Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 7:15:27 PM   
DeZanic

 

Posts: 26
Joined: 2/21/2014
Status: offline
Hi guys.

I am very new to this game and just playing it more and more has increased my thirst for knowledge about WWII and the Pacific Theater in specific. I am learning more and more about but some questions I don't get answered and I would like to hear your opinions.

Well we all know that the american population was against any intervention into the war by 1941 and the president seems to have wanted the US to enter the war as soon as possible, so technically he was a war mongerer. Ohh by the way nothing against FDR, he is a good man.

But I cannot understand how four big fat aircraft carriers with their screens could park so close to Pearl Harbor unnoticed? For me it sounds a little like a conspiracy actually. Call me weird but maybe the navy and army wanted to look away and let it happen so to have a reason to get the US into the war, as was the wish of the president. What do you guys think about this theory?

AND what if these carriers would have been spotted in time, would the US intervene? Would there be any war declaration anyway. What was the Japanese plan B in case the task force got discovered? I mean certainly the US would have increased the presence of patrols around Pearl Harbor to prevent the Japanese trying to come close again if this first attempt would have failed. So what would have happened if the carriers got discovered?

Lets discuss.
Post #: 1
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 7:19:56 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
It was 6 fat carriers.

Do you really believe that Franklin D Roosevelt was a mass murderer of his own people?

Was FDR a warmongerer or did he simply have the foresight many of his contemporaries lacked? namely that he recognised Hitler for what he was and he knew that he could fight him in Europe (either through or alongside the Western Powers) or in his own backyard at some point in the future.

Btw how can you be a warmongerer and a good man?

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 1/6/2015 9:46:06 PM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 2
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 7:22:38 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

Lets discuss.

Dog poop.

_____________________________


(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 3
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 7:39:48 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
Let's not.


_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 4
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:00:18 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline
This has been batted around since 1942 and no one has been able to come up with any gun, let alone a smoking one about FDR and prior knowledge. So I agree, lets allow this one to settle into the mud, much like battleship row. Additionally many text seem to be clear that Yamamoto's orders to Nagumo were that if discovered within 24 hours of the raid, he was to carry on (Zimm's "Attack on Pearl Harbor" and other works).

_____________________________


(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 5
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:12:32 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I'm glad to accomodate you.

You're weird.

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 6
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:12:40 PM   
DeZanic

 

Posts: 26
Joined: 2/21/2014
Status: offline
Man you guys are boring... what are you british?

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 7
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:13:57 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Man you guys are boring... what are you british?


Not I, and I agree 100% with the revered Canoe man. Tin foil hats belong in the Distant Worlds forum

(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 8
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:17:50 PM   
sprior


Posts: 8596
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Portsmouth, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Man you guys are boring... what are you british?


I am. It was really Illustrious, Ark Royal, Argus and Eagle with a bunch of Swordfish and Babararacucudadas to make sure you joined in all the fun.

_____________________________

"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.



(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 9
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:19:18 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Man you guys are boring... what are you british?
Warspite1

Well I'm British. I gave your questions the courtesy of a response and thoughts as to why I don't think there was any conspiracy and you respond like that.

What a tosser


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 10
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:22:37 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I'm glad to accomodate you.

You're weird.

I am? How did you know?

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:23:23 PM   
sprior


Posts: 8596
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Portsmouth, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dr.hal


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I'm glad to accomodate you.

You're weird.

I am? How did you know?


Because you wouldn't open the bloody pod bay doors.

_____________________________

"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.



(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 12
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:26:23 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sprior



Because you wouldn't open the bloody pod bay doors.

I'm sorry Dave but I can't do that......

_____________________________


(in reply to sprior)
Post #: 13
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:36:21 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Ohh by the way nothing against FDR, he is a good man.

BoringBrit

Ohh by the way tosser, FDR died in 1945


< Message edited by warspite1 -- 1/6/2015 9:37:14 PM >


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 14
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 8:49:43 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lecivius


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Man you guys are boring... what are you british?


Not I
warspite1

Yeah but admit it - you'd like to be

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 15
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/6/2015 11:04:55 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lecivius


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Man you guys are boring... what are you british?


Not I
warspite1

Yeah but admit it - you'd like to be


What? Boring? Sorry, mate-I know that I'd never hold a candle to you for 'boringness' (is that a word?). I won't even try to compete with the likes of you.

_____________________________


(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 16
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 12:50:13 AM   
BattleMoose

 

Posts: 231
Joined: 2/17/2014
Status: offline
And then there was that all Pacific commands were warned of imminent war with Japan.

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 17
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 4:14:00 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lecivius


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Man you guys are boring... what are you british?


Not I
warspite1

Yeah but admit it - you'd like to be


What? Boring? Sorry, mate-I know that I'd never hold a candle to you for 'boringness' (is that a word?). I won't even try to compete with the likes of you.
Boring Brit

+1


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 18
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 7:19:59 AM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
I'm British, and I am not boring

You won't find me spending most of my free time playing a mega strategy game on my PC.........oh wait

_____________________________


(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 19
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 8:43:26 AM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

Hi guys.

I am very new to this game and just playing it more and more has increased my thirst for knowledge about WWII and the Pacific Theater in specific. I am learning more and more about but some questions I don't get answered and I would like to hear your opinions.

Well we all know that the american population was against any intervention into the war by 1941 and the president seems to have wanted the US to enter the war as soon as possible, so technically he was a war mongerer. Ohh by the way nothing against FDR, he is a good man.

But I cannot understand how four big fat aircraft carriers with their screens could park so close to Pearl Harbor unnoticed? For me it sounds a little like a conspiracy actually. Call me weird but maybe the navy and army wanted to look away and let it happen so to have a reason to get the US into the war, as was the wish of the president. What do you guys think about this theory?

AND what if these carriers would have been spotted in time, would the US intervene? Would there be any war declaration anyway. What was the Japanese plan B in case the task force got discovered? I mean certainly the US would have increased the presence of patrols around Pearl Harbor to prevent the Japanese trying to come close again if this first attempt would have failed. So what would have happened if the carriers got discovered?

Lets discuss.


If you can find a single serious, respected scholar, go ahead. You are wasting your time though. No such serious, respected historian has said FDR & Co. knew PH was going to be attacked

That they knew the Japanese would most likely initiate agressive movements, ok. That was mere political analysis.

Just like saying the USSR was going to attack Nazi Germany, thus legitimazing the Nazi agression Classic neo-nazi stuff

And no, the existence of a plan is not enough. Every serious military organization will elaborate war plans (involving dozens of not-yet-but-who-knows hostile nations ) ... *Just in case* They are paid to do that.

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 20
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 9:16:31 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
The US drew up a lot of war plans and gave them different colors:

Red - war with the UK
Black - Germany
Emerald - Ireland
Green - Mexico
Crimson - Canada
India - ruby
Australia - Scarlet
New Zealand - Garnet

etc.

Some were considered highly remote, even when they were initially drawn up, but the war planners wanted to map out every contingency. Orange had a better chance of happening, but it was just one plan among many.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 21
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 10:05:59 AM   
Bo Rearguard


Posts: 492
Joined: 4/7/2008
From: Basement of the Alamo
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DeZanic

AND what if these carriers would have been spotted in time, would the US intervene? Would there be any war declaration anyway. What was the Japanese plan B in case the task force got discovered? I mean certainly the US would have increased the presence of patrols around Pearl Harbor to prevent the Japanese trying to come close again if this first attempt would have failed. So what would have happened if the carriers got discovered?

Lets discuss.


It's important to note several things about Pearl Harbor: the Japanese did not fully expect the attack to be a surprise. They anticipated the possibility of facing an alerted enemy. They figured to lose two carriers. In that regard, they were surprised themselves. There's always been speculation that had the US battleship fleet received adequate warning that getting underway and out into deep water might have resulted in a greater loss of life had the Japanese found them. The shallow depth of Pearl Harbor ensured many ships would fight again.

Equally importantly is that most of the conspiracy theories about Pearl Harbor display a lot of ex post facto knowledge. The idea, for example, that FDR would sacrifice what were later seen as outdated warships (second-generation battleships and older destroyers). At the time, carrier operations were entirely new, and very few nations had mastered them. Not even the Japanese conceded the seas to carriers...the plan for Midway six months later called for the coup de grace to be delivered not by Nagumo's carriers, but by Yamamoto's powerful battleship division, led by the Yamato. If a war was going to be fought, the planners of 1941 expected it to be fought by those second-generation battleships lined up at Pearl Harbor, with the carriers in a supporting role.

There's also the point that tethering the battleships at Hawaii without torpedo nets was not as stupid as it sounded. The torpedoes the Japanese used in the attack were new and highly secret. The potency of Japanese torpedoes came as a shock to the US throughout the first months of the war.

And if Pearl Harbor is the subject of so many conspiracy theories, then the Battle of Savo Island, on August 8/9, 1942, should be even more controversial. Four Allied cruisers sunk, 1,000 bluejackets drowned, with no damage inflicted on the Japanese in return. That was nine months into the war, and the US Navy still was operating with a complacent mindset nine months after "The Day of Infamy." You see the same comedy of errors, missed intelligence and luck as at Pearl Harbor, but you never hear conspiracy theories on how the Japanese got the drop on the USN in the midst of an important counteroffensive.

The bottom line to me on Pearl Harbor is that the Americans underestimated the Japanese in 1941 as diminutive yellow men in buck teeth and spectacles who bowed a lot and made cheap imitation goods. In the racial environment of the 1940s the idea of an Asian people striking the USN in a safe port thousands of miles from the expected area of conflict was inconceivable. It took many months for that mindset to dissipate, which is why a lot of the conspiracy theories which popped up right after the attack inferred German planning or even outright participation in the attack.

I do feel that General Short and Admiral Kimmel got a harsher deal from Washington than they deserved. MacArthur lost all of his planes in the Philippines the following day, and became a hero. Short and Kimmel were not colorful characters or brilliant leaders, but they were unfairly treated when compared with MacArthur and Brereton. Their talents -- and Kimmel's were pretty considerable -- should not have been left to waste. As Prange wrote, "There was enough blame to go around at Pearl Harbor."


< Message edited by Bo Rearguard -- 1/7/2015 2:30:44 PM >


_____________________________

"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist ...." Union General John Sedgwick, 1864

(in reply to DeZanic)
Post #: 22
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 11:30:09 AM   
Wuffer

 

Posts: 402
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline
"The modern development of aircraft has demonstrated conclusively that the backbone of the Navy today is the aircraft carrier. The carrier, with destroyers, cruisers and submarines grouped around it[,] is the spearhead of all modern naval task forces."[5]
Trussell, C.P. (19 June 1940). in : "8 1⁄2 Billion is Voted for 1,500 Warships". New York Times. Retrieved 9 August 2012.

citated in: wikepedia, "two-ocean navy act", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-Ocean_Navy_Act

"The Act authorized the procurement of:[1][4]

18 aircraft carriers
2 Iowa-class battleships
5 Montana-class battleships
6 Alaska-class cruisers
27 cruisers
115 destroyers
43 submarines
15,000 aircraft
The conversion of 100,000 tons of auxiliary ships
$50 million for patrol, escort and other vessels
$150 million for essential equipment and facilities
$65 million for the manufacture of ordnance material or munitions
$35 million for the expansion of facilities

On June 17, a few days after German troops conquered France, Chief of Naval Operations Harold Stark requested four billion dollars from Congress to increase the size of the American combat fleet by 70% by adding 257 ships amounting to 1,325,000 tons.[4]"

I hope this article has correct facts.

Per definition warmongers do not sell wars, but they advocate and promote them, and sometimes they had very good reasons for this. If FDR was a warmonger, he was at least not alone, as a) half Asia und nearly complete Europe was allready conquered/ruled by deadly lunatic dictators and b) " On June 18, after less than an hour of debate, the House of Representatives by a 316–0 vote authorized $8.55 billion for a naval expansion program, giving emphasis to aircraft."
Rise and fall of great nations are nearly allways connected to their leadership.

But please don't confuse stupidity/lack of attention/naive sitereps etc. with conspiracy. No one could expect the Japanese to be such fools, really? :-)

Some very careful thoughts:
1. The US were surprised, but (thx god!) not completely unprepared.
2. It was the last chance for the Japanese (see above).
3. It was the first chance for the US trying to stop the murdering - you simply need real world power for an ultimatum.
4. At least Berlin was completely surprised - nobody at OKH could find PH on a map. :-)
5. Without the PH attack, the national shock and Hitler's following declaration of war only three days later, probably much more Americans would have died: The three biggest threads were Germany, Germany and Germany.


(in reply to Bo Rearguard)
Post #: 23
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 11:50:35 AM   
Wuffer

 

Posts: 402
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline
and btw, real warmongering needs adaquate propaganda - do you think 'The Great Dictator' was successful in this aspect?

.-)

< Message edited by Wuffer -- 1/7/2015 12:50:59 PM >

(in reply to Wuffer)
Post #: 24
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 3:30:00 PM   
pontiouspilot


Posts: 1127
Joined: 7/27/2012
Status: offline
pls read John Toland's Infamy, which I take to be the Bible on this point, and then come back and ask for the debate! Amongst the well read there seems no conspiracy theory.

(in reply to Wuffer)
Post #: 25
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 3:42:55 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Btw how can you be a warmongerer and a good man?


That depends.

Do you consider Churchill a "good man"?


(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 26
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 4:03:49 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The author of the original post might be surprised at the fervor with which his propopsed topic was dismissed. He might wonder why. He might wonder if those of us who disagreed with him are close-minded. That isn't the case. Let me explain.

The dismissal isn't because the subject isn't of interest. It's because the subject has been considered and studied exhaustively. There is no credible evidence that Roosevelt "wanted" the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor so that we could join the war effort. There is abundant, overwhelming evidence ("beyond a reasonable doubt") that he did not. Many of us have been through this excercise before (including multiple times in the WitP forums over the years) and are persauded that the issue has been settled after thorough and careful examination by many credible historians.

Occasionally people pop up and want to re-open the issue. Usually, they preface by taking this position: "I've seen some arguments that Roosevelt knew" and I'd like to discuss it. When the response is "already discussed and settled," the reaction is often: "Well, you must be close minded. Please prove to me that he wasn't involved in a conspiracy." This kind of approach to history drives historians and reasonable people nuts.

In the study of controversial, "outlying" views of history, the approach isn't to assume that the outlier is true and to demand that others prove it isn't. The reasonable approach is that it's up to you - the proponent of the outlier - to prove that evidence supports the absurd, the unlikely, the "outlying."

What if you offered this for discussion: "Abraham Lincoln was a female." Hopefully you wouldn't accept that as true and expect others to prove that he was a male. You'd understand that you carried the burden of proof since you were offering an unlikely, bizarre proposition.

If you were an unreasonable sort, you'd take offense when others replied: "Come on. He was a male. There's no evidence that he was a female." You'd reply: "You're not open minded. You've fallen for the party line and failed to fairly and thoroughly sift through history. In all the existing letters we have - hundreds and hundreds - not a single person wrote that they absolutely KNEW that Lincoln was a male. There's not a single document in which an eyewitness viewed his anatomy and said he was a male. His kindly nature and eloquent words suggest he was uncommonly sensitive. Mathematicus DaVinci Organelle, a professor of Sexual History at the Providence School of Proctology said, in 1911, that Lincoln exhibited many tendencies of a female. In total, there's reason to believe Lincoln might have been a female."

The rest of us would pull out our hair in frustration or peremptorily dismiss your thoughts from consideration at this point.

Matters of history are often up for discussion, interpretation and study. But certain things are beyond dispute because they are so well established. To dispute settled matters and, in so doing, to actually besmirth the reputations of historical people, can be pretty darn offensive.

(in reply to pontiouspilot)
Post #: 27
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 4:47:50 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline
Sorry to Canoerebel for responding to his post. It was just the last one in the thread.

Canoerebel is an historian and editor/publisher of an historical magazine. As such, he is bound by factual matters, of historical significance. That is his paradigm.

Mine is different. Fat, smelly, pimply faced, 12 year-olds, that can’t get a date no matter how much money they offer, just ain’t in it, so they have to play the tin foil hat card and make pronunciamento about conspiracies, in order to validate their pathetic existence.

This is a forum dealing with the Pacific War. Take your fat, smelly, conspiracy crap, shove it up your brown spot, and go away. JWE


_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 28
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 4:48:08 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline
From a different tangent - what difference does it really make?

It is beyond question that the US knew war was imminent, had recently issued war warnings, was tracking the movement of Japanese fleets (except apparently the KB), was rushing everything they could to the Philippines...

So other than the reputations of a handful of top players, what changes if they really knew about PH?

Is that the only thing at steak? Reputations of a handful of leaders? It certainly won't change anything that happened....

At this distant point in time I honestly fail to grasp the emotional aspect of the question. Will the world change if it was now presumed that FDR and a couple of others knew....maybe we'd have to issue new dimes?

Personally, I think they look as guilty as a puppy sitting next to a pile of poo...but, you know - whatever.

My 2c....and that doesn't matter either
B

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 29
RE: Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor - 1/7/2015 4:49:44 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
"Abraham Lincoln was a female."


Everybody knows this is an absurdity not worthy of additional consideration.

But did you know that Jefferson Davis was a cross-dresser? I heard that he had women's dresses in his home. The only reasonable explanation is that he wore them from time to time.

Also, 'tis a pity about Stonewall Jackson's proclivities. But we needn't discuss these in polite company.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Lets talk about conspiracies - Pearl Harbor Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.875