Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

21 inch MK14 torpedo

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> 21 inch MK14 torpedo Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/15/2014 8:11:17 PM   
heckler

 

Posts: 42
Joined: 6/29/2011
Status: offline
Ok, noob back again with a question...

After Jan 1 1943 my torpedoes are supposed to have their dud rate reduced by 20% (to 60% if I read the editor correctly)-do I need to access a port in order to get that? 25 torpedoes in, and of the hits only 5 have gone off. That is what I would expect before the New Year.

And in my data collecting I have been counting "hit! no explosion" the same as "torpedoes fail to detonate"...is that faulty understanding on my part?

Hoping I'm unlucky and not stupid, I think
Post #: 1
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/15/2014 8:26:54 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Happens automagically. It has nothing to do with "upgrading" one torpedo device to another.

And your understanding is not faulty regarding reports of torpedoes not exploding.

< Message edited by Terminus -- 4/15/2014 9:27:33 PM >


_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to heckler)
Post #: 2
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/15/2014 9:20:28 PM   
heckler

 

Posts: 42
Joined: 6/29/2011
Status: offline
Coolio! Thanks Terminus

I'll just keep thinking positively that I'm due for a good run

Like maybe the next ten will explode

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 3
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/16/2014 12:24:19 AM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline


_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to heckler)
Post #: 4
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/16/2014 2:59:32 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
In my experience you will hit AKL's, miss and dud on CV's, tear your hair out & gnash your teeth...




And then go play another turn

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 5
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/16/2014 3:13:43 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
One moves at 9 knts and the other can move at 25+ knts so there is a reason this happens

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 6
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 10:03:44 AM   
heckler

 

Posts: 42
Joined: 6/29/2011
Status: offline
It feels pretty cool to get the "PB obliterated by torpedo" or somesuch...but I would love for the hits on BB, CA, and CVE to bear fruit. Deadly exploding fruit

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 7
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 10:54:24 AM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

In my experience you will hit AKL's, miss and dud on CV's, tear your hair out & gnash your teeth...


My experience as well.

Historically quite a few Mk 14s did score on IJN warships; mostly in 1944 IIRC. HIJMS Kongo was the only IJN BB sunk but a couple of others were hit and damaged including Yamato. HIJMS Shokaku and Taiho were sunk along with most of the IJN CVEs. Junyo was damaged to such a degree by a submarine torpedo as to be out of the war thereafter.

(in reply to heckler)
Post #: 8
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 11:05:03 AM   
Feltan


Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
Spence,

Don't forget that the largest ship ever sunk by a submarine, the IJN Shinano (CV), got stitched with 4 sub launched torpedoes on the way to Kure for fitting out and work ups.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 9
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 11:43:11 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Feltan)
Post #: 10
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 12:32:43 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!



Back pain getting to you T?

_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 11
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 12:33:40 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feltan

Spence,

Don't forget that the largest ship ever sunk by a submarine, the IJN Shinano (CV), got stitched with 4 sub launched torpedoes on the way to Kure for fitting out and work ups.

Regards,
Feltan

True , but she was in narrow coastal waters , not blue water. Her speed and maneuvering were significantly reduced.

_____________________________


(in reply to Feltan)
Post #: 12
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 12:50:29 PM   
msieving1


Posts: 526
Joined: 3/23/2007
From: Missouri
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!


They are in the device database, but no subs use them. That can be fixed in the editor.

_____________________________

-- Mark Sieving

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 13
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 1:19:25 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!



Back pain getting to you T?


I was being sarcastic. The Mk 14 remained the primary sub-launched torpedo until the end of the war; it's proper that it's the device being used in the game.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 14
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 4:05:36 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!



Back pain getting to you T?


I was being sarcastic. The Mk 14 remained the primary sub-launched torpedo until the end of the war; it's proper that it's the device being used in the game.



Actually , so was I. We REALLY need to come up with a Sarcasm smiley.

_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 15
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 4:12:35 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: spence

quote:

In my experience you will hit AKL's, miss and dud on CV's, tear your hair out & gnash your teeth...


My experience as well.

Historically quite a few Mk 14s did score on IJN warships; mostly in 1944 IIRC. HIJMS Kongo was the only IJN BB sunk but a couple of others were hit and damaged including Yamato. HIJMS Shokaku and Taiho were sunk along with most of the IJN CVEs. Junyo was damaged to such a degree by a submarine torpedo as to be out of the war thereafter.



It was adequate by the end of the war as far as reliability goes. I think they pretty much abandoned trying to kill ships using the magnetic fuse and mostly relied on the contact fuse to get the job done. This lessened the effect of the warhead but they sill did enough damage. I don't think anyone really had a reliable magnetic device anyways. But am speaking with very little actual knowledge on this subject and defer to my superiors here..


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 16
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 6:10:00 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!



Back pain getting to you T?


I was being sarcastic. The Mk 14 remained the primary sub-launched torpedo until the end of the war; it's proper that it's the device being used in the game.



Actually , so was I. We REALLY need to come up with a Sarcasm smiley.


On other forums I've used, we just had a designated Sarcasm Font Color. Like Red.

Gee, I sure do love the Yankees!!

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 17
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 6:47:41 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!



Back pain getting to you T?


I was being sarcastic. The Mk 14 remained the primary sub-launched torpedo until the end of the war; it's proper that it's the device being used in the game.



Actually , so was I. We REALLY need to come up with a Sarcasm smiley.


On other forums I've used, we just had a designated Sarcasm Font Color. Like Red.

Gee, I sure do love the Yankees!!


Spit. (NOT in red. )

< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 4/17/2014 7:48:01 PM >


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 18
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 6:50:55 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!



Back pain getting to you T?


I was being sarcastic. The Mk 14 remained the primary sub-launched torpedo until the end of the war; it's proper that it's the device being used in the game.


About a third of torpedoes shot by USN subs in the war were Mk 18s. From mid-1944 to the end I believe the ratio was much higher to average out. Mk14 was still probably half-ish in 1945, but it's not true that the Mk 18 was not in widespread use and effective.

In terms of the game I don't see any way where the Mk18's advantages would matter in the engine. No-bubbles isn't a thing is the algorithm, and on-board maintenance is not modeled.

< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 4/17/2014 7:51:28 PM >


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 19
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 7:19:39 PM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
In terms of the game I don't see any way where the Mk18's advantages would matter in the engine. No-bubbles isn't a thing is the algorithm, and on-board maintenance is not modeled.

Individual torps should accumulate sys, float & engine damage. Not to mention fires! Captain's skills and crew experience would factor into torp maintenance.
/red

Didn't subs usually carry a mix of electric & steam-powered torps? If a modder was sufficiently OCD, he could change some of the tubes in each sub to carry the Mk18 during one of the upgrades.

< Message edited by jmalter -- 4/17/2014 8:20:12 PM >

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 20
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 8:21:25 PM   
czert2

 

Posts: 508
Joined: 2/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!


they were not worth of adding ?

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 21
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 9:19:10 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jmalter
Didn't subs usually carry a mix of electric & steam-powered torps? If a modder was sufficiently OCD, he could change some of the tubes in each sub to carry the Mk18 during one of the upgrades.


Yeah, a mix. I don't know if it was a set ratio, and if it was it was probably up to the squadron commander. The sub force was pretty local. I'd bet the main factor was just whatever the tender had right then. As lines and subases moved forward the ordnance had to catch up. If you were drawing at Saipan in February 1945 you took what they had. I also imagine sub COs' wishes were listened to a lot. The Mk14 had a lot of fans, and not just among the TMs who could drink the fuel.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 22
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 9:43:22 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: jmalter
Didn't subs usually carry a mix of electric & steam-powered torps? If a modder was sufficiently OCD, he could change some of the tubes in each sub to carry the Mk18 during one of the upgrades.


Yeah, a mix. I don't know if it was a set ratio, and if it was it was probably up to the squadron commander. The sub force was pretty local. I'd bet the main factor was just whatever the tender had right then. As lines and subases moved forward the ordnance had to catch up. If you were drawing at Saipan in February 1945 you took what they had. I also imagine sub COs' wishes were listened to a lot. The Mk14 had a lot of fans, and not just among the TMs who could drink the fuel.



Hence the term "torpedo juice". Literally. It also explains why cans of fruit juice were drunk more by submariners then other sailors. So Moose...What's "Otto-fuel" taste like?

_____________________________


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 23
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 10:10:21 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: jmalter
Didn't subs usually carry a mix of electric & steam-powered torps? If a modder was sufficiently OCD, he could change some of the tubes in each sub to carry the Mk18 during one of the upgrades.


Yeah, a mix. I don't know if it was a set ratio, and if it was it was probably up to the squadron commander. The sub force was pretty local. I'd bet the main factor was just whatever the tender had right then. As lines and subases moved forward the ordnance had to catch up. If you were drawing at Saipan in February 1945 you took what they had. I also imagine sub COs' wishes were listened to a lot. The Mk14 had a lot of fans, and not just among the TMs who could drink the fuel.



Hence the term "torpedo juice". Literally. It also explains why cans of fruit juice were drunk more by submariners then other sailors. So Moose...What's "Otto-fuel" taste like?


Ah, good, like . . .. ACK! (Thud)

My boat was commissioned in 1964 and had tubes with starting latch guides so Mk 14s could be shot. There was also a small fuel make-up tank, on the starboard forward bulkhead as I recall in my mind's eye. About the size of a big propane tank as for a gas grill. It had been empty for at least fifteen years, but nevertheless the Weaps sometimes opened the drain valve just to be sure.

More than you'd ever want to know about the Mk14 here. They really could write manuals in those days.

http://hnsa.org/doc/torpedo/index.htm

< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 4/17/2014 11:11:36 PM >


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 24
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 10:44:56 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

In terms of the game I don't see any way where the Mk18's advantages would matter in the engine. No-bubbles isn't a thing is the algorithm, and on-board maintenance is not modeled.


Perhaps a modest increase in the accuracy could be incorporated to model the bubbleless torpedo to simulate it relative lack of visibility. Of course it's not really in the game so I suppose that possibility is moot anyways.


(in reply to heckler)
Post #: 25
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/17/2014 11:06:26 PM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
The USN also started using Torpex by late 43 which increased the explosive blast of the torpedoes by about 50%.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 26
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/18/2014 12:26:00 AM   
msieving1


Posts: 526
Joined: 3/23/2007
From: Missouri
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Kongo was sunk by Mk 18 torpedoes. THEY'RE NOT EVEN IN THIS BROKEN PoS GAME!



Back pain getting to you T?


I was being sarcastic. The Mk 14 remained the primary sub-launched torpedo until the end of the war; it's proper that it's the device being used in the game.


60% of sub launched torpedoes in 1945 were Mk 18s.


_____________________________

-- Mark Sieving

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 27
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/18/2014 3:15:19 AM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: msieving1
60% of sub launched torpedoes in 1945 were Mk 18s.

Well I'm def'nitely not a modder, but since subs are now modelled w/ pairs of tubes, it would be simple (albeit tedious) to change one pair of tubes to the Mk 18 in mid-war, and another pair in a late-war upgrade. Appropriate changes could be made by introducing new torp devices as needed, to reflect the increased power of the torpex warhead.

I've always thought it wasn't quite right that when the Mk 14 torpedo is upgraded, that that at-sea subs immediately take advantage w/o having to RTB to exchange their old-model ammo for the newer more effective fish.

(in reply to msieving1)
Post #: 28
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/18/2014 11:56:39 AM   
Feltan


Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jmalter

quote:

ORIGINAL: msieving1
60% of sub launched torpedoes in 1945 were Mk 18s.

Well I'm def'nitely not a modder, but since subs are now modelled w/ pairs of tubes, it would be simple (albeit tedious) to change one pair of tubes to the Mk 18 in mid-war, and another pair in a late-war upgrade. Appropriate changes could be made by introducing new torp devices as needed, to reflect the increased power of the torpex warhead.

I've always thought it wasn't quite right that when the Mk 14 torpedo is upgraded, that that at-sea subs immediately take advantage w/o having to RTB to exchange their old-model ammo for the newer more effective fish.



So, from a modeling point-of-view on the scale of WITP-AE it doesn't bother me. When did the subs at sea get their last re-load of new torpedoes? What's to say that they weren't given new and improved torpedoes as part of their last re-load?

If this transition was modeled more "accurately", you'd see a transition period of what? Maybe 10 days to 2 weeks? In game, all the subs would head to the barn on the designated day all over the Pacific to grab the new torpedoes that have magically restocked all ports and AS ships in theater and magically become available to detonate on a given day? That's more accurate?

I think you'd feel better about it if you consider that magic day the end of the process of distribution and re-loading rather then the first day they are available at a naval depot on the West coast.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 29
RE: 21 inch MK14 torpedo - 4/18/2014 1:13:54 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Feltan


quote:

ORIGINAL: jmalter

quote:

ORIGINAL: msieving1
60% of sub launched torpedoes in 1945 were Mk 18s.

Well I'm def'nitely not a modder, but since subs are now modelled w/ pairs of tubes, it would be simple (albeit tedious) to change one pair of tubes to the Mk 18 in mid-war, and another pair in a late-war upgrade. Appropriate changes could be made by introducing new torp devices as needed, to reflect the increased power of the torpex warhead.

I've always thought it wasn't quite right that when the Mk 14 torpedo is upgraded, that that at-sea subs immediately take advantage w/o having to RTB to exchange their old-model ammo for the newer more effective fish.



So, from a modeling point-of-view on the scale of WITP-AE it doesn't bother me. When did the subs at sea get their last re-load of new torpedoes? What's to say that they weren't given new and improved torpedoes as part of their last re-load?

If this transition was modeled more "accurately", you'd see a transition period of what? Maybe 10 days to 2 weeks? In game, all the subs would head to the barn on the designated day all over the Pacific to grab the new torpedoes that have magically restocked all ports and AS ships in theater and magically become available to detonate on a given day? That's more accurate?

I think you'd feel better about it if you consider that magic day the end of the process of distribution and re-loading rather then the first day they are available at a naval depot on the West coast.

Regards,
Feltan


It's harder than this and a case of players needing to just chill out and take the abstractions of the game in stride.

The rule in Section 6.4.2.1 says that in January 1943 ALL torpedoes with a dud rate greater than 49 have their rate reduced by 20. (Not TO 20; one could only wish!)

The editor sez that the MK 13 aerial torpedo used by carrier TBs has a dud rate of 50. Ponder that.

How would your average AFB feel about having to pull every carrier into a major fleet base, say Pearl or larger, in January 1943 to swap out fish? Kind of disturbs a lot of plans.

Submarine warfare in the game is MASSIVLEY ahistorical. I've said that for years. No R&R periods, dense-pack boats repaired of major structural damage in a matter of days, no ability to choose how many fish to spend on low-mix targets, no ability to do multiple attacks on the same TF with one boat in one phase. (This is a huge difference from history.) Many other factors including crew rotations and training granularity, not modeled. In comparison the dud rate is minor.

I'm not aware of any Allied player who has ever come close to historical numbers with his subs. Few Japan players would play if that were the case. (Eight
aircraft carriers sunk by subs? Insane!)

And yet, and yet . . . It all works very well. It's balanced against the middle range of performance. Subs are useful, they're dangerous, sometimes they pack a huge punch, they can never be ignored. But they aren't the war-deciders they were in RL against the Japanese economy. IF they were the whole underpinning of the game would have to be re-cast. Victory conditions to begin and go from there.

So them getting "healed" in January while at sea is a flyspeck issue. If a player had to drive home and then back out it would just be another level of micro-management that adds nothing to strategy and tactics. In RL there was no such "Great Healing." By January 1943 Mk14 performance was all over the board, driven by individual COs who risked their careers and commands to get into their fish once they left on patrol and "fix" them locally. Also some squadrons did "helpful preventative maintenance" on the front lines in direct violation of BuOrd. It happened. If a boat's fish were at 80% dud rates in December 1942 it was because the CO was either an idiot or a coward or both. But the game needs a cut off date for the code and January works OK.

But don't for a minute think it reflects history.

< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 4/18/2014 2:21:51 PM >


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Feltan)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> 21 inch MK14 torpedo Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.453