berto
Posts: 20708
Joined: 3/13/2002 From: metro Chicago, Illinois, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tide1530 ok so it's picky :) That means you can't choose a division sized battle? That is correct. Unfortunately, for (too many, alas) nations OOBs and ORGs, for (some) dates, even division-sized random battles are not supported -- by the data. Generally speaking, you will have better luck with smaller sized engagements bigger nations standard timelines (i.e., matching the actual war timelines) The more you deviate away from those "ideals", the less likely the unit data files have the sufficient scope and flexibility to support more "obscure", "far-out" battle combinations. I'm not saying that your attempts were "obscure" or "far out". We know that some combinations -- what should seem perfectly reasonable -- the unit data do not support. So, it's a data problem. Fortunately, using the new -X NoEncryption data option, you can mod the data to support your desired battle combination. Not saying it's easy, but it can be done. For more info, refer to Crossroads' Dev Diaries #2 & #3. Note that, sometime in 2016, we plan to release a 2.10 "mega patch" with a clean-up, expansion, and filling out of the game data. Until then, there are limits unfortunately. (But no worse than they've ever been.)
_____________________________
|