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 659
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 4/19/2014 2:50:46 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Beagle

I would like to add a low priority request for runways to allow two fighters to take off at once. This is quite common place and makes a big difference on intercept missions in getting the extra fighters off the ground quicker.


Pretty sure this will be available next public beta release.

M

_____________________________


(in reply to Beagle)
Post #: 660
Page:   <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.718