Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2015 4:47:40 PM   
trujillocorreo

 

Posts: 44
Joined: 3/15/2014
Status: offline
[UPDATED DB v439]

Hello friends.
working in scenario I used SA-23 Gladiator/Giant (S-300V4) corresponding to the #1860 database entry and I have noticed that despite being equipped with scope 150MN 9M82M missile, the same may not be employees or assigned targed to it. It is only possible to assign and make use of the 9M83M missile. Reason why the system, which theoretically can use both types of missile, Gladiator/Giant in practice only can make use of the 9M83M type.
Thank you.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/22/2015 8:28:12 PM >

(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 1681
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2015 7:38:17 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline
For the Archangel, I found these and I hope they are helpful...

http://www.airrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1813

http://maxdefense.blogspot.com/2014/06/updates-and-analysis-on-close-air.html <-- compares the Archangel to the Super Tucano


quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Lol its a converted crop sprayer

Not nearly enough info available for us to add it though...




quote:

ORIGINAL: Tarawa565

Kind of a cool new platform coming up:

http://www.iomax.net/archangel/

http://www.janes.com/article/42680/iomax-flies-archangel-border-patrol-aircraft-prototype

The UAE is getting some already, as well as Jordan. Could be a fun plane for "what if" scenarios. And cheap, comparatively :)





< Message edited by Mgellis -- 6/21/2015 9:13:04 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1682
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2015 7:57:42 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Edited out my own ****ty comment.....

I'm so sick of the sniping that appears in these db requests. It really needs to stop. It is not what we want this community to be about

Fact new rule. They'll be one warning and then after that we won't fulfill a db request of yours ever again. Sound fair?

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 6/21/2015 9:07:48 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 1683
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2015 8:18:15 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seaman

Hello friends.
working in scenario I used SA-23 Gladiator/Giant (S-300V4) corresponding to the #1860 database entry and I have noticed that despite being equipped with scope 150MN 9M82M missile, the same may not be employees or assigned targed to it. It is only possible to assign and make use of the 9M83M missile. Reason why the system, which theoretically can use both types of missile, Gladiator/Giant in practice only can make use of the 9M83M type.
Thank you.


Yeah its flagged as only to be used against missiles and PGM's. We'll take a look at WRA settings to cover this.

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 6/21/2015 9:29:20 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to trujillocorreo)
Post #: 1684
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2015 8:24:56 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

Whatever it was I said that sounded like I was sniping, I'm sorry. I was not trying to upset or offend people, but I clearly put my foot in my mouth somehow, and I apologize.


quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Edited out my own ****ty comment.....

I'm so sick of the sniping that appears in these db requests. It really needs to stop. It is not what we want this community to be about

Fact new rule. They'll be one warning and then after that we won't fulfill a db request of yours ever again. Sound fair?

Mike


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1685
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/21/2015 8:47:36 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis


Whatever it was I said that sounded like I was sniping, I'm sorry. I was not trying to upset or offend people, but I clearly put my foot in my mouth somehow, and I apologize.


quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Edited out my own ****ty comment.....

I'm so sick of the sniping that appears in these db requests. It really needs to stop. It is not what we want this community to be about

Fact new rule. They'll be one warning and then after that we won't fulfill a db request of yours ever again. Sound fair?

Mike




Just ask for stuff like a normal person would. We don't need lectures on how to google things or that we can "just ask". Believe me we know.

We ask for sources because its saves us a ton of time. We could certainly google etc as well as anybody else here could. Our problem is time to do it The benefit of actually doing this is you get what you want (if the data is good/complete likely quickly) and the whole process speeds up.

Obviously trying to piss us off with passive aggressive stuff doesn't help. Examples of this recently are:

Somebody asking to check our work because we screw things up.
Multiple examples of people asking us to google demonstration systems that aren't even on the deck of a ship yet.
Numerous posts with artist drawings rather than actual photos
News articles that don't have one stat in them or a wrong picture.

Dealing with this stuff actually takes time away and doesn't encourage us to even want to look. We don't owe anybody a platform update at all but choose to do it because we want to support scenario work and grow this community. However...This is not going to be at the expense of us though... I hope you all understand that.

Nuff said. Anybody that doesn't get it will get nothing out of us.

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 1686
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 4:23:44 AM   
Tarawa565

 

Posts: 33
Joined: 6/9/2010
Status: offline
Could be wrong here but I think that some of the later German Air Force Tornado IDS are missing a load out option. I'd definitely appreciate a Luftwaffe expert to chime in here though...

When the Marineflieger was disbanded, the aircraft and associated naval strike mission was transferred to the Luftwaffe. This includes the AS34 Kormoran ASM. As far as I can tell, this mission/missile has not been retired yet.

However, in the database the latest aircraft to carry the AS34 is the 2004 Tornado IDS (German Navy) while none of the later model Luftwaffe aircraft carry the ASuW load-out. It seems to me that any of the post 2005 Tornado IDS's of the German Air Force should be able to have the ASuW load out of the German Navy aircraft.

Some links:

http://www.touchdown-aviation.com/types/german-air-force/tornado.php
(Talking about German Navy aircraft being transferred to German Air Force)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panavia_Tornado#German_Navy_.28Marineflieger.29
(More info about reorganization)
http://www.luftwaffe.de/portal/a/luftwaffe/!ut/p/c4/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP3I5EyrpHK9nHK9_KJ0vZzStJJcvcR0U0O9RCCzKDFdvyDbUREA_eM7AA!!/
(German Air Force official site, the bottom of the page talks about using the missiles "HARM" and "Kormoran" as well as lists "Seekriegführung aus der Luft" - sea warfare from the air - as a mission)

It appears the Italian Air Force entries have the Kormoran, so perhaps it was just an oversight?

You guys are awesome for taking the time to support all of this. If you need more info I'd be happy to gather it.

Thanks!



< Message edited by Tarawa565 -- 6/22/2015 5:38:33 AM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1687
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 4:57:58 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Thanks! But we haven't seen it mounted on any AC since Luftwaffe took over. Would it be possible to dig up a recent photo or two?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Tarawa565)
Post #: 1688
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 5:45:33 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Seems there is some updated information on the Luftwaffe Kormorants. Below is what I dug up real quick, feel free to chime in guys. Seems a single Luftwaffe wing took over the maritime strike role. Anyone knows which one?

"All of the maritime combat role was assigned to the Luftwaffe, and one unit of this has had its Tornadoes fighters equipped to carry Kormoran II missiles and American HARM missiles." from Wikipedia:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Air_Force

Photo of Luftwaffe (not Marine) Tornado with Kormorant 2:
http://www.luftwaffe.de/portal/a/luftwaffe/!ut/p/c4/TYrdCsIwDIXfqJkNTcU7n0LnXbfWEejPKNH5-KYXgnzwnYRz4AFKDW_egnCrIcMd5pUvy2HyYT6mpMhh4RzhNpYxmbXVJMOSqrB660FaN3vrkkfz6l0bwxFmPKHDs02IaNXjQ01Ci9M_5OlJ5K1HvRw5O_2AvZTrF7WKpKg!/




_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1689
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 7:27:17 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
This article says the Kormorant 2 has been retired already (if my German skills serve me right):
http://augengeradeaus.net/2014/09/deutsche-kampfjets-im-baltikum-bewaffnet-an-der-russischen-grenze/

Here:
https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=no&ie=UTF8&nv=1&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.no&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.luftwaffe.de/portal/a/luftwaffe/!ut/p/c4/NYq7CsJAEEX_aGY3qIhdQhpbDWjsxmQJA_tiMjGNH-9u4T1wmnPxhYVIH15IOUXy-MRx4st7B7-DOgrQmMZkv61AK-Oj_mcHU4pOq9VF5eJFSJNATqK-lk2kFOAZR2P7zpzMf_Z7vg_tYbBH21-7G-YQ2h8oHex4/&usg=ALkJrhjymFE5NSDcVVidqmnWMAP-iTQFJQ

And here:
http://www.bits.de/public/stichwort/tornado-nuklear.htm

The missile was used in live-fire exersises in 2008:
http://www.saairforce.co.za/news-and-events/669/exercise-good-hope-iii

So seems the weapon was retired when JLDAM was introduced? HARM seems to be close to retirement as well.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/22/2015 2:47:00 PM >


_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1690
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 12:26:19 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Seems a single Luftwaffe wing took over the maritime strike role. Anyone knows which one?

This must be the Taktisches Luftwaffengeschwader 51 "Immelmann" (TaktLwG 51) which operates the Tornado ECR from Schleswig Airbase. In the image description of the photo you posted it says that the photo was taken by Aufklärungsgeschwader 51 (In 2013, Aufklärungsgeschwader 51 became Taktisches Luftwaffengeschwader 51). Further, you can see the units emblem on the Tornados tail fin. Until 2012, the Squadron possessed up to 140 Kormorans, which were replaced with GBU-54(V)3 LGBs.

Hope this helps!



http://www.jet-prints.com/verb_ag51/index_e.html (very good summary of the TaktLwG 51's Tornados)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taktisches_Luftwaffengeschwader_51
Very long link

< Message edited by Supreme 2.0 -- 6/22/2015 1:38:56 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1691
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 1:46:34 PM   
Tarawa565

 

Posts: 33
Joined: 6/9/2010
Status: offline
Thanks emsoy and Supreme! I definitely need to brush up on my German. I'd be curious to know what the ASuW tactics are for TaktLwG 51, especially against some of the long range air defense ships. Also, I wonder if the Italians got 140 new missiles or they're sitting in reserve somewhere...

So, trying to summarize here:

The 2005 Tornado ECR should be able to carry the Kormoran load out? (2 Kormorans or 2 Kormorans + 2 HARMS)

The 2005 Tornado IDS should be able to carry the same? (2 Kormorans or 2 Kormorans + 2 HARMS)

The 2013 and later Tornado IDSs are correct with their LDGP load and no Kormorans.

The 2013 and later Tornado ECR should be able to carry the LDGP load? (x number of weapons)

It seems that the German ECRs are far more weaponized that the current DB indicates.


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1692
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 2:18:13 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Thanks guys, we'll update the db and add Kormorant to Luftwaffe Tornadoes 2005-2012

The ECRs arrived at the wing in 2013, when their role changed from recon and naval strike to SEAD. So seems the ECR version ever only used HARM.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Tarawa565)
Post #: 1693
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 2:48:13 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tarawa565

I'd be curious to know what the ASuW tactics are for TaktLwG 51, especially against some of the long range air defense ships.

In a nutshell, there are close to none currently. When the Air Force retired the Kormorant ASM, it was decided to not get a new ASM for the Tornado. Instead, a new ASuW missile will be acquired ones the Tornado replacement is being determined. For that time, GBUs and HARMs will have to do.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tarawa565

The 2013 and later Tornado IDSs are correct with their LDGP load and no Kormorans.

The 2013 and later Tornado ECR should be able to carry the LDGP load? (x number of weapons)

Well, it seems that the GBU-54 LJDAM was introduced in 2012, this may requiere an new DB entry.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tarawa565)
Post #: 1694
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 3:46:35 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
[UPDATED DB v439]

Hi there!

Playing the Kingdom Come BETA lately, I noticed that the Saudi La Fayette-class (#1290 - 812 Al Riyadh [La Fayette]) has the same Model 1968-II/100 TR main gun as the french La Fayette. Altough the Saudis initally ordered and tested their first La Fayette with this gun, it was decided to subsequently fit all ships with an Oto Melara 76/62 Super Rapid naval gun.

Thanks!

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/al_riyadh

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/22/2015 8:39:46 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1695
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 4:01:50 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Tornado ECR carries LJDAM? Info?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1696
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 5:45:48 PM   
Tarawa565

 

Posts: 33
Joined: 6/9/2010
Status: offline
It appears that the ASSTA 3 upgrade, starting in mid-2015 and ending in 2018, will give all Luftwaffe Tornados (IDS and ECR) the capability to drop LJDAMs. Whether or not they'll ever carry them operationally is another question...

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panavia_Tornado#Avionik

Based on the software upgrades, it seems that ASSTA 1 gave GBU-24 capability to the IDS. It says that all remaining Tornado variants received this upgrade, but I'm not sure if that means the ECR (or, again, if the ECR would ever carry those weapons).

ASSTA 2, started in 2009: http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/news71739.html appears to have integrated the GBU-54 LJDAM and Taurus onto the IDS, with IOC being in 2010 based on the wikipedia link.

This like provides more info on the ASSTA: http://www.tornadosig.com/assta.html

Finally, this link states that the ASSTA 3 modernization will allow both variants to fulfill either mission, while obviously the Mauser cannon and ELS will remain variant specific. http://archive.defensenews.com/article/20120313/DEFREG01/303130005/Germany-Boosts-Multirole-Capability-Shrinking-Tornado-Fleet

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1697
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 7:12:56 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline
Thanks! The Taurus Wikipedia article says 2005 IOC so dunno.

Will try to push out the database asap.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Tarawa565)
Post #: 1698
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 7:27:47 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: seaman

Hello friends.
working in scenario I used SA-23 Gladiator/Giant (S-300V4) corresponding to the #1860 database entry and I have noticed that despite being equipped with scope 150MN 9M82M missile, the same may not be employees or assigned targed to it. It is only possible to assign and make use of the 9M83M missile. Reason why the system, which theoretically can use both types of missile, Gladiator/Giant in practice only can make use of the 9M83M type.
Thank you.


We've discussed this and made the missile anti-aircraft capable but the WRA tells it to not shoot at anything but ballistic missiles. The player / scenario designer can change the WRA themselves to suit their needs

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to trujillocorreo)
Post #: 1699
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 7:34:22 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

For the Archangel, I found these and I hope they are helpful...

http://www.airrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1813

http://maxdefense.blogspot.com/2014/06/updates-and-analysis-on-close-air.html <-- compares the Archangel to the Super Tucano



Thanks!

But it says that its the IOMAX's border patrol Block 1 and Block 2 AT-802 that are currently operational? And not the Archangel, which is an upgraded version?

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 1700
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/22/2015 9:14:47 PM   
Halsey1945

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 5/18/2015
Status: offline
Hello everyone,

Is it possible to get tomahawks with cluster munitions added?

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1701
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/22/2015 9:18:02 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Halsey1945

Hello everyone,

Is it possible to get tomahawks with cluster munitions added?


The U/RGM-109D is in the game, it has a 26xBLU97/B cluster bomb payload.

(in reply to Halsey1945)
Post #: 1702
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/22/2015 11:44:02 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Tornado ECR carries LJDAM? Info?

quote:


http://www.luftwaffe.de/portal/a/luftwaffe/!ut/p/c4/NYq7CsJAEEX_aGY3qIhdQhpbDWjsxmQJA_tiMjGNH-9u4T1wmnPxhYVIH15IOUXy-MRx4st7B7-DOgrQmMZkv61AK-Oj_mcHU4pOq9VF5eJFSJNATqK-lk2kFOAZR2P7zpzMf_Z7vg_tYbBH21-7G-YQ2h8oHex4/

"Die GBU-54 wird alternativ die Seeziele bekämpfen, während die HARM vorab das feindliche Schiffsradar niederhält. Diese Maßnahme kann organisatorisch auch dadurch gefestigt werden, dass die ECR-Tornados, die bisher am Standort Lechfeld stationiert waren, zum Fliegerhorst nach Jagel (oder einem nahen Ausweichflugplatz wie Jever oder Wittmund) temporär oder langfristig verlegt werden.


http://www.luftwaffe.de/portal/a/luftwaffe/!ut/p/c4/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP3I5EyrpHK9nHK98sS0NL2s1JJivZL8ojz9gmxHRQCuLSDf/ (scroll down to the armament section)

< Message edited by Supreme 2.0 -- 6/23/2015 1:26:38 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1703
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2015 4:18:10 PM   
trujillocorreo

 

Posts: 44
Joined: 3/15/2014
Status: offline
quote:

We've discussed this and made the missile anti-aircraft capable but the WRA tells it to not shoot at anything but ballistic missiles. The player / scenario designer can change the WRA themselves to suit their needs


Gracias-thanks!!!

< Message edited by seaman -- 6/23/2015 5:20:48 PM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1704
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2015 4:34:29 PM   
1Eddie2

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 2/7/2015
Status: offline
[UPDATED / ADDED DB v440]

I've compiled a list of UK aircraft in the game which may need changes made to them. I've tried to explain what they need changed and I'll provide links by PM if needed or put them up in a text file because I can't post them yet.

The A330 MRTT Voyager KC2 has a passenger transport capability as does the KC3 version (not in game) which has a centreline drogue for refuelling larger aircraft.

The RAF operates two more BAe Statesman (-200 model) which carry small freight loads, these were introduced in 2011. Designated BAe146 CMk3

The C-130J is being upgraded to Lockheed Martin's Block 8.1 standard (improved communications and surveillance capabilities) and an additional modification of external fuel tanks for special forces use. (N.B. UKSF are reportedly not impressed with the A400M)

Eight C-17s are in service with the RAF with the designation.. C-17 (for some reason they never named it)

Further to my post last time new Chinook variants are being gradually introduced. Chinook HC4 is an upgrade of the Chinook HC2. This adds a glass cockpit, improved engines, improved DAS, new comms suite, FLIR.
The HC5 is an upgrade of HC3s to give it similar performance to the HC4. The HC3 model has external fuel tanks.
The HC6 is a new build of 14 CH-47F model helicopters fitted with FLIR, rescue hoist, Digital Automatic Flight Control System (DAFCS) and Display Night Vision Goggles (DNVG), although all Chinooks are cleared for night operations.

The E-3D Sentry received a Mode S upgrade to its IFF system last year, allowing it to operate in controlled airspace.

As already mentioned the Merlin Crowsnest bid was won by Thales who will integrate and then upgrade the already existing Searchwater 2000 radar. This will be known in service as the Merlin ASaC5

Merlin HM1/HM2 is able to use the MX-15 EO/IR sensor turret on one of its outboard weapons pylons, and an M3M .50 Cal machine gun mounted in the cabin.

The Merlin HC3 is listed as Navy although it is technically (the best kind) in service with the RAF. The Merlin HC3 will enter service with the Royal Navy's Commando Helicopter Force (CHF) this July. It will then undergo upgrades to give it the same cockpit as a HM2 (glass), folding tail boom and main rotor blades, and a strengthened undercarriage. It will then be known as the Merlin HC4

The Puma HC1 has been upgraded to the HC2 version and entered service last year. Upgrades include a glass cockpit, Digital Automatic Flight Control System (DAFCS), increased fuel capacity, upgraded DAS, ballistic protection for crew and passengers

The Sea King HC4 (Plus) Commando has now been retired and have been replaced by the Merlin. Also all Sea King HC4s were part of the Royal Navy, not the British Army (as listed in game). The Sea King HAR.3 are retiring from RAF service this year. In game they are listed as Royal Navy, which they never served with. The Sea King HAR.3 S&R role will be fulfilled by a civilian organisation so there's no direct replacement.

The Typhoon FGR4's CAESAR radar supposedly detects targets at a further range than the Rafale due to more T/R modules on the larger Typhoon radar. There's an interview with a Selex ES representative that I can provide if you need it. Jamming and electronic attack are also rumoured to be in development under the UK's Project Bright ADDER programme, although there's obviously no official or hard evidence of this.

The WAH-64D Apache (known in Army service as the Apache AH1) will likely be upgraded in the next couple of years to AH-64E Guardian standards with additional UK specific items: A floatation device, canopy jettison ability, an improved battery life and an I-band transponder to navigate back to ships. Delays by lobbyist Agusta-Westland means the decision won't be made until 2016, so introduction won't be until around 2018 at best.

Wildcat AH1 can carry forward firing 2.75" rockets on its outboard pylons. Wildcat HMA2 will carry the Lightweight Multirole Missile (LMM), a small missile with a 6.6lb warhead intended to destroy small boats. The Royal Navy and Marine Nationale will also be using the Sea Venom (UK designation) anti-ship missile in the coming years. In UK service this replaces the Sea Skua.

TL;DR: A lot of minor aesthetic changes that most likely aren't needed, but some upgrades that are coming up for key aircraft.

Hopefully this doesn't come across as demanding, just pointing things out


< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/28/2015 6:28:15 PM >

(in reply to trujillocorreo)
Post #: 1705
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2015 4:59:18 PM   
blh42

 

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
[ADDED DB v440]

Russian Air Force TU-214 versions

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-204#Tu-214

Tu-214ON
Observation version of Tu-204-200 equipped for Treaty on Open Skies missions. Two ordered by Russian Ministry of Defence, with delivery planned in 2012 and 2013.

Tu-214PU
Airborne command post version. Two operated for Russian Ministry of Defence. (also called doomsday flights for government continuation in case of nuclear war)

Tu-214SR
Communications relay version. Two operated by GTK Rossiya for Russian government, with three more planned. (used for relaying launch commands in case of thermal nuclear war in case launch commands has to be issued from places that lack communications infrastructure)

Tu-214SUS
Communications relay version for Russian Ministry of Defence. Two on order, with delivery planned by end of 2012.

Tu-214R inflight from Borisoglebskoye airfield (2014)
Special-mission versions of the Tu-214 commercial transport aircraft, developed under the codename ‘Project 141', to replace the Il-20 Coot ELINT platform. The aircraft are configured to carry the MRC-411 multi-intelligence payload, to include electronic intelligence (ELINT) sensors, side-looking Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and other Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) and Communications Intelligence (COMINT). In addition, the aircraft will carry multi-spectral electro-optical systems. The aircraft has conducted test flights over the Sea of Japan but the programme experienced problems in January of 2013. (Jane's Defence Weekly 16 January 2013)

The Tu-214R made its public debut on August 2013 at Moscow Air Show MAKS and is the proposed platform for conducting surveillance of the United States of America in accordance with the open skies treaty to monitor compliance with the relevant treaties

As of January 2015, two are conducting test flights with the Russian Air Force.


Thanks, blh

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/29/2015 7:51:58 PM >

(in reply to 1Eddie2)
Post #: 1706
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2015 5:58:22 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Thanks!

But it says that its the IOMAX's border patrol Block 1 and Block 2 AT-802 that are currently operational? And not the Archangel, which is an upgraded version?


Wikipedia says, "AT-802U, in 2008, with engine and cockpit armor, a bulletproof windscreen, self-sealing fuel tanks, and structural reinforcements for the carriage of 9,000 pounds (4,100 kg) of payload. A reinforced wing spar was certified for 12,000 hours of flight time, and the AT-802U was displayed in 2009 at the Paris Air Show" so I'm assuming Block 1 was available from around 2008 and Block 2 (the reinforced wing spar?) from around 2009. As for Block 3, this article from Janes...

http://www.janes.com/article/42680/iomax-flies-archangel-border-patrol-aircraft-prototype

...says, "The engineering, manufacturing, and development (EMD) prototype IOMAX Archangel Block 3 Border Patrol Aircraft (BPA) recently made its maiden flight." The article is dated Sept. 3, 2014, but I'm not sure if that means the aircraft is fully operational or not. They do seem to be trying to market the Block 3, so I'm guessing it is fully operational as of 2015? But I'm not sure.

I found another Janes article with more information (numbers purchased, etc.)...

http://www.janes.com/article/40503/jordan-to-arm-donated-iomax-block-1-bpas-uae-to-order-block-3-aircraft

This says the prototype flew in 2013, and they are actually selling it to people, so I'm guessing the Block 3 is operational as of 2015. But that is just a guess.

I hope this helps.

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1707
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2015 6:06:43 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
[ADDED DB v440]

AGM-88B HARM and AGM-88E AARGM for Australian Super Hornets/Growlers

http://www.janes.com/article/52486/australia-requests-harm-aargm-for-growlers-super-hornets
http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/australia-agm-88b-high-speed-anti-radiation-missiles

Just Maybe? Thanks anyways!

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/29/2015 7:56:40 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 1708
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2015 8:00:34 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
[UPDATED / ADDED DB v440]

GAF RECCE Pod

Obviously, this Sensor Pod already made it into the DB as #989 - GAFRP Recon Pod [EO + IR] (GAFRP = GAF RECCE Pod??). If this is the case, I'd appreciate if you would rework the original sensor pod and jazz things up a little bit! If not, can you then create them please? First, I propose changing its current name to GAF RECCE Pod. This sensor pod is used as a low-level tactical reconnaissance pod, particularly at low and middle altitudes (200ft - 2000ft).





General Data:

Weight: 545 kg
Lenght: 4313 mm
Height: 663 mm
Width: 635 mm

Sensors:

KS-153 Trilens 80
KS-153 Pentalens 57
IRLS (Infrared Line Scanner)


GAF Telelens Pod

The GAF TELELENS Pod is used as a middle/high-level tactical reconnaissance pod at altitudes ranging from 2000ft to 8000ft.





General Data:

Weight: 710 kg
Lenght: 4637 mm
Height: 665 mm
Width: 644 mm

Sensors:

KS-153 Telelens 610
KS-153 Pentalens 57 (optionally KS-153 Trilens 80)
IRLS (Infrarot Line Scanner)


I can imagine it might be useful to apply a short note (like Low-level Recon or Medium/High-level Recon) to the DB indicating which pod is used at which altitudes. The only aircraft which is compatible with these sensor pods is the Tornado RECCE, which is currently not in the DB. For now, I'm only requesting the pods. I will submit a seperate request for this aircraft in the next days.

Thanks a lot!

Supreme

http://www.bredow-web.de/Luftwaffenmuseum/Kampfjets/Tornado/tornado.html
http://www.aviation4u.de/gallery/Deutschland/TLG51/Equipment-Recce.htm (<-- ridiculous amount of data)
http://www.manfred-bischoff.de/images/recce-Pod_Schautafel.jpg
http://www.luftwaffe.de/portal/a/luftwaffe/!ut/p/c4/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP3I5EyrpHK9nHK98sS0NL2s1JJivZL8ojz9gmxHRQCuLSDf/
http://www.luftwaffe.de/portal/a/luftwaffe/!ut/p/c4/NYq7DsIwDEX_yE4llIENBEgw0I0-NtOmlVHqVKkhCx9PMnCvdJZzsMd8oQ_PpByEPLbYDbx_JvAJEk0TvJxuoCEKNiUeHQxBnBaqE-XMOVIOYA1RfTHvGLMBHrEz1elorPmv-tr-cW5vxu6u90uN67IcftVxqhc!/

(Edit: more links)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/29/2015 8:11:18 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1709
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 6/23/2015 8:27:14 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1Eddie2

I've compiled a list of UK aircraft in the game which may need changes made to them. I've tried to explain what they need changed and I'll provide links by PM if needed or put them up in a text file because I can't post them yet.

TL;DR: A lot of minor aesthetic changes that most likely aren't needed, but some upgrades that are coming up for key aircraft.

Hopefully this doesn't come across as demanding, just pointing things out



Thanks Eddie, will add your requests to my list

I'd also be interested in minor aesthetic mods.

_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to 1Eddie2)
Post #: 1710
Page:   <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.938