Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Amphib task forces and stacking limits

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Amphib task forces and stacking limits Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/20/2014 2:14:02 AM   
walkerd


Posts: 184
Joined: 10/7/2004
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline 		Hi

Just started a new game after several years off and still getting the "feel" of the game. 2 questions if I may.

1. What are the affects of over stacking when you have stacking limits. I understand increased disruption and supply use. Any one know how much and when it kicks in? % over the limit or # over the limit?

2. I recall reading (may have been the original WITP) that putting large warships in the TF helps reduce damage to the troop ships. Are you better to have separate Bombardment TF's or put the bombardment ships in the Amphib TF?

Thanks

_____________________________

"Carpe diem" - Seize the day!

"Carpe Cerevisi" - Seize the beer!
Post #: 1
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/20/2014 2:54:50 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		I think it's a good idea to have some heavy units in the amphib TF to soak up shore rounds, although I usually don't go above CA for that. I'd rather have my BBs doing bombardment or put in the lead surface TF for protection.

I do overstacked invasions all the time. The key is having enough LSTs and/or AKs/AKAs loaded only with supply in the amphib TF so the disembarked units stay supplied. The ill effects are relative to the amount of overstacking in what seems a linear relationship to me.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to walkerd)
Post #: 2
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/20/2014 4:05:48 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline 		Although Cody states his case well, I would argue that it might be advantageous to put an older BB into the amphib mix. CAs are a good suggestion but if the shore guns are of any size, they can do some real damage to a CA, where a BB would almost certainly shrug hits off like so many flies. But Cody is right, put something in the amphib mix to stop your transports from taking too much fire, as that fire Can kill your landing.

_____________________________


(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 3
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/21/2014 2:00:53 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		I think if you know you are going to face major shore guns, then yes, a BB would help. I just play against the IJ AI and seem to do OK with CAs. Of course, I avoid Truk.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 4
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/21/2014 4:44:21 AM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline 		I use older BBs and CAs depending on the expected opposition. Both work but if there is a dedicated CD unit then use a BB. That is what they are for. Another reason for using a BB is that if your opponent sends in an airstrike the old BB will absorb many bombs hits that would otherwise hit your transports. Air attack units favor bombing the BB when it is there to be bombed. Thus saving your critical assault ships. Many Allies players squander old BBs in dangerous night surface actions. These ships are useless in night fights but become very useful later in the war for supporting landings and providing AA defense.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 5
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/21/2014 10:56:47 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		I agree with those posting that its good to add on old, slow BB to the amphib TF.

It is beneficial to have both a BB in the amphib TF and a separate BB bombard TF to soften up the target.

The BB in the amphib TF will fire to suppress CD guns, absorb CD gun hits and become the main target of air attacks as crsutton points out, but it really isn't going to do much in the way of softening up the target..

Having the separate BB TF to do the softening up is still an essential component.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 6
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/21/2014 2:10:23 PM   
Amoral

 

Posts: 378
Joined: 7/28/2010
Status: offline 		Japan has only two sets of mobile coast defense guns big enough to endanger a CA. One does not show up until mid 1943. There are also a few locations with static guns, but you can study those ahead of time.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 7
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 11/24/2014 9:26:08 PM   
leehunt27@bloomberg.net


Posts: 533
Joined: 9/6/2004
Status: offline 		I'm holding the Marianas against multiple Allied amphibious landings right now, and the US task forces with an old BB and cruisers are basically unscathed against my Japanese CD defenses. I haven't sunk a single APA, AKA, or LST and at best have sent only a few destroyers back to Pearl for repairs. The only place I had decent success during an Allied bombardment TF attack was at Truk...

_____________________________

John 21:25

(in reply to Amoral)
Post #: 8
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 12/7/2014 7:43:43 AM   
Jellicoe


Posts: 157
Joined: 9/26/2012
From: Kent, UK
Status: offline 		I always like to include at least a pair of old battleships and a couple of cruisers. My invasions of the Marianas against the AI have still been pretty bloody. The landing on Saipan cost me about 10 LSTs despite 2 BB and 3 CA in the amphib force - all due to shore defences. Mind you I discovered 2 divisions amongst the 16 units there!!

(in reply to leehunt27@bloomberg.net)
Post #: 9
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 12/7/2014 10:19:07 PM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline 		Amph Assaults be tough ops. Until late-war, the Allies must be v. choosy about where they place the higher-caliber gunfire support. Hvy BombTFs compete w/ the need to support to the AmphTF. Then there's the need to provide gunfire support to the 2nd wave ships.
You've really got to 'bring it all' to an amph assault. Then micro-manage the thing during execution.
For example, DDs in the CV TFs can switch w/ DDs in the AmphTFs. If you set your BombTFs to 'No escort', their DDs can be switched w/ ammo-expended DDs from the AmphTFs. Set your BombTFs to range=15, so they retain their close-in AA ammo to join a withdrawing TF.

(in reply to Jellicoe)
Post #: 10
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 12/30/2014 2:22:05 PM   
miv792

 

Posts: 159
Joined: 4/28/2013
Status: offline 		How best to make a landing in strong enemy resistance on the island where a lot of mines and most likely a large number of aircraft on the neighboring islands. whether to use the barge ? Pago pago, likely to CD guns and more infantry, and tanks. Losing it will block access to Australia. The use of barges reduce losses?

< Message edited by miv79 -- 12/31/2014 9:19:20 AM >

_____________________________

Sorry for my english

(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 11
RE: Amphib task forces and stacking limits - 12/31/2014 9:03:10 AM   
Barb


Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline 		Best course of action is to avoid the target and grab something else - cheap, with minimal forces, build up and bypass the fortress...

Barges are best used for moving between various islands - their range is 3. Units loaded in Barge/Landing Crafts accumulate fatigue very quickly each turn - thus they are best used in shore-to-shore type operations (in range of just one day trip).

For longer trips you need APA/AKA/AP/AK and Landing Ships (LSD, LST, LSI, ...).

_____________________________


(in reply to miv792)
Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Amphib task forces and stacking limits Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.328