unsafe flying condtions? or bug?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

unsafe flying condtions? or bug?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Order of Battle : World War II >> unsafe flying condtions? or bug?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

unsafe flying condtions? or bug? - 7/30/2015 3:07:14 PM

brucemcl777

Posts: 102
Joined: 11/14/2011
From: Toronto Canada
Status: offline

This could be deliberate to represent unsafe flying conditions - playing yanks in coral sea scenario - when I had the lexington and yorktown side by side @ 315 degrees for 3 turns - I could not land any planes on either of them - as soon as I moved them apart not to be exactly parallel I could land again.

_____________________________

you can always find me on Steam at
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/stratwin
Where we are all about Strategy - come join us - there my name is I'm Spartacus.

Order of Battle: Pacific fan
Morning Sun: beta tester
US Marines: beta tester

Post #: 1

RE: unsafe flying condtions? or bug? - 7/30/2015 6:59:54 PM

Lukas

Posts: 354
Joined: 5/31/2010
Status: offline

If more than one carrier is adjacent to an aircraft you have to select one of them by clicking on the hex AFTER clicking the land ability.

If that is not the issue, then please upload a savegame!

_____________________________

(in reply to brucemcl777)

Post #: 2

RE: unsafe flying condtions? or bug? - 7/30/2015 7:17:30 PM

brucemcl777

Posts: 102
Joined: 11/14/2011
From: Toronto Canada
Status: offline

Aah that makes sense - I'm in the habit of going right over the carrier and forgot you could be beside it as well.
Thanks Lukas

Ps. I've played almost 100 hours in 3 weeks - haven't done that in many years. Really enjoying this.

_____________________________

(in reply to Lukas)

Post #: 3