Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

An interesting article about the Russian navy

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> An interesting article about the Russian navy Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 10:29:14 AM   
chesmart


Posts: 908
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Malta
Status: offline
http://englishrussia.com/2012/03/30/ill-fame-of-the-aircraft-cruiser-admiral-kuznetsov/
Post #: 1
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 10:54:37 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
Every time it (or any major Russian ship) moves it's accompanied by a fleet tug. Major breakdowns are apparently routine. Its a good thing the game doesn't model this reality or half the Cold War scenarios would be a tad boring

B

(in reply to chesmart)
Post #: 2
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 11:06:15 AM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
I recall seeing tugs in western deployments too. This stereotype has been beaten to a pulp.

_____________________________


(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 3
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 11:10:22 AM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gunner98

Every time it (or any major Russian ship) moves it's accompanied by a fleet tug. Major breakdowns are apparently routine. Its a good thing the game doesn't model this reality or half the Cold War scenarios would be a tad boring

B


How many Soviet ships broke down during any of the Okean or Summer ex exercises?

Hold back with the jingoism, please.

< Message edited by Sunburn -- 6/22/2014 12:13:48 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 4
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 11:11:17 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
Point! HMCS Protector in March of this year - http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/hmcs-protecteur-too-badly-damaged-to-sail-home-on-her-own-1.2573437

B

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 5
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 11:12:00 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
No jingoism here.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 6
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 3:52:58 PM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline
The French Aircraft Carrier Charles de Gaulle, had all kinds of mechanical problems- at least in the sea trials. She lost an entire screw.
But I'd say that the RFN's ships are generally in a perpetual state of disrepair. It is what it is. Lipstick on a pig, is still a pig wearing lipstick.


_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 7
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 4:22:40 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
It would be interesting to see the maintenance records of all fleets. Guessing there would be a few surprises in there.

As far as the Kusnetsov having a tug along surely tells a tale but at the end of the day it costs to keep a ship in operation. If it was a true junk-pile it would have been retired by now. The Russian Navy has a lot of new stuff it needs to pay for.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 8
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 4:59:59 PM   
ExNusquam

 

Posts: 513
Joined: 3/4/2014
From: Washington, D.C.
Status: offline
quote:

As far as the Kusnetsov having a tug along surely tells a tale but at the end of the day it costs to keep a ship in operation. If it was a true junk-pile it would have been retired by now. The Russian Navy has a lot of new stuff it needs to pay for.

Several defense writers argue that the Kusnetsov and several other small carriers operate mostly as status symbols.

See: http://smokeandstir.org/2013/12/29/why-does-brazil-operate-an-aircraft-carrier/
https://medium.com/war-is-boring/f3f52d299588

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 9
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 5:23:56 PM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline
I was a sailor aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln back in the day, and knowing what I know about how hard we worked to keep that ship in fighting shape with constant maintenance, cleaning, upgrades, inspections, etc- if all that is not going on at a constant pace, your fleet tug is more than a "just-in-case" asset- it's a necessity. I'd be quite fearful of combat at sea, if I was a Russian sailor working aboard their HVU's such as Kuznetsov, and Pyotr Velikiy. Combat is combat, and breaking things and killing people is all part of it- and that said, I'd rather be tasked to do it aboard a modern, well-maintained vessel, as opposed to one that just barely gets by. Game it out in CMANO, and you'll see. A USN CSG at full strength versus it's Russian counterpart in a blue water engagement has a tendency to end very badly for the Russians every time.
Is it just a game? Yep. Is it a decent model of real life? Pretty close to it, and getting better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say that the Bear is toothless, and lacking claws- but if she ever intends on taking on the Eagle again, she'll need a good deal more than an 1980's workout montage video...

< Message edited by NakedWeasel -- 6/22/2014 6:26:11 PM >


_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to ExNusquam)
Post #: 10
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 5:54:10 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel

I was a sailor aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln back in the day, and knowing what I know about how hard we worked to keep that ship in fighting shape with constant maintenance, cleaning, upgrades, inspections, etc- if all that is not going on at a constant pace, your fleet tug is more than a "just-in-case" asset- it's a necessity. I'd be quite fearful of combat at sea, if I was a Russian sailor working aboard their HVU's such as Kuznetsov, and Pyotr Velikiy. Combat is combat, and breaking things and killing people is all part of it- and that said, I'd rather be tasked to do it aboard a modern, well-maintained vessel, as opposed to one that just barely gets by. Game it out in CMANO, and you'll see. A USN CSG at full strength versus it's Russian counterpart in a blue water engagement has a tendency to end very badly for the Russians every time.
Is it just a game? Yep. Is it a decent model of real life? Pretty close to it, and getting better.

I wouldn't go so far as to say that the Bear is toothless, and lacking claws- but if she ever intends on taking on the Eagle again, she'll need a good deal more than an 1980's workout montage video...


Nobody said its a montage video.

We work with folks who are active now that don't sound like you do.

Mike





< Message edited by mikmyk -- 6/22/2014 6:56:04 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 11
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 6:26:08 PM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline
Hmm well I was being a little tongue-in-cheek with my post, as I am frequently apt to do. Returning to my coffee in 3, 2, 1 ...

_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 12
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 8:38:47 PM   
AlmightyTallest

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/25/2014
Status: offline
Well, if any of the info in this article is true, it certainly isn't good for morale on a ship, any ship, from any country.

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/f3f52d299588

I was surprised about the part of the Kusnetsov having only around 50 latrines, of which half are disabled, so something like 25 latrines for 2,000 sailors.

I think there were over 400 commodes on a U.S. Carrier by contrast.

I thought it was amusing the Kusnetsov was tracked by her oil spill though:

http://www.emsa.europa.eu/csn-menu/csn-service/oil-spill-detection-examples/286-oil-spill-detection-examples/1872-oil-spill-detection-examples-admiral-kuznetsov-february-2009.html







< Message edited by AlmightyTallest -- 6/22/2014 9:45:33 PM >

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 13
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 9:27:09 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Well that ain't good.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to AlmightyTallest)
Post #: 14
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/22/2014 9:36:59 PM   
thewood1

 

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline
The only thing many of these "light" carriers are good for is getting a culture of naval aviation started. A few of these navies have the history of having carriers. But their naval aviation has never had to put their carriers and aviation crews through any thing beyond training. And even that training is very low tempo.

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 15
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 2:16:44 PM   
Feltan


Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
I think when the OP source document is a Russian publication, that is corroborated by other sources, the claims of jingoism are unfounded.  By any reasonable measure, this ship is problematic.  It's internal systems (heating and water) can't sustain the crew -- and even the Russians admit it.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to thewood1)
Post #: 16
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 2:24:46 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
My objection was not to the current reported state, but with:

1) The implication that only Russian forces use tugs on deployments or face maintenance problems (ISTR a recent report referenced on ID which paints a pretty bleak picture of the USN non-carrier surface fleet, for example).

2) The completely unfounded extrapolation to the Cold War era. Back then there was money. From the early 90s until very recently, the Russian navy had to make do with funds that wouldn't support a local highschool beach trip.

< Message edited by Sunburn -- 6/24/2014 3:28:54 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Feltan)
Post #: 17
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 4:15:10 PM   
Feltan


Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sunburn

My objection was not to the current reported state, but with:

1) The implication that only Russian forces use tugs on deployments or face maintenance problems (ISTR a recent report referenced on ID which paints a pretty bleak picture of the USN non-carrier surface fleet, for example).

2) The completely unfounded extrapolation to the Cold War era. Back then there was money. From the early 90s until very recently, the Russian navy had to make do with funds that wouldn't support a local highschool beach trip.


Quite so, thank you for clarifying.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 18
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 8:02:18 PM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline
Just for giggles I do have a modern, US CSG vs RFN CSG test scenario that demonstrates to some extent what happens when "East Meets West" in the North Sea. I started with blh42's imported Carrier Group Twelve (excellent addon!) the only major change/addition I gave the USN was adding a Seawolf and Virginia SSN to the group- (CSGs typically deploy with SSN's, so it's not really that far-fetched.) Now, for the Russians, I had to turn up the cheat matrix to full, just to give the Russians a fighting chance. I filled out the Kutz with Flankers, AND Fulcrums. One third AAW, and ASuW AC ready and waiting to pounce. I created a massive Cold War-style battle group with a Slava, a Kirov, 2X Sovremenny, 2X Udaloy, a late-model Krivak, and a Neustrashimy. Additionally, I added a Severodvinsk and Oscar II to the RFN CSG formation. Finally, just to be "sporting" about it, I provided the Russians with a buttload of land-based air assets for surveillance and AEW, and even a full squadron of Backfires and Su-34's in the hopes it would make me sweat a little. Naturally, one can see that the virtual Russian side has far more going for it, than they do in real life.

Nope. No sweat. Not even a little. In AI versus AI games, (I prefer to sit back and watch the madness) the end result will be a possible single Krypton hit against the CVN and/or an escort about 50% of the time. The entire Russian force is thoroughly destroyed resulting in game defeat 99.999% of the time. I say 99.99999% because there is a very small possibility for one of those big ASM's to leak through. But in more than a dozen games, the Russian side has never sunk the US CVN. (Their victory condition.)

As far as CMANO is concerned, the fault is probably not so much with the Kuznetsov- in the game she is new, fully-loaded, armed, and manned- as are her escorts. (To be fair, so are the American ships.) She doesn't launch half-loaded Flankers for CAP. She can be loaded with three times as many aircraft as the real-life Kuznetsov deploys with. Her screws turn for 29 knots, she doesn't leak fuel for thousands of miles in her wake. All of her virtual toilets work. Her pilots are paid and and well cared for.

The victory for the virtual USN lies with the more than ample capabilities of the 12 AIM-120D-equipped FA/18E's that I have assigned for AAW BARCAP. Though there are never more than four patroling at 200nm's from the carrier, they viciously man-handle any threat they find, and typically escape AAW engagements like NINJA-PIRATES. Whatever aircraft or missile threats they do not completely brutalize, is easy pickins for the CSG's SAMs. The other key to the USN's victory is the heavy use of the JSOW BROACH combined with AARGM's. If I change it up, and give the alpha strike Harpoons or SLAM-ERs with HARMs, the RFN group may shoot them all down, and kill up to half of the strikers- but eventually the two battle groups will close to secondary weapon range, and the US CSG blows the Russians out of the water with hundreds of combined RGM-84, and ESSMs. The Russian survivors, if any, are finished off with 127mm fire. Interestingly, the two US SSN's never fire a single torp- even within spitting range of the RFN fleet. That said, the Russian subs let loose with a massive volley of ASM's every time. The combined shock and awe effect of all those Sunburn, Shipwreck, Kitchen, Oniks and Krypton ASMs suddenly bearing down on the CVN does make me sit up and take notice, but typically all are shot down- even at less than 20 miles.

Maybe it's the model. Maybe it's a fault in the game engine. But it's kinda crazy to watch the most powerful sea-denial force the US has ever faced, get fully trounced like a bunch of newborn kittens every single match.

I'll provide said scenario to anyone who wants a go upon request. Peace out.

_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to Feltan)
Post #: 19
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 8:44:14 PM   
AlmightyTallest

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/25/2014
Status: offline
I'm willing to bet if you switched to the Russian side in your scenario and used your human intelligence, you'd be able to defeat the U.S. CVBG.

Part of the problem might be the AI, and other times it's also our own setup of the Scenario.

Does the AI in your scenario attempt to have all missiles strike the CVBG at the same time to get some through?



< Message edited by AlmightyTallest -- 6/24/2014 9:45:09 PM >

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 20
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 9:17:25 PM   
RoryAndersonCDT

 

Posts: 1830
Joined: 6/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel
I'll provide said scenario to anyone who wants a go upon request. Peace out.


I want to sink the russian navy with ease!

_____________________________

Command Dev Team
Technical Lead

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 21
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 9:19:32 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
I like to think that the point of our AI isn't to beat a human but to entertain them by presenting a challenge and/or decisions. We provide the tools in the editor for the player to script the AI to do just that. If it doesn't happen it doesn't necessarily mean that its the tools or AI that is at fault.

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 6/24/2014 10:20:39 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to AlmightyTallest)
Post #: 22
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 9:21:49 PM   
Feltan


Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel

Just for giggles I do have a modern, US CSG vs RFN CSG test scenario that demonstrates to some extent what happens when "East Meets West" in the North Sea. I started with blh42's imported Carrier Group Twelve (excellent addon!) the only major change/addition I gave the USN was adding a Seawolf and Virginia SSN to the group- (CSGs typically deploy with SSN's, so it's not really that far-fetched.) Now, for the Russians, I had to turn up the cheat matrix to full, just to give the Russians a fighting chance. I filled out the Kutz with Flankers, AND Fulcrums. One third AAW, and ASuW AC ready and waiting to pounce. I created a massive Cold War-style battle group with a Slava, a Kirov, 2X Sovremenny, 2X Udaloy, a late-model Krivak, and a Neustrashimy. Additionally, I added a Severodvinsk and Oscar II to the RFN CSG formation. Finally, just to be "sporting" about it, I provided the Russians with a buttload of land-based air assets for surveillance and AEW, and even a full squadron of Backfires and Su-34's in the hopes it would make me sweat a little. Naturally, one can see that the virtual Russian side has far more going for it, than they do in real life.

Nope. No sweat. Not even a little. In AI versus AI games, (I prefer to sit back and watch the madness) the end result will be a possible single Krypton hit against the CVN and/or an escort about 50% of the time. The entire Russian force is thoroughly destroyed resulting in game defeat 99.999% of the time. I say 99.99999% because there is a very small possibility for one of those big ASM's to leak through. But in more than a dozen games, the Russian side has never sunk the US CVN. (Their victory condition.)

As far as CMANO is concerned, the fault is probably not so much with the Kuznetsov- in the game she is new, fully-loaded, armed, and manned- as are her escorts. (To be fair, so are the American ships.) She doesn't launch half-loaded Flankers for CAP. She can be loaded with three times as many aircraft as the real-life Kuznetsov deploys with. Her screws turn for 29 knots, she doesn't leak fuel for thousands of miles in her wake. All of her virtual toilets work. Her pilots are paid and and well cared for.

The victory for the virtual USN lies with the more than ample capabilities of the 12 AIM-120D-equipped FA/18E's that I have assigned for AAW BARCAP. Though there are never more than four patroling at 200nm's from the carrier, they viciously man-handle any threat they find, and typically escape AAW engagements like NINJA-PIRATES. Whatever aircraft or missile threats they do not completely brutalize, is easy pickins for the CSG's SAMs. The other key to the USN's victory is the heavy use of the JSOW BROACH combined with AARGM's. If I change it up, and give the alpha strike Harpoons or SLAM-ERs with HARMs, the RFN group may shoot them all down, and kill up to half of the strikers- but eventually the two battle groups will close to secondary weapon range, and the US CSG blows the Russians out of the water with hundreds of combined RGM-84, and ESSMs. The Russian survivors, if any, are finished off with 127mm fire. Interestingly, the two US SSN's never fire a single torp- even within spitting range of the RFN fleet. That said, the Russian subs let loose with a massive volley of ASM's every time. The combined shock and awe effect of all those Sunburn, Shipwreck, Kitchen, Oniks and Krypton ASMs suddenly bearing down on the CVN does make me sit up and take notice, but typically all are shot down- even at less than 20 miles.

Maybe it's the model. Maybe it's a fault in the game engine. But it's kinda crazy to watch the most powerful sea-denial force the US has ever faced, get fully trounced like a bunch of newborn kittens every single match.

I'll provide said scenario to anyone who wants a go upon request. Peace out.


The thing here is that I would not expect the Russian Federation to be successful. The thought of a CVN vs. any RFN surface force in a face-to-face conflict would be almost a foregone conclusion. While it might be an interesting exercise, I would think the Kuznetzov would more likely play a role as a helo/ASW platform under the umbrella of land-based air protecting SSBN marshaling areas.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 23
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 9:28:16 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Yeah Russian carriers were never meant to go toe to toe with US CVGB's. They were part of a larger strike complex (Subs, Backfire's, Surface fleet etc).

Was any jamming included in the scenario?

Make sure to use the strike editor feature as well for raids. Off axis

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 6/24/2014 10:29:41 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Feltan)
Post #: 24
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 10:43:49 PM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Yeah Russian carriers were never meant to go toe to toe with US CVGB's. They were part of a larger strike complex (Subs, Backfire's, Surface fleet etc).

Was any jamming included in the scenario?

Make sure to use the strike editor feature as well for raids. Off axis

Mike


Oh you betcha. I never set up a game without it, if at all possible. 5 Growlers on the flat top, perpetually patrolling out to about 200nm at 45 degree off-bore to the group's course. Now, at this point I don't have any Russian platforms jamming, because they really don't have any carrier-borne assets for that, aside from the ships themselves. I don't like to use the ships jammers in order to maintain EMCON- but I am seriously thinking about adding some OECM Fencers, or maybe even some Tu-22PD.

_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 25
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 10:56:08 PM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline
Done. Tasty revised build, now with even more jamming!

Edited, wrong build. Sorry folks.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by NakedWeasel -- 6/25/2014 12:47:40 AM >


_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 26
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 10:57:57 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
Tu-16P Badger J & L's do a nice job on the jamming side of things. Tu-16R Badger F has got some decent ELINT as well. They were designed to support the fleet in this type of fight I think. I'm not sure how they would stack against a Growler but against an EA-6B they seem to do a pretty good job.

I think it would be a foolhardy Russian Admiral who would go toe to toe with a US CSG without a lot of land based air support. Luring a CSG into an LBA/SSN ambush perhaps but its an unequal fight from the get-go. Still, I'll take a look at your scenario for S*&ts & giggles.

B

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 27
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/24/2014 11:49:31 PM   
AlmightyTallest

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/25/2014
Status: offline
This is a fun scenario, try it by adding all the currently orbiting Russian and US Satellites.

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 28
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/25/2014 12:11:39 AM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline
Yes, it's really just a test scenario, not one of my more than 10,000-AU monsters, that takes me months to build. But it is one of the more fun scenarios I've made lately, as it maintains a fairly quick pace if you have any time compression set. Just a friendly bump, I've re-uploaded the file, as this one is much more elegant and allows both sides jammers to really be put to use.

< Message edited by NakedWeasel -- 6/25/2014 1:12:40 AM >


_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to AlmightyTallest)
Post #: 29
RE: An interesting article about the Russian navy - 6/25/2014 12:34:44 AM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline
Not really a full AAR, but this shows the typical outcome. Note: This is with the Russian jamming cranked up to 110%... You'll also notice the heavy ASM's were never launched, probably due to heavy jamming from the Growlers obscuring the battle group's position- and the US alpha strike then turned the Russian boats into smoking holes in the ocean. The only Russian survivors were the SSN's, which blasted right past the US CSG without either side catching wind of the other. ( I watched it with God Perspective turned on. )

There were no hits on the US ships, not even a scratch.

SIDE: United States
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
7x F/A-18C Hornet
2x F/A-18E Super Hornet
1x E-2C Hawkeye 2000
2x F/A-18F Super Hornet


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
197x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
24x AIM-9X Sidewinder
43x 20mm/85 M61A1 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
5x RIM-66M-2 SM-2MR Blk IIIA
2x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
32x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
1x AN/ALE-50
1x 20mm/85 M61A2 Vulcan Burst [100 rnds]
48x AGM-88E AARGM
48x AGM-154C JSOW [BROACH]
10x AGM-84K SLAMER-ATA
48x RGM-84G Harpoon ICR



SIDE: Russian Federation
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
12x Tu-142MZ Bear F Mod 4
6x Su-24MP Fencer F
8x Tu-95MR Bear E
4x A-50 Mainstay A
28x MiG-29K Fulcrum D
12x Su-34 Fullback
4x Tu-22PD Blinder E
12x Tu-22M-3 Backfire C
11x Ka-27PL Helix A
7x Ka-29RLD Helix
1x RKR Petr Velikiy [Pr.1144 Orlan, Ex-Yuri Androvo]
1x RKR Slava [Pr.1164 Atlant]
2x EM Sovremenny I [Pr.956A]
4x MiG-29UB Fulcrum B
14x Su-33 Flanker D
2x BPK Udaloy II [Pr.1155.1]
1x SKR Krivak III [Pr.1135.5 Nerei]
1x TAKR Admiral Kuznetsov [Pr.1143.5]
1x SKR Neustrashimy [Pr.1154 Yastreb]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
61x Generic Chaff Salvo [8x Cartridges]
14x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
53x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
4x Generic Flare Salvo [2x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
2x AA-11 Archer [R-73]
19x AA-12 Adder A [R-77, RVV-AE]
2x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
5x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
3x 30mm Gsh-30-1 Burst [30 rnds]
2x AS-4 Kitchen A Mod 3 [Kh-22N ASM]
24x SA-N-20a Gargoyle [48N6]
171x SA-N-9 Gauntlet [9M330-2 Kinzhal]
19x SA-N-11a Grisom [9M311K]
9x 30mm Twin Gatling Gsh-6-30K Burst [375 rnds]
22x SA-N-6a Grumble [5R55RM]
46x PK-10 Flare [SO-50]
31x SA-N-7 Gadfly [9M38]
17x AK-130 130mm/54 Twin Frag Burst [2 rnds]
144x PK-10 Chaff [SR-50]
45x PK-2 Chaff [TSP-47]
12x PK-16 Chaff [TSP-60U]
1x SA-N-4b Gecko [9M33M3]
1x PK-2 Flare [TST-47]
13x AK-100 100mm/70 Frag

< Message edited by NakedWeasel -- 6/25/2014 1:43:15 AM >


_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> An interesting article about the Russian navy Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.984