Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  77 78 [79] 80 81   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/6/2015 3:55:56 PM   
Skjold

 

Posts: 240
Joined: 9/29/2015
Status: offline 		No clue how i managed to double post.

< Message edited by Skjold -- 10/6/2015 6:24:36 PM >

(in reply to Skjold)
Post #: 2341
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/6/2015 4:42:00 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		[NOT ENOUGH INFO]

can you add DF-26 ASBM variant? Maybe added as hypothetical for now?

http://www.janes.com/article/53994/df-26-irbm-may-have-asm-variant-china-reveals-at-3-september-parade

< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 1:35:54 PM >

(in reply to Skjold)
Post #: 2342
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/6/2015 7:59:28 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		[NOT ENOUGH INFO]

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

can you add DF-26 ASBM variant? Maybe added as hypothetical for now?

http://www.janes.com/article/53994/df-26-irbm-may-have-asm-variant-china-reveals-at-3-september-parade


DF-26 is an ASBM first and foremost. Precision guided conventional strike is merely a nice byproduct of a MARV that has to be capable of terminal guidance and evasive maneuvering.

An interesting hypothetical weapon to include would rather be the Wu-14 Hypersonic Glide Vehicle, also designated as DF-ZF, which is still in the testing phase.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WU-14

The 4th and 5th test confirmed that it had the capability to perform 'extreme menuvers' and 'evasive actions' - presumable during its mid-course cruise (4th test) and terminal reentry phase (5th test) as well.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/china-conducts-fourth-test-of-wu-14-strike-vehicle/
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/china-conducts-fifth-test-of-hypersonic-glide-vehicle/

Compared to the traditional ballistic missile with MARV which is only maneuverable during its terminal reentry phase, where the RV has seperated from the 'bus' that was carrying it into orbit, but still maintained a predictable and vulnerable ballistic trajectory during mid-course phase, the Wu-14/DF-ZF HGV seperates from its carrier missile as soon as leaving the boost-stage to glide on a flat, non-ballistic trajectory for its entire mid-course phase. The HGV would perform pull-up and other evasive maneuvers on its glide-phase, designed to make it less predictable and less susceptible to mid-course ABM systems. The mid-course cruise also would happen at an altitude-gap between the minimum engagement altitude of a mid-course ABM (such as SM-3) and above the maximum engagement altitude of a long range SAM system (such as SM-6). During the terminal descent, the Wu-14 would again pull off evasive maneuvering to defeat terminal-phase ABM systems (THAAD).

The US will respond to this development with the deployment of extended-range THAAD-ER, which covers the altitude-gap between SM-6/PAC-3 and SM-3 that the Wu-14 HGV will exploit. But this is merely a stop-gap, by their own words, until directed energy weapons and railguns would provide a more reliable means to defend against the Wu-14:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_High_Altitude_Area_Defense

quote:

THAAD-ER[edit]
Lockheed is pushing for funding for the development of an ER version of the THAAD to counter maturing threats posed by hypersonic glide vehicles adversaries may employ, namely the Chinese WU-14, to penetrate the gap between low and high-altitude missile defenses. The company performed static fire trials of a prototype modified THAAD second booster in 2006 and continued to self-fund the project until 2008. The current 14.5 in (37 cm)-diameter single-stage booster design would be expanded to a 21 in (53 cm) first stage for greater range with a second "kick stage" to close the distance to the target and provide improved velocity at burnout and more lateral movement during an engagement. Although the kill vehicle would not need a redesign, the ground-based launcher would have to be modified with a decreased interceptor capacity from eight to five. Currently, THAAD-ER is an industry concept and not a program of record, but Lockheed believes the Missile Defense Agency will show interest because of the threats under development by potential adversaries.[18] If funding for the THAAD-ER began in 2018, a fielded product could be produced in 2022. Although the system could provide some capability against a rudimentary hypersonic threat, the Pentagon is researching other technologies like directed energy weapons and railguns to be optimal solutions. Therefore, the THAAD-ER would be an interim measure to counter the emerging threat until laser and railgun systems capable of performing missile defense come online, expected in the mid to late-2020s.[19]


< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 1:36:07 PM >

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 2343
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/7/2015 9:20:16 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Or easier way -- add surface ships as targetable subjects for DF-26, no need to separate two variants since it is still not yet confirmed whether it is defined by different warhead, or having multi-purpose capability.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 10/7/2015 10:21:03 AM >

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2344
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/7/2015 1:10:36 PM   
Stratos_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 84
Joined: 7/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Stratos


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEVELOPER'S NOTE: Database development slow-down!

Hey guys,

Just wanted to let you know that I have now re-directed my limited Command time (which is squeezed inbetween family life, day-job, workout, and various other interests) to write code. My code contributions have been rather limited lately and I need to add several new features and fix a few bugs before I can start working on the Advanced Strike Planner.

This means I will only fix reported errors/inaccuracies in existing platforms and only make critical additions, i.e. units needed for a scenario currently under construction. Nice-to-have stuff (that no-one will ever use in a scenario anyway haha) will not be added.

If there is anything you consider extremely important (...enough to justify spending time on adding / fixing, rather than having me working on code) then feel feee to post. If not then you'll find me burried deep down in the Command game engine.

Thanks!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Well I'm working on a scenario for Uruguay, is my first one so don't know how much will took to complete it.

(in reply to Stratos_MatrixForum)
Post #: 2345
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/7/2015 5:12:37 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline 		[UPDATED DB v441]

3M-14 Kalibr for Gepard class and Buyan Mod class

https://www.rt.com/news/317864-russian-warships-missiles-launch/

< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 1:42:14 PM >

(in reply to Stratos_MatrixForum)
Post #: 2346
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/7/2015 6:20:43 PM   
Rongor

 

Posts: 451
Joined: 3/25/2014
Status: offline 		[UPDATED DB v441]

To bring some additional light into the Klub/Kalibr CM issue:
There is the 3M-54 family, these are anti-ship-missiles.
The 3M-14 family is the dedicated land targeting version.
Exact performance data is impossible to find, these are highly classified.

Since today, the 3M-14 is reported to have a range of 2600 km. This affects the russian ship classes Pr.21631 (Buyan-M corvettes) and Pr. 11661 ("Gepard-class") Dagestan guard ship, which all need a VLS housing 8 canisters of that long range 3M-14.

Btw, the Bulava SLBM is not a 3M-14 as some western websites confusingly tell, the Bulava is a 3M-30.
Also notice that not all of the 3M-14 / 3M-54 versions have a NATO designation (yet). This also adds to confusion.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 1:42:35 PM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 2347
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/7/2015 7:34:44 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline 		[UPDATED DB v441]

quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

3M-14 Kalibr for Gepard class and Buyan Mod class

https://www.rt.com/news/317864-russian-warships-missiles-launch/

The missile is already in the DB. You can add them to the ships yourself using the editor.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rongor

Since today, the 3M-14 is reported to have a range of 2600 km. This affects the russian ship classes Pr.21631 (Buyan-M corvettes) and Pr. 11661 ("Gepard-class") Dagestan guard ship, which all need a VLS housing 8 canisters of that long range 3M-14.

+1

An eight-shot missile record of the 3M14 Kalibr should be added to the UKSK launcher of both platforms! Not now of course but when you guys get back to database stuff.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 1:42:51 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Rongor)
Post #: 2348
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/8/2015 11:30:30 AM   
Rongor

 

Posts: 451
Joined: 3/25/2014
Status: offline 		[UPDATED DB v441]

[NOTE! SS-N-25 FIT SEEMS CORRECT ON ORIGINAL PLATFORM. ARE YOU USING DB v440?]

I wanna add that adding the current 3M14 by using the editor will not generate the weapon we learned of yesterday. You can put the 3M14 (which are named "Klub" in the db, despite being "Kalibr") into the SS-N-27 VLS mount. You will have to select the single 3M14 mounts. If you select the bunch of 12, they will have a ROF of 120 seconds and as we witnessed yesterday the ROF was one every 4 seconds or so.

To give a overview:
GRAU NAME NATO NOTES
3M55 Oniks SS-N-26 Strobile Anti-ship
3M54 Klub SS-N-27 Sizzler Anti-ship
3M14 Kalibr SS-N-30 Land attack, export versions may also be named Klub
if there is a desire to break it down even further:
Klub-S sub launched Klub
Klub-N ship launched Klub
Klub-A air launched Klub

The VLS weapon mount should be named "UKSK" and be able to host the 3M54, the 3M14 and Indian Brahmos, which is based on the 3M55. In the current DB, the Brahmos has already a dedicated VLS.
The UKSK should be available as 8, 4 and 2 canister version.



Regarding the affected ship classes:
ID439, Pr.11661K doesn't have those 2 x SS-N-25 Switchblade quadruple mounts. These are only aboard the exported Vietnamese Pr.11661E (ID2567) and the historical Pr.11660 (out of service 1993, not in the DB)
Instead there should be 2 UKSK VLS quad mounts.
ID2410, Pr. 21631, currently has a SS-N-27 VLS. Should be changed to a "UKSK" hosting 8 long ranged 3M14.

Summary:
Both the "UKSK" and the long ranged 3M14 aren't currently in the DB. The UKSK can be simulated by the "SS-N-27 VLS", only a workaround for the 2600 km ranged 3M14 is missing.
Ship ID439 needs correction addressing the SS-N-25 mounts, which need to be replaced by a UKSK VLS.
Ship ID2410 should get a "UKSK" mount instead of the current "SS-N-27 VLS". This UKSK should host the SS-N-30, 3M14.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 1:55:10 PM >

(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 2349
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/8/2015 5:42:43 PM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline 		[UPDATED DB v441]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rongor

2600 km ranged 3M14


Only nuclear 3M14 have range 2600 km
range of conventional 3M14 is 1400-1500 km (depending on source)
as for UKSK , well:

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3722877

also about affected ship classes, it is not only projects 1166K("Dagestan")and 21631 but also 11356 ,20385, 22350
modernized 11442M "Nakhimov" and modernized project 949AM submarines (in other words all ships with UKSK)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 2:01:27 PM >

(in reply to Rongor)
Post #: 2350
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/9/2015 11:23:34 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		[NEED MORE INFO]

Su-30SM (in service 2014+) should be equipped with SS-N-26 Strobile/P-800 Oniks (Kh-61 variant) air-launched anti-ship missile (discovered a few minute ago perousing the Russia Wikipedia for updated data on missiles). Perhaps is only employed by the Russian Navy Su-30SM and not by the Russian Air Force.

As stated in the Russian Wikipedia, loadout as in the Su-30MKI, a maximum of three missiles (The Russian Wikipedia also says Indian Tu-142 are equipped with 6xBrahmos, but I doubt it very much:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/weapons/current/119-tupolev-tu142m.html ).

What you think about both issues, Triode?

Source:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Оникс_(%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0)


Quote
Су-30СМ — 35 в 2014 году. Аналогичны по количеству ракет Су-30МКИ
Su-30 cm-35 in the year 2014. The same number of missiles, the Su-30mki (automatic translator, it means "Su-35SM - 35 en el año 2014. Same number of missiles as in Su-30MKI" (three missiles)).
Quote
БраМос-А: на Су-30МКИ (до 3 ракет) и Ту-142 (до 6)
БПРК с ракетами «БраМос»
Brahmos-a: Su-30mki (up to 3 missiles), Tu-142 (up to 6)/missile "Brahmos".

< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 2:01:49 PM >

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 2351
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/9/2015 2:43:38 PM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline 		Well, about air lauched Brahmos/Oniks , this is my very theoretical thoughts,


Su-30MKI cant have loadouts with 3 Brahmos/Oniks , air launched variant have weight 2500 kg + some kind of heavy MBDZ (something like 300-400 kg)
http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/Yahont_MAKS-2003_20.jpg
http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/Yahont_MAKS-2003_23.jpg

"heavy" points on Su-30 wing can take only 1700kg so ,obviosly no Brahmos on wing pylons
only place where Brahmos theoreticaly can be placed is two centerline pylons and only if second pylon can also take 1700kg ( in loadouts schemes it is only something like 1000kg)
of course there is talks about Su-30MKI with "strenghten airframe" (based on Su-35S) but so far it is only words

So, for "baseline" Su-30MKI/Su-30SM Brahmos/Oniks is very theoretical thing

As for Tu-142 , this plane recive "Novella" upgrade and in this upgrade there possible integration of Kh-35U missile
of course Russian Navy can continue save money and dont give missile to Tu-142 at all
I never heard about plans of integration of Oniks missile on Tu-142



(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 2352
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/9/2015 6:50:39 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		Thanks Triode, more or less my same thoughts (I'm for some years "reading" Russian on this issues, but "cheating" with translator and later aiding the translator with the technical words, but obviously I'm not fluent in Russian). Go on with your interesting and valuable researchs!

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 2353
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/9/2015 8:45:04 PM   
Schr75


Posts: 803
Joined: 7/18/2014
From: Denmark
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v441]

Loadout request.

This is low priority, but I would like to see the AGM-158C LRASM on the A-12 Avenger.

Søren



< Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 2:15:11 PM >

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 2354
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/10/2015 7:09:01 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks!

Have updated the SA-23 and given the central FCR 48 datalink channels (Grill Pan [9S32M]). However the system is still limited by the number of illuminators (one per TEL) and there must be an illuminator available to provide terminal guidance. If no illuminator is available when a missile requests one, the weapon will overshoot its target.

The SA-17 datalink is a per-TELAR datalink rather than a centralized system. As such, a SA-17 unit can fire all weapons simultaneously



quote:

ORIGINAL: seaman

Hello fellow. Checking the catalog of export of systems of Defense air of ROSOBORONEXPORT, I have observed some points to correct DB3000 database.
For example the number of simultaneous channels in systems:
-S-300VM. 12 channels according to BD3000. 24 according to ROSOBORONEXPORT.
-BUK-M2E. 4 channels according to BD3000. 6 according to ROSOBORONEXPORT.






http://www.mediafire.com/?0wobrnne62i8ic7

Best regards.



_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to trujillocorreo)
Post #: 2355
RE: ADMIRAL GRIGOROVICH [Pr.1135.6M] - 10/10/2015 7:10:11 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		So the database is correct, yes?

Thanks!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Triode


quote:

ORIGINAL: KLAB

Ref two current or soon (???) to be in service Russian surface vessels, there appear to be issues with the numbers and types of AAW systems, could the DB be amended please?

#2815 & #2305 SKR ADMIRAL GRIGOROVICH [Pr.1135.6M]

VLS for the 3S90M (SA-N-12 Grizzly)appears to be 36 cell not 24, (3 blocks of 12 close together in foredeck).


Regards
Karl




reality check :

0:09 , 0:12 12x2=24 "Shtil" VLS cells for "Grigorovich"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=9&v=PzLnKVXqE6I



_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 2356
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/10/2015 10:30:54 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Very interesting, but seems there is only 'a desire' to get them operational? Hmm dunno what to do here, really...


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis


150-kw laser loadout for the Predator C.

Please, please figure out how to get this into the next version of the database! Seriously...flying killer robots with lasers. What's not to love? :)

It looks like this one is designed to hit ground targets as well as surface naval targets. Maybe for an initial version, until more data is available, just use the COIL as a template but add ground targets to the list of possible targets?

http://www.defensereview.com/new-laser-weapons-coming-to-a-drone-near-you-general-atomics-predator-c-avenger-getting-150-kilowatt-laser-weapon-and-rheinmatall-developing-80-kilowatt-gatling-laser/

I'm not sure how the 80-kw gatling laser is meant to be used...is it for ground vehicles in the AAA role?

May I also suggest, for hypothetical platforms, the ACL-130X Thor (i.e., a C-130 armed with a couple of these lasers...it's got enough space onboard for the power system) and maybe even the MVL-22X Osprey Terminator (i.e., an Osprey with all its cargo space eliminated so it can carry the power system for one laser...just the thing for taking off from an amphibious warfare ship, flying in low and fast, and taking out a few terrorists)?

Thanks for considering these ideas.







quote:

to hit ground targets as well as surface naval targets.


_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 2357
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/10/2015 10:34:17 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		This seems to be a concept only, not an operational loadout

quote:

ORIGINAL: Excroat3

New loadout for MQ-9:

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/new-maritime-capability-developed-for-mq-9-417133/



_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 2358
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/10/2015 10:45:43 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		The modern types are already there, have assigned the old ones to Paul. Have made some minor mods here-and-there.

Thanks!


quote:

ORIGINAL: conforoa

Not recent French Strategic Missile in DB
For all (another in french )

MSBS M4A

MSBS M4B

MSBS M45

and the most recent MSBS M51




_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to conforoa)
Post #: 2359
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/10/2015 11:27:02 AM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Added, thanks!


quote:

ORIGINAL: Stratos

Ok, a couple of platforms for Uruguay.

First the Pilatus Pc-7. the Uruguayan Pilatus were received in 1992 for a total of 6 machines. Working in dual role for trainer/light attack they were usually armed with 2x7.62 MAG MG pods + 2 LAU rocket pods with 7 2'75" rockets each. Can carry drop tanks as well

[image][URL=http://s20.photobucket.com/user/Capitanstratos/media/Aviation/pc715rsx_zpsewrypcxd.jpg.html][/URL][/image]

The Ia-58 Pucarà, armed the same as they argentinian brothers with the usual mix of mg pods, rockets and bombs, received in late 1980. 6 in number.

[URL=http://s20.photobucket.com/user/Capitanstratos/media/Aviation/Cruzex_IV_2008_Natal_-_RN_-_Brasil_zpsurxhnppa.jpg.html][/URL]

And finally the Westland Wessex received during the 90's. Cannot found the exact number, but can be six AFAIK of HC.2 version for both the navy and air force users, there's one in action still in the navy.

[URL=http://s20.photobucket.com/user/Capitanstratos/media/Aviation/csar3_zps1yzcockl.png.html][/URL]



_____________________________



Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Stratos_MatrixForum)
Post #: 2360
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/10/2015 12:34:12 PM   
ComDev

 

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline 		Thanks for your input Skjold!

On the Visby Umkhonto, would it not be possible to use the same mount as is found on the Finnish ships? There is some platform editing capability already built into the game and you can add the mount yourself, no problem!

Tapper is already in there as '81 Tapper [Bevakningsbåt 2000 / Type 80] -- Sweden (Navy), 1993'.

Added all helicopters.

Do you know the in-service date for Hkp 3C?

Have assigned the ground stuff to Mike (BostonMyk).


quote:

ORIGINAL: Skjold

I am aware that little work is done on adding new things to the DB, but i think that the top two naval additions and the TOW capable helicopter would add alot to the Swedish scenarios (out of which i am building several for public release). This represents an alternative universe where our swedish goverment actually cares about the armed forces and put SAM's on the Visby class. I also added some less important additions, such as ground units. Apparantly i can't post links here becouse i am new, which is quite the problem so i can't provide proper source links.

Visby class corvette
I want to mount the cancelled 8x (1 cell) Umkhonto SAM's on the Visby (2013) class missile frigate as a hypothetical unit. The Umkhonto SAM system is already in-game on the 2009 version of the finnish Hamina PCFG and the 2009 version of the Hämeenmaa ML.

Sources & Justification

"Swedish Navy: The Swedish government has expressed interest in the Umkhonto-IR Block 2 system for five Visby class corvettes for at total cost of about 1 bn SEK. Due to budgetary constraints a decision was taken in 2008 to delete the SAM requirement." - Wikipedia

"8 × Umkhonto SAM(cancelled)" - Wikipedia

"The Visbys will not initially be fitted with an air-defence missile system. But space has been allocated for Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAM)." - Kockums Official PDF (Naval Yard)

"Forecast International reports external link that Sweden has decided to equip its 5 Visby Class stealth corvettes external link with Denel’s Umkhonto-IR external link anti-aircraft missile system at a total cost of about SEK 1 billion (currently about $149.6 million)." - Defence Industry Daily

Bevakningsbåt typ 80 (Tapper class patrol boat) 1993-present 12x
Length: 23 m
Width: 5,4 m
Draught: 1,8 m
Top Speed: 25 knots
Displacement: 62 tons
Crew: 8 men
Engine: 2 x Deutz MWM 1200 HP Diesel Engines.
Weaponry: 6x depth charges, 4x ASW Grenade launchers with 36 grenades total, 2x HMG 12.7mm.


Hkp 10 (Eurocopter AS332 Super Puma) 12x 1988-present
Almost exclusivly SAR duty.

Hkp 9A (MBB BO 105 CB-3) 20x 1987-
Armed with 4x TOW missiles, local designation Rb 55.

Hkp 3C (Bell 204B) 24x
15x Army (transport), 9x Air Force (SAR)

Hkp 6A (Bell 206A Jetranger)
22x Army (transport)

Hkp 6B (Bell 206A Jetranger)
10x Navy (ASW) Armed with 1x ASW Tp 451

Sources: Swedish Armed Forces official website & Soldf, a veteran community.

Ground Forces
On the backburner, i would also like to request these things: (Note, not very important at all due to the limited simulation of ground forces but thought i'd ask)

  • Add the Swedish Armored Plt Centurion from the Cold War DB to DB300. (Used until mid 1990s activly, also their designation should be Strv 104 judging by it having rangefinder.)
  • Add Bkan 1C self propelled artillery piece. 155 mm. (1980s-2003)
  • Add Strv 103C tank, 105 mm with laser rangefinder and 3x GMG. (1980s-1997)
  • Add Pbv 302 Mech Inf Plt, 4x Pbv 302 with 1x Hispano 20mm, (1966 to 1990s, would fit CW DB aswell.)

    Note: The Swedish CV90 Mech Inf Plt seems to be the only one in the game with infantry weapons somewhat modelled, seems weird.

    This would essentially complete Sweden as a faction entirly, and would make me a very happy bunny.
    Thanks for reading.



    • < Message edited by emsoy -- 10/10/2015 1:34:43 PM >

    _____________________________



    Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

    (in reply to Skjold)
    Post #: 2361
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/10/2015 11:08:35 PM   
    Vici Supreme

     

    Posts: 558
    Joined: 12/4/2013
    From: Southern Germany
    Status: offline     		[UPDATED DB v441]

    Minor request for both Chinese HQ-9 platforms.

    Always wondered why the Chinese HQ-9 SAM battalion (DBID #1276) hasn't any reloads. For example, the Russian S-300PM battalion with 8 TELs (DBID #1488) has a magazine with enough missiles to reload all launchers. I found this HQ-9 factsheet a while ago which states that a HQ-9/FD-2000 battalion has 64 missiles in container (of which 32 are already loaded onto the TAS-5380 8x8 TELs). That being said, the remaining 32 missiles should be included in a magazine, representing the battalion's missile transporters. Maybe also add a limited number of reloads to the other, 2 launcher HQ-9 battalion in the DB.



    Thanks!

    Attachment (1)

    < Message edited by emsoy -- 10/11/2015 8:42:41 AM >

    _____________________________


    (in reply to ComDev)
    Post #: 2362
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 3:56:01 AM   
    DESRON420

     

    Posts: 57
    Joined: 9/30/2015
    Status: offline     		I've been testing LRASM #2786 against the JSM #2885 and finding that the radar component of the multimode seeker on the LRASM causes LRASMs to be detected significantly earlier than JSMs by ESM-equipped units, 8-9 nm vs 5 nm. Is there a way to command LRASMs (and SDB-II, and other multimode seeker-equipped weapons) to employ only passive sensors on launch?

    < Message edited by DESRON420 -- 10/11/2015 4:56:32 AM >

    (in reply to Vici Supreme)
    Post #: 2363
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 7:38:20 AM   
    ComDev

     

    Posts: 5735
    Joined: 5/12/2006
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: DESRON420

    I've been testing LRASM #2786 against the JSM #2885 and finding that the radar component of the multimode seeker on the LRASM causes LRASMs to be detected significantly earlier than JSMs by ESM-equipped units, 8-9 nm vs 5 nm. Is there a way to command LRASMs (and SDB-II, and other multimode seeker-equipped weapons) to employ only passive sensors on launch?


    Not yet, this is a great feature request though

    The actual fix will have to wait for the advanced strike planner and weapon route planner.

    _____________________________



    Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

    (in reply to DESRON420)
    Post #: 2364
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 7:42:10 AM   
    ComDev

     

    Posts: 5735
    Joined: 5/12/2006
    Status: offline     		Added, thanks!

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Supreme 2.0

    Minor request for both Chinese HQ-9 platforms.

    Always wondered why the Chinese HQ-9 SAM battalion (DBID #1276) hasn't any reloads. For example, the Russian S-300PM battalion with 8 TELs (DBID #1488) has a magazine with enough missiles to reload all launchers. I found this HQ-9 factsheet a while ago which states that a HQ-9/FD-2000 battalion has 64 missiles in container (of which 32 are already loaded onto the TAS-5380 8x8 TELs). That being said, the remaining 32 missiles should be included in a magazine, representing the battalion's missile transporters. Maybe also add a limited number of reloads to the other, 2 launcher HQ-9 battalion in the DB.



    _____________________________



    Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

    (in reply to Vici Supreme)
    Post #: 2365
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 9:29:50 AM   
    Skjold

     

    Posts: 240
    Joined: 9/29/2015
    Status: offline
    quote:


    Do you know the in-service date for Hkp 3C?


    Hey, thanks for the reply. Thats awesome! Yeah i will use the existing cell, thanks for the tip.

    I actually had service dates of all helicopters but the forum thought i was spamming phone numbers so i couldnt finish them.

    Hkp 9A = 1987 to 1999 (technically 2009, but not a single missile has been fired since 1999)

    Hkp 3C = 1963 to 2000, can't find precise date of upgrade to C version as these service dates also include the A and B.

    Hkp 6A = 1968 to 2004

    Hkp 6B = 1970 to 2002

    (in reply to ComDev)
    Post #: 2366
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 11:05:26 AM   
    ComDev

     

    Posts: 5735
    Joined: 5/12/2006
    Status: offline     		Thanks, updated!

    Although the Hkp 3B and Hkp 3C may not have been available before 1970?

    _____________________________



    Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

    (in reply to Skjold)
    Post #: 2367
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 11:14:40 AM   
    DeSade

     

    Posts: 156
    Joined: 3/1/2004
    Status: offline     		[FIXED DB v441]

    #1198 - RIM-161B SM-3 NTW Blk IA -- 2007 and similiar have target max speed property 8000 nm, resulting in no speed penalty modifiers against ballistic missiles. While its not bug per se, combined with lack of other modifiers it gives unrealistically high PK (95%) against that kind of targets. It should be more like 80-85% according to test results.

    < Message edited by emsoy -- 10/11/2015 9:19:53 PM >

    (in reply to ComDev)
    Post #: 2368
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 11:20:28 AM   
    Skjold

     

    Posts: 240
    Joined: 9/29/2015
    Status: offline     		[UPDATED DB v441]

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: emsoy

    Thanks, updated!

    Although the Hkp 3B and Hkp 3C may not have been available before 1970?


    Yeah, not sure. I found solid information that the A came into service 1962 (not 63, typo) and the B's 1965. (Source: Swedish Air Force Museum).
    A dodgy source also claims 1969 as the entry to service for the C.

    The information i can get is that Hkb 3B has a upgraded engine (Rolls Royce Gnome H 1200 Mk 610) and that Hkp 3C has longer main rotor blades and longer tail. That might help in regards to the year.

    < Message edited by emsoy -- 10/11/2015 9:20:22 PM >

    (in reply to ComDev)
    Post #: 2369
    RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/11/2015 5:54:58 PM   
    orca

     

    Posts: 501
    Joined: 11/6/2013
    Status: offline     		Would the loadout for the E/A18 growler with the NGJ also include 2 AMRAAMs similar to current growler loadout?


    < Message edited by orca -- 10/11/2015 7:23:53 PM >

    (in reply to SASR)
    Post #: 2370
    Page:   <<   < prev  77 78 [79] 80 81   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  77 78 [79] 80 81   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts


    Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

    3.969