Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

First person shooters then and now

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> First person shooters then and now Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 6:40:54 AM   
Kuokkanen

 

Posts: 3545
Joined: 4/2/2004
Status: offline
This video raises a point about first person shooters that were and what they are now. I have to admit, he has a point. To sum it up: older FPS games were mazes with hidden secrets and locked doors; new games move on tracks. That apply for most of the (single player) FPS games, not for Operation Flashpoint, Armed Assault and Unreal Tournament.

I have played FPS games from each category. Doom, Duke Nukem 3D, and Shadow Warrior were fun games. And then came Call of Duty, Halo, and Doom 3. Difference is clear. Project IGI and Chrome are excellent games on their own rights: I liked sneaking around in the grass, climb up to lookout towers, and snipe stuff. Operation Flashpoint feels like real damn war with teammates and all. I hope everyone here knows it or Armed Assault at least by name. If not, go look up those on YouTube.

But what about games like Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Halo, and Doom 3? In first 2 Dooms there wasn't clear direction where to go. Player had to wander around and hit the fire button until he came across locked door, then had to go back to look for key cards. Doom 2 even has vast open spaces, part of a town with streets and buildings and the likes. Comes Doom 3, and it is mostly just corridors and small rooms. And there aren't many different ways to go. Enemies are tougher, point for that (I think). Same applies to Halo franchise, though corridors on it are wide and rooms are large. Both enough so to drive with a tank around them. Fun on its own right when done right. Newest Doom under work seems to be part on this, and I hope they get it right. Call of Duty (the first anyway) didn't get it right for me, but marketing department managed to make it sell.

What are your opinions about the matter?

_____________________________

You know what they say, don't you? About how us MechWarriors are the modern knights, how warfare has become civilized now that we have to abide by conventions and rules of war. Don't believe it.

MekWars
Post #: 1
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 7:50:32 AM   
aaatoysandmore

 

Posts: 2848
Joined: 9/11/2013
Status: offline
I haven't found a single FPS I liked then or now. The closest game I can stomach is Mount and Blade Warband and that isn't a shooter though it plays like one.

Are there any of them where "friendly fire" doesn't hurt you? That's a big reason I don't play them. especially online. Little kids think it's funny to go around shooting their own teammates. Maybe older people also with kids minds.

(in reply to Kuokkanen)
Post #: 2
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 10:39:13 AM   
chemkid

 

Posts: 1238
Joined: 12/15/2012
Status: offline
.

< Message edited by chemkid -- 4/24/2018 12:28:12 PM >

(in reply to aaatoysandmore)
Post #: 3
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 11:16:59 AM   
Trugrit


Posts: 947
Joined: 7/14/2014
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Matti Kuokkanen

I liked sneaking around in the grass, climb up to lookout towers, and snipe stuff. Operation Flashpoint feels like real damn war with teammates and all. I hope everyone here knows it or Armed Assault at least by name. If not, go look up those on YouTube.


I’ve dusted off my copy of the original “Far Cry” and have been playing it for several days
While my WITPAE opponent has been away.

The AI enemy mercenaries are the best I’ve ever seen in a FPS.

With a real good computer and graphics card the jungle at max is a near religious experience.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/far-cry-10th-anniversary-retrospective/1100-6420000/

I recommend the FCAM mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/app/13520/discussions/0/617320628148392846/






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Kuokkanen)
Post #: 4
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 11:44:50 AM   
demyansk


Posts: 2840
Joined: 2/20/2008
Status: offline
I play a lot of hours with fps games. I have them all and I must have logged hours on Battlefield 1, 2, and 4. The Hardcore servers on B4 require that you don't aim at your teammates. For the most part, most players use these games for the multiplayer perspective. The single player is at times a waste. However, it all depends on the developer.

Far Cry was great, excellent AI. I played a little of version 3.

I still love Battlefield 4 and Panzer Korps

(in reply to Trugrit)
Post #: 5
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 12:11:28 PM   
wings7


Posts: 4591
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trugrit

I’ve dusted off my copy of the original “Far Cry” and have been playing it for several days
While my WITPAE opponent has been away.

The AI enemy mercenaries are the best I’ve ever seen in a FPS.

With a real good computer and graphics card the jungle at max is a near religious experience.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/far-cry-10th-anniversary-retrospective/1100-6420000/

I recommend the FCAM mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/app/13520/discussions/0/617320628148392846/







Far Cry and the CryEngine really put FPS on the gaming map! 16 years later this game is still a blast to play and the AI is quite good!

Patrick


_____________________________

Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427

(in reply to Trugrit)
Post #: 6
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 12:26:20 PM   
jamus34

 

Posts: 103
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wings7


quote:

ORIGINAL: Trugrit

I’ve dusted off my copy of the original “Far Cry” and have been playing it for several days
While my WITPAE opponent has been away.

The AI enemy mercenaries are the best I’ve ever seen in a FPS.

With a real good computer and graphics card the jungle at max is a near religious experience.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/far-cry-10th-anniversary-retrospective/1100-6420000/

I recommend the FCAM mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/app/13520/discussions/0/617320628148392846/







Far Cry and the CryEngine really put FPS on the gaming map! 16 years later this game is still a blast to play and the AI is quite good!

Patrick


Agreed. One of the early sequences where you highjack a buggy to make a run for it and they have a PT boat sitting there shelling you was great.

I think the first FC is what got FPS gaming out of the rut back then. Unfortunately it lead to the downfall of one of my favorite genres (space shooters) Freespace 2 to this day is one of my top 5 games and #1 space shooter, even if the graphics are looking dated.

(in reply to wings7)
Post #: 7
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 12:54:43 PM   
wings7


Posts: 4591
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jamus34

I think the first FC is what got FPS gaming out of the rut back then. Unfortunately it lead to the downfall of one of my favorite genres (space shooters) Freespace 2 to this day is one of my top 5 games and #1 space shooter, even if the graphics are looking dated.


Freespace is a great game! There are still alot Space Shooters (and 4X) on Steam!

Patrick

_____________________________

Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427

(in reply to jamus34)
Post #: 8
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 1:06:28 PM   
invernomuto


Posts: 986
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Turin, Italy
Status: offline
The only FPS I tried recently are Arma3 and Red Orchestra 2 (+ Pacific Expansion). They're simulation of real war, with realistic ballistic and accurate wounds modelling (player has no "energy", usually is one shot one kill) and expecially for Red Orchestra 2, they're damned fun.




_____________________________


(in reply to wings7)
Post #: 9
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 1:21:38 PM   
chemkid

 

Posts: 1238
Joined: 12/15/2012
Status: offline
.

< Message edited by chemkid -- 4/24/2018 12:28:07 PM >

(in reply to invernomuto)
Post #: 10
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 1:25:01 PM   
wings7


Posts: 4591
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: invernomuto

The only FPS I tried recently are Arma3 and Red Orchestra 2 (+ Pacific Expansion). They're simulation of real war, with realistic ballistic and accurate wounds modelling (player has no "energy", usually is one shot one kill) and expecially for Red Orchestra 2, they're damned fun.





Indeed Davide, both of them are excellent! And with a long play life!

Patrick

_____________________________

Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427

(in reply to invernomuto)
Post #: 11
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 1:32:45 PM   
invernomuto


Posts: 986
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Turin, Italy
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chemkid


do ARMA and RO(2) count as FPS?! i mean S = Shooter?! ARMA is advertised as 'Infantry Simulator' and RO feels very much the same. IMHO, if these two count as FPS i'd like to say RO is great stuff but as far as video'games' go these are no 'games' anymore!



From a technical point of view they're not so "different" from Call of Duty, expecially Red Orchestra. You have a single player campaign and some multiplayer map with different objectives (depending on the mission) to acheive before the time stop (usually, half an hour).
The differences are in the "realism" setting that can be very frustrating at the beginning. Usually you learn the hard way how to spot enemies from building windows in Red Orchestra if there are enemy snipers nearby :)




< Message edited by invernomuto -- 1/17/2016 2:35:16 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to chemkid)
Post #: 12
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 1:35:54 PM   
Kuokkanen

 

Posts: 3545
Joined: 4/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chemkid


quote:

ORIGINAL: invernomuto

The only FPS I tried recently are Arma3 and Red Orchestra 2 (+ Pacific Expansion). They're simulation of real war, with realistic ballistic and accurate wounds modelling (player has no "energy", usually is one shot one kill) and expecially for Red Orchestra 2, they're damned fun.




do ARMA and RO(2) count as FPS?! i mean S = Shooter?! ARMA is advertised as 'Infantry Simulator' and RO feels very much the same. IMHO, if these two count as FPS i'd like to say RO is great stuff but as far as video'games' go these are no 'games' anymore!

Could same argument be said about WitP & sequels? What about flight sims like Microsoft Flight Simulator, Falcon 4, and IL-2 Sturmovik?

_____________________________

You know what they say, don't you? About how us MechWarriors are the modern knights, how warfare has become civilized now that we have to abide by conventions and rules of war. Don't believe it.

MekWars

(in reply to chemkid)
Post #: 13
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 1:40:26 PM   
wings7


Posts: 4591
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Matti Kuokkanen

quote:

ORIGINAL: chemkid


quote:

ORIGINAL: invernomuto

The only FPS I tried recently are Arma3 and Red Orchestra 2 (+ Pacific Expansion). They're simulation of real war, with realistic ballistic and accurate wounds modelling (player has no "energy", usually is one shot one kill) and expecially for Red Orchestra 2, they're damned fun.




do ARMA and RO(2) count as FPS?! i mean S = Shooter?! ARMA is advertised as 'Infantry Simulator' and RO feels very much the same. IMHO, if these two count as FPS i'd like to say RO is great stuff but as far as video'games' go these are no 'games' anymore!

Could same argument be said about WitP & sequels? What about flight sims like Microsoft Flight Simulator, Falcon 4, and IL-2 Sturmovik?


I think they all have FPS elements to them, some more than others...all terrific games!

_____________________________

Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427

(in reply to Kuokkanen)
Post #: 14
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 2:07:44 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Matti Kuokkanen

This video raises a point about first person shooters that were and what they are now. I have to admit, he has a point. To sum it up: older FPS games were mazes with hidden secrets and locked doors; new games move on tracks. That apply for most of the (single player) FPS games, not for Operation Flashpoint, Armed Assault and Unreal Tournament.

I have played FPS games from each category. Doom, Duke Nukem 3D, and Shadow Warrior were fun games. And then came Call of Duty, Halo, and Doom 3. Difference is clear. Project IGI and Chrome are excellent games on their own rights: I liked sneaking around in the grass, climb up to lookout towers, and snipe stuff. Operation Flashpoint feels like real damn war with teammates and all. I hope everyone here knows it or Armed Assault at least by name. If not, go look up those on YouTube.

But what about games like Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Halo, and Doom 3? In first 2 Dooms there wasn't clear direction where to go. Player had to wander around and hit the fire button until he came across locked door, then had to go back to look for key cards. Doom 2 even has vast open spaces, part of a town with streets and buildings and the likes. Comes Doom 3, and it is mostly just corridors and small rooms. And there aren't many different ways to go. Enemies are tougher, point for that (I think). Same applies to Halo franchise, though corridors on it are wide and rooms are large. Both enough so to drive with a tank around them. Fun on its own right when done right. Newest Doom under work seems to be part on this, and I hope they get it right. Call of Duty (the first anyway) didn't get it right for me, but marketing department managed to make it sell.

What are your opinions about the matter?


I guess saying we like FPS might be an anathema on these forums

The evolution of this genre is clear: from mazes to an "open", utter realistic world.

I played Wolfenstein, Doom and Doom 2 in the 90s. I loved them, especially Doom 2. Then in the 2000s a big surprise: the first Stalker! No mazes anymore, a "real", oneiric world with amazing graphics, sounds and atmosphere. And of course the hilarious Left 4 Dead

Now I plan to get me a proper gaming computer. I never paid attention to video cards, always had low or standard quality and you need High quality to play the most demanding FPS

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to Kuokkanen)
Post #: 15
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 2:26:28 PM   
bairdlander2


Posts: 2264
Joined: 3/28/2009
From: Toronto Ontario but living in Edmonton,Alberta
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: aaatoysandmore

I haven't found a single FPS I liked then or now.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to aaatoysandmore)
Post #: 16
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 2:44:47 PM   
wings7


Posts: 4591
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus


I guess saying we like FPS might be an anathema on these forums

The evolution of this genre is clear: from mazes to an "open", utter realistic world.

I played Wolfenstein, Doom and Doom 2 in the 90s. I loved them, especially Doom 2. Then in the 2000s a big surprise: the first Stalker! No mazes anymore, a "real", oneiric world with amazing graphics, sounds and atmosphere. And of course the hilarious Left 4 Dead

Now I plan to get me a proper gaming computer. I never paid attention to video cards, always had low or standard quality and you need High quality to play the most demanding FPS


I think there are many closet FPS gamers here...it's time to come out of the closet! You can be a Strategy/Wargamer and a FPS gamer also! (I like alot of different game genre's, the key is quality and play ability for me) I too am purchasing more of a proper gaming computer in the near future!

Patrick

_____________________________

Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 17
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 3:26:06 PM   
VPaulus

 

Posts: 3630
Joined: 6/23/2011
From: Portugal
Status: offline
@bairdlander
That's off-topic. Please don't troll.

(in reply to wings7)
Post #: 18
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 3:30:26 PM   
budd


Posts: 2972
Joined: 7/4/2009
From: Tacoma
Status: offline
I've been an FPS'er since way back. Came from 3rd person adventure games, you know the quest series. Once i loaded up that wolfenstein shareware disk from what ever that magazine was i was hooked. Played every FPS i could get my hands on back then, it just seemed awesome. Played FPS before i even knew about computer wargames. Did a bit of multiplayer FPS back in the day with clans with Quake, TFC and DOD, wasn't easy on dialup. Don't do much of the multiplayer FPS these days for various reasons, the knuckleheadedness of online players is one and the time commitment is another. You have to spend a bit of time with a game to get up to snuff. It can be a rewarding game experience with a bunch of like minded players. I have a new computer so i can catch up on some FPS goodness i missed, there's quite a few in my steam backlog i've been waiting to play, Rage, stalker series, newer Farcry's. I put the open world FPS's in a different category, there just a different mood for me. Nothing like a well done FPS on rails with a good environment and a bit of tactical choice in your approach, plus they actually end. I'm not talking DOOM 3 on rails type, i still haven't finished that one. Some of my favorites from days gone past are Halflife, F.E.A.R., Farcry, Call of Juarez, Serious Sam and of course all the really oldies i.e Doom, Quake, Wolfenstein, Duke Nukem, Heretic, Blood, Decent, probably a lot more i'm forgetting. One thing that didn't bother me back then but drives me to rage quit some FPS now is the old lock you in a room with a bunch of bad guys/things and you ain't getting out until everything is dead, O did i forget to mention you'll be low health and not have much ammo. the control the difficulty through keeping you low on health and without ammo is something i'm not a big fan of these days, not too mention a checkpoint system.I'll usually have one FPS going as a change of pace to my wargaming, currently playing Extraction point a DLC to the original F.E.A.R. Nothing closet about my enjoyment of FPS games, I'll play whatever is fun for me.

_____________________________

Enjoy when you can, and endure when you must. ~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

"Be Yourself; Everyone else is already taken" ~Oscar Wilde

*I'm in the Wargamer middle ground*
I don't buy all the wargames I want, I just buy more than I need.

(in reply to wings7)
Post #: 19
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 4:08:43 PM   
Gilmer


Posts: 1452
Joined: 7/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wings7


quote:

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus


I guess saying we like FPS might be an anathema on these forums

The evolution of this genre is clear: from mazes to an "open", utter realistic world.

I played Wolfenstein, Doom and Doom 2 in the 90s. I loved them, especially Doom 2. Then in the 2000s a big surprise: the first Stalker! No mazes anymore, a "real", oneiric world with amazing graphics, sounds and atmosphere. And of course the hilarious Left 4 Dead

Now I plan to get me a proper gaming computer. I never paid attention to video cards, always had low or standard quality and you need High quality to play the most demanding FPS


I think there are many closet FPS gamers here...it's time to come out of the closet! You can be a Strategy/Wargamer and a FPS gamer also! (I like alot of different game genre's, the key is quality and play ability for me) I too am purchasing more of a proper gaming computer in the near future!

Patrick


I love many FPS games and I am very open about it. To me they are like a story. And you "read" through it at your pace.

I bought The most recent Wolfenstein game on sale at Steam (How did I miss these games?) and loved it immensely. Frustrating at times, but very fun.

Call of Duty 1 and 2 loved them. The more modern ones - they are OK, but I still like the WW2 ones the best.

_____________________________

"Venimus, vidimus, Deus vicit" John III Sobieski as he entered Vienna on 9/11/1683. "I came, I saw, God conquered."
He that has a mind to fight, let him fight, for now is the time. - Anacreon

(in reply to wings7)
Post #: 20
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 4:30:16 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: H Gilmer

I still like the WW2 ones the best.


I only have played one multiplayer game: Wolfenstein Enemy Territory. WW2. I can't tell you how much much I liked it. Charging like a crazy buffalo with the flamethrower. So many big big big laughs!

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to Gilmer)
Post #: 21
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 7:30:11 PM   
aaatoysandmore

 

Posts: 2848
Joined: 9/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VPaulus

@bairdlander
That's off-topic. Please don't troll.


Finally.

(in reply to VPaulus)
Post #: 22
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/17/2016 9:42:23 PM   
z1812


Posts: 1796
Joined: 9/1/2004
Status: offline
My first FPS was the original Ghost Recon. What a game.........I still play and enjoy it.

(in reply to aaatoysandmore)
Post #: 23
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/18/2016 12:04:16 AM   
wings7


Posts: 4591
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: aaatoysandmore

I haven't found a single FPS I liked then or now. The closest game I can stomach is Mount and Blade Warband and that isn't a shooter though it plays like one.

Are there any of them where "friendly fire" doesn't hurt you? That's a big reason I don't play them. especially online. Little kids think it's funny to go around shooting their own teammates. Maybe older people also with kids minds.




_____________________________

Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427

(in reply to aaatoysandmore)
Post #: 24
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/18/2016 12:54:44 AM   
hadberz


Posts: 1629
Joined: 5/11/2000
From: Moncks Corner, SC
Status: offline
Battlefield 4 pistols only server is my drug. :) Lots of fun. :)

(in reply to wings7)
Post #: 25
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/18/2016 4:02:32 AM   
Zap


Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline
FPS gives me a headache after a while. I think FPS and RPG are very similar. The only difference I see is the story developed RPG. Having a choice i'd choose RPG

< Message edited by Zap -- 1/18/2016 6:45:42 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to hadberz)
Post #: 26
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/18/2016 5:17:42 PM   
Kuokkanen

 

Posts: 3545
Joined: 4/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: **budd**

Some of my favorites from days gone past are Halflife, F.E.A.R., Farcry, Call of Juarez, Serious Sam and of course all the really oldies i.e Doom, Quake, Wolfenstein, Duke Nukem, Heretic, Blood, Decent, probably a lot more i'm forgetting.

I recommend you Chrome and Chrome: SpecForce. Games have grass and crawling on it keeps you hidden from the bad guys. Game maps are wide, open areas, but there are times when player has only 1 way to go to. Occasionally other game characters fight alongside with the player. It's all good, and both games are available on Steam for 1,99 € (together).

[edit]
FRS = ???

< Message edited by Matti Kuokkanen -- 1/18/2016 6:18:06 PM >


_____________________________

You know what they say, don't you? About how us MechWarriors are the modern knights, how warfare has become civilized now that we have to abide by conventions and rules of war. Don't believe it.

MekWars

(in reply to budd)
Post #: 27
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/18/2016 5:40:47 PM   
Pvt_Grunt

 

Posts: 327
Joined: 2/13/2007
From: Frankston Victoria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus


quote:

ORIGINAL: H Gilmer

I still like the WW2 ones the best.


I only have played one multiplayer game: Wolfenstein Enemy Territory. WW2. I can't tell you how much much I liked it. Charging like a crazy buffalo with the flamethrower. So many big big big laughs!

Agreed - that game was one of the funnest I have ever played. I had a small group of friends playing ET online years ago and we had a blast. Free too -!!!

If you were a sniper you could steal the uniform from a dead enemy and be disguised! Usually just long enough to lob a grenade at the spawn pack !

_____________________________


(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 28
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/19/2016 2:33:30 PM   
Kuokkanen

 

Posts: 3545
Joined: 4/2/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

The evolution of this genre is clear: from mazes to an "open", utter realistic world.

You think so? Video would have been better with Classic Doom 3.
So what open & realistic world FPS games were made last year?

_____________________________

You know what they say, don't you? About how us MechWarriors are the modern knights, how warfare has become civilized now that we have to abide by conventions and rules of war. Don't believe it.

MekWars

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 29
RE: First person shooters then and now - 1/19/2016 7:27:48 PM   
wings7


Posts: 4591
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: **budd**

I've been an FPS'er since way back. Came from 3rd person adventure games, you know the quest series. Once i loaded up that wolfenstein shareware disk from what ever that magazine was i was hooked. Played every FPS i could get my hands on back then, it just seemed awesome. Played FPS before i even knew about computer wargames. Did a bit of multiplayer FPS back in the day with clans with Quake, TFC and DOD, wasn't easy on dialup. Don't do much of the multiplayer FPS these days for various reasons, the knuckleheadedness of online players is one and the time commitment is another. You have to spend a bit of time with a game to get up to snuff. It can be a rewarding game experience with a bunch of like minded players. I have a new computer so i can catch up on some FPS goodness i missed, there's quite a few in my steam backlog i've been waiting to play, Rage, stalker series, newer Farcry's. I put the open world FPS's in a different category, there just a different mood for me. Nothing like a well done FPS on rails with a good environment and a bit of tactical choice in your approach, plus they actually end. I'm not talking DOOM 3 on rails type, i still haven't finished that one. Some of my favorites from days gone past are Halflife, F.E.A.R., Farcry, Call of Juarez, Serious Sam and of course all the really oldies i.e Doom, Quake, Wolfenstein, Duke Nukem, Heretic, Blood, Decent, probably a lot more i'm forgetting. One thing that didn't bother me back then but drives me to rage quit some FPS now is the old lock you in a room with a bunch of bad guys/things and you ain't getting out until everything is dead, O did i forget to mention you'll be low health and not have much ammo. the control the difficulty through keeping you low on health and without ammo is something i'm not a big fan of these days, not too mention a checkpoint system.I'll usually have one FPS going as a change of pace to my wargaming, currently playing Extraction point a DLC to the original F.E.A.R. Nothing closet about my enjoyment of FPS games, I'll play whatever is fun for me.


Awesome post Ron! Not technically a FPS but have you played any of the later Fallout's? I also like the early isometric ones too!

_____________________________

Please come and join and befriend me at the great Steam portal! There are quite a few Matrix/Slitherine players on Steam! My member page: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197988402427

(in reply to budd)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> First person shooters then and now Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.922