D3A1 vs D3A2

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

D3A1 vs D3A2

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> D3A1 vs D3A2

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/18/2016 7:05:11 PM

Coach Zuck

Posts: 132
Joined: 12/25/2002
From: Long Island NY
Status: offline

My game is currently at the 31st of July 1942. "Tomorrow" D3A2 Vals will be available. Is the +27 mph Max speed of the D3A2, better than the the extra hex range of the D3A1?

Should have asked question earlier but have been swamped..... damn real life interrupting my WitP time!

< Message edited by Coach Zuck -- 1/18/2016 8:05:31 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/18/2016 8:38:41 PM

geofflambert

Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline

They use the same engine, so that's not an issue. They're both rated at service level one so that isn't either. There is certainly no reason to convert factories to the 2 version if it costs anything (and I can't think of a situation where that would be the case, offhand)if you're converting a non Val factory to a Val factory, go with the D3M2. Also it is wise to keep at least one factory open while any squadron is using them until you can afford to ditch their airframes and replace them with the new one. Despite the range advantage I recommend having your last D3A1 squadron land based. In any carrier battle the D3A2's range will be adequate assuming you operate the fleet properly (have a reaction range). You should assume your attack will be a one shot deal and the D3A2 has a better chance of delivering hits.

Part of what I said sounds contradictory but you know what I mean. Or if you don't, do not convert every D3A1 factory to D3A2 (which is free)until only one squadron uses them and they don't have enough planes. Alternatively you could convert that squadron to a training squadron, which does not require a full complement of planes to operate effectively.

< Message edited by geofflambert -- 1/18/2016 9:46:32 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Coach Zuck)

Post #: 2

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/18/2016 8:43:22 PM

Jorge_Stanbury

Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline

267 mph is still slower than the slowest fighter you will find in mid 42

I would take the longer range Val for the few more months left on it... remember Judy (at 343mph; 500kg bomb) comes in November 42, even earlier if you accelerate. And this plane is worth accelerating

< Message edited by Jorge_Stanbury -- 1/18/2016 9:45:09 PM >

(in reply to Coach Zuck)

Post #: 3

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/18/2016 8:51:41 PM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

Range os what keeps you away from early Allied TBs and fighters, don't squander it for measly 27 mph on D3A2

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury
remember Judy (at 343mph; 500kg bomb) comes in November 42, even earlier if you accelerate

Depends on scenario, Judy arrival is 4/43 in stock 1. And yes, it is the most desirable plane for R&D other than fighters

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)

Post #: 4

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/18/2016 8:54:33 PM

Jorge_Stanbury

Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline

Yes, I play DBB-C
it is 4/43 in stock

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 5

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/18/2016 9:29:08 PM

Coach Zuck

Posts: 132
Joined: 12/25/2002
From: Long Island NY
Status: offline

Playing Stock Scenario 2.
JUDY not available to 1/43.

So Range more important than speed?

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)

Post #: 6

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/18/2016 10:33:08 PM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Coach Zuck
So Range more important than speed?

Would you ask this if it was +1 mph instead of +27? It's all relative.
In case of fighters, every inch would count late war to escape +50 mph malus. In this case, loss of range is not worth it.

(in reply to Coach Zuck)

Post #: 7

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/19/2016 3:07:17 AM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Coach Zuck
So Range more important than speed?

Would you ask this if it was +1 mph instead of +27? It's all relative.
In case of fighters, every inch would count late war to escape +50 mph malus. In this case, loss of range is not worth it.

Is there perhaps a durability improvement with the new model Val? A bit of armour could cut your losses in planes and pilots. Perhaps even keep an aircraft on its dive attack while AA fragments are pinging off the armour rather than filling the windscreen with oil.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 8

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/19/2016 7:27:07 AM

GetAssista

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline

BBfanboy,
higher max speed, lower endurance and range, higher max alt and climb. That's it, everything else is identical.

Kates can carry torps to 7 hexes, so I would use D3A1 even if it was more vulnerable than D3A2, just for a chance to have some more meatshields for your heaviest hitters in 7 hex strikes. And 6 hex to 7 hex is a big increase in area covered (~35%).

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 9

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/19/2016 8:27:26 AM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

BBfanboy,
higher max speed, lower endurance and range, higher max alt and climb. That's it, everything else is identical.

Kates can carry torps to 7 hexes, so I would use D3A1 even if it was more vulnerable than D3A2, just for a chance to have some more meatshields for your heaviest hitters in 7 hex strikes. And 6 hex to 7 hex is a big increase in area covered (~35%).

+1

_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to GetAssista)

Post #: 10

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/19/2016 10:45:57 AM

Encircled

Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline

The range is the key really.

I only build it in very small units so I can upgrade my plans (playing with PDU off)

_____________________________

(in reply to koniu)

Post #: 11

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/19/2016 11:56:08 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

BBfanboy,
higher max speed, lower endurance and range, higher max alt and climb. That's it, everything else is identical.

Kates can carry torps to 7 hexes, so I would use D3A1 even if it was more vulnerable than D3A2, just for a chance to have some more meatshields for your heaviest hitters in 7 hex strikes. And 6 hex to 7 hex is a big increase in area covered (~35%).

+1

+2

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to koniu)

Post #: 12

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/19/2016 3:19:29 PM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

Meh, both will die just as easily...

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 13

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/20/2016 6:39:59 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Ok, I am building the D3A2!

PDU off game with Jocke.

I think there is quite a bit of flavor in building the less than optimal designs, and anyhow, the plane will see use in my game as the primary Navy divebomber for a while.

Yep, I will take the one hex range hit...but I will enjoy using them until the Judies come along, and even then I will probably leave a few squadrons flying them to train, and or perhaps late, late war kamikaze/db role. Divebombers are always very useful.

Of course so much depends upon how the game plays out.

(in reply to crsutton)

Post #: 14

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/20/2016 9:44:15 PM

rustysi

Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline

quote:

Kates can carry torps to 7 hexes

I seem to recall that there's a hard coded limit to the distance a CV TF will launch a strike. Something like 6 hexes for Japan, and 5 hexes for the Allies. Anyone know if that's true?

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 15

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/21/2016 1:13:55 AM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rustysi

quote:

Kates can carry torps to 7 hexes

I seem to recall that there's a hard coded limit to the distance a CV TF will launch a strike. Something like 6 hexes for Japan, and 5 hexes for the Allies. Anyone know if that's true?

It's 8 for Japan and 7 for Allies, however there is the special CV TF reaction if they detect an enemy CV TF within a certain range.

(in reply to rustysi)

Post #: 16

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/21/2016 1:56:07 AM

rustysi

Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline

Thanks.

_____________________________

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 17

RE: D3A1 vs D3A2 - 1/21/2016 5:04:35 PM

Alpha77

Posts: 2116
Joined: 9/24/2010
Status: offline

Maybe the small speed increase is useful. Even if still much slower than the Allied fighters. Lets say the CAP has no optimal position to reach your strike then the + on speed could help to get to the target without every cap fighter reaching you (they may hit you after you drop the bomb of course)....also another maybe if the fighter is already damaged its speed my be lowered and it would catch the older VAL but not the not the newer one. Not sure if the above aspects are moddeled...

(in reply to rustysi)

Post #: 18