cf_dallas
Posts: 303
Joined: 4/13/2006 From: Grapevine, TX Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel Technically, it could be done fairly quickly, if necessity demanded it. That said, for a purely (or even rocket-assisted/base bleed) ballistic round for the AGS, it would obviously require a completely new shell that is 62 caliber in length, as opposed to the 155/45's used in most howitzers. I'd like to know what could be done to adapt the 155/62 LRAP with an IIR seeker for anti-ship warfare. That could be a real game-changer against many targets smaller than a DDG. It would be hard to shoot down a number of those rounds, and their warheads could do real damage to most vessels topside electronics and bridge. I suppose a 50 kilo rocket-assisted round going off in the guts of a ship would do some real damage as well. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "62" or "45" are barrel length, not shell length, right? That said, yeah, the shell design for the two is different. Adding an IIR sensor shouldn't be too difficult, but still has the same basic problem as all PGMs.... In a high intensity conflict, everyone runs out of precision ammo before they run out of targets. I was thinking more along the lines of "take out the electronics and gadgets, put in more stuff that goes bang." :-)
_____________________________
Formerly cwemyss
|