RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (A) vs. Q-Ball (J)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (A) vs. Q-Ball (J)

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (A) vs. Q-Ball (J)

Page: << < prev 10 11 [12] 13 14 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/28/2014 6:28:40 PM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Again, everyone is focused on a defensive strategy entirely, ignoring Alfred's strong hint that the Chinese should not just dig in.
He seemed to be hinting that there are opportunities to send troops into his rear areas to cut supply, take and destroy bases (after taking just vacate them and let the partisans destroy them),
and draw IJA forces away from the front.
I recommend a mobile reserve of at least five units with good morale (important for march progress) to sneak around the flanks and head for important bases that are likely lightly defended. Shanghai or Peiping will do.

Offensives in China early tend to turn into disasters. I've seen some grew pushes into Japanese territory that led to all of China being lost by mid-42.

My advice would be to dig.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 331

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/28/2014 6:49:49 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

Not to mention magical Japanese recon seeing Chinese units a couple of hexes out in most cases.

I have had some access with forward operations in China, but it's been very marginal. In the one game where I seemed to have the IJA on its back feet or at least stalemated, I think I got lucky. It was against Richard III and I had almost taken Canton after a 2-division IJA push to Hong Kong, and I had him tied up around Sinyang with what were supposed to be throwaway units rather than defending around Ankang and Nanyang. If Burma had gone well, China could have turned into a really nasty theater for him.

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 332

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/28/2014 8:34:36 PM

Sangeli

Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Not to mention magical Japanese recon seeing Chinese units a couple of hexes out in most cases.

I have had some access with forward operations in China, but it's been very marginal. In the one game where I seemed to have the IJA on its back feet or at least stalemated, I think I got lucky. It was against Richard III and I had almost taken Canton after a 2-division IJA push to Hong Kong, and I had him tied up around Sinyang with what were supposed to be throwaway units rather than defending around Ankang and Nanyang. If Burma had gone well, China could have turned into a really nasty theater for him.

Most I've ever done offensively with the Chinese is take Nanchang from the Japanese in early 1942. It was a level 4 fort with 300 AV in 1x terrain and it took about 10 days to conquer with around 1700 AV Chinese AV deployed in attacks with fresh units being cycled in to replace ones with heavy disablements. And it only worked because I had another offensive nearby to tie down reserves so they couldn't reach Nanchang. Every time I actually am able to get the numerical superiority that I want, I am continually disappointing by the performance of the Chinese in offensive attacks. And even in this game I'm back on the defensive after Japanese reinforcements showed up (although I still hold Nanchang and its important road crossings).

< Message edited by Sangeli -- 10/28/2014 9:38:24 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 333

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/28/2014 9:44:47 PM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr
..But Lokasenna is correct, this is not CSI Miami. A clue does not necessarily point directly to reality.

Of course not. It's CSI Calcutta!

But, seriously, I look at intel information using, for want of a better term, a probabilistic framework. At best it tells you what might be "more likely" than other things. That's good enough for me!

(in reply to Mike McCreery)

Post #: 334

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/28/2014 10:02:10 PM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

So much good stuff has been posted. Luckily, we're moving slowly now due to work obligations and stuff like that so I might actually have time to implement some ideas before Japanese soldiers are strolling the streets of towns near Bombay.

I do expect paradrops as Q-Ball has made at least 2 so far so I'll tell come small units to go double-quick to those key bases on the RR. So many of based need covering, though.

I do need to figure out how to use my more mobile units. One better unit I have available is the 2nd USMC Tank Bn, but I'm not sure how I want to use it yet. Its tanks are the older Stuarts but combined with the experience of the Marines they might be able to do good work again Japanese tank units. I think. My main ID in India are split between Karachi and Bombay, but Karachi has most of the high quality Aussie units. I probably should split them between the two cities.

In China I lack the experience, knowledge, and skills to go on the offensive anywhere seriously. My goal is to have a slow collapse in China rather than a rapid collapse. I do need to start thinking, as suggested, about what I'll do when parts of my defenses get breached and I need to fall back. Right now I'm too committed on the front lines as so many of my reserves have already been tapped. I'm starting to do a census of the hexes I control in China to find where I have more units than needed to defend these hexes.

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 335

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/28/2014 10:48:08 PM

Sangeli

Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack
In China I lack the experience, knowledge, and skills to go on the offensive anywhere seriously. My goal is to have a slow collapse in China rather than a rapid collapse. I do need to start thinking, as suggested, about what I'll do when parts of my defenses get breached and I need to fall back. Right now I'm too committed on the front lines as so many of my reserves have already been tapped. I'm starting to do a census of the hexes I control in China to find where I have more units than needed to defend these hexes.

I would suggest going through your "front lines" and pulling some units back if there is no Japanese threat at that point in the line. There are definitely a few places in your line where you are committing units to defensive positions where no threat has yet arisen. Your defensive positions NW of Ichang are a pretty good example of this; it seems clear with current Japanese plans they do not intend to march NW out of Ichang yet you even have units deployed off the road to counter that. It seems you have moved away from the tripwire scheme you implemented earlier and as a result are less able to maneuver to meet Japanese attacks.

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 336

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/28/2014 11:18:22 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack
In China I lack the experience, knowledge, and skills to go on the offensive anywhere seriously. My goal is to have a slow collapse in China rather than a rapid collapse. I do need to start thinking, as suggested, about what I'll do when parts of my defenses get breached and I need to fall back. Right now I'm too committed on the front lines as so many of my reserves have already been tapped. I'm starting to do a census of the hexes I control in China to find where I have more units than needed to defend these hexes.

I would suggest going through your "front lines" and pulling some units back if there is no Japanese threat at that point in the line. There are definitely a few places in your line where you are committing units to defensive positions where no threat has yet arisen. Your defensive positions NW of Ichang are a pretty good example of this; it seems clear with current Japanese plans they do not intend to march NW out of Ichang yet you even have units deployed off the road to counter that. It seems you have moved away from the tripwire scheme you implemented earlier and as a result are less able to maneuver to meet Japanese attacks.

Right - you can't really form a continuous line so you just keep some units mobile to go where needed. Strat mode and railways are your friends in India.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Sangeli)

Post #: 337

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 4:46:07 PM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

March 5-6, 1942
---------------------
Japan takes new RR base (Rajshahi) near Calcutta and units are marching to the RR base at Rangpur. At Rangpur the strongest (sic) unit is the 7th Indian Division with 25 experience. No way it can hold against what is likely coming. I'll likely RR the unit out, but it takes 3 days to go into strat mode so some other units are going to try to delay the approaching Japanese units.

A new landing a Vizagapatnam. As of now, it appears to include only a small number of troops.

Trincomalee is the only holdout on Ceylon.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 338

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 5:32:01 PM

Sangeli

Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline

Don't be afraid to use Blenheim bombers in India against the Japanese as they advance. The bombs won't do much damage and the planes are extremely vulnerable to Japanese fighters but they will slow down the Japanese who are advancing and it is unlikely that Q-ball is providing LRCAP on them. They are very useful in enabling extraction in tricky situations where the Japanese are trying to cut off or attack your units before they can escape.

< Message edited by Sangeli -- 10/30/2014 6:32:22 PM >

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 339

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 8:02:52 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

I would guess that new small landing is a rail blocker forcing you to divert around it.

_____________________________

Hans

(in reply to Sangeli)

Post #: 340

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 8:32:50 PM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

Yes, good ideas about the Blenheims. I used some a week ago but LRCAP shot down most of them. But it's worth giving a couple of them another shot.

The landing at Vizagapathnam being a blocking move seems to make sense as it involves (allegedly) 2000 troops, 18 guns, and 2AFV so they don't seem intended to move very far and fast.

In other fronts...

Intel says a couple of units are planning for Perth, and Q-Ball has taken all the bases on the north coast of Oz. In addition, intel also says,

1942-02-26 2/7th Tank Regiment is loaded on a Aden Cargo class xAK moving to Port Hedland

Does that suggest Q-Ball might be planning to drive to Carnarvon or down toward Perth across the desert?!

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Panjack -- 10/30/2014 9:33:27 PM >

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 341

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 8:44:17 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

It's possible that he's just stopping there before heading onwards.

You can drive tanks across the wasteland there, but I wouldn't recommend it. It would take forever and if you see him, you can bomb him into dust.

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 342

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 9:17:55 PM

Sangeli

Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

It's possible that he's just stopping there before heading onwards.

You can drive tanks across the wasteland there, but I wouldn't recommend it. It would take forever and if you see him, you can bomb him into dust.

Actually the movement speed here is pretty good. 30 miles a day over the desert and 15 over rough desert for tanks. The units are definitely vulnerable to bombers but you have to spot them first; in moving through open desert you would have to have recon planes in the exact hex. But even with all of that, its still not a recommended move for the Japanese when you can just land units directly easily enough. But keep this in mind as the Allies because the overland attack route can be quite attractive.

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 343

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 9:38:48 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

It's possible that he's just stopping there before heading onwards.

You can drive tanks across the wasteland there, but I wouldn't recommend it. It would take forever and if you see him, you can bomb him into dust.

Actually the movement speed here is pretty good. 30 miles a day over the desert and 15 over rough desert for tanks. The units are definitely vulnerable to bombers but you have to spot them first; in moving through open desert you would have to have recon planes in the exact hex. But even with all of that, its still not a recommended move for the Japanese when you can just land units directly easily enough. But keep this in mind as the Allies because the overland attack route can be quite attractive.

I'm more thinking of the supply flow. Even just a couple of bombing raids could prove disastrous to individual tank units once they got about halfway, maybe more, to Carnarvon or that dot base.

(in reply to Sangeli)

Post #: 344

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 10/30/2014 11:47:11 PM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

It's possible that he's just stopping there before heading onwards.

You can drive tanks across the wasteland there, but I wouldn't recommend it. It would take forever and if you see him, you can bomb him into dust.

+1

This is an often used SIGINT deception trick as well. Send teh TF to various different spots and only a few days before it lands does it have it's actual destination.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 345

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/2/2014 2:17:36 AM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

March 7-10, 1941
------------------
The most significant event was the landing of a Japanese division at Diamond Harbour and the taking of that base the next day. Otherwise, Chinese units have been reorganizing trying to reestablish pools of units that can move elsewhere problems occur, Indian and British units have been moving to cover various RR bases between SE India and Bombay/Karachi, and units are moving (slowly) to Noumea.

March 10 marked the end of an operation that likely worked out as well as can be expected. Below are two xAKs: one docked at Subic Bay and the other at Bataan. They arrived after a long, and indirect, trip from PH. They arrived about 3 days apart and both were unobserved the whole way from PH to the PIs. But the very first day the first ship arrived at Subic Bay it was apparently observed by Japanese fighters flying over Clark. Detection on the ship then went from zero to 4/4 and Subic Bay went from zero to 9/10. For a couple of days the ship was unmolested (and unloading SO slowly) as I'm supposing Q-Ball either didn't notice the ship or didn't think it was important. But then the bombing began just as the second ship arrived at Bataan. A couple of days of bombing by level bombers failed to score at hit but then Vals came in and plastered the poor ships.

The two xAKs managed to offload maybe 3k in supplies before they met their end. All bases I still hold in the PI were down to almost zero supplies before the ships arrived so I'm sure the supplies are quite appreciated by Allied troops still holding out.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Panjack -- 11/2/2014 3:28:53 AM >

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 346

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/2/2014 9:42:05 PM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack

March 7-10, 1941
------------------
The most significant event was the landing of a Japanese division at Diamond Harbour and the taking of that base the next day. Otherwise, Chinese units have been reorganizing trying to reestablish pools of units that can move elsewhere problems occur, Indian and British units have been moving to cover various RR bases between SE India and Bombay/Karachi, and units are moving (slowly) to Noumea.

March 10 marked the end of an operation that likely worked out as well as can be expected. Below are two xAKs: one docked at Subic Bay and the other at Bataan. They arrived after a long, and indirect, trip from PH. They arrived about 3 days apart and both were unobserved the whole way from PH to the PIs. But the very first day the first ship arrived at Subic Bay it was apparently observed by Japanese fighters flying over Clark. Detection on the ship then went from zero to 4/4 and Subic Bay went from zero to 9/10. For a couple of days the ship was unmolested (and unloading SO slowly) as I'm supposing Q-Ball either didn't notice the ship or didn't think it was important. But then the bombing began just as the second ship arrived at Bataan. A couple of days of bombing by level bombers failed to score at hit but then Vals came in and plastered the poor ships.

The two xAKs managed to offload maybe 3k in supplies before they met their end. All bases I still hold in the PI were down to almost zero supplies before the ships arrived so I'm sure the supplies are quite appreciated by Allied troops still holding out.

It was a nice effort. I had an opponent do the same and he kept at it for weeks. I didn't like at first that they were somehow getting through, then I realized that the supply they brought would last all of a few days and sinking them gave me 5-10 VPs while training up my DB pilots. That group got into the 60s in exp pretty quickly with all of the work!

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 347

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/4/2014 2:05:02 AM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

March 11-13
----------------------
A large Japanese transport TF is moving up the Bay of Bengal towards, I guess, Madras (still in Allied hands) or Vizagapatnam (occupied by Japan). At the same time, a group of TFs are moving west along the top of Oz and are about to turn the corner at Exmouth. Q-Ball has been reconning Carnarvon so I suppose he might be landing there and then moving down to Perth by land. Perth is only lightly defended and, according to intel, a handful of Japanese units are planning to attack that city.

I don�t know for sure where the KB is, but on March 11 all subs in the Oosthaven area suddenly reported being sighted from the air (having previously been unsighted), and in one case a sub reported being sighted by a dive bomber. The next day all subs again reported being sighted. But on the following day, March 13, the sub I had move further north was the only sub to report being sighted while the ones in the south were not sighted. So my guess, based on this flimsy evidence, is that this carrier(s) is moving north and is moving fairly slowly perhaps as it is escorting an invasion taskforce. Perhaps it is headed toward the Bombay/Karachi area trying to beat the deadline for the Japanese invasion bonus.

The first significant surface battle of the war occurred up in the Aleutians, of all places. For quite a long time my Alaska navy has harassed the Japanese-held islands from Attu to Adak. Allied DDs have sunk transports and CLs have been regularly bombarding the islands. Q-Ball retaliate a couple of weeks ago by sinking two DDs. Making a long story short: both Q-Ball and I decided to send more firepower to the Aleutians and so on March 12 we had:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Adak Island at 162,52, Range 2,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Jintsu, Shell hits 1
CL Isuzu, Shell hits 5, and is sunk
CL Kuma
DD Michishio
DD Arashio, Shell hits 1
DD Shiratsuyu
DD Shigure, Shell hits 1
DD Yugure, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Fubuki

Allied Ships
BB Idaho
BB New Mexico
BB Mississippi, Shell hits 2
DD Bagley, Shell hits 1
DD Mugford
DD Jarvis
DD Smith
DD Worden
DD Gilmer, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 348

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/4/2014 2:12:41 AM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert
It was a nice effort. I had an opponent do the same and he kept at it for weeks. I didn't like at first that they were somehow getting through, then I realized that the supply they brought would last all of a few days and sinking them gave me 5-10 VPs while training up my DB pilots. That group got into the 60s in exp pretty quickly with all of the work!

I was hopeful that it would work out much better, but I didn't know the ability of fighters to see things from so far away (but I guess fighters at 20k feet can see quite some distance!) I had a couple more ships queued up across the ocean ready to sail to the PI if things worked out, but they have turned back and it appears Q-Ball is now using search planes on the approach to the PI (as one of the xAKs in the middle of the ocean has now been detected).

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 349

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/4/2014 7:35:52 AM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert
It was a nice effort. I had an opponent do the same and he kept at it for weeks. I didn't like at first that they were somehow getting through, then I realized that the supply they brought would last all of a few days and sinking them gave me 5-10 VPs while training up my DB pilots. That group got into the 60s in exp pretty quickly with all of the work!

I was hopeful that it would work out much better, but I didn't know the ability of fighters to see things from so far away (but I guess fighters at 20k feet can see quite some distance!) I had a couple more ships queued up across the ocean ready to sail to the PI if things worked out, but they have turned back and it appears Q-Ball is now using search planes on the approach to the PI (as one of the xAKs in the middle of the ocean has now been detected).

In a port hex the recon will pick them up easily, since he's probably getting 4-5 flights a day over Manilla and Bataan while the siege is still going on.

Japan has great search options early and WAY more recon planes than the Allies in 42. It's tough to go unnoticed if he's being diligent in his coverage.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 350

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/5/2014 5:31:14 AM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

For the past 10 days or so I've had transports unloading at Noumea, maybe 4 at a time. But during this period Japanese subs (often two at a time in the hex) have sunk 2 xAP, 2 xAK, and 2 xAKL! I have 100 mines in the hex, a handful of ASW ships (only one decent one however), and cats providing day and night search in the hex. But the sinkings continue.

Is there some secret I don't know about how to do this, or is this just the cost of doing business at this point of the game (March 1942)?

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 351

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/5/2014 6:32:52 AM

Sangeli

Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack
Is there some secret I don't know about how to do this, or is this just the cost of doing business at this point of the game (March 1942)?

Float planes and air detection really. That's the best way to prevent sub attacks.

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 352

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/5/2014 2:18:50 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack
Is there some secret I don't know about how to do this, or is this just the cost of doing business at this point of the game (March 1942)?

Float planes and air detection really. That's the best way to prevent sub attacks.

Well, and having the ASW escorts within the same TF as the ships you're losing. Unescorted ships are easy prey.

(in reply to Sangeli)

Post #: 353

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/9/2014 1:03:45 AM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

March 21, 1942
---------------

Western Oz has been invaded. Here's what landed at Geraldton on the first day:
Assaulting units:
20th Ind Engineer Regiment
8th Tank Regiment
21st Division
56th Recon Regiment
1st Ind Engineer Regiment
4th Engineer Co
48th Division
6th Tank Regiment
56th Field Artillery Regiment
43rd Const Co
16th Army
21th JNAF AF Unit
Whether other units landed later is unknown, but the list above does not include all the ID intel says were preparing for Perth.

I'm concerned about an end-around to Kalgoorlie that would cut off Perth. I have two recon units (soon to be) on the northern roads to hopefully stumble across any units trying to sneak around.

Here's my thinking about Western Oz: it's too hard to defend given how isolated it is and the fact that Perth is so easily cut off. Although supply has been coming through Perth, I can easily get it to Oz via other ports. I'm reluctant to pull anything of note out of Sydney, Melbourne, or Brisbane given the (unlikely but still possible) chance of an invasion in Southern Oz. I prefer that any extra units in these areas go to Noumea to start making possible offensive moves up the Solomons.

My tentative plan is to bomb Japanese units moving in the open. I only have 30 Hudson I's at Kalgoorlie and a unit of Wirraways at Perth but they should be able to do some damage. I'll look around for better bombers elsewhere. Kalgoorlie is up to a 3 level air base to facilitate air operations. I might try to get it to a level 4 and then bring in a few B-17s to bomb cities taken by Japan.

Perth itself has almost nothing in it, but Kilgoorlie has the 3rd Aussie Division and the 13th Aussie Bde, and other units, for a total of 450 AV. I have an anti-tank unit and the 754th US Tank Battalion (with 51 M3 Stuarts) on their way to Kilgoorlie via RR. But I'm not sure whether it even makes any sense to defend Kilgoorlie as if Japanese units get on the RR line behind it, it would be a long walk for my units back to Southern Oz.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 354

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/9/2014 1:52:06 AM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

China Update:

The Bulge (below) is still slowly developing. I think I'll have enough units to stop this advance, but far too many units are having to defend this area.

To the east of Changsha was a very close call: I let the two units defending this hex slowly lose morale until they became so depressed they refused to pick up their weapons. Two days of Japanese attacks completely routed the units and they fled to Changsha, possibly leaving the road to the city open. The Japanese attacking units included tanks and they were clearly rolling toward the city.

This is what happens when you neglect to check your units often enough:
Ground combat at 83,52 (near Changsha)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27402 troops, 219 guns, 169 vehicles, Assault Value = 1031

Defending force 15527 troops, 81 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 319

Japanese adjusted assault: 631

Allied adjusted defense: 203

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), disruption(-), fatigue(-)
morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
25 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
5167 casualties reported
Squads: 159 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 200 destroyed, 30 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 11 (4 destroyed, 7 disabled)
Units retreated 3

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
9th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
6th Division
61st Infantry Brigade
27th Division
51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion

Defending units:
37th Chinese Corps
58th Chinese Corps
29th Group Army

What a disaster!

But luckily I had sent relief to the hex and it arrived the day after the horrible defeat, just in time to stop the tanks. I'm hoping these two units (with 400 AV) can hold back the Japanese for a couple of turns before more relief arrives.

Near Kukong more Japanese units are piling into a hex on the road up to Hengyang so I'm force to move units into the hex also.

A new offensive seems to be developing around Kweilin and Luichow. Nothing has happened here before, but 7 Japanese units suddenly appeared near Wuchow and at least one unit is moving to the west. This seems like a lousy place to defend.

Although China has been pretty stable so far, the whole Chinese army is getting worn down and supply is falling, falling, falling. East of Sian, in a single key contested hex, up to 100 bombers hit my units daily! This is not making them happy.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 355

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/9/2014 2:01:28 AM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

RE: Australia -

Get yourself some B-17s there. He will struggle to provide fighter cover far from Geraldton, and now's your chance to bomb him. Once he takes other airbases, he can supply coverage.

What's at Perth? How are the forts? If you don't have enough to defend, just GTFO, in my opinion. Not worth losing LCUs for territory you can easily take back later and that you don't need right now.

You could try to hold Kalgoorlie, but it's probably a losing proposition. I'd stall there until your units can rail out.

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 11/9/2014 3:02:26 AM >

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 356

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/9/2014 2:44:26 AM

Panjack

Posts: 401
Joined: 7/12/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

Unfortunately, one of our HRs is no ground bombing by 4Es. But I do hope to hit is airbases with B-17s. Can I use B-17s effectively at a 3 level airbase?

Perth will soon have 4 forts, but only 33 AV (!) is in the city.

Edit: dumb me, Perth has a level 4 airbase.

< Message edited by Panjack -- 11/9/2014 3:53:50 AM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 357

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/9/2014 6:30:16 AM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack

Unfortunately, one of our HRs is no ground bombing by 4Es. But I do hope to hit is airbases with B-17s. Can I use B-17s effectively at a 3 level airbase?

Perth will soon have 4 forts, but only 33 AV (!) is in the city.

Edit: dumb me, Perth has a level 4 airbase.

No, you need a level 5 AF to use B-17s to maximum effect.

(in reply to Panjack)

Post #: 358

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/9/2014 1:56:04 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack

Unfortunately, one of our HRs is no ground bombing by 4Es. But I do hope to hit is airbases with B-17s. Can I use B-17s effectively at a 3 level airbase?

Perth will soon have 4 forts, but only 33 AV (!) is in the city.

Edit: dumb me, Perth has a level 4 airbase.

No, you need a level 5 AF to use B-17s to maximum effect.

AFAIK, a level 4 airfield lets you carry only half the bomb load. I don't know for sure but level 3 might not let you carry any load - i.e. you could only use HBs on search and recon missions.
The level of airfield also affects op losses. Level 5 is still a minimum for a HB with full bomb load, and, IMO, the AF should be built to at least 7 for HB and 8 for B-29s.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 359

RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (... - 11/9/2014 4:59:15 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panjack

Unfortunately, one of our HRs is no ground bombing by 4Es. But I do hope to hit is airbases with B-17s. Can I use B-17s effectively at a 3 level airbase?

Perth will soon have 4 forts, but only 33 AV (!) is in the city.

Edit: dumb me, Perth has a level 4 airbase.

No, you need a level 5 AF to use B-17s to maximum effect.

AFAIK, a level 4 airfield lets you carry only half the bomb load. I don't know for sure but level 3 might not let you carry any load - i.e. you could only use HBs on search and recon missions.
The level of airfield also affects op losses. Level 5 is still a minimum for a HB with full bomb load, and, IMO, the AF should be built to at least 7 for HB and 8 for B-29s.

You need a level 5. You can fly them off of smaller fields, but they will run you out of stacking space really quickly. You can fly them off of a level 2 field, as far as I know, so long as you have the supply for the bombs. No difference between that and a level 4.

I believe the calculation is Level 4 + (1 per 6000 lbs in the max load rounding down). A B-17 with 6800 max load requires level 5. A B-29 with 20000 max load requires level 7.

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 360

Page: << < prev 10 11 [12] 13 14 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fools Rush In Where Angels Fear To Tread: Panjack (A) vs. Q-Ball (J)