[WAD] Standoff Distance Problem?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

[WAD] Standoff Distance Problem?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> [WAD] Standoff Distance Problem?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

[WAD] Standoff Distance Problem? - 9/2/2015 9:02:59 PM

decaf

Posts: 91
Joined: 8/1/2008
Status: offline

Am I missing some concept with standoff distance?

Save game is attached - -

Command Version: 1.09RC1-Build735

Made a tiny version of Kushan's Iran 2015 scenario.

Made a Strike Mission & a Refuel Mission
Its a 4x B1-B JASSM strike on the Fordow Complex

Running in Editor Mode.

The Doctrine Window at the Unit View (Bat #1) says:
"Maintain standoff to target: Inherited, Yes"
And, Side Doctrine is "Yes" for maintaining standoff.

The JASSM's launch OK (at the IP).

But, then, the B1's follow the JASSM's into the target.

After first wave detonates, more JASSMS are launched
and the B1's orbit the site and keep launching until
the complex is totally destroyed. If there was active
air defense, the B1's would be toasted.

Why are the B1's not maintaining standoff distance?

Thanks for your help.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 9/3/2015 6:25:59 AM >

Post #: 1

RE: Standoff Distance Problem? - 9/2/2015 9:41:56 PM

thewood1

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline

I think the standoff in DOE is for non-air units only. It tickles my memory that that is the setting.

(in reply to decaf)

Post #: 2

RE: Standoff Distance Problem? - 9/2/2015 10:03:33 PM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

Yes this is for ships only and I think land units only.

Definitely not air.

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 9/2/2015 11:03:47 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to thewood1)