IvanShuski
Posts: 22
Joined: 4/9/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: chaos45 (...) Learned one thing i really dont like on the fronts is that when actived 2 of them still control garrison units that you cant get rid of so it take up their command space....one of them has like 10+ command points of junk i cant use attached to it so limits how many armies it can effectively control. Think when it converts to non-garrison the other units should drop to Stavka control or be transferrable since they will never leave garrison status by the turkish border. That's the North Caucasus and Transcaucaus fronts. For the North Caucasus Front, it loses 1 CP because of that pesky NKVD Border Guard garrisoned frozen at Novorossiysk, that should just disband like all other NKVD Border units do, but doesn't because it's permanently frozen. It's not a big loss, specially after Command Capacity for fronts increases at early 1942. If you can't cope with it, you can just use the scenario editor and either transfer control of that unit to the Transcaucasus Front, or set it to unfrozen late in 1941 so it disbands like all other NKVD Border Guards. Regarding the Transcaucasus Front, I just assume it's a frozen front like the Northern and Southern Urals Military Districts, and don't use it at all. After all, It's not like the Soviets have that many capable generals for Front-Level command, and I rather leave the Armies report directly to Stavka than put them under command of Budyonny, Kulik or Cherevichenko, who are only good to fail the roll and double the difficulty for the Stavka commander (usually Zhukov). (I have a soft spot for Voroshilov because of his excellent morale rating, though). By the time the Soviets promote enough capable leaders to Front-Level command, you have more than enough command capacity without the (now) Caucasus Front.
< Message edited by IvanShuski -- 11/2/2015 11:11:31 AM >
|