Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

The Senkaku Conflict

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> The Senkaku Conflict Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Senkaku Conflict - 7/7/2015 6:27:50 PM   
jmarso

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 4/29/2015
Status: offline
Current as today's headlines: The Senkaku Islands, 2015. A minor air-sea shooting match between JSDF and the PLAN over the Senkaku Islands to the northeast of Taiwan. This is a real-world flashpoint taken into the realm of a Command scenario. The player plays the Japanese side.

Enjoy!

Attachment (1)
Post #: 1
RE: The Senkaku Conflict - 7/7/2015 8:10:35 PM   
AlexGGGG

 

Posts: 685
Joined: 9/25/2014
Status: offline
I have a small note of the waypoint marking Senkaku Islands should perhaps be locked or else I move it all the way to Moscow.

(in reply to jmarso)
Post #: 2
RE: The Senkaku Conflict - 7/10/2015 7:11:23 AM   
jmarso

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 4/29/2015
Status: offline
The only reason that ref point is there is so folks actually can see where the Senkaku Islands are. Once you know, move it, delete it, or do whatever to it. Don't matter once you know what's what!

(in reply to AlexGGGG)
Post #: 3
RE: The Senkaku Conflict - 7/12/2015 4:17:04 AM   
MR_BURNS2


Posts: 974
Joined: 7/18/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline
Nice mission. The chinese fleet is easily overwhelmed, and i had plenty assets to defend my SAG from being saturated with missiles, one of my destroyers was hit by an ARM though, but she survived.

You could delete the mainland radar stations since they won't be needed in the scenario.


SIDE: Japan
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x P-3C Orion Update III
3x F-15J Eagle J-MSIP


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
16x ASM-1C [Type 91]
16x SSM-1B [Type 90]
8x RGM-84D Harpoon IC
60x AAM-4B Kai [Type 99]
10x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
3x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
74x RIM-66M-1 SM-2MR Blk III
13x RIM-162B ESSM
1x 127mm/54 OTO Melara Compact HECVT
8x Mk182 SRBOC Chaff [Seduction]
2x 20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 1 Burst [300 rnds]
25x ASM-2 [Type 93]
10x AAM-5 [Type 04]
1x 127mm/62 HE-CVT [HiFrag]
2x 20mm/100 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 1B Burst [300 rnds]



SIDE: China
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x Type 056A Jiangdao [593 Sanmenxia]
1x Type 052D Luyang III [172 Kunming]
15x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-30MK2 Copy]
1x A-50 Mainring [KJ-2000]
1x Type 052C Luyang II [170 Lanzhou]
2x Type 726 Yuyi [LCAC]
1x Type 071 [998 Kunlun Shan]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
3x HQ-9B
14x HQ-9A
16x YJ-18 [3M54E Klub Copy]
8x C-803 [YJ-83]
8x YJ-62
47x PL-12
23x HQ-10 [FL-3000N]
8x YJ-18 [3M54E Klub Copy, Rocket Boosted Penetrator]
8x 30mm China H/PJ-17 [20 rnds]
6x Generic Chaff Rocket
7x 100mm/55 H/PJ-87 HECVT
15x 30mm China H/PJ-12 [Type 730, 240 rnds]
4x Generic Flare Rocket [Single Spectral]
35x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
6x C-803K [YJ-83]
1x PL-9
1x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
12x AS-17 Krypton C [Kh-31P, ARM]

_____________________________

Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



(in reply to jmarso)
Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> The Senkaku Conflict Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.689