Dreaming about the future

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Dreaming about the future

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Dreaming about the future

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Dreaming about the future - 7/22/2014 2:01:15 PM

OnFire

Posts: 79
Joined: 6/12/2014
Status: offline

CMANO is a gem and has revolutionised the Naval warfare simulation genre. It is one of my favourite "games" and I am really enjoying it.

Nevertheless, I wondered what the next years might hold from the wizards that call themselves developers:

CMANO 2 - Pre-1945 DB (WWI & II) added

CMANO 3 - Detailed Land-Combat model

CMANO 4 - Multiplayer added

CMANO 5 - 3D graphics ala SH5 introduced

( CMANO 6 - A working refuel logic

)

So, what do you guys think we will see in the next ten or so years in this genre?

< Message edited by OnFire -- 7/22/2014 7:43:18 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/22/2014 6:12:24 PM

warshipbuilder

Posts: 1960
Joined: 2/23/2013
From: C-eh-n-eh-d-eh
Status: offline

quote:

CMANO 2 - Pre-1945 DB (WWI & II) added

How many of you out there remember the old Dos game Great Naval Battles of the North Atlantic? OK so I am old, what can I say. It has been one of my fondest hopes that there would be, for lack of a better term, a re-make of this game. For those of you unfamiliar with that game, it was basically doing convoy protection throughout the war. Oddly enough, it was about protecting the convoys from surface raiders and not U-boats. Still it was a game I really enjoyed and I am thinking CMNAO would be a great starting point.

_____________________________

warshipbuilder

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.
ED/BTR Ressurection Project
https://www.bombercommandmuseumarchives.ca/

(in reply to OnFire)

Post #: 2

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 3:35:24 AM

GBOATZ

Posts: 126
Joined: 10/22/2013
Status: offline

Hi Warshipbuilder, I actually still have 2 of those Great Naval Battles DOS Games, (North Atlantic and Burning Steel) as well as Dale Brown's Megafortress and several others. I have to keep a fairly old computer to play them on, but I do engage them from time to time, and yes, LOL,. I am old too! Frankly, I preferred that no submarines were involved as it seemed the primary goal in these games was to mix and match SAG's to 1) Protect your bases, 2) take on an opposing adversary or 3) avoid contact altogether and bombard your enemy. My particular favorite was "Operation Hercules" Protecting Malta from being overrun, keeping it supplied and attacking German and Italian Shipping while they were still in port. Mostly it was creating the right timing to sneak your Carriers, battleships and cruisers in late at night or early in the morning, do as much damage as possible or land troops and then get out quickly without either being spotted or getting into a surface battle with an opposing force for once the battle starts, its hard to predict an outcome! I guess my tactics haven't changed much in COMMAND or when I played Harpoon: Use as much deception as possible to preserve your assets while obliterating the enemy. I had great fun with those older games, and my strategy would perhaps be harder with COMMAND with the advent of satellites, better sensors, aircraft and ECM, but its a great challenge and as they say "its hard to teach old dogs new tricks."

< Message edited by GBOATZ -- 7/23/2014 4:37:04 AM >

(in reply to warshipbuilder)

Post #: 3

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 5:03:34 PM

AdmiralSteve

Posts: 270
Joined: 3/28/2011
From: Red Bluff, CA
Status: offline

I don't see 3D coming to Command. I think that market is wrapped up with Call of Duty and Battlefield which are enormously popular games.

I would like to see land combat worked a bit more. I think it works fine now but it could use some cleaning up in terms of unit movement, patrols, engagements etc. Point of Attack worked land combat well but it had quiet the steep learning curve for me.

A DB beginning with WWI I think would wrap up all of the Steam and Iron players (which is a good game in itself).

I'm getting used to the refueling quwerks in Command. I think its just using it and seeing how to do it.

_____________________________

�There are no extraordinary men...just extraordinary circumstances that ordinary men are forced to deal with.�
Admiral William Frederick Halsey Jr. 1882-1959

(in reply to GBOATZ)

Post #: 4

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 5:27:19 PM

Primarchx

Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

Not sure why 3d is necessary. Might be helpful for taking full advantage of terrain effects but beyond that I don't see the appeal. I like having something analogous to a CIC display.

(in reply to AdmiralSteve)

Post #: 5

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 6:11:05 PM

NakedWeasel

Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline

3-D is probably not such a difficult thing to achieve, these day. As to it's usefulness, it's fluff/eye candy. That said, if done right, it could generate massive sales, by bringing visually-oriented novices into the game. Particularly in a head to head environment. My brother, (USAF Tsgt. Flying crew-chief on SPECOPS -130s, nearly retired) and I discuss my scenarios for hours on end. But unless there is some sort of visual component for instant gratification, he's uninterested in actually playing it. Army-types are probably even less inclined to play this game, because outside of FBCB2, the ground pounders don't have as much appreciation for the top-down picture that is so common for us NTDS-experienced types. But when you consider games like DCS: Combined Arms, ( http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/products/combined_arms/index.php ) and Wargame AirLand Battle, ( www.wargame-rd.com/en/game-ab.html ) the possibilites to ensnare new player ( and market-share) are hugely expanded. I lack the programming knowledge, and the artistic skills required to produce something like that, but I believe that it's almost plug and play with open source engines like Python, these days. I expect it would require some people to upgrade to more powerful systems, though it seems logical to be able to turn the 3-D stuff off, for less GPU-intensive gameplay.

Honestly, I love the game as an uber-realistic NTDS simulator, and will for a very long time- but I wouldn't hate being able to see my fighters and bombers blowing the crap out of 3-d ships in Google maps. Try not to flame me, but I am a "cake and eat it too" sort of fellow.

_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to Primarchx)

Post #: 6

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 6:31:23 PM

Primarchx

Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

No flames from me. You have a valid point about the market space. I will say my quadcore i7 Alienware laptop can be challenged by the game engine even now, with minimal graphics requirements. Granted it's not using the video card at all...

(in reply to NakedWeasel)

Post #: 7

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 6:47:04 PM

Meroka37

Posts: 770
Joined: 7/31/2009
Status: offline

I vote for detailed land combat model...

_____________________________

'Better honor without ships, than ships without honor"

(in reply to Primarchx)

Post #: 8

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 7:30:29 PM

Primarchx

Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

Meroka37 - sounds a lot easier said than done. How do you model cover and concealment from ground level on a global scale in tune with the air/naval game? Perhaps designer-specified 'zones' using something like RPs designating basic terrain types like urban, wooded, clear, etc?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Meroka37

I vote for detailed land combat model...

(in reply to Meroka37)

Post #: 9

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 7:33:27 PM

ParachuteProne

Posts: 207
Joined: 8/2/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Meroka37

I vote for detailed land combat model...

Me too, along with the ability to load/unload and transport ground forces.

(in reply to Meroka37)

Post #: 10

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 8:39:04 PM

NakedWeasel

Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Primarchx

Meroka37 - sounds a lot easier said than done. How do you model cover and concealment from ground level on a global scale in tune with the air/naval game? Perhaps designer-specified 'zones' using something like RPs designating basic terrain types like urban, wooded, clear, etc?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Meroka37

I vote for detailed land combat model...

I think this would be the most obvious course.

_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to Primarchx)

Post #: 11

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 8:44:58 PM

Primarchx

Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

I suppose that would resemble a real-time version of TacOps to some degree, then?

(in reply to NakedWeasel)

Post #: 12

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 9:01:33 PM

Feltan

Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline

I think it would appear similar to TACOPS, but on a larger scale -- operational not tactical. Additionally, for ground-ground combat, the designers might want to get away from the engagement profile that CMANO uses for ship-v-air and air-v-air and air-v-ship. It would kill performance to try and model all the weapons and weapon types one could engage with in a brigade vs. brigade size fight. They'll probably need to move to a Lanchester or Lanchester-type algorithm (http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/wdj/_files/documents/teach/sm212/DiffyQ/de-lanchesters-eqns.pdf) to resolve ground vs. ground combat. It will be slightly more abstract, but have the advantage of actually allowing the simulator to run without chugging to a halt during ground combat.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to Primarchx)

Post #: 13

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 9:53:28 PM

NakedWeasel

Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline

Could that algorithm be applied to the naval combat aspects of CMANO, in the hopes of improving the navigation pathfinding?

_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to Feltan)

Post #: 14

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/23/2014 10:10:22 PM

hellfish6

Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline

Of course there's room in the market for a 3D version of CMNAO. Why wouldn't there be? Because Call of Duty exists?

Janes Fleet Command had a 3D interface and while it wasn't the greatest naval game of all time, you gotta admit that 3D view was really damn attractive.

I'd love to see a 3D version of Command, but I don't know if it would be worth the effort (would it bring in that many new customers to justify the immense workload?). Even if it was, it's not a priority as far as I'm concerned. It's a "nice to have."

I'd like the land warfare segment enhanced over time - especially the ability to add/paint types of terrain on the map that affect sensors and lines of sight. Enhanced logistics would be nice as well, in order to simulate campaigns better.

_____________________________

(in reply to NakedWeasel)

Post #: 15

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/24/2014 12:32:39 AM

Feltan

Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel

Could that algorithm be applied to the naval combat aspects of CMANO, in the hopes of improving the navigation pathfinding?

NakedWeasel,

In a word, no. That isn't a proper application of the algorithm. Think of land forces, two blobs approaching one another.

The Lanchester equations allow you to have a framework for attrition among the two blobs.

This is an entirely different approach than naval combat. What you save is the CPU time to adjudicate every weapon in a ground unit firing.

It is an abstract way of resolving land combat.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to NakedWeasel)

Post #: 16

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/24/2014 3:05:46 AM

NakedWeasel

Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline

Ah. I appreciate the clarification. Thank you.

_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to Feltan)

Post #: 17

RE: Dreaming about the future - 7/24/2014 6:49:23 AM

Tancrede

Posts: 24
Joined: 7/11/2013
Status: offline

Apart from generating more sales, 3-D features are also very good to immerse a player into the simulation and eventually
they can help some people to stick to it as the can visualize what they are doing.

I still do remember when playing DW the th 3-D window adds some spices to the action.

(in reply to OnFire)

Post #: 18