The problem with StuH 42

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

The problem with StuH 42

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support >> The problem with StuH 42

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

The problem with StuH 42 - 4/28/2014 9:52:34 AM

ito

Posts: 12
Joined: 11/8/2010
Status: offline

In the game StuH 42 is misused. Historically Nazi Empire produced over 1200 StuHs 42 to the end of the war
and the equipment has been used by all Stug battalions and panzergrenadier divisions.
Meanwhile, in the game it is present in trace amounts and only 4 battalions stug s (904,905,909,911).
After update in 1944 no. TOE (OB) (356), disappears completely from the game.
As a result, by the end of the game Germany produce but do not use StuH 42 is an obvious mistake!

My suggestion to improve this error.

In update no.356 - 8 StuH and 28 Stug IIIg

In update no. 357 - 12 StuH and 33 Stug IIIg

Additionally, enter StuH 42 in panzergrenadier divisions:

and so for these divisions: for update no. 98 � 24 pieces of StuH 42

In update no. 132 � 24 pieces of StuH 42

In update no. 157 � 24 pieces of StuH 42

Post #: 1

RE: The problem with StuH 42 - 4/28/2014 10:15:03 AM

Denniss

Posts: 7902
Joined: 1/10/2002
From: Germany, Hannover (region)
Status: offline

At least the StuG Bns starting/arriving with StuH should stay on this path and upgrade to Bdes with StuH and not to the StuG-only variant.
The other problem is the Sturmpanzer IV which is hardly used (if at all).

(in reply to ito)

Post #: 2

RE: The problem with StuH 42 - 4/28/2014 12:39:47 PM

swkuh

Posts: 1034
Joined: 10/5/2009
Status: offline

Well, that's the torment of GG's WitE realization. Exquisite detail which I enjoy, but I doubt that I could detect the consequences!

(in reply to Denniss)

Post #: 3