Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/8/2015 8:15:52 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 4, 1942


Allies Deny El Lobo Batangas!

Ground combat at Batangas (79,78)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 2826 troops, 18 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 107

Defending force 6656 troops, 142 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 278

Japanese adjusted assault: 74

Allied adjusted defense: 59

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+)

Japanee ground losses:
386 casualsties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 36 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
73 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
58th Infantry Brigade

Defending units:
41st PA Infantry Division
51st PA Infantry Division
PAF Aviation

Allies Remain Stubborn at Clark Field!

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32497 troops, 418 guns, 347 vehicles, Assault Value = 956

Defending force 24630 troops, 348 guns, 487 vehicles, Assault Value = 424

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 419

Allied adjusted defense: 424

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2560 casualties reported

Squads: 10 destroyed, 162 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 74 disabled
Vehicles lost 27 (4 destroyed, 23 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1489 casualties reported

Squads: 34 destroyed, 97 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 22 disabled
Engineers: 33 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 34 (8 destroyed, 26 disabled)
Vehicles lost 21 (8 destroyed, 13 disabled)

Assaulting units:
9th Infantry Regiment
2nd Engineer Regiment
113th Infantry Regiment
II./4th Infantry Battalion
16th Recon Regiment
65th Brigade
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
2nd Recon Regiment
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
56th Engineer Regiment
16th Engineer Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
56th Recon Regiment
20th Infantry Regiment
5th Amphibious Brigade
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
I./4th Infantry Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
48th Field Artillery Regiment
9th Field AF Construction Battalion
3rd Engineer Construction Battalion
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
56th Field Artillery Regiment
56th Const Co
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
14th PS Engineer Regiment
3rd/45th PS Inf Battalion
21st PA Infantry Division
1st PA Infantry Division
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
Subic Bay Defenses
11th PA Infantry Division
71st PA Infantry Division
192nd Tank Battalion
194th Tank Battalion
91st PA Infantry Division
31st Infantry Regiment
2nd PA Constabulary Regiment
Manila USAAF Base Force
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
301st Construction Battalion
I Philippine Corps
Cavite USN Base Force
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
86th PS Coastal Artillery Battalion
Asiatic Fleet
Far East USAAF
1st USMC AA Battalion
1st PA Constabulary Regiment

Allies Shred Japanese at Batavia!

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 6528 troops, 118 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 351

Defending force 23522 troops, 318 guns, 110 vehicles, Assault Value = 636

Japanese ground losses:
208 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
73 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
1st KNIL Regiment
2nd KNIL Regiment
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st Regt Cavalerie
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Roodenburg Battalion
ML-KNIL
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
Merak Base Force
Batavia Base Force

Defending units:
15th Naval Guard Unit
14th Guards Regiment
21st/B Division
16th Naval Guard Unit
55th Infantry Regiment
15th Guards Regiment
21st/C Division
2nd Mortar Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th JAAF AF Bn
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
93rd JAAF AF Bn
29th JAAF AF Coy

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 301
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/9/2015 4:36:45 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 5, 1942


A Slow day.

Evil El Lobo Shoves Chinese Around Near Sian:


Ground combat at 83,39 (near Sian)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 10026 troops, 112 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 188

Defending force 1512 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 61

Japanese adjusted assault: 171

Allied adjusted defense: 17

Japanese assault odds: 10 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
105 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
650 casualties reported

Squads: 31 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 17 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
37th Division

Defending units:
22nd Chinese Corps

Allied Big Guns Rip Into Japanese at Batavia!

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 6457 troops, 118 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 345

Defending force 27244 troops, 349 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 770

Japanese ground losses:
63 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
27 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st KNIL Regiment
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st Regt Cavalerie
Roodenburg Battalion
Merak Base Force
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
ML-KNIL
Batavia Base Force

Defending units:
14th Guards Regiment
15th Guards Regiment
21st/A Division
55th Infantry Regiment
15th Naval Guard Unit
21st/B Division
16th Naval Guard Unit
21st/C Division
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
93rd JAAF AF Bn
2nd Mortar Battalion
15th JAAF AF Bn
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
29th JAAF AF Coy

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 302
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/12/2015 8:15:47 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 6, 1942


El Lobo Pushes Back Chinese Near Tienshui:

Ground combat at 81,39 (near Tienshui)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 53818 troops, 1067 guns, 926 vehicles, Assault Value = 1493

Defending force 6983 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 226

Japanese adjusted assault: 1781

Allied adjusted defense: 187

Japanese assault odds: 9 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
488 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 46 disabled
Vehicles lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2653 casualties reported

Squads: 74 destroyed, 50 disabled
Non Combat: 119 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 11 destroyed, 13 disabled
Guns lost 21 (3 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
27th Electric Engineer Regiment
28th Engineer Regiment
1st Engineer Regiment
14th Division
23rd Division
12th Division
26th Engineer Regiment
7th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
6th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
49th Const Co
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
15th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
46th Road Const Co
26th Field Artillery Regiment
48th Road Const Co
45th Const Co
20th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
12th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
47th Road Const Co
1st Field Artillery Regiment
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
12th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
11th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
9th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
Tonei Hvy Gun Regiment
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
9th Ind. Engineer Regiment
5th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
46th Const Co
13th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
6th RF Gun Battalion
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
4th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
7th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
45th Road Const Co
4th RF Gun Battalion
22nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
4th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd RF Gun Battalion
7th RF Gun Battalion
2nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
1st Ind. Field Artillery Regiment
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
11th Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
42nd Chinese Corps

Imagine This: Allies Bombard Japanese at Batavia!

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 6482 troops, 118 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 350

Defending force 27284 troops, 349 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 772

Japanese ground losses:
20 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
54 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
2nd KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
Merak Base Force
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
ML-KNIL
Batavia Base Force

Defending units:
15th Naval Guard Unit
21st/A Division
55th Infantry Regiment
14th Guards Regiment
21st/B Division
15th Guards Regiment
16th Naval Guard Unit
21st/C Division
2nd Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th JAAF AF Bn
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
93rd JAAF AF Bn
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
29th JAAF AF Coy

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 303
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/15/2015 4:17:54 AM   
biggins89

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 10/24/2004
Status: offline
Had this large post I was going to offer on midstarting strategy as a semi-new guy but then realised the only reason the BIG guys were not posting it was because they are Big guys and they want you to experience it for yourself. All I can say is... Your opponent can not be every where... all of the time.

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 304
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/16/2015 6:44:18 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: biggins89

Had this large post I was going to offer on midstarting strategy as a semi-new guy but then realised the only reason the BIG guys were not posting it was because they are Big guys and they want you to experience it for yourself. All I can say is... Your opponent can not be every where... all of the time.



biggins-

Welcome to The War College.

I think what The War College Scholars are trying to impress upon me is to be very, very careful what the Allies choose to tackle this early in the war.

When I find out where that damn El Lobo KB is, I will strike somewhere.

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to biggins89)
Post #: 305
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/16/2015 7:01:22 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 7, 1942


El Lobo's vacation is coming to an end in the states. The Evil Emperor is heading back to Thailand this coming Thursday (17th of September). After Les has had a couple days to settle back into his home in Thailand, we will be back on schedule to try to complete a turn per day.

Japanese Amphibious Assault Hex 52,102:

Amphibious Assault at 52,101

TF 168 troops unloading over beach at 52,101

Japanese ground losses:
52 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

19 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 33rd/A Div
10 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 33rd/A Div /3
19 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 33rd/A Div /5
70mm T92 Howitzer damaged beyond repair during unload of 33rd/A Div /5

SS Pompano uses xAK Toho Maru as Candle!

Sub attack near Tokunoshima at 98,66

Japanese Ships
xAK Toho Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage


Allied Ships
SS Pompano, hits 1

Japanese ground losses:
73 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

SS Pompano attacking xAK Toho Maru on the surface

Allies Hold Clark Field!

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32597 troops, 429 guns, 350 vehicles, Assault Value = 910

Defending force 23237 troops, 324 guns, 475 vehicles, Assault Value = 304

Japanese adjusted assault: 435

Allied adjusted defense: 289

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1252 casualties reported

Squads: 4 destroyed, 99 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
Vehicles lost 7 (2 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1792 casualties reported

Squads: 75 destroyed, 96 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 91 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 47 (12 destroyed, 35 disabled)
Vehicles lost 31 (4 destroyed, 27 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
II./4th Infantry Battalion
2nd Tank Regiment
20th Infantry Regiment
16th Recon Regiment
56th Engineer Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
65th Brigade
2nd Recon Regiment
56th Recon Regiment
I./4th Infantry Battalion
113th Infantry Regiment
16th Engineer Regiment
2nd Engineer Regiment
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
5th Amphibious Brigade
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Engineer Construction Battalion
9th Field AF Construction Battalion
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
56th Const Co
56th Field Artillery Regiment
48th Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
3rd/45th PS Inf Battalion
31st Infantry Regiment
194th Tank Battalion
21st PA Infantry Division
91st PA Infantry Division
1st PA Infantry Division
Subic Bay Defenses
11th PA Infantry Division
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
192nd Tank Battalion
71st PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constabulary Regiment
14th PS Engineer Regiment
1st USMC AA Battalion
Manila USAAF Base Force
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
86th PS Coastal Artillery Battalion
Cavite USN Base Force
I Philippine Corps
301st Construction Battalion
Far East USAAF
Asiatic Fleet
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
1st PA Constabulary Regiment

Brave Chinese Hold Tsuyung!

Ground combat at Tsuyung(68,46)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 13124 troops, 131 guns, 161 vehicles, Assault Value = 507

Defending force 6517 troops, 42 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 117

Japanese adjusted assault: 297

Allied adjusted defense: 157

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
303 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
237 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled

Assaulting units:
Yokosuka 4th SNLF
6th Tank Regiment
22nd Recon Regiment
Sasebo 3rd SNLF
Yokosuka Assault SNLF
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
Sasebo 8th SNLF
3rd Militia Regiment

Defending units:
54th Chinese Corps
11th Group Army

Allies Continue to Be Stubborn at Batavia!

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27000 troops, 349 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 776

Defending force 13580 troops, 177 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 344

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 382

Allied adjusted defense: 415

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1700 casualties reported

Squads: 7 destroyed, 157 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled

Allied ground losses:
694 casualties reported

Squads: 12 destroyed, 92 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled

Assaulting units:
21st/A Division
21st/B Division
55th Infantry Regiment
15th Guards Regiment
15th Naval Guard Unit
14th Guards Regiment
16th Naval Guard Unit
21st/C Division
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
93rd JAAF AF Bn
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
15th JAAF AF Bn
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
29th JAAF AF Coy

Defending units:
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
Roodenburg Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Merak Base Force
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
ML-KNIL
Batavia Base Force

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 306
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/17/2015 11:32:29 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Question Regarding Aircraft Disband/Withdrawal

for

The War College


Gentlemen:

I notice that at Brisbane, several squadrons are scheduled to be disbanded or withdrawn a bit later this month (i.e., in March of 1942). Some of these squadrons show upgrades are available.

At this stage of the war, is it best to disband these aircraft or to withdraw them?

And, would it be prudent to upgrade these aircraft prior to disbanding or withdrawing the aircraft?

If you need more information; perhaps the names of the actual squadrons in question, I can provide the same.

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 307
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/17/2015 2:52:22 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
I'm a little unsure what you are getting at. Most times when a squadron withdraws the aircraft go into the pool. Sometimes they can't due to the squadron being isolated and the aircraft are lost. Sometimes it's basically an out of theater withdrawal and the aircraft and pilots are lost (by go to the Atlantic). So why would you consider upgrading the aircraft before they withdraw? They reason I can think of is if you are desperate to keep their current aircraft but are OK to risk losing the ones they would upgrade to.



_____________________________


(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 308
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/17/2015 3:21:26 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
No don't upgrade!

If they are a valuable airframe type, then it's best to DOWNGRADE any that would take the planes with them and not deliver them into the pools.

It's also best to strip all pilots out of the squads that will take them out of theater, although your opponent might call this gamey.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 309
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/17/2015 4:29:46 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

No don't upgrade!

If they are a valuable airframe type, then it's best to DOWNGRADE any that would take the planes with them and not deliver them into the pools.

It's also best to strip all pilots out of the squads that will take them out of theater, although your opponent might call this gamey.

Good point about the planes if the group goes out of theater.

But I take the opposite view about the pilots in that case, because I use those groups for training. I figure if I train the pilots for weeks and months then I can take the pilots before the group withdraws. YMMV.

_____________________________


(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 310
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/18/2015 1:19:47 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 8,1942


Red Sun Rises Over Tsuyung:

Ground combat at Tsuyung (68,46)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 12972 troops, 131 guns, 161 vehicles, Assault Value = 490

Defending force 6354 troops, 42 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 101

Japanese adjusted assault: 327

Allied adjusted defense: 130

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Tsuyung !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
172 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1762 casualties reported

Squads: 52 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 118 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 21 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 9 (7 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Units retreated 2

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
22nd Recon Regiment
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
Yokosuka 4th SNLF
Sasebo 3rd SNLF
Yokosuka Assault SNLF
Sasebo 8th SNLF
6th Tank Regiment
3rd Militia Regiment

Defending units:
54th Chinese Corps
11th Group Army

Japanese Shove Chinese Around Near Sinyang:

Ground combat at 85,47 (near Sinyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 690 troops, 0 guns, 103 vehicles, Assault Value = 57

Defending force 8251 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 211

Japanese adjusted assault: 25

Allied adjusted defense: 193

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 7

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), fatigue(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-)

Allied ground losses:
114 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
9th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
85th Chinese Corps

Evil Empire Amphibious Assaults Hex 52, 101 and Roxas:

Amphibious Assault at 52,101

TF 109 troops unloading over beach at 52,101

Japanese ground losses:
41 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

19 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of 33rd/B Div
19 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 33rd/B Div
10 Support troops lost from landing craft during unload of 33rd/B Div /11

And

Amphibious Assault at Roxas (79,83)

TF 334 troops unloading over beach at Roxas, 79,83

Japanese ground losses:
55 casualties reported

Squads: 3 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 10th Garrison Unit /2
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 10th Garrison Unit /2
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of 10th Garrison Unit /4
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 10th Garrison Unit /8

Chinese Hold Their Turf Near Chengting!

Ground combat at 91,39 (near Chengting)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 6149 troops, 50 guns, 16 vehicles, Assault Value = 188

Defending force 11230 troops, 75 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 256

Japanese adjusted assault: 66

Allied adjusted defense: 101

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
286 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 40 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
98 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Assaulting units:
2nd NCPC Infantry Brigade
3rd NCPC Infantry Brigade
10th/A Division

Defending units:
35th Chinese Corps
83rd Chinese Corps
13th Group Army

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 311
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/18/2015 1:34:49 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Hans & witpqs-

Regarding the Brisbane Air Groups:

1.) To date (March 8, 1942), Japan has not threatened Australia.

2.) Except for the ATC Sqn, all Brisbane Air Groups are scheduled to disband or withdraw.

3.) Is it best to disband or withdraw these Air Groups?

Best Regards,

-Terry






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 312
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/18/2015 3:31:49 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
It's dependent on the message you get when selecting the two choices.

If when you select withdraw you get a message that planes and pilots will be returned to the pools then go ahead and withdraw.

If the message is planes and pilots will be lost then don't withdraw.

If when you go to disband you get a message that planes and pilots will be returned to the pools then go ahead and disband.

If when you go to disband you get a message that the planes and pilots will be lost you may be stuck with losing the airframes if you don't downgrade them first.

Whether planes and pilots will be lost is sometimes dependent on where the squad is stationed and sometimes it is hard coded and can't be avoided.

The pilots can always be transferred out no matter what.

I seem to recall that if you station the A24 withdrawing squads in the same hex with non-withdrawing A24s and disband all planes will be transferred into the non-withdrawing squads.

With no receiving squad in the same hex the planes will be lost.

All of this warrants some experimentation to get the hang of what is best to do in a given situation.


_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 313
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/18/2015 3:34:48 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
"Disband" means planes and pilots go to another group in the same nationality code and equipped with the same planes. It looks like you don't have any that are staying - all withdraw, so you have no choice.

_____________________________


(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 314
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/18/2015 4:38:56 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Hans and witpqs-

Dangit.

Kind of liked having the Brisbane Air Groups in Brisbane.

The deadline date is the 15th of March.

I will withdraw those Brisbane Air Groups on the 14th of March.

As soon as I find out whom is responsible for this decision, heads are going to roll.

So, my Commanders best duck.

*laughing*

Thank you Hans and witpqs.

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 315
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/18/2015 5:18:48 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
First few games I played I lost the A24 airframes.

After that I started planning ahead to make sure I had those squads at the same location as the other group of A24s that don't withdraw, the 3rd Bomb Group IIRC.

Experience is the best teacher.

< Message edited by HansBolter -- 9/18/2015 6:20:21 PM >


_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 316
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/18/2015 5:23:13 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Your screen capture says the date is March 8, so you have some time to move the groups to where there ARE squadrons that will stay. Look around the map, anywhere within drop-tank range that is also a valid location to withdraw the aircraft (big enough AF, etc. - I forget what all the rules are). You may have to take a few hops to get there.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 317
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/21/2015 10:52:40 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Your screen capture says the date is March 8, so you have some time to move the groups to where there ARE squadrons that will stay. Look around the map, anywhere within drop-tank range that is also a valid location to withdraw the aircraft (big enough AF, etc. - I forget what all the rules are). You may have to take a few hops to get there.



BBfanboy-

Right now, other than Brisbane, the vast amount of my squadrons are at Melbourne. So, I will fly the Brisbane Air Groups to Melbourne and then withdraw (not disband) those Air Groups.

Thank you for that advice as now I may be able to save some of these aircraft.

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 318
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/22/2015 10:31:51 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 9, 1942


El Lobo Continues to Feed His Greed By Capturing Batangas and Roxas:

Ground combat at Batangas (79,78)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 7862 troops, 66 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 321

Defending force 6604 troops, 142 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 268

Japanese adjusted assault: 118

Allied adjusted defense: 38

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Batangas !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
348 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 45 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
7924 casualties reported

Squads: 361 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 491 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 13 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 163 (163 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 3

Assaulting units:
65th Naval Guard Unit
64th Naval Guard Unit
58th Infantry Brigade
63rd Naval Guard Unit
62nd Nav Gd /1

Defending units:
41st PA Infantry Division
51st PA Infantry Division
PAF Aviation

And

Ground combat at Roxas (79,83)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3287 troops, 17 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 121

Defending force 1762 troops, 32 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 47

Japanese adjusted assault: 15

Allied adjusted defense: 4

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Roxas !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)

Allied ground losses:
2167 casualties reported

Squads: 110 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 144 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 38 (38 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
10th Garrison Unit

Defending units:
61st PA Infantry Division

Japanese Bombard Clark Field:

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 23094 troops, 400 guns, 109 vehicles, Assault Value = 893

Defending force 21603 troops, 295 guns, 466 vehicles, Assault Value = 164

Allied ground losses:
64 casualties reported

Squads: 6 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
2nd Engineer Regiment
16th Engineer Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
20th Infantry Regiment
II./4th Infantry Battalion
2nd Recon Regiment
56th Recon Regiment
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
65th Brigade
16th Recon Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
113th Infantry Regiment
56th Engineer Regiment
I./4th Infantry Battalion
5th Amphibious Brigade
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
48th Field Artillery Regiment
56th Const Co
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
56th Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Engineer Construction Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
9th Field AF Construction Battalion
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
1st PA Infantry Division
71st PA Infantry Division
31st Infantry Regiment
11th PA Infantry Division
192nd Tank Battalion
91st PA Infantry Division
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
194th Tank Battalion
21st PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constabulary Regiment
Cavite USN Base Force
I Philippine Corps
Far East USAAF
Asiatic Fleet
3rd/45th PS Inf Battalion
Subic Bay Defenses
301st Construction Battalion
1st USMC AA Battalion
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
14th PS Engineer Regiment
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
Manila USAAF Base Force
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
1st PA Constabulary Regiment

Allies Deny Batavia to Bully El Lobo!

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 26121 troops, 349 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 689

Defending force 12652 troops, 174 guns, 78 vehicles, Assault Value = 258

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 380

Allied adjusted defense: 237

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
849 casualties reported

Squads: 3 destroyed, 113 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled

Allied ground losses:
869 casualties reported

Squads: 29 destroyed, 66 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Assaulting units:
55th Infantry Regiment
15th Naval Guard Unit
14th Guards Regiment
15th Guards Regiment
16th Naval Guard Unit
21st/B Division
21st/A Division
21st/C Division
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
93rd JAAF AF Bn
15th JAAF AF Bn
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
29th JAAF AF Coy

Defending units:
1st Regt Cavalerie
1st KNIL Regiment
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
2nd KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
ML-KNIL
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Merak Base Force
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
Batavia Base Force

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 319
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/23/2015 7:51:12 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 10, 1942


The Allies hold Batavia and Clark Field. However, the Allied troop strength at both bases is severely low. It is more than probable that the next Japanese deliberate attacks at these bases will result in El Lobo capturing the bases.

Allies Repel Japanese at Batavia and Clark Field!

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 25426 troops, 349 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 619

Defending force 11843 troops, 174 guns, 77 vehicles, Assault Value = 205

Japanese adjusted assault: 5

Allied adjusted defense: 281

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 56 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
44 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled

Allied ground losses:
163 casualties reported

Squads: 7 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Assaulting units:
21st/B Division
15th Naval Guard Unit
15th Guards Regiment
16th Naval Guard Unit
55th Infantry Regiment
14th Guards Regiment
21st/A Division
21st/C Division
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
93rd JAAF AF Bn
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Mortar Battalion
15th JAAF AF Bn
29th JAAF AF Coy

Defending units:
1st Regt Cavalerie
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
Merak Base Force
1st KNIL AA Battalion
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
ML-KNIL
Batavia Base Force

And

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32952 troops, 432 guns, 351 vehicles, Assault Value = 926

Defending force 21478 troops, 286 guns, 465 vehicles, Assault Value = 164

Japanese adjusted assault: 444

Allied adjusted defense: 259

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
665 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 68 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 26 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1351 casualties reported

Squads: 46 destroyed, 38 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 81 disabled
Engineers: 7 destroyed, 16 disabled
Guns lost 50 (21 destroyed, 29 disabled)
Vehicles lost 36 (1 destroyed, 35 disabled)

Assaulting units:
56th Engineer Regiment
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
65th Brigade
2nd Tank Regiment
113th Infantry Regiment
2nd Engineer Regiment
I./4th Infantry Battalion
16th Engineer Regiment
20th Infantry Regiment
56th Recon Regiment
II./4th Infantry Battalion
16th Recon Regiment
2nd Recon Regiment
5th Amphibious Brigade
56th Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Engineer Construction Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
48th Field Artillery Regiment
56th Const Co
9th Field AF Construction Battalion
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
194th Tank Battalion
11th PA Infantry Division
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
71st PA Infantry Division
1st PA Infantry Division
31st Infantry Regiment
21st PA Infantry Division
91st PA Infantry Division
192nd Tank Battalion
2nd PA Constabulary Regiment
1st USMC AA Battalion
I Philippine Corps
3rd/45th PS Inf Battalion
Manila USAAF Base Force
14th PS Engineer Regiment
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
301st Construction Battalion
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
Cavite USN Base Force
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
Far East USAAF
Asiatic Fleet
Subic Bay Defenses
1st PA Constabulary Regiment

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 320
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/25/2015 11:58:18 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 11, 1942


Thanks to The War College advice, the ABDA Brisbane Air Groups were withdrawn saving the aircraft and pilots to return another day. And, in the process enough political points were given to buy out a U. S. Army Regiment from Pearl which is loading for transport to Australia!

Japanese Sneak Around at Night and Naval Bombard Port Blair:

Night Naval bombardment of Port Blair at 46,58

Japanese Ships
BB Kirishima
BB Hiei
CL Sendai

Allied ground losses:
63 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 16
Port hits 5
Port fuel hits 3
Port supply hits 2

BB Kirishima firing at Port Blair
BB Hiei firing at Port Blair
CL Sendai firing at Port Blair

Japanese Amphibious Assault Hex 52, 101:

Amphibious Assault at 52,101

TF 268 troops unloading over beach at 52,101

Japanese ground losses:
22 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

19 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of 33rd/C Div /3
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 33rd/C Div /6

Japanese Shove Allies Around Near Kota Bharu:

Ground combat at 51,77 (near Kota Bharu)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 585 troops, 0 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 51

Defending force 370 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 11

Japanese adjusted assault: 23

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 23 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(-), morale(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Allied ground losses:
425 casualties reported

Squads: 31 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 39 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units destroyed 2

Assaulting units:
7th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
2nd Argylls Battalion
8th Indian Brigade

Japanese Kick Chinese Off Their Turf Near Tienshui:

Ground combat at 83,38 (near Tienshui)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 10305 troops, 112 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 208

Defending force 868 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 30

Japanese adjusted assault: 103

Allied adjusted defense: 3

Japanese assault odds: 34 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
100 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
462 casualties reported

Squads: 14 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
37th Division

Defending units:
22nd Chinese Corps

SS Tambor Trashes xAK Daisin Maru Near Tokara Retto!

Submarine attack near Tokara Retto at 99,62

Japanese Ships
xAK Daisin Maru, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1


Allied Ships
SS Tambor

xAK Daisin Maru is sighted by SS Tambor
SS Tambor attacking on the surface
Massive explosion on xAK Daisin Maru
SS Tambor low on gun ammo, Murphy, J.W. breaks off surface engagement and submerges

SS Triton Dunks PB Fukui Maru Near Truk!

ASW attack near Truk at 112,107

Japanese Ships
PB Fukui Maru, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage

TK Akatuki Maru
PB Nagata Maru

Allied Ships
SS Triton

SS Triton launches 2 torpedoes at PB Fukui Maru
Triton diving deep ....
PB Nagata Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Nagata Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Nagata Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Nagata Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Nagata Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

Chinese Hold Their Turf Near Sian and Near Tsyuyung!

Ground combat at 84,42 (near Sian)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5856 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 211

Defending force 8766 troops, 39 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 274

Japanese adjusted assault: 193

Allied adjusted defense: 208

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), morale(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+)

Japanese ground losses:
129 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
296 casualties reported

Squads: 2 destroyed, 13 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled

Assaulting units:
59th Infantry Brigade

Defending units:
9th Chinese Corps
38th Chinese Corps
4th Group Army

And

Ground combat at 67,45 (near Tsuyung)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1668 troops, 4 guns, 144 vehicles, Assault Value = 376

Defending force 4555 troops, 36 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 58

Japanese adjusted assault: 55

Allied adjusted defense: 64

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
47 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
110 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
22nd Recon Regiment
Sasebo 3rd SNLF
6th Tank Regiment
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
Sasebo 8th SNLF
3rd Militia Regiment

Defending units:
54th Chinese Corps
11th Group Army

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 321
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/25/2015 1:09:27 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Burma Update

for

The War College


Gentlemen:

We have been at war with El Lobo's Japanese Evil Empire for ninety-five (95) days. To date, as you will notice from the map below, El Lobo has not invaded Burma.

India has grown strong. Primary troop concentrations in India are as follows:

Karachi: Northern Command Troops (497 AV)
Hyderabad (Sindh): Chinese Troops (1,483 AV)...Reserve
Ahmecabad: I Australian Corps Troops (1,680 AV)...Reserve
Surat: Eastern Command Troops (403 AV)
Bombay: Southern Command Troops (467 AV)
Jalgaon: ABDA Troops (237 AV)...Reserve
Bhopal: III India Corps Troops (740 AV)...Reserve
Cawnpore: Burma Corps Troops (1,400 AV)...Reserve
Bangalore: Eastern Command Troops (306 AV)
Hyderabad: U.S. Army Troops (382 AV)...Reserve
Madras: Southern Command Troops (364 AV)
Calcutta: Eastern Command Troops (174 AV)

Three (3) more Chinese Corps are close to entering India and are heading for Hyderabad (Sindh).

U. S. Army Troops continue to pour into India on a Daily basis.

Considering El Lobo hasn't moved on Burma, I am considering moving the Burma Corps and I Australian Corps to Burma. And, I am considering moving III India Corps to Ceylon.

Perhaps it is premature to strip India of the Burma, I Australian, and III Indian Corps'?

Please provide your analysis and comments.

Best Regards,

Terry




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 322
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/25/2015 3:06:06 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 12, 1942


Muggers Amphibious Assault Port Blair:

Amphibious Assault at Port Blair (46,58)

TF 239 troops unloading over beach at Port Blair, 46,58

Japanese ground losses:
127 casualties reported

Squads: 5 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)

17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of Imperial Guards Div /1
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of Imperial Guards Div /1
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of Imperial Guards Div /2
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of Imperial Guards Div /2
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of Imperial Guards Div /3
10 Support troops lost overboard during unload of Imperial Guards Div /3
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of Imperial Guards Div
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of Imperial Guards Div
10 Support troops lost from landing craft during unload of Imperial Guards Div
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of Imperial Guards Div /5
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of Imperial Guards Div /5
Motorized Support accidentally lost during unload of Imperial Guards Div /5
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of Imperial Guards Div /5
10 Support troops lost from landing craft during unload of Imperial Guards Div /5
Motorized Support damaged beyond repair during unload of Imperial Guards Div /6
75mm T90 Field Gun dropped into water during unload of Imperial Guards Div /7
47mm Type 01 AT Gun lost overboard during unload of Imperial Guards Div /9

Thugs Push Chinese Out of Wuchow:

Ground combat at Wuchow (76,57)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 14408 troops, 195 guns, 72 vehicles, Assault Value = 480

Defending force 2532 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 42

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 427

Allied adjusted defense: 28

Japanese assault odds: 15 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Wuchow !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
25 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
866 casualties reported

Squads: 6 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 40 destroyed, 27 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units retreated 2

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
104th Division
5th RF Gun Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
23rd Army
2nd RF Gun Battalion
47th JAAF AF Bn
1st JAAF AF Coy
2nd JAAF AF Coy

Defending units:
16th Group Army
13th Chinese Base Force

Rat Bastards Send Chinese Packing Near Tsuyung:

Ground combat at 67,45 (near Tsuyung)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 9936 troops, 88 guns, 159 vehicles, Assault Value = 375

Defending force 4464 troops, 36 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 51

Japanese adjusted assault: 249

Allied adjusted defense: 76

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
63 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1438 casualties reported

Squads: 47 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 65 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 2

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
6th Tank Regiment
Sasebo 3rd SNLF
22nd Recon Regiment
Sasebo 8th SNLF
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
3rd Militia Regiment

Defending units:
54th Chinese Corps
11th Group Army

Chinese Give Japanese a Lesson in the Fine Art of Combat Near Ankang!

Ground combat at 81,40 (near Ankang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 41352 troops, 951 guns, 868 vehicles, Assault Value = 1055

Defending force 76646 troops, 431 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2780

Japanese adjusted assault: 370

Allied adjusted defense: 3940

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 10

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2384 casualties reported

Squads: 6 destroyed, 179 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 114 disabled
Engineers: 134 destroyed, 37 disabled
Guns lost 15 (7 destroyed, 8 disabled)
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1197 casualties reported

Squads: 10 destroyed, 110 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 16 disabled
Guns lost 11 (2 destroyed, 9 disabled)

Assaulting units:
28th Engineer Regiment
1st Engineer Regiment
23rd Division
12th Division
27th Electric Engineer Regiment
26th Engineer Regiment
4th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
22nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
9th Ind. Engineer Regiment
46th Const Co
49th Const Co
11th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
7th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
45th Const Co
26th Field Artillery Regiment
48th Road Const Co
12th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
47th Road Const Co
7th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
45th Road Const Co
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
Botanko Hvy Gun Regiment
4th RF Gun Battalion
5th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
20th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
4th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd RF Gun Battalion
12th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
1st Field Artillery Regiment
13th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
9th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
6th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
7th RF Gun Battalion
1st Ind. Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
46th Road Const Co
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
6th RF Gun Battalion
Tonei Hvy Gun Regiment
11th Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
32nd Chinese Corps
99th Chinese Corps
60th Chinese Corps
45th Chinese Corps
55th Chinese Corps
75th Chinese Corps
2nd Chinese Corps
4th Chinese Corps
50th Chinese Corps
100th Chinese Corps
23rd Group Army
26th Group Army

Chinese "Just Say No" to Japanese Near Paotow!

Ground combat at 91,33 (near Paotow)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3388 troops, 44 guns, 100 vehicles, Assault Value = 113

Defending force 2065 troops, 26 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 47

Japanese adjusted assault: 64

Allied adjusted defense: 39

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-), supply(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
29 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
177 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
1st Cavalry Brigade
4th Cavalry Brigade
3rd Ching An Tui Brigade

Defending units:
81st Chinese Corps

Allies Perform Miracle at Batavia!

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 24117 troops, 329 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 655

Defending force 11486 troops, 170 guns, 77 vehicles, Assault Value = 190

Japanese adjusted assault: 354

Allied adjusted defense: 181

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
678 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 44 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
850 casualties reported

Squads: 27 destroyed, 77 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 20 (2 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Assaulting units:
21st/A Division
15th Naval Guard Unit
14th Guards Regiment
55th Infantry Regiment
16th Naval Guard Unit
21st/B Division
15th Guards Regiment
21st/C Division
93rd JAAF AF Bn
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
15th JAAF AF Bn
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
29th JAAF AF Coy

Defending units:
1st KNIL Regiment
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
Roodenburg Battalion
Merak Base Force
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
ML-KNIL
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
Batavia Base Force

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 323
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/25/2015 6:57:25 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
I do not know your opponent's experience level or aggressiveness, so it is hard to judge what the lack of action in Burma means.
With experienced players it normally means they are gathering troops to attack Australia, the Aleutians, or deep into SoPac.
So you have a risk of being blind-sided in another theatre and an opportunity to first develop solid bases in Burma and then push into Indo-China.

One of the keys to decision making is accounting for all the Japanese Divisions. Search this forum (AARs) and the War Room forum to find the lists people have made of the IJA divisions. Then go back over your Sigint and bombing data to see which ones are where. If a bunch are missing, keep a good reserve of troops available to react when they show up.

Also keep in mind the IJN still controls the seas so transferring troops to places like Australia and SoPac must be well covered.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 324
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/27/2015 12:12:15 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 13, 1942


The Wolff (El Lobo) Captures Port Blair:

Ground combat at Port Blair (46,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 11559 troops, 93 guns, 36 vehicles, Assault Value = 409

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 391

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 391 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Port Blair !!!

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 3 destroyed

Combat modifiers
Attacker:

Assaulting units:
Imperial Guards Division

Japanese Forces Hammer Chinese Near Ichang:

Ground combat at 83,46 (near Ichang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27507 troops, 242 guns, 42 vehicles, Assault Value = 793

Defending force 4738 troops, 41 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 37

Japanese adjusted assault: 762

Allied adjusted defense: 43

Japanese assault odds: 17 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
58 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1991 casualties reported

Squads: 34 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 143 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 10 (7 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Units retreated 4

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
61st Infantry Brigade
116th Division
32nd Division

Defending units:
41st Chinese Corps
92nd Chinese Corps
48th Chinese Corps
3rd Group Army
4th Construction Regiment

Japanese Put the Run on Chinese Near Paotow:

Ground combat at 91,33 (near Paotow)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3368 troops, 44 guns, 100 vehicles, Assault Value = 110

Defending force 1933 troops, 26 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 32

Japanese adjusted assault: 57

Allied adjusted defense: 23

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
31 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
458 casualties reported

Squads: 30 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 11 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
1st Cavalry Brigade
4th Cavalry Brigade
3rd Ching An Tui Brigade

Defending units:
81st Chinese Corps

Chinese Pack Mud into Japanese Tank Barrels at Lanchow!

Ground combat at Lanchow (81,34)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 173 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 388

Defending force 23708 troops, 86 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 710

Assault collapses, survivors seek cover

Japanese ground losses:
129 casualties reported

Squads: 16 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
12th Tank Regiment
10th Tank Regiment
8th Recon Regiment
5th Armored Car Co
15th Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
1st Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
303rd Brigade
34th Separate Brigade
9th Separate Brigade
259th Brigade
27th Chinese Corps
82nd Chinese Corps
8th War Area
8th Chinese Base Force
19th Chinese Base Force
21st Chinese Base Force

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 325
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/27/2015 12:26:11 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I do not know your opponent's experience level or aggressiveness, so it is hard to judge what the lack of action in Burma means.
With experienced players it normally means they are gathering troops to attack Australia, the Aleutians, or deep into SoPac.
So you have a risk of being blind-sided in another theatre and an opportunity to first develop solid bases in Burma and then push into Indo-China.

One of the keys to decision making is accounting for all the Japanese Divisions. Search this forum (AARs) and the War Room forum to find the lists people have made of the IJA divisions. Then go back over your Sigint and bombing data to see which ones are where. If a bunch are missing, keep a good reserve of troops available to react when they show up.

Also keep in mind the IJN still controls the seas so transferring troops to places like Australia and SoPac must be well covered.



BBfanboy-

I have kept a list as to where Japanese ground forces were last seen. I am fully aware that the Japanese carriers, for now, command the water.

It is difficult to predict what El Lobo has in mind. On the one hand, I can envision him not expanding too far; conserving his fuel, supply, and fighting machine. On the other hand, El Lobo is definitely a methodical and calculated risk-taker and he could strike anywhere he thinks he might get a good bang for his buck!

Now then, on the one hand, it would be nice to move into and give that Rising Sun a good battle in Burma or on Ceylon. If he stuffed India with considerable Japanese forces, he could no doubt strangle Burma. And, if he landed on Ceylon with sufficient power, he could decimate any troops I put on Ceylon. On the other hand, staying put in India for now and playing "Rope a Dope" could prove to be fruitful. IF El Lobo over-extended himself in India, he could get himself into big trouble in India.

For now, considering that I haven't a clue where the KB is and haven't a clue where El Lobo's next big target might be, if any, "Rope a Dope" will remain in effect.

Thank you for your comment and warnings, BBfanboy.

Best Regards,

-Terry



_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 326
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/27/2015 4:42:51 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
India Aircraft

Question and Advice for

The War College


Gentlemen-

I want to prepare to be in the best shape possible to destroy Japanese airbases. Accordingly, I want to train India Bomber aircraft to bomb Japanese airfields and I want to train the Fighter aircraft to escort the Bombers.

Please advise as to the best settings to accomplish the above stated goal for the following types of India based aircraft:

Bombers

Bleinheim I (MLB)
Bleinheim IV (MLB)
Hudson I (MLB)
Hudson IIIa (MLB)

Wirraway (LLB)
Audax I (LLB)
Lysander II (LLB)
Wapiti IIa (LLB)

Fighters

Hurricane I Trop
Hurricane IIa Trop
Hurricane IIB Trop
H81-A3
Buffalo I
Bleinheim IF
Mohawk IV

Upon arrival of the II U.S. Fighter Squadrons and V U.S. Bomber Squadrons, I will request settings for those air groups too for Japanese airfield destruction purposes.

Best Regrads,

-Terry


_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 327
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/27/2015 7:27:01 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
I take it your question is about training, not operations, so that is what I will comment on.

All training should be taken at range 0 to reduce fatigue. Setting a longer range does not improve training in any way.
For bombers, you must decide what they will be most needed for - land bombing, naval attack or ASW, or Recon.

In my experience land bombing is the majority of the work, so set most bomber squadrons training in Airfield Attack or Ground Attack, altitude 2000 feet. The low altitude still trains GroundB skill, and it also gives a good rate of training in Defensive skill.

The Lysanders carry a camera so many players train them in Recon. Altitude can be as low as 100 feet - I use 1000 feet.

Torpedo bombers should train at 1000' or 100' with torpedoes for NavT or with bombs for Low Naval.

Hudson IIIs have good range and can be used for Naval Search or ASW, if you do not need them for land bombing. Use 1000' or 100' during training.

Unless the enemy has a sitting duck group in the open, with no CAP and no AA, the light bombers should only be used for training (other than Lysander Recons).

Blenheims seem best at bombing land targets.


All fighters should train escort or sweep to gain Air skill. Use 1000 feet during training. Altitude does not seem to affect the training gains except for Defensive skill. Once Air skill is in the 70s you can consider training them in Ground Attack at 1000 feet (if they can carry a bomb or two) or Strafe at 100 feet.

I leave it to more experienced players to advise on the operational altitudes. My own experience is that it varies depending on what the enemy has for CAP and AA, what the weather is and how badly I want to hit the target (take heavier losses to ensure target is hit).

You must also temper the desire to hit as hard as possible with the ability to replace aircraft and pilots.




_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 328
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/28/2015 12:36:09 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Combat Report

for

March 14, 1942


Nothing unexpected, but still a bad day for the Allies.

Japanese Capture Clark Field, Batavia, and Semarang:

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 37035 troops, 454 guns, 352 vehicles, Assault Value = 1313

Defending force 19762 troops, 232 guns, 455 vehicles, Assault Value = 99

Japanese adjusted assault: 664

Allied adjusted defense: 220

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Clark Field !!!

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
O-47A: 4 destroyed
B-17D Fortress: 7 destroyed
P-40B Warhawk: 8 destroyed
P-35A: 7 destroyed


Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
586 casualties reported

Squads: 1 destroyed, 40 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Guns lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Vehicles lost 3 (2 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
7467 casualties reported

Squads: 432 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 858 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 82 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 119 (119 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 389 (388 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Units retreated 22
Units destroyed 2

Assaulting units:
16th Engineer Regiment
2nd Engineer Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
56th Recon Regiment
3rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
I./4th Infantry Battalion
9th Infantry Regiment
20th Infantry Regiment
65th Naval Guard Unit
5th Amphibious Brigade
113th Infantry Regiment
16th Recon Regiment
21st Ind. Engineer Regiment
64th Naval Guard Unit
II./4th Infantry Battalion
65th Brigade
63rd Naval Guard Unit
148th Infantry Regiment
2nd Recon Regiment
56th Engineer Regiment
62nd Nav Gd /1
56th Const Co
9th Field AF Construction Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
48th Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Engineer Construction Battalion
56th Field Artillery Regiment
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
1st PA Constabulary Regiment
192nd Tank Battalion
11th PA Infantry Division
57th PS Infantry Regimental Combat Team
71st PA Infantry Division
91st PA Infantry Division
31st Infantry Regiment
21st PA Infantry Division
1st PA Infantry Division
2nd PA Constabulary Regiment
Subic Bay Defenses
14th PS Engineer Regiment
I Philippine Corps
26th PS Cavalry Regiment
Manila USAAF Base Force
Far East USAAF
Asiatic Fleet
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
Cavite USN Base Force
194th Tank Battalion
3rd/45th PS Inf Battalion
1st USMC AA Battalion
Clark Field USAAF Base Force
301st Construction Battalion

And

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 26232 troops, 363 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 665

Defending force 10387 troops, 164 guns, 76 vehicles, Assault Value = 124

Japanese adjusted assault: 481

Allied adjusted defense: 119

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Batavia !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
343 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 21 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled

Allied ground losses:
10175 casualties reported

Squads: 382 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1143 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 50 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 193 (193 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 71 (71 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 12

Assaulting units:
21st/B Division
15th Guards Regiment
16th Naval Guard Unit
14th Guards Regiment
55th Infantry Regiment
III/81st Naval Guard Unit
21st/A Division
15th Naval Guard Unit
21st/C Division
15th JAAF AF Bn
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
93rd JAAF AF Bn
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
29th JAAF AF Coy

Defending units:
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
1st KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Merak Base Force
ML-KNIL
1 ML-KNIL Aviation
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Batavia Base Force

And

Ground combat at Semarang (53,102)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 12456 troops, 115 guns, 31 vehicles, Assault Value = 429

Defending force 415 troops, 4 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 210

Allied adjusted defense: 3

Japanese assault odds: 70 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Semarang !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-)

Allied ground losses:
184 casualties reported

Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 8 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 5 (5 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
33rd Division

Defending units:
Semarang Base Force

Allied Aircraft Finally Hit a Japanese Transport Near Kalidjati!

Morning Air attack on TF, near Kalidjati at 52,99

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 4 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 1 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 11

Allied aircraft
CW-22 Falcon x 8

No Japanese losses

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
xAK Nippo Maru, Bomb hits 1


Aircraft Attacking:
8 x CW-22 Falcon bombing from 15000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 50 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
260th Sentai with Ki-43-Ib Oscar (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
11 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 49 minutes

Now that Japanese Ground Forces are Freed up From Clark Field and Batavia, the question is: where will El Lobo launch his next major invasion? I am hoping it is India.

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 329
RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) - 9/28/2015 12:38:10 AM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I take it your question is about training, not operations, so that is what I will comment on.

All training should be taken at range 0 to reduce fatigue. Setting a longer range does not improve training in any way.
For bombers, you must decide what they will be most needed for - land bombing, naval attack or ASW, or Recon.

In my experience land bombing is the majority of the work, so set most bomber squadrons training in Airfield Attack or Ground Attack, altitude 2000 feet. The low altitude still trains GroundB skill, and it also gives a good rate of training in Defensive skill.

The Lysanders carry a camera so many players train them in Recon. Altitude can be as low as 100 feet - I use 1000 feet.

Torpedo bombers should train at 1000' or 100' with torpedoes for NavT or with bombs for Low Naval.

Hudson IIIs have good range and can be used for Naval Search or ASW, if you do not need them for land bombing. Use 1000' or 100' during training.

Unless the enemy has a sitting duck group in the open, with no CAP and no AA, the light bombers should only be used for training (other than Lysander Recons).

Blenheims seem best at bombing land targets.


All fighters should train escort or sweep to gain Air skill. Use 1000 feet during training. Altitude does not seem to affect the training gains except for Defensive skill. Once Air skill is in the 70s you can consider training them in Ground Attack at 1000 feet (if they can carry a bomb or two) or Strafe at 100 feet.

I leave it to more experienced players to advise on the operational altitudes. My own experience is that it varies depending on what the enemy has for CAP and AA, what the weather is and how badly I want to hit the target (take heavier losses to ensure target is hit).

You must also temper the desire to hit as hard as possible with the ability to replace aircraft and pilots.






BBfanboy-

Your assumption is correct; I was asking about settings for training purposes.

Thank you for all the good information. I will implement the same on March 15, 1942!

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 330
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: THE WAR COLLEGE-Rio Bravo (A) v. El Lobo (J) Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.328