Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Bren supression

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat - Gateway to Caen >> Tech Support >> Bren supression Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Bren supression - 9/8/2015 9:35:19 PM   
STIENER

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
really?? the bren STILL doesn't suppress ****. its painfull. we have been complaining about the bren for ever....since CC3 and still its useless. come on ...fix it in the next patch!!
3 brit inf squads with brens cant suppress one german squad with a mg 42
.
its just bad..seriously.

can we do something with this?
Post #: 1
RE: Bren supression - 9/8/2015 9:55:45 PM   
SteveMcClaire

 

Posts: 4472
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline
I don't think I've ever heard a complaint about this before. The Bren LMG has the same effectiveness as any other weapon with a comparable rate of fire and penetration. It isn't special-cased in any way. Its suppression is more akin to a BAR than an MG34/42, due to the modest rate of fire and the small clip size (meaning frequent pauses to reload, during which suppression effects gradually drop off.)

Steve

(in reply to STIENER)
Post #: 2
RE: Bren supression - 9/8/2015 10:03:00 PM   
STIENER

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
LOL...you have heard this from me for sure every CC that comes out. i hear it from every allied opponent I play. players need to tell u this stuff, but we have had this conversation before....most DONT post. I don't no why.
every one is just used to the bren being a useless weapon now in CC??

trust me...its bad...you need to step it up.

(in reply to SteveMcClaire)
Post #: 3
RE: Bren supression - 9/9/2015 1:02:55 AM   
Kanov


Posts: 312
Joined: 5/21/2012
From: México
Status: offline
Not to be an ass, but I have witnessed the opposite, the Bren kills men in buildings even though the bren gunner is out in the open and I find it in general more accurate and deadly. Against infantry out in open field though I choose the MG42 because its rate of fire.

The Bren has 85% of accuracy vs 80% of the leMG42 according to the data, range of 800m vs 1000m and slightly more leathal

Kill ratings (mm of game "steel" it can penetrate) for PB, close, medium and long ranges:

Bren : 9-8-5-4
vs
LeMG42: 9-8-4-3

The rate of fire though 4 for the bren and 8 rounds for the mg42 in one burst, I believe that's where the suppression comes from.

_____________________________

Hard-core Spectre

(in reply to STIENER)
Post #: 4
RE: Bren supression - 9/9/2015 2:55:46 AM   
STIENER

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
well your the 1st player ive heard that from kanov. most will curse the useless bren, and now even if steve was remotely thinking about stepping it up, he wont....been down this path he before. ;-(

we have learned that its the mg 42 rate of fire that gives it high suppression factor.as far as the pen numbers..i don't know which , the bren or the mg 42 has the biggest punch per round size. but the fact remains ...most will say the bren needs to be stepped up...if for only playability sakes.

(in reply to Kanov)
Post #: 5
RE: Bren supression - 9/9/2015 3:28:00 AM   
STIENER

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
anyone reading this post...feel free to say ..nay or yay...to the bren performance. ;-)

(in reply to STIENER)
Post #: 6
RE: Bren supression - 9/12/2015 9:31:57 PM   
crackwise

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 7/26/2015
Status: offline
I find the Bren performance fine overall. MG 42s are too deadly on the other hand, which gives the impression Bren is useless. But I guess MG42s were also like that historically.

I agree with Kanov that Bren seem to be somewhat more accurate. They can score plenty of kills if left unsuppressed. Advancing against MG42s is almost impossible without tank support, which I guess also makes sense. This is the case starting from TLD up until GtC by the way, old CC5 did not have MG42s so deadly.

(in reply to STIENER)
Post #: 7
RE: Bren supression - 9/12/2015 10:51:45 PM   
CGGrognard


Posts: 594
Joined: 10/3/2013
From: USA
Status: offline
The Bren has performed as well as expected in each series of the game. No problems with it in GTC that I've seen since playing the game.

_____________________________

"The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." - Sun Tzu

(in reply to crackwise)
Post #: 8
RE: Bren supression - 9/12/2015 11:10:56 PM   
STIENER

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
well...I don't no what to say other than perhaps we expect so little of it that were used to it being useless?
the bren doesn't seem to actually kill many germans. at least not in my german squads when there fired upon. it doesn't suppress well even when given the jump on a german squad. its been bad since cc3 IMO.

interesting feed back tho guys...keep it coming.


(in reply to CGGrognard)
Post #: 9
RE: Bren supression - 4/25/2017 5:31:52 AM   
Digs


Posts: 48
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
I recommend a book called "World War II Infantry Fire Support Tactics", by Gordon L. Rottman; put out by Osprey Publishing (the .303in Mk I Bren gun, is no MG42).

< Message edited by Digs -- 4/25/2017 5:32:08 AM >

(in reply to STIENER)
Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat - Gateway to Caen >> Tech Support >> Bren supression Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.859