ckfinite
Posts: 377
Joined: 7/20/2013 Status: offline
|
quote:
However the AIM-120 AMRAAM has a lousy endgame kill rate against stealthy and/or agile fighters, so basically in the end the f-22 is knife-fighting after missiles run out. Source? quote:
With more stealthy adversaries like the PAK-FA, J-20 and other on the way including better stealth counter measures the f-22 will be soon obsolete (around 2020). Such as what? VHF radars can't fit on aircraft, and AWACS makes up for GCI. quote:
There are no funds available (because of the F-35) to evolve (IRST!) and remanufacture the aircraft in case F-35 cant hack it. I can't find anything about the F-22's IRST being cancelled. F-35 will also likely hack it pretty well, as I'll discuss later. Also, about the article you cite. Firstly, they criticize the F-22 for not having an HMD capable missile. This was true at the time that it was written, but is no longer the case with AIM-9X integration, a missile that is substantially more capable than the IRIS-Ts that it was going up against there. Secondly, they utterly fail to mention that the EF2000s and Rafales were unable to match F-22 at all in BVR, and had to drop all external stores to score a 1:5 kill ratio. quote:
at present [F-35] is not ready to serve Yep. quote:
and its price tag is still going further up Nope. F-35A (in millions of USD) LRIP 4: $111.6. LRIP 5: $106. LRIP 6: $103. LRIP 7: $98. LRIP 9: $96. Source: http://www.janes.com/article/46129/pentagon-finalises-f-35-lrip-8-contract. I'm not sure that's going up. quote:
too many important operational concerns are still in limbo Which, exactly? quote:
the aircraft relies too much on sensor fusion and networking, so it is most vulnerable to cyber warfare Let's suppose that there is a vulnerability. Then, you're left with a fighter with a great radar, VLO, IRST, pretty good handling and large internal stores. Oh, woe is me. I should also note that the article you cite is 100% speculation. quote:
it is also too slow to run away and relies on friendly aircraft to protect it from enemy 4++ and 5 gen fighters (suchoi proliferation). Now, ask the Sukhois to catch it with full fuel and external tanks (hint: they can't). quote:
Even upgradable with mods the airframe of the f-35 makes it obsolete and dangerous to use in a real war. Why? Sprey's criticism of its handling is demonstrably not based in reality, like everything else he's said for the last 40 years, as his favorite wing-loading metrics handle lifting bodies very badly. The aircraft likely performs about as well as a clean F-16 with CFTs, which is very impressive when you consider it has 10% more range still and can two 2klb bombs at the same time. Furthermore, how exactly is the airframe obsolete? The sensors are top-notch, and those are what really make a modern fighter. quote:
There is no backup program in case the F-35 fails. Which it isn't going to, at this point. If it were 5 years ago, possibly. Not now. quote:
There is no backup program in case the F-35 fails. So Airforce, Navy and MCorps is stuck with this plane... and F-22 are trained to "babysit" them The Harrier clearly outperforms the F-35 in every single way imaginable, right? Also, the article you cite is referring to F-22 escorts of F-35s. At no point in the past has a single F-15C escorted any group of F-16s in any engagement ever. quote:
Both will be better useable and more economically feasable then the F-22 and F-35. The traditional problem with Russian aircraft is that they burn through engines 2x as fast as US aircraft do. The PAK-FA and T-50 carry this tradition onwards, as expected. Uptime and maintainability were one of the F-35's main objectives, so I'm going to need a citation on this one. quote:
Another info: Many countries chose to skip the high costs of development of a 5th gen fighter and allocating funds to 6th gen fighter drones (UCAVs). If technology advances in current rate, first 6th gen UCAVs will IOC in 2030... The US certainly didn't just launch a UCAV off a CVN, and we have definitely not been one of the major users of UAVs in the last 10 years at all. Edit: rearranged my responses so that the point actually made sense.
< Message edited by ckfinite -- 12/2/2014 5:51:11 AM >
|