warspite1
Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008 From: England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mind_messing quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote:
ORIGINAL: mind_messing quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 The ships were completed remarkably similar to each other. There were detail differences of course, but those affecting the stern was limited to the sternwalk (on Queen Elizabeth only) I mentioned previously. I am intrigued as to what gave Barham away. My first thought was some snarky reply about how it had the look of being built properly, a look that all the yards south of the border didn't really manage to match warspite1 You? Giving me a snarky reply? Surely not, you are normally so polite and courteous toward me ...but then, if you did, I could reply that the three ships built south of the border were properly constructed and so lasted the war - Warspite despite taking 29 hits from the Germans at Jutland, a glider bomb at Salerno, bombed off Crete, mined in the English Channel etc etc. Not so the Scottish-built Barham. But then, despite responding in obvious jest to your response, I would then get another snarky - and totally erroneous - response from you to say I was bringing Nationalism into it..... Can't blame us someone from Kent sailing her into two torpedoes! In spite of everything, I like you; you give as good as you get. Just be glad John Brown and Co didn't build the Sea-lion invasion barges warspite1 I don't think John Brown building the barges would have made any difference. From the way they have been described they would have been impregnable whoever built them!!! In fact I am surprised the Allies didn't simply take the German designs, build them to match and use them for D-Day! But more importantly - it looks like I have stumped the panel with the picture! Hussah!
_____________________________
England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805 
|