Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

MGK-520 Skat-BDRM evolution against various targets

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> MGK-520 Skat-BDRM evolution against various targets Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
MGK-520 Skat-BDRM evolution against various targets - 12/12/2015 8:49:53 PM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline
MGK-520 Skat-BDRM is sonar system from project 667BDRM subs ,last anlog GAK(gidro-accoustik complex) ,
MGK-540 as example first digital GAK for soviet/russian submarines

One of system in this GAK ,"Delta", made by JSC NPP "Soyuz"
"Delta" is analize information from Skat-BDRM and TASS Pelamida to find range,speed,dept and course of target
and achieve auto-tracking
and with 667BDRM dont have flank sonar array this is really hard job

So, from JSC NPP "Soyuz" with love



1990-1991 Trials of MGK-520 and "Delta-P"

vs project 671RTM sub

upper three pictures Norway Sea 1990-91 ,winter ,GAK in active mode
speed 5kts ,depth 80m , range to target 3,7nm autotracking achieved
lower three Greenland Sea GAK in active
speed 2,5-3kts, depth 144-152m ,range to target 5,4-8,2nm autotracking achieved

vs project 945 submarine ,Barents Sea GAK in passive mode

1) 13,9kts ,depth 160m , range to target 5,3nm autotracking achieved
2) 1,9kts ,depth 52m , range to target 0,7nm autotracking achieved

vs project 971 only detection without autotracking 23.10.2004

tracking channel off ,GAK passive, according to JSK NPP"Soyuz" pr.971 speed is near 5kts and range 1,6-2 nm

after that came upgraded MGK-520.6 with "Delta-PM1" vs " unknown, 7-bladed " submarines (who say LA-class?)in Barents Sea 2010


target speed 4,1-4,7 , range to target 2,4-4,9nm autotracking on


range to target 4,3nm autotracking on


and here is interesting thing ,initial detection of "7-bladed" in 0.33
autotracking by TASS Pelemida in 0.47 autotracking by bow sonar in 01.01
target speed 6,6kts, depth 48m range to target 3,1nm
also there is some surface target autotracked at 15,3nm


target speed 6,0kts ,depth 51m ,range 5,4nm autotracking on


Interesting things , it seems project 971 (more like so called Improved Akula, since this is Northern Fleet in 2004 )is quieter than "unknown intruders of Brents Sea" (LA-class? Improved LA? who know)

also in game model of MGK-520 vs LA-class submarines fit MGK-520.6 vs "unknown intruders of Brents Sea"

project 971 and 945 in examples from NPP "Soyuz" quieter than in game database

active hydrolocation by MGK-520 against 671RTM in game also more effective than in real life

generally speaking , if we disregad local conditions , it looks like high end Soviet/Russian submarines in
database (945,971 improved Akula) more noisy than in this MGK-520 testing

maybe it is just local conditions , but from other hand LosAngeleles-class vs MGK-520 in game almoust like
in this screenshots from NPP"Soyuz"

anyway what people think about this?




< Message edited by Triode -- 12/12/2015 9:51:20 PM >
Post #: 1
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> MGK-520 Skat-BDRM evolution against various targets Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.109