Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015 Status: offline
|
Sorry for the late response, I searched so many sources all night to reply. I list those unchanged/ongoing issues from 'DB3000 issues' spreadsheet below: (Sources are in spreadsheet as I cannot post source location yet) 2296 Type 052D Luyang III [172 Kunming] (China) Issue: Incorrect picture (from Database Images & Descriptions Add-ons), Also 173 (Changsha, 2015) is in service. Suggested solution: Change the picture for 172 to the correct one, Add 173 Changsha in database Remark: 173 Changsha has no real photo yet, General Description is recommened (if not necessary) to include. 696 Type 052C Luyang II [170 Lanzhou] (China) Issue: Incorrect picture (from Database Images & Descriptions Addons) of "173" as it have no such number on this series, also 4 new ships (numbers in spreadsheet) are in services. Suggested solution: Remove incorrect picture (173), Add new numbers in database, please note those are installed with domestic turbine engines called QC-280. Remark: Update General Description (optional), sources for pictures are in spreadsheet. 577 and 580 Type 041 Yuan (039C) (China) Issue: Incorrect picture (from Database Images & Descriptions Add-ons) Suggested solution: Change the picture to the correct one Remark: The redesigned conning tower with extrusion suggested it have limited improvement of signature (noise) reduction compare to the previous models. 660 and 2494 Type 908 Fusu [885 Qinghaihu] (China) Issue: Incorrect max speed & fuel capacity, (DEL)cannot refuel or replenish Suggested solution: Max speed is 16 kts, Total fuel is 9630 tons, (DEL)Add refuel and replenish properties Additional reply: It seems I was mistaken between naval replenishment and cargo transfer for Type 908. I've searched many military websites but so far there's none mentioned about its naval replenishment capability to Chinese indigenous warships. Unmarked the issue with (DEL) ahead. ID [Numerous] Depth Charge Rockets Issue: No option for launching depth charge rocket against torpedo Suggested solution: Add Torpedo as Valid Target. Remark: Unlike specifically designed anti-torpedo torpedo or depth charge, they're relatively unreliable (especially high speed and/or agile torpedo). Some salvo can direct with ship-based acoustic system to increase accuracy. It is optional to use it as a final resort. Additional reply: Need time to search for more sources. Only few does mentioned the anti-torpedo purpose with depth charge during WWII. The closest case is the Saab ASW-601's magnetic grenade salvo can also contact and detonate any attached target undersea. Yet it does not mentioned its anti-torpedo capability. Also the alarmingly aggressive use of rocket depth charge salvo by Chinese Navy during naval drills in recent years, suggested its doctrine of anti-torpedo engagement. The theory from source also supported it. However the effectiveness is still in question, as the case of torpedo being intercepted by rocket depth charge is not yet found. Other countries' navies however have no reported case of using rocket depth charge against torpedo, and only fire decoys instead. Except the Soviet's RBU-1000 is the first case of intended use of anti-torpedo with convential depth charge warhead, which is from 1962. In short: Unusual, but encouraging.
< Message edited by Dysta -- 8/12/2015 2:14:59 PM >
|